Chapter published in:
Cross-linguistic Correspondences: From lexis to genre
Edited by Thomas Egan and Hildegunn Dirdal
[Studies in Language Companion Series 191] 2017
► pp. 121145



2009The Oxford English Dictionary: On Compact Disc. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar


Arppe, Antti, Gilquin, Gaëtanelle, Glynn, Dylan, Hilpert, Martin & Zeschel, Arne
2011Cognitive corpus linguistics: Five points of debate on current theory and methodology. Corpora 5(1): 1–27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brisard, Frank
1997The English tense system as an epistemic category: The case of futurity. In Lexical and Syntactical Constructions and the Construction of Meaning [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 150], Marjolein Verspoor, Kee Dong Lee and Eve Sweetser (eds), 271–86. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dyvik, Helge
1998A translational basis for semantics. In Corpora and Cross-linguistic Research: Theory, Method, and Case Studies, Stig Johansson & Signe Oksefjell (eds), 51–86. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
2004Translations as semantic mirrors: From parallel corpus to wordnet. In Advances in Corpus Linguistics: Papers from the 23rd International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora (ICAME 23), Göteborg 22–26 May 2002, Karin Aijmer & Bengt Altenberg (eds), 313–326. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles
1994Mental Spaces. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997Mappings in Thought and Language. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garretson, Gregory
2004The Meanings of English “of”: Uncovering Semantic Distinctions via a Translation Corpus. MA thesis, Boston University.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd
1997Cognitive Foundations of Grammar. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Herskovits, Annette
1986Language and Spatial Cognition: An Interdisciplinary Study of the Prepositions in English. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
1983Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Johansson, Stig
2007Seeing through Multilingual Corpora: On the Use of Corpora in Contrastive Studies [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 26]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George
1987Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1987Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Theoretical prerequisites. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
1991aConcept, Image, and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
1991bFoundations of Cognitive Grammar: Descriptive Applications. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2008Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lindkvist, Karl Gunnar
1978AT versus ON, IN, BY: On the Early History of Spatial AT and Certain Ideas Distinguishing AT from ON, IN, BY. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Lindstromberg, Seth
2010English Prepositions Explained. Revised Edition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Noël, Dirk
2003Translations as evidence for semantics: An illustration. Linguistics 41(4): 757–785. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rice, Sally A.
1992Polysemy and lexical representation: The case of three English prepositions. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 89–94. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Rice, Sally
1993Far afield in lexical fields: The English prepositions. In ESCOL ’92 Proceedings, 206–217. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor
1978Principles of categorization. In Cognition and Categorization, Eleanor Rosch & Barbara B. Lloyd (eds), 27–48. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Sandra, Dominiek & Rice, Sally
1995Network analyses of prepositional meaning: Mirroring whose mind – the linguist’s or the language user’s? Cognitive Linguistics 6(1): 89–130. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
2000Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tyler, Andrea & Evans, Vyvyan
2001Reconsidering propositional polysemy networks: The case of over . Language 77(4): 724–765. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Viberg, Åke
1998Contrasts in polysemy and differentiation: Running and putting in English and Swedish. In Corpora and Cross-linguistic Research, Stig Johansson & Signe Oksefjell (eds), 343–376. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
2002Polysemy and disambiguation cues across languages: The case of Swedish and English get . In Lexis in Contrast [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 7], Bengt Altenberg & Sylviane Granger (eds), 119–150. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003The polysemy of the Swedish verb komma ‘come’: A view from translation corpora. In Meaning through Language Contrast, Vol. 2 [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 99], Kasia M. Jaszczolt & Ken Turner (eds), 75–105. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Egan, Thomas & Siri Fürst Skogmo
2021.  In Time in Languages, Languages in Time [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 101],  pp. 155 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 october 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.