Chapter published in:
Cross-linguistic Correspondences: From lexis to genre
Edited by Thomas Egan and Hildegunn Dirdal
[Studies in Language Companion Series 191] 2017
► pp. 253270


Berkenkotter, Carol & Huckin, Thomas
1995Genre Knowledge in Disciplinary Communication: Cognition/Culture/Power. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas
2009A corpus-driven approach to formulaic language in English: Multi-word patterns in speech and writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14(3): 275–311. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bloveščiūnienė, Lina & Petrauskaitė, Rūta
2013From bibliographic to full text open access database on Lithuanian studies. ScieCom Info 9(2). http://​journals​.lub​.lu​.se​/index​.php​/sciecominfo​/article​/view​/7314​/6124
Bowker, Lynne & Pearson, Jennifer
2002Working with Specialized Language: A Practical Guide to Using Corpora. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cargill, Margaret & O’Connor, Patrick
2009Writing Scientific Research Articles: Strategy and Steps. Hoboken NJ: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Connor, Ulla & Moreno, Ana I.
2005Tertium comparationis: A vital component in contrastive rhetoric research. In Directions in Applied Linguistics, Paul Bruthiaux, Dwight Atkinson, William G. Eggington, William Grabe & Vaidehi Ramanathan (eds), 153–164. Clevedon: Multilingual MattersGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Trine
2004Textual metadiscourse in research articles: A marker of national culture or of academic discipline? Journal of Pragmatics 36(10): 1807–1825. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Del Saz Rubio, M. Milagros
2011A pragmatic approach to the macro-structure and metadiscoursal features of research article introductions in the field of Agricultural Sciences. English for Specific Purposes 30(4): 258–271. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fløttum, Kjersti, Dahl, Trine & Kinn, Torodd
2006Academic Voices: Across Languages and Disciplines [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 148]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garfield, Eugene
1989The English language: The lingua franca of international science. The Scientist 3(10): 12.Google Scholar
Giannoni, Davide Simone
2002Worlds of gratitude: A contrastive study of acknowledgment texts in English and Italian research articles. Applied Linguistics 23(1): 1–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle, Granger, Sylviane & Paquot, Magali
2007Learner corpora: The missing link in EAP pedagogy. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 6(4): 319–335. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harwood, Nigel
2009An interview-based study of the functions of citations in academic writing across two disciplines. Journal of Pragmatics 41(3): 497–518. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hirano, Eliana
2009Research article introductions in English for specific purposes: A comparison between Brazilian Portuguese and English. English for Specific Purposes 28(4): 240–250. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hu, Guangwei & Wang, Guihua
2014Disciplinary and ethnolinguistic influences on citation in research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 14:14–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken
1999Academic attribution: Citation and the construction of disciplinary knowledge. Applied Linguistics 20(3): 341–367. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003Dissertation acknowledgements: The anatomy of a Cinderella genre. Written Communication 20(3): 242–268. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004aGraduates’ gratitude: The generic structure of dissertation acknowledgments. English for Specific Purposes 23(3): 303–324. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004bA convincing argument: Corpus analysis and academic persuasion. In Discourse in the Professions: Perspectives from Corpus Linguistics [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 16], Ulla Connor & Thomas A. Upton (eds), 87–112. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2008aPersuasion, interaction and the construction of knowledge: Representing self and others in research writing. International Journal of English Studies 8(2): 1–23.Google Scholar
2008bAs can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes 27(1): 4–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Academic discourse. In The Continuum Companion to Discourse Analysis, Ken Hyland & Brian Paltridge (eds), 171–184. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Kanoksilapatham, Budsaba
2005Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles. English for Specific Purposes 24(3): 269–292. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Latour, Bruno
2002[1987]Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lorés-Sanz, Rosa, Mur Dueñas, Pilar & Lafuente-Millán, Enrique
(eds) 2010Constructing Interpersonality: Multiple Perspectives on Written Academic Genres. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Mauranen, Anna
1993Cultural Differences in Academic Rhetoric: A Textlinguistic Study. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Moreno, Ana I.
2008The importance of comparable corpora in cross-cultural studies. In Contrastive Rhetoric: Reaching to Intercultural Rhetoric [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 169], Ulla Connor, Ed Nagelhout & William V. Rozycki (eds), 25–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mur Dueñas, Pilar
2009Citation in business management research articles: A contrastive (English–Spanish) corpus-based analysis. In Suomela-Salmi & Dervin (eds), 49–60.Google Scholar
2010A contrastive analysis of research article introductions in English and Spanish. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 61: 119–133.Google Scholar
2011An intercultural analysis of metadiscourse features in research articles written in English and in Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics 43(12): 3068–3079. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Llantada, Carmen
2010The discourse functions of metadiscourse in published academic writing: Issues of culture and language. Nordic Journal of English Studies 9(2): 41–68.Google Scholar
Petrić, Bojana
2007Rhetorical functions of citations in high- and low-rated master’s theses. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 6(3): 238–253. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sala, Michele
2008Argumentative styles as cultural identity traits in legal studies. Linguistica e Filologia 27: 93–113.Google Scholar
Samraj, Betty
2002Introductions in research articles: Variations across disciplines. English for Specific Purposes 21(1): 1–17. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scott, Mike
2008WordSmith Tools, version 5. Liverpool: Lexical Analysis Software.Google Scholar
Soler, Viviana
2011Comparative and contrastive observations on scientific titles written in English and Spanish. English for Specific Purposes 30(2): 124–137. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Suomela-Salmi, Eija & Dervin, Fred
(eds) 2009Cross-linguistic and Cross-cultural Perspectives on Academic Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 193], Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swales, John M.
1981Aspects of Article Introductions. Birmingham: University of Aston.Google Scholar
1990Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Thompson, Paul & Tribble, Christopher
2001Looking at citations: Using corpora in English for academic purposes. Language Learning and Technology 5(3): 91–105.Google Scholar
Wang, Yan & Bai, Yongquan
2007A corpus-based syntactic study of medical research article titles. System 35(3): 388–399. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Dontcheva-Navrátilová, Olga
2018.  In Intercultural Perspectives on Research Writing [AILA Applied Linguistics Series, 18],  pp. 15 ff. Crossref logo
Mur-Dueñas, Pilar & Jolanta Šinkūnienė
2018.  In Intercultural Perspectives on Research Writing [AILA Applied Linguistics Series, 18],  pp. 2 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 december 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.