Cover not available
Part of
Functionalist and Usage-based Approaches to the Study of Language: In honor of Joan L. Bybee
Edited by K. Aaron Smith and Dawn Nordquist
[Studies in Language Companion Series 192] 2018
► pp. 1–15

Features of some ergative languages that impact on acquisition

 | La Trobe University
Bybee’s (e.g., 2006, 2010, 2013) view is that grammar is the cognitive organisation of one’s experience with the language. Evidence from the language acquisition field supports this approach. A major task for the child in acquiring a language is detecting distributional properties of the language and the co-occurrence of features, that is, identifying the form-function units in the language input. In this chapter, I briefly discuss ergative alignment and present examples from research on the acquisition of ergative languages to show that different cues to ergativity are provided. The examples illustrate that children quickly attune to contexts for ergative marking, identifying regularity and recurring patterns as they construct a grammar.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Cues to acquisition
  • Ergative alignment
  • Acquiring ergative languages: Some examples of influencing factors
    • Hindi
    • Warlpiri
  • Mayan languages
  • Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 1 March 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.192.01bav
References (34)
References
Bates, Elizabeth & MacWhinney, Brian. 1989. Functionalism and the Competition Model. In The Crosslinguistic Study of Sentence Processing, Brian MacWhinney & Elizabeth Bates (eds), 3–76. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Bavin, Edith L. 2000. Ellipsis in Warlpiri children’s narratives: An analysis of Warlpiri frog stories. Linguistics 38: 569–589. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004. Focusing on where. In Relating Events in Narrative: Typological and Contextual Perspectives, Vol. 2, Sven Stromqvist & Ludo Verhoeven (eds), 17–35. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
2013. The acquisition of ergative case in Warlpiri. In Bavin & Stoll (eds), 107–131.Google Scholar
Bavin, Edith L. & Stoll, Sabine. 2013. The Acquisition of Ergativity [Trends in Language Acquisition Research 9]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope. 2007. Culture-specific influences on semantic development: Acquiring the Tzeltal ‘benefactive’ construction. In Learning Indigenous Languages: Child Language Acquisition in Mesoamerica, Barbara Blaha Pfeiler (ed.), 119–154. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. Verb specificity and argument realization in Tzeltal child language. In Crosslinguistic Perspectives on Argument Structure: Implications for Language Acquisition, Melissa Bowerman & Penelope Brown (eds), 167–189. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope., Pfeiler, Barbara, de Léon, Lourdes & Pye, Clifton. 2013. The acquisition of ergativity in four Mayan languages. In Bavin & Stoll (eds), 271–305.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. 2006. From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language 82(4): 711–733. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010. Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2013. Usage-based theory and exemplar representation. In The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, Thomas Hoffman & Graeme Trousdale (eds), 49–69. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 2013. Ergativity. Some recurrent themes. In Bavin & Stoll (eds), 15–33.Google Scholar
Gertner, Yael, Fisher, Cynthia & Eisengart, Julie. 2006. Learning words and rules: Abstract knowledge of word order in early sentence comprehension. Psychological Science 17: 684–691. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gentner, D. & Namy, L. L. 2006. Analogical processes in language learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science 15, 297–301. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele. 2006. Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Hale, Kenneth L. 1982. Some essential features of Warlpiri verbal clauses. In Papers in Warlpiri Grammar: In Memory of Lothar Jagst [Work Papers of SIL-AAB: Series A, 6], Stephen Swartz (ed.). 217–315. Darwin: SIL.Google Scholar
Hoff, Erika. 2006. How social contexts support and shape language development. Developmental Review 26: 55–88 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laughren, Mary, Hoogenraad, Robert, Hale, Kenneth L. & Granites, Robin Japanangka. 1996. A Learner’s Guide to Warlpiri. Alice Springs: IAD Press.Google Scholar
Naigles, Letitia R. 1990. Children use syntax to learn verb meaning. Journal of Child Language 17: 357–374. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Naigles, Letitia R., Bavin, Edith L. & Smith, Melissa A. 2005. Toddlers recognize verbs in novel situations and sentences. Developmental Science 8: 424–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Narasimhan, Bhuvana. 2005. Splitting the notion of “agent”. Case marking in early Hindi. Journal of Child Language 32: 787–803. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Narasimhan, Bhuvana, Budwig, Nancy & Murty, Lalita. 2005. Argument realization in Hindi caregiver-child discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 37: 461–495. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Narasimhan, Bhuvana. 2013. Ergative case-marking in Hindi child-caregiver speech. In Bavin & Stoll (eds), 209–237.Google Scholar
Nash, David. 1986 Topics in Warlpiri Grammar. New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar
. 1982. Warlpiri verbs and preverbs. In Papers in Warlpiri Grammar: In Memory of Lothar Jagst [Work Papers of SIL-AAB:Series A, 6], Stephen Swartz (ed.), 165–216. Darwin: SIL.Google Scholar
O’Grady, William. 2015. Frequency effects and processing. Journal of Child Language 42: 294–297. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Shanassy, Carmel. 2009. Language variation and change in a North Australian indigenous community. In Variation in Indigenous Minority Languages [Impact: Studies in Language and Society 25], James N. Stanford & Dennis Preston (eds), 419–439. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. Distributions of case allomorphy by multilingual children speaking Warlpiri and Light Warlpiri. Linguistic Variation 16: 68–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pye, Clifton. 2017. The Comparative Method of Language Acquisition Research. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pye, Clifton, Pfeiler, Barbara, de León, Lourde, Brown, Penelope & Mateo Pedro, Pedro. 2007. Roots or edges? Explaining variation in children’s early verb forms across five Mayan languages. In Learning Indigenous Languages: Child Language Acquisition in Mesoamerica, Barbara Blaha Pfeiler (ed.), 15–46. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rumsey, Alan, San Roque, Lila & Schieffelin, Bambi B. 2013. The acquisition of ergative marking in Kaluli, Ku Waru and Duna (Trans New Guinea). In Bavin & Stoll (eds), 135–182.Google Scholar
Thiessen, E. 2016. What’s statistical about learning? Insights from modelling statistical learning as a set of memory processes. Philosophical Transactions Royal Society B 372: 20160056. <DOI logo>Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael. 2003. Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
. 2015. The usage-based theory of language acquisition. In The Cambridge Handbook of Child Language, 2nd edn, Edith L. Bavin & Letitia R. Naigles (eds). Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar