Baayen, Harald
2003Probabilistic approaches to morphology. In Probabilistic Linguistics, Rens Bod, Jennifer Hay & Stephanie Jannedy (eds), 229–287. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Beckner, Clayton & Bybee, Joan L.
2009A usage-based account of constituency and reanalysis. Language Learning 59 (Supplement 1): 27–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Conrad, Susan, Leech, Geoffrey & Finegan, Edward
1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Blank, Andreas
2001Pathways of lexicalization. In Language Typology and Language Universals, Vol. II [Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft 20.2], Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds), 1596–1608. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2005Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L.
2010Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language 82(4): 711–733. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002aPhonological evidence for exemplar storage of multiword sequences. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 4: 215–221.Google Scholar
2002bSequentiality as the basis of constituent structure. In The Evolution of Language out of Pre-language [Typological Studies in Language 53], T. Givón & Bertram Malle (eds), 107–132. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. & Scheibman, Joanne
1999The effect of usage on degree of constituency: The reduction of don’t in English. Linguistics 37: 575–596. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Christianson, Kiel, Hollingworth, Andrew, Halliwell, John F. & Ferreira, Fernanda
2001Thematic roles assigned along the garden path linger. Cognitive Psychology 42: 368–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Claridge, Claudia
2000Multi-word Verbs in Early Modern English: A Corpus-based Study. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William
1991Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dąbrowska, Eva
2004Language, mind, and brain: Some psychological and neurological constraints on theories of grammar. Washington, D.C: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
1997The LAD goes to school: A cautionary tale for nativists. Linguistics 35: 735–766. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, Mark
2008The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 450 million words, 1990–present. [URL]
Dellaira, Ava
2014Love Letters to the Dead. New York NY: Farrar Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Denison, David
1985Why Old English had no prepositional passive. English Studies 66(3): 189–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diemer, S.
2008Corpus linguistics with Google? Paper presented at International Society for the Linguistics of English, Boston.
Ellis, Nick. C. & Frey, Eric
2009The psycholinguistic reality of collocation and semantic prosody (2): Affective priming. In Formulaic Language, Vol. 2: Acquisition, Loss, Psychological Reality, and Functional Explanations [Typological Studies in Language 83], Roberta Corrigan, Edith Moravcsik, Hamid Ouali & Kathleen Wheatley (eds), 473–497. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, Fernanda
2003The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences. Cognitive Psychology 47: 164–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, William H.
2007Concordancing the web: Promise and problems, tools and techniques. In Corpus Linguistics and the Web, Marianne Hundt, Nadja Nesselhauf & Carolin Biewer (eds), 25–46. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Peter C., Hendrick, Randall & Johnson, Marcus
2001Memory interference during language processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 27(6): 1411–23.Google Scholar
Hagège, Claude
Hay, Jennifer
2002From speech perception to morphology: Affix ordering revisited. Language 78(3): 527–555. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Sebastian
2005Grammaticalization and English Complex Prepositions: A Corpus- based Study. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney
2002The clause: Complements. In The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, Rodney Huddleston & Geoffrey K. Pullum (eds), 213–322. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krug, Manfred
1998 Gotta – the tenth central modal in English? Social, stylistic and regional variation in the British National Corpus as evidence of ongoing grammaticalization. In The Major Varieties of English, Hans Lindquist, Staffan Klintborg, Magnus Levin & Maria Estling (eds), 177–191. Växjö: Edman & Westerlunds Tryckeri AB.Google Scholar
Kuzmack, Stefanie
2010How medium shapes language development: The emergence of quotative re online. In Studies in the History of the English Language, V: Variation and Change in English Grammar and Lexicon: Contemporary Approaches, Robert A. Cloutier, Anne-Marie Hamilton-Brehm & William A. Kretzschmar Jr. (eds) 293–310. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey
2007New resources, or just better old ones? The Holy Grail of representativeness. In Corpus Linguistics and the Web, Marianne Hundt, Nadja Nesselhauf & Carolin Biewer (eds), 133–150. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
1989Grammatikalisierung und Lexikalisierung. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 42:11–19. (Cited in Blank 2001).Google Scholar
Moreno Cabrera, Juan C.
1998On the nature of grammaticalization and lexicalization. In The Limits of Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 37], Anna Giacalone Ramat & Paul J. Hopper (eds), 211–227. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morford, Jill P.
2003Grammatical development in adolescent first-language learners. Linguistics 41(4): 681–721. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Dowd, Elizabeth M.
1998Prepositions and Particles in English: A Discourse-functional Account. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Rainie, Lee & Tancer, Bill
2007Pew Internet and American Life Project. Data Memo, April. [URL]
Roland, Douglas, Dick, Frederic & Elman, Jeffrey L.
2007Frequency of basic English grammatical structures: A corpus analysis. Journal of Memory and Language 57: 348–379. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sanford, Anthony J.
2002Context, attention and depth of processing during interpretation. Mind & Language 17(1–2): 188–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sanford, Anthony J. & Sturt, Patrick
2002Depth of processing in language comprehension: Not noticing the evidence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6(9): 382–386. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmid, Hans-Jörg
1999Cognitive effects of shell nouns. In Discourse Studies in Cognitive Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 176], Karen van Hoek, Andrej A. Kibrik & Leo Noordman (eds), 111–132. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, John McH
1991Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Townsend, David J. & Bever, Thomas G.
2001Sentence Comprehension: The Integration of Rules and Habits. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wischer, Ilse
2000Grammaticalization versus lexicalization  – “methinks” there is some confusion. In Pathways of Change: Grammaticalization in English [Studies in Language Companion Series 53], Olga Fischer, Anette Rosenbach & Dieter Stein (eds), 355–370. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar