Yiddish possessives as a case for genitive case
Yiddish is standardly characterised as a language with a three-case system, differentiating between nominative, accusative and dative. Possessor noun phrases that occur before the possessum appear to be marked by dative and an additional formative ‑s, which attaches to the head noun at the right edge of the possessor phrase. This article presents evidence for considering the possessive marker part of the exponence of genitive case, and thus, for revising the description of the Yiddish case system. The arguments given concern, on the one hand, the morphosyntactic status of the possessive marker and, on the other, the fact that, upon closer inspection, the nominal with which the possessive marker is combined is not identical with a noun phrase case-marked for dative.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The Yiddish case system
- 3.The morphosyntactic status of the Yiddish possessive marker
- 3.1Prenominal possessor constructions in Fribourg German
-
3.2The properties of Yiddish prenominal possessors
- 3.2.1Selectional restrictions
- 3.2.2Morphological marking
- 3.2.3Type of placement
- 3.3Summary and analysis
- 4.Some remarks on the diachrony of Yiddish possessive marking
- 4.1
Prenominal possessors in the Tsenerene
- 4.2A diachronic scenario
-
4.3Summary
- 5.Conclusion
-
Acknowledgements
-
Notes
-
Primary sources
-
References
References (98)
Primary sources
Rozenfarb, Khava
1947 Di balade fun nekhtikn vald un andere lider. London: The Narod Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sholem, Aleichem
1917–1923 Ale verk fun Sholem Aleykhem, 28 Vols. New York NY: Sholom Aleykhem folksfond oysgabe.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
von Zesen, Philipp
1971 Sämtliche Werke, Vol. 9,
Ferdinand van Ingen (ed.). Berlin: De Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ackerman, Tanja
2018 From genitive inflection to possessive marker? The development of German possessive -s with personal names. In this volume.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2002 Typological parameters of clitics, with special reference to Tariana. In
Words: A Cross-linguistic Typology,
Robert M. W. Dixon &
Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds), 1–41. Cambridge: CUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Albright, Adam & Fuß, Eric
2012 Syncretism. In
The Morphology and Phonology of Exponence,
Jochen Trommer (ed.), 236–287. Oxford: OUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Allen, Cynthia
2008 Genitives in Early English: Typology and Evidence. Oxford: OUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Anderson, Stephen R.
2013 The marker of the English ‘group genitive’ is a special clitic, not an inflection. In
Börjars, Denison &
Scott (eds), 193–217.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aptroot, Marion & Nath, Holger
2002 Einführung in die jiddische Sprache und Kultur. Hamburg: Buske.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bayer, Josef
2015 A note on possessor agreement. In
In Untiring Pursuit of Better Alternatives,
Hiroki Egashira,
Hisatsugu Kitahara,
Kazuo Nakazawa,
Tadao Nomura,
Masayuki Oishi,
Akira Saizen &
Motoko Suzuki (eds), 2–11. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Behaghel, Otto
1923 Deutsche Syntax: Eine geschichtliche Darstellung, Band I: Die Wortklassen und Wortformen, A. Nomen, B. Pronomen. Heidelberg: Winter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Behaghel, Otto
1924 Deutsche Syntax: Eine geschichtliche Darstellung, Band II: Die Wortklassen und Wortformen, B. Adverbium, C. Verbum. Heidelberg: Winter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Beider, Alexander
2015 Origins of Yiddish dialects. Oxford: OUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Birnbaum, Salomo A.
1918 Praktische Grammatik der jiddischen Sprache für den Selbstunterricht. Wien: Hartleben.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Birnbaum, Solomon
1939 The age of the Yiddish language.
Transactions of the Philological Society 38: 31–43.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Birnbaum, Salomo A.
1979 Yiddish: A Survey and a Grammar. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Blake, Barry J.
2004 Case, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Börjars, Kersti
2003 Morphological status and (de)grammaticalisation: The Swedish possessive.
Nordic Journal of Linguistics 26: 133–163.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Börjars, Kersti, Denison, David & Scott, Alan K.
Börjars, Kersti, Denison, David, Krajewski, Grzegorz & Scott, Alan
Carlier, Anne & Verstraete, Jean-Christophe
Chomsky, Noam
1981 Lectures in Government and Binding: The Pisa Lectures. Dordrecht: Foris.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Curzan, Anne
2003 Gender shifts in the history of English. Cambridge: CUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Denison, David, Scott, Alan K. & Börjars, Kersti
Elbaum, Jacob & Turniansky, Chava
2010 Tsene-rene. In
The YIVO Encyclopedia of Jews in Eastern Europe, Vol. 2,
Gershon Hundert (ed.), 1912–1913. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Embick, David & Noyer, Rolf
2001 Movement operations after syntax.
Linguistic Inquiry 32: 555–595.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fábregas, Antonio & Scalise, Sergio
2012 Morphology: From Data to Theories. Edinburgh: EUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fertig, David
2013 Analogy and Morphological Change. Edinburgh: EUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, Charles J.
1968 The case for case. In
Universals of Linguistic Theory,
Emmon Bach &
Robert T. Harms (eds), 1–90. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fishman, Joshua A.
2001 A decade in the life of a two-in-one language: Yiddish in New York City (secular and ultra-orthodox). In
Can Threatened Languages be Saved?,
Joshua A. Fishman (ed.), 74–100. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fishman, Joshua A.
2008 Language: Planning and standardization of Yiddish. In
The YIVO Encyclopedia of Jews in Eastern Europe, Vol. 1,
Gershon Hundert (ed.), 987–991. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fleischer, Jürg & Schallert, Oliver
2011 Historische Syntax des Deutschen: Eine Einführung. Tübingen: Narr.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Futato, Mark David
2003 Beginning Biblical Hebrew. Winona Lake IN: Eisenbrauns.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gärtner, Kurt, Gerhardt, Christoph, Jährling, Jürgen, Plate, Ralf, Röll, Walter & Timm, Erika
1992 Findebuch zum mittelhochdeutschen Wortschatz. Stuttgart: Hirzel.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Georgi, Doreen & Salzmann, Martin
2011 DP-internal double agreement is not double Agree: Consequences of Agree-based case assignment within DP.
Lingua 121: 2069–2088.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gerlach, Birgit & Grijzenhout, Janet
2000 Clitics from different perspectives. In
Clitics in Phonology, Morphology and Syntax [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 36],
Birgit Gerlach &
Janet Grijzenhout (eds), 1–29. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gold, David L.
2009 Studies in Etymology and Etiology: With Emphasis on Germanic, Jewish, Romance, and Slavic languages. Alicante: Universidad de Alicante.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haider, Hubert
1992 Die Struktur der Nominalphrase: Lexikalische und funktionale Strukturen. In
Deutsche Syntax: Ansichten und Aussichten,
Ludger Hoffmann (ed.), 304–333. Berlin: De Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harbert, Wayne
2007 The Germanic Languages. Cambridge: CUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harley, Heidi
2015 The syntax-morphology interface. In
Syntax – theory and Analysis: An International Handbook [Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft/Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 42/2],
Tibor Kiss &
Artemis Alexiadou (eds), 1128–1154. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hartmann, Katharina & Zimmermann, Malte
2002 Syntactic and semantic adnominal genitive. In
(A)symmetrien – (a)symmetries: Beiträge zu Ehren von Ewald Lang,
Claudia Maienborn (ed.), 171–202. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hartweg, Frédéric & Wegera, Klaus-Peter
2005 Frühneuhochdeutsch: Eine Einführung in die deutsche Spraches des Spätmittelalters und der frühen Neuzeit, 2nd edn [Germanistische Arbeitshefte 33]. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haspelmath, Martin
2009 Terminology of case. In
The Oxford Handbook of Case,
Andrej Malchukov &
Andrew Spencer (eds), 505–517. Oxford: OUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haspelmath, Martin
2011 The indeterminacy of word segmentation and the nature of morphology and syntax.
Folia Linguistica 45: 31–80.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Henzen, Walter
1927 Die deutsche Freiburger Mundart im Sense- und südöstlichen Seebezirk. Frauenfeld: Huber.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Herzog, Marvin
et al. (eds) 2000 The Language and Culture Atlas of Ashkenazic Jewry. The Eastern Yiddish – Western Yiddish Continuum, Vol. 3. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jacobs, Neil G.
2005 Yiddish: A Linguistic Introduction. Cambridge: CUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jacobs, Neil G., Prince, Ellen F. & van der Auwera, Johan
1994 Yiddish. In
The Germanic Languages,
Ekkehard König &
Johan van der Auwera (eds), 388–419. London: Routledge.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jespersen, Otto
1894 Progress in Language: With Special Reference to English. London: Swan Sonnenschein.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Joffe, Judah A.
1964 Der genitiv in yidish.
Yidishe shprakh 24: 19–23.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Katz, Dovid
1987a Grammar of the Yiddish Language. London: Duckworth.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Katz, Dovid
1987b The proto-dialectology of Ashkenaz. In
Origins of the Yiddish Language,
Dovid Katz (ed.), 47–60. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kerler, Dov-Ber
1999 The Origins of Modern Literary Yiddish. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kiefer, Ulrike
2000 Das Jiddische in Beziehung zum Mittelhochdeutschen. In
Sprachgeschichte: Ein Handbuch zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und ihrer Erforschung, 2nd edn [Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft/ Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 2/2],
Werner Besch,
Anne Betten,
Oskar Reichmann &
Stefan Sonderegger (eds), 1399–1408. Berlin: De Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Köpcke, Klaus-Michael
1995 Die Klassifikation der schwachen Maskulina in der deutschen Gegenwartssprache – Ein Beispiel für die Leistungsfähigkeit der Prototypentheorie.
Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 14: 159–180.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria
2003 Possessive noun phrases in the languages of Europe. In
Noun Phrase Structure in the Languages of Europe [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 20-7],
Frans Plank (ed.), 621–722. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Krause, Cornelia
1999 Two notes on prenominal possessors in German.
MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 33: 191–217.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Krifka, Manfred
2009 Case syncretism in German feminines: Typological, functional and structural aspects. In
On Inflection [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 184],
Patrick Steinkrüger &
Manfred Krifka (eds), 141–172. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Krischke, Wolfgang
2012 Des Menschens Genitive.
Linguistik Online 53: 55–84.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kürschner, Sebastian & Nübling, Damaris
2011 The interaction of gender and declension in Germanic languages.
Folia Linguistica 45: 355–388.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lander, Yury A.
2009 Varieties of genitive. In
The Oxford Handbook of Case,
Andrej Malchukov &
Andrew Spencer (eds), 581–592. Oxford: OUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lexer, Matthias
[1872–1878]1992 Mittelhochdeutsches Handwörterbuch, Nachdruck mit einer Einleitung von Kurt Gärtner. Leipzig: Hirzel.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lincoff, Beatrice
1963 A Study in Inflectional Morphologic Development: Old and Middle Yiddish. PhD dissertation, New York University.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lockwood, William B.
1968 Historical German Syntax. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lockwood, William B.
1995 Lehrbuch der modernen jiddischen Sprache. Hamburg: Buske.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Maiden, Martin
2016 Ambiguity in Romanian word structure: The structure of plurals in …uri
.
Revue Roumaine de Linguistique 61: 3–12.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mark, Yudl
1941 Folk(s)lid, leben(s)frayd, tsaytung(s)mentsh: Vegn dem samekh in di tsunoyfheftn.
Yidishe Shprakh 1: 47–56.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mark, Yudl
1978 Gramatik fun der yidisher klal-shprakh. New York NY: Alveltlekher yiddisher kultur-kongres.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mazin, Jacob R. & De Woolf, S
1927 A Manual and Grammar of the Yiddish Language. London: Mazin.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mlotek, Chana & Slobin, Mark
(eds) 2007 Yiddish Folksongs from the Ruth Rubin Archive. Detroit MI: Wayne State University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Neuberg, Simon
1999 Pragmatische Aspekte der jiddischen Sprachgeschichte am Beispiel der ‘Zenerene‘. Hamburg: Buske.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Neuberg, Simon
2000 Das schwedesch lid: Ein westjiddischer Bericht über die Ereignisse in Prag im Jahre 1648. Hamburg: Buske.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nevins, Andrew
2011 Multiple Agree with clitics: Person complementarity vs. omnivorous number.
Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29: 939–971.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nübling, Damaris
2008 Was tun mit Flexionsklassen? Deklinationsklassen und ihr Wandel im Deutschen und seinen Dialekten.
Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 75: 282–330.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Paul, Hermann
2007 Mittelhochdeutsche Grammatik, 25th edn. rev. by
Thomas Klein,
Hans-Joachim Solms &
Klaus-Peter Wegera. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Roehrs, Dorian
2013 Possessives as extended projections.
Working Papers in Scandinavian Linguistics 91: 37–112.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schmid, Hans Ulrich
2009 Einführung in die deutsche Sprachgeschichte. Stuttgart: Metzler.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Scott, Alan K.
2011 Everyday language in the spotlight: The decline of the genitive case.
German as a Foreign Language 12: 53–70.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Scott, Alan K.
2014 The Genitive Case in Dutch and German. A Study of Morphosyntactic Change in Codified Languages [Brill’s studies in historical linguistics 2]. Leiden: Brill.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Solms, Hans-Joachim & Wegera, Klaus-Peter
1993 Flexionsmorphologie. In
Frühneuhochdeutsche Grammatik [Sammlung kurzer Grammatiken germanischer Dialekte. A, Hauptreihe 12],
Oskar Reichmann &
Klaus-Peter Wegera (eds), 164–312. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Spencer, Andrew & Luís, Ana R.
2012 Clitics. An Introduction. Cambridge: CUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Spencer, Andrew & Luís, Ana R.
2013 The canonical clitic. In
Canonical Morphology and Syntax,
Dunstan Brown,
Marina Chumakina &
Greville G. Corbett (eds), 123–150. Oxford: OUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Taylor, John R.
1996 Possessives in English: An Exploration in Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: OUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Timm, Erika
1987 Graphische und phonische Struktur des Westjiddischen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Zeit um 1600 [Hermaea. Neue Folge 52]. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Timm, Erika
1999 Matronymika im aschkenasischen Kulturbereich: Ein Beitrag zur Mentalitäts- und Sozialgeschichte der europäischen Juden. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wegera, Klaus-Peter & Solms, Hans-Joachim
2000 Morphologie des Frühneuhochdeutschen. In
Sprachgeschichte: Ein Handbuch zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und ihrer Erforschung, 2nd edn [Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft/ Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 2/2],
Werner Besch,
Anne Betten,
Oskar Reichmann &
Stefan Sonderegger (eds), 1542–1554. Berlin: De Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Weinreich, Max
2008 History of the Yiddish Language, translated by
Shlomo Noble. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Weinreich, Uriel
1968 Modern English-Yiddish Yiddish-English dictionary. New York NY: Schocken.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Weinreich, Uriel
1981 College Yiddish: An Introduction to the Yiddish Language and to Jewish Life and Culture, 5th edn. New York NY: YIVO Institute for Jewish Research.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Weiß, Helmut
2008 The possessor that appears twice: Variation, structure and function of possessive doubling in German. In
Microvariation in Syntactic Doubling,
Sjef Barbiers,
Olaf Koeneman,
Maria Lekakou &
Margreet van der Ham (eds), 381–401. Bingley: Emerald.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Weissberg, Josef
1988 Jiddisch: Eine Einführung [Langs Germanistische Lehrbuchsammlung 27]. Bern: Lang.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wexler, Paul
1987 Explorations in Judeo-Slavic Linguistics. Leiden: Brill.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wolf, Meyer
1969 The geography of Yiddish case and gender variation. In
The Field of Yiddish: Studies in Language, Folklore and Literature, Vol. 3,
Marvin I. Herzog,
Wita Ravid &
Uriel Weinreich (eds), 102–215. The Hague: Mouton.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zifonun, Gisela
2005 Der Dativ ist dem Genitiv sein Tod: Zur Analyse des adnominalen possessiven Dativs. In
Deutsche Syntax: Theorie und Empirie. Symposium in Göteborg, 13.–15. Mai 2004,
Franz Josef d’Avis (ed.), 25–51. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zwicky, Arnold
1994 What is a clitic? In
Clitics: A Comprehensive Bibliography 1892–1991 [Library and Information Sources in Linguistics 22],
Joel A. Nevis,
Brian D. Joseph,
Dieter Wanner &
Arnold M. Zwicky (eds), xii–xx. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zwicky, Arnold & Pullum, Geoffrey K.
1983 Cliticization vs. inflection: English n’t
.
Language 59: 502–513.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (2)
Cited by 2 other publications
Roehrs, Dorian
2022.
Prenominal possessives in Yiddish: mayn khaver versus mayner a khaver
.
Linguistics 60:2
► pp. 347 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.