Cover not available
Part of
Germanic Genitives
Edited by Tanja Ackermann, Horst J. Simon and Christian Zimmer
[Studies in Language Companion Series 193] 2018
► pp. 231–272

Yiddish possessives as a case for genitive case

Yiddish is standardly characterised as a language with a three-case system, differentiating between nominative, accusative and dative. Possessor noun phrases that occur before the possessum appear to be marked by dative and an additional formative ‑s, which attaches to the head noun at the right edge of the possessor phrase. This article presents evidence for considering the possessive marker part of the exponence of genitive case, and thus, for revising the description of the Yiddish case system. The arguments given concern, on the one hand, the morphosyntactic status of the possessive marker and, on the other, the fact that, upon closer inspection, the nominal with which the possessive marker is combined is not identical with a noun phrase case-marked for dative.

Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The Yiddish case system
  • 3.The morphosyntactic status of the Yiddish possessive marker
    • 3.1Prenominal possessor constructions in Fribourg German
    • 3.2The properties of Yiddish prenominal possessors
      • 3.2.1Selectional restrictions
      • 3.2.2Morphological marking
      • 3.2.3Type of placement
    • 3.3Summary and analysis
  • 4.Some remarks on the diachrony of Yiddish possessive marking
    • 4.1 Prenominal possessors in the Tsenerene
    • 4.2A diachronic scenario
    • 4.3Summary
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Primary sources
  • References
Published online: 26 April 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.193.09hog
References

Primary sources

Rozenfarb, Khava
1947 Di balade fun nekhtikn vald un andere lider. London: The Narod Press.Google Scholar
Sholem, Aleichem
1917–1923 Ale verk fun Sholem Aleykhem, 28 Vols. New York NY: Sholom Aleykhem folksfond oysgabe.Google Scholar
von Zesen, Philipp
1971 Sämtliche Werke, Vol. 9, Ferdinand van Ingen (ed.). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ackerman, Tanja
2018 From genitive inflection to possessive marker? The development of German possessive -s with personal names. In this volume.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2002 Typological parameters of clitics, with special reference to Tariana. In Words: A Cross-linguistic Typology, Robert M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds), 1–41. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Albright, Adam & Fuß, Eric
2012 Syncretism. In The Morphology and Phonology of Exponence, Jochen Trommer (ed.), 236–287. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Allen, Cynthia
2008 Genitives in Early English: Typology and Evidence. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R.
2013 The marker of the English ‘group genitive’ is a special clitic, not an inflection. In Börjars, Denison & Scott (eds), 193–217.Google Scholar
Aptroot, Marion & Nath, Holger
2002 Einführung in die jiddische Sprache und Kultur. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Bayer, Josef
2015 A note on possessor agreement. In In Untiring Pursuit of Better Alternatives, Hiroki Egashira, Hisatsugu Kitahara, Kazuo Nakazawa, Tadao Nomura, Masayuki Oishi, Akira Saizen & Motoko Suzuki (eds), 2–11. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
Behaghel, Otto
1923 Deutsche Syntax: Eine geschichtliche Darstellung, Band I: Die Wortklassen und Wortformen, A. Nomen, B. Pronomen. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
1924 Deutsche Syntax: Eine geschichtliche Darstellung, Band II: Die Wortklassen und Wortformen, B. Adverbium, C. Verbum. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Beider, Alexander
2015 Origins of Yiddish dialects. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Birnbaum, Salomo A.
1918 Praktische Grammatik der jiddischen Sprache für den Selbstunterricht. Wien: Hartleben.Google Scholar
Birnbaum, Solomon
1939 The age of the Yiddish language. Transactions of the Philological Society 38: 31–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Birnbaum, Salomo A.
1979 Yiddish: A Survey and a Grammar. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Blake, Barry J.
2004 Case, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Börjars, Kersti
2003 Morphological status and (de)grammaticalisation: The Swedish possessive. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 26: 133–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Börjars, Kersti, Denison, David & Scott, Alan K.
(eds) 2013 Morphosyntactic Categories and the Expression of Possession [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 199]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Börjars, Kersti, Denison, David, Krajewski, Grzegorz & Scott, Alan
2013 Expression of possession in English: The significance of the right edge. In Börjars, Denison & Scott (eds), 123–148.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carlier, Anne & Verstraete, Jean-Christophe
2013 Genitive case and genitive constructions: An introduction. In The Genitive [Case and Grammatical Relations across Languages 5], Anne Carlier & Jean-Christophe Verstraete (eds), 1–16. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1981 Lectures in Government and Binding: The Pisa Lectures. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Curzan, Anne
2003 Gender shifts in the history of English. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Denison, David, Scott, Alan K. & Börjars, Kersti
2010 The real distribution of the English “group genitive”. Studies in Language 34: 532–564. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elbaum, Jacob & Turniansky, Chava
2010 Tsene-rene. In The YIVO Encyclopedia of Jews in Eastern Europe, Vol. 2, Gershon Hundert (ed.), 1912–1913. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Embick, David & Noyer, Rolf
2001 Movement operations after syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 32: 555–595. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fábregas, Antonio & Scalise, Sergio
2012 Morphology: From Data to Theories. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
Fertig, David
2013 Analogy and Morphological Change. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J.
1968 The case for case. In Universals of Linguistic Theory, Emmon Bach & Robert T. Harms (eds), 1–90. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Fishman, Joshua A.
2001 A decade in the life of a two-in-one language: Yiddish in New York City (secular and ultra-orthodox). In Can Threatened Languages be Saved?, Joshua A. Fishman (ed.), 74–100. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
2008 Language: Planning and standardization of Yiddish. In The YIVO Encyclopedia of Jews in Eastern Europe, Vol. 1, Gershon Hundert (ed.), 987–991. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fleischer, Jürg & Schallert, Oliver
2011 Historische Syntax des Deutschen: Eine Einführung. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Futato, Mark David
2003 Beginning Biblical Hebrew. Winona Lake IN: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar
Gärtner, Kurt, Gerhardt, Christoph, Jährling, Jürgen, Plate, Ralf, Röll, Walter & Timm, Erika
1992 Findebuch zum mittelhochdeutschen Wortschatz. Stuttgart: Hirzel.Google Scholar
Georgi, Doreen & Salzmann, Martin
2011 DP-internal double agreement is not double Agree: Consequences of Agree-based case assignment within DP. Lingua 121: 2069–2088. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gerlach, Birgit & Grijzenhout, Janet
2000 Clitics from different perspectives. In Clitics in Phonology, Morphology and Syntax [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 36], Birgit Gerlach & Janet Grijzenhout (eds), 1–29. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Gold, David L.
2009 Studies in Etymology and Etiology: With Emphasis on Germanic, Jewish, Romance, and Slavic languages. Alicante: Universidad de Alicante.Google Scholar
Haider, Hubert
1992 Die Struktur der Nominalphrase: Lexikalische und funktionale Strukturen. In Deutsche Syntax: Ansichten und Aussichten, Ludger Hoffmann (ed.), 304–333. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Harbert, Wayne
2007 The Germanic Languages. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi
2015 The syntax-morphology interface. In Syntax – theory and Analysis: An International Handbook [Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft/Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 42/2], Tibor Kiss & Artemis Alexiadou (eds), 1128–1154. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hartmann, Katharina & Zimmermann, Malte
2002 Syntactic and semantic adnominal genitive. In (A)symmetrien – (a)symmetries: Beiträge zu Ehren von Ewald Lang, Claudia Maienborn (ed.), 171–202. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Hartweg, Frédéric & Wegera, Klaus-Peter
2005 Frühneuhochdeutsch: Eine Einführung in die deutsche Spraches des Spätmittelalters und der frühen Neuzeit, 2nd edn [Germanistische Arbeitshefte 33]. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2009 Terminology of case. In The Oxford Handbook of Case, Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds), 505–517. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2011 The indeterminacy of word segmentation and the nature of morphology and syntax. Folia Linguistica 45: 31–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Henzen, Walter
1927 Die deutsche Freiburger Mundart im Sense- und südöstlichen Seebezirk. Frauenfeld: Huber.Google Scholar
Herzog, Marvin
et al. (eds) 2000 The Language and Culture Atlas of Ashkenazic Jewry. The Eastern Yiddish – Western Yiddish Continuum, Vol. 3. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Neil G.
2005 Yiddish: A Linguistic Introduction. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Neil G., Prince, Ellen F. & van der Auwera, Johan
1994 Yiddish. In The Germanic Languages, Ekkehard König & Johan van der Auwera (eds), 388–419. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1894 Progress in Language: With Special Reference to English. London: Swan Sonnenschein.Google Scholar
Joffe, Judah A.
1964 Der genitiv in yidish. Yidishe shprakh 24: 19–23.Google Scholar
Katz, Dovid
1987a Grammar of the Yiddish Language. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
1987b The proto-dialectology of Ashkenaz. In Origins of the Yiddish Language, Dovid Katz (ed.), 47–60. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Kerler, Dov-Ber
1999 The Origins of Modern Literary Yiddish. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kiefer, Ulrike
2000 Das Jiddische in Beziehung zum Mittelhochdeutschen. In Sprachgeschichte: Ein Handbuch zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und ihrer Erforschung, 2nd edn [Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft/ Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 2/2], Werner Besch, Anne Betten, Oskar Reichmann & Stefan Sonderegger (eds), 1399–1408. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Köpcke, Klaus-Michael
1995 Die Klassifikation der schwachen Maskulina in der deutschen Gegenwartssprache – Ein Beispiel für die Leistungsfähigkeit der Prototypentheorie. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 14: 159–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria
2003 Possessive noun phrases in the languages of Europe. In Noun Phrase Structure in the Languages of Europe [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 20-7], Frans Plank (ed.), 621–722. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Krause, Cornelia
1999 Two notes on prenominal possessors in German. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 33: 191–217.Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred
2009 Case syncretism in German feminines: Typological, functional and structural aspects. In On Inflection [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 184], Patrick Steinkrüger & Manfred Krifka (eds), 141–172. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Krischke, Wolfgang
2012 Des Menschens Genitive. Linguistik Online 53: 55–84.Google Scholar
Kürschner, Sebastian & Nübling, Damaris
2011 The interaction of gender and declension in Germanic languages. Folia Linguistica 45: 355–388. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lander, Yury A.
2009 Varieties of genitive. In The Oxford Handbook of Case, Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds), 581–592. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Lexer, Matthias
[1872–1878]1992 Mittelhochdeutsches Handwörterbuch, Nachdruck mit einer Einleitung von Kurt Gärtner. Leipzig: Hirzel.Google Scholar
Lincoff, Beatrice
1963 A Study in Inflectional Morphologic Development: Old and Middle Yiddish. PhD dissertation, New York University.Google Scholar
Lockwood, William B.
1968 Historical German Syntax. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
1995 Lehrbuch der modernen jiddischen Sprache. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Maiden, Martin
2016 Ambiguity in Romanian word structure: The structure of plurals in …uri . Revue Roumaine de Linguistique 61: 3–12.Google Scholar
Mark, Yudl
1941 Folk(s)lid, leben(s)frayd, tsaytung(s)mentsh: Vegn dem samekh in di tsunoyfheftn. Yidishe Shprakh 1: 47–56.Google Scholar
1978 Gramatik fun der yidisher klal-shprakh. New York NY: Alveltlekher yiddisher kultur-kongres.Google Scholar
Mazin, Jacob R. & De Woolf, S
1927 A Manual and Grammar of the Yiddish Language. London: Mazin.Google Scholar
Mlotek, Chana & Slobin, Mark
(eds) 2007 Yiddish Folksongs from the Ruth Rubin Archive. Detroit MI: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
Neuberg, Simon
1999 Pragmatische Aspekte der jiddischen Sprachgeschichte am Beispiel der ‘Zenerene‘. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
2000 Das schwedesch lid: Ein westjiddischer Bericht über die Ereignisse in Prag im Jahre 1648. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Nevins, Andrew
2011 Multiple Agree with clitics: Person complementarity vs. omnivorous number. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29: 939–971. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norde, Muriel
2013 Tracing the origins of the Swedish group genitive. In The Genitive [Case and Grammatical Relations Across Languages 5], Anne Carlier & Jean-Christophe Verstraete (eds), 299–332. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nübling, Damaris
2008 Was tun mit Flexionsklassen? Deklinationsklassen und ihr Wandel im Deutschen und seinen Dialekten. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 75: 282–330.Google Scholar
Paul, Hermann
2007 Mittelhochdeutsche Grammatik, 25th edn. rev. by Thomas Klein, Hans-Joachim Solms & Klaus-Peter Wegera. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Peltz, Rakhmiel
2003 Yiddish: A language without an army regulates itself. In Germanic Standardizations: Past to Present [Impact: Studies in Language and Society 18], Ana Deumert & Wim Vandenbussche (eds), 431–454. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roehrs, Dorian
2013 Possessives as extended projections. Working Papers in Scandinavian Linguistics 91: 37–112.Google Scholar
Schmid, Hans Ulrich
2009 Einführung in die deutsche Sprachgeschichte. Stuttgart: Metzler.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scott, Alan K.
2011 Everyday language in the spotlight: The decline of the genitive case. German as a Foreign Language 12: 53–70.Google Scholar
2014 The Genitive Case in Dutch and German. A Study of Morphosyntactic Change in Codified Languages [Brill’s studies in historical linguistics 2]. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Solms, Hans-Joachim & Wegera, Klaus-Peter
1993 Flexionsmorphologie. In Frühneuhochdeutsche Grammatik [Sammlung kurzer Grammatiken germanischer Dialekte. A, Hauptreihe 12], Oskar Reichmann & Klaus-Peter Wegera (eds), 164–312. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Spencer, Andrew & Luís, Ana R.
2012 Clitics. An Introduction. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spencer, Andrew & Luís, Ana R.
2013 The canonical clitic. In Canonical Morphology and Syntax, Dunstan Brown, Marina Chumakina & Greville G. Corbett (eds), 123–150. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Taylor, John R.
1996 Possessives in English: An Exploration in Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Timm, Erika
1987 Graphische und phonische Struktur des Westjiddischen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Zeit um 1600 [Hermaea. Neue Folge 52]. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999 Matronymika im aschkenasischen Kulturbereich: Ein Beitrag zur Mentalitäts- und Sozialgeschichte der europäischen Juden. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wegera, Klaus-Peter & Solms, Hans-Joachim
2000 Morphologie des Frühneuhochdeutschen. In Sprachgeschichte: Ein Handbuch zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und ihrer Erforschung, 2nd edn [Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft/ Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 2/2], Werner Besch, Anne Betten, Oskar Reichmann & Stefan Sonderegger (eds), 1542–1554. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Max
2008 History of the Yiddish Language, translated by Shlomo Noble. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel
1968 Modern English-Yiddish Yiddish-English dictionary. New York NY: Schocken.Google Scholar
1981 College Yiddish: An Introduction to the Yiddish Language and to Jewish Life and Culture, 5th edn. New York NY: YIVO Institute for Jewish Research.Google Scholar
Weiß, Helmut
2008 The possessor that appears twice: Variation, structure and function of possessive doubling in German. In Microvariation in Syntactic Doubling, Sjef Barbiers, Olaf Koeneman, Maria Lekakou & Margreet van der Ham (eds), 381–401. Bingley: Emerald. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weissberg, Josef
1988 Jiddisch: Eine Einführung [Langs Germanistische Lehrbuchsammlung 27]. Bern: Lang.Google Scholar
Wexler, Paul
1987 Explorations in Judeo-Slavic Linguistics. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Wolf, Meyer
1969 The geography of Yiddish case and gender variation. In The Field of Yiddish: Studies in Language, Folklore and Literature, Vol. 3, Marvin I. Herzog, Wita Ravid & Uriel Weinreich (eds), 102–215. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Zifonun, Gisela
2005 Der Dativ ist dem Genitiv sein Tod: Zur Analyse des adnominalen possessiven Dativs. In Deutsche Syntax: Theorie und Empirie. Symposium in Göteborg, 13.–15. Mai 2004, Franz Josef d’Avis (ed.), 25–51. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold
1994 What is a clitic? In Clitics: A Comprehensive Bibliography 1892–1991 [Library and Information Sources in Linguistics 22], Joel A. Nevis, Brian D. Joseph, Dieter Wanner & Arnold M. Zwicky (eds), xii–xx. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold & Pullum, Geoffrey K.
1983 Cliticization vs. inflection: English n’t . Language 59: 502–513. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Hoekstra, Jarich
2018. Frisian genitives. In Germanic Genitives [Studies in Language Companion Series, 193], ► pp. 37 ff. DOI logo
Roehrs, Dorian
2022. Prenominal possessives in Yiddish:mayn khaverversusmayner a khaver. Linguistics 60:2 ► pp. 347 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 march 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.