Chapter published in:
Germanic Genitives
Edited by Tanja Ackermann, Horst J. Simon and Christian Zimmer
[Studies in Language Companion Series 193] 2018
► pp. 301–323

On the role of cases and possession in Germanic

A typological approach

| University of Hamburg
The Germanic languages exhibit several interesting developments with respect to genitive and ‘possession’. The genitive cannot be considered a structural case in line with the nominative or accusative, the function of which can often be expressed by word order alone. It has a very complex semantic status in its own right and shows several intersections with the semantics of the dative, also a formerly complex case. The transfer of possessive datives from Low German into the Mainland Scandinavian languages led, however, to language-internal typological inconsistency, as far as the possessive pronouns (3rd person) are concerned. Moreover, ‘possession’ may also be rendered through periphrastic constructions which display various realisations in the Scandinavian languages. Special emphasis is paid to the word order within noun phrases and to distributional restrictions. Morphological transparency, the emergence of a new possessive clitic (-sa) in Faroese and the inter/independency of pre- and postposed possessive constructions are also investigated. The conclusion focuses on the issue of whether these developments may be seen as a “progress in language” (Jespersen 1894) or rather as a “helix in language history” (von der Gabelentz 1901).
Published online: 26 April 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.193.11bra
References

Primary sources

Mitchell, Bruce & Robinson, Fred C.
1998 Beowulf. An edition. Oxford: Blackwell (reprinted in 2003).Google Scholar
Sievers, Eduard
1892 Tatian. Lateinisch und altdeutsch mit ausführlichem Glossar, 2nd edn. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh (reprinted in Darmstadt: Wiss. Buchgesellschaft 1966).Google Scholar

References

Ackerman, Tanja.
2018 From genitive inflection to possessive marker? The development of German possessive -s with personal names. In this volume.Google Scholar
Börjars, Kersti, Denison, David & Scott, Alan K.
(eds) 2013 Morphosyntactic Categories and the Expression of Possession [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 199]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Braunmüller, Kurt
1982 Syntaxtypologische Studien zum Germanischen [Tübinger Beiträge zur Linguistik 197]. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
2008a Das älteste Germanische: Offene Fragen und mögliche Antworten. Sprachwissenschaft 33: 373–403.Google Scholar
2008b Observations on the origins of definiteness in ancient Germanic. Sprachwissenschaft 33: 351–371.Google Scholar
2015 Competing tendencies in Germanic pronominal and deictic systems: The most general principle will prevail. In New trends in Nordic and general linguistics [Linguae et Litterae 42], Martin Hilpert, Jan-Ola Östman, Christine Merzlufft, Michael Rießler & Janet Duke (eds), 11–27. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
2016 On the origins of complexity: Evidence from Germanic. In Complexity, Isolation, and Variation [Lingua et Litterae 57], Raffaela Baechler & Guido Seiler (eds), 47–69. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017 Nyt lys over de vest- og sønderjyske dialekter [‘A new sight on Western and Southern Jutish dialects’]. In Tionde nordiska dialektologkonferensen i Mariehamn, på Åland, 20.–25. augusti 2014, Jan-Ola Östman, Caroline Sandström, Pamela Gustavsson & Lisa Södergård (eds), 147–160. Helsinki: Nordica Helsingensia.Google Scholar
De Vogelaer, Gunther
2007 Extending Hawkins’ comparative typology: Case, word order, and verb agreement in the Germanic languages. Nordlyd 34: 167–182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Döhla, Hans-Jörg
2014 Diachronic convergence and divergence in differential object marking between Spanish and Portuguese. In Stability and Divergence in Language Contact. Factors and Mechanisms [Studies in Language Variation 16], Kurt Braunmüller, Steffen Höder & Karoline Kühl (eds), 265–289. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Eggers, Liliana
2008 S-Genitiv versus Präpositionalattribut im Schwedischen. Animatizität und Gewicht als beeinflussende Faktoren. MA thesis, University of Hamburg.Google Scholar
von der Gabelentz, Georg
1901 Die Sprachwissenschaft, ihre Aufgaben, Methoden und bisherigen Ergebnisse, 2nd edn. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1894 Progress in Language, with Special Reference to English. London: Swan Sonnenschein.Google Scholar
Jul Nielsen, Bent
1986 Om pronominet sin i jysk [‘On the pronoun sin in Jutish (dialects)’]. Danske Folkemål 28: 41–101.Google Scholar
Lindström, Jan & Karlsson, Susanna
2005 Verb-first constructions as a syntactic and functional resource in (spoken) Swedish. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 28: 97–131. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mackowiak, Klaus
2008 Die 101 häufigsten Fehler im Deutschen: Und wie man sie vermeidet, 3rd edn. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
McWhorter, John
2007 Language Interrupted. Signs of Non-native Acquisition in Standard Language Grammars. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, Hjalmar P.
2016 The spread of the phrasal clitic sa in Faroese. Arkiv för Nordisk Filologi 131: 105–128.Google Scholar
Rosenbach, Anette
2005 Animacy versus weight as determinants of grammatical variation in English. Language 8: 613–644. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 Animacy and grammatical variation – Findings from English genitive variation. Lingua 118: 151–171. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 English genitive variation – The state of the art. English Language and Linguistics 18: 215–262. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Þráinsson, Höskuldur
2005 Íslensk tunga, III: Setningar. Handbók um setningarfræði [‘Icelandic language, III: Sentences. Handbook about syntax’]. Reykjavík: Almenna Bókafélagið.Google Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur, Petersen, Hjalmar, Jacobsen, Jógvan í Lon & Hansen, Zakaris Svabo
2004 Faroese. An Overview and Reference Grammar. Tórshavn: Føroya Fróðskaparfelag.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter
2011 Sociolinguistic Typology: Social Determinants of Linguistic Complexity. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Vennemann gen. Nierfeld, Theo
2012 Germania semitica [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 259], Patrizia Noel Aziz Hanna (ed.). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar