Part of
Germanic Genitives
Edited by Tanja Ackermann, Horst J. Simon and Christian Zimmer
[Studies in Language Companion Series 193] 2018
► pp. 301323
References (27)
Primary sources
Mitchell, Bruce & Robinson, Fred C.. 1998. Beowulf. An edition. Oxford: Blackwell (reprinted in 2003).Google Scholar
Sievers, Eduard. 1892. Tatian. Lateinisch und altdeutsch mit ausführlichem Glossar, 2nd edn. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh (reprinted in Darmstadt: Wiss. Buchgesellschaft 1966).Google Scholar
References
Ackerman, Tanja.. 2018. From genitive inflection to possessive marker? The development of German possessive -s with personal names. In this volume.Google Scholar
Börjars, Kersti, Denison, David & Scott, Alan K. (eds). 2013. Morphosyntactic Categories and the Expression of Possession [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 199]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Braunmüller, Kurt. 1982. Syntaxtypologische Studien zum Germanischen [Tübinger Beiträge zur Linguistik 197]. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
. 2008a. Das älteste Germanische: Offene Fragen und mögliche Antworten. Sprachwissenschaft 33: 373–403.Google Scholar
. 2008b. Observations on the origins of definiteness in ancient Germanic. Sprachwissenschaft 33: 351–371.Google Scholar
. 2015. Competing tendencies in Germanic pronominal and deictic systems: The most general principle will prevail. In New trends in Nordic and general linguistics [Linguae et Litterae 42], Martin Hilpert, Jan-Ola Östman, Christine Merzlufft, Michael Rießler & Janet Duke (eds), 11–27. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2016. On the origins of complexity: Evidence from Germanic. In Complexity, Isolation, and Variation [Lingua et Litterae 57], Raffaela Baechler & Guido Seiler (eds), 47–69. Berlin: De Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. Nyt lys over de vest- og sønderjyske dialekter [‘A new sight on Western and Southern Jutish dialects’]. In Tionde nordiska dialektologkonferensen i Mariehamn, på Åland, 20.–25. augusti 2014, Jan-Ola Östman, Caroline Sandström, Pamela Gustavsson & Lisa Södergård (eds), 147–160. Helsinki: Nordica Helsingensia.Google Scholar
De Vogelaer, Gunther. 2007. Extending Hawkins’ comparative typology: Case, word order, and verb agreement in the Germanic languages. Nordlyd 34: 167–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Döhla, Hans-Jörg. 2014. Diachronic convergence and divergence in differential object marking between Spanish and Portuguese. In Stability and Divergence in Language Contact. Factors and Mechanisms [Studies in Language Variation 16], Kurt Braunmüller, Steffen Höder & Karoline Kühl (eds), 265–289. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Eggers, Liliana. 2008. S-Genitiv versus Präpositionalattribut im Schwedischen. Animatizität und Gewicht als beeinflussende Faktoren. MA thesis, University of Hamburg.Google Scholar
von der Gabelentz, Georg. 1901. Die Sprachwissenschaft, ihre Aufgaben, Methoden und bisherigen Ergebnisse, 2nd edn. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1894. Progress in Language, with Special Reference to English. London: Swan Sonnenschein.Google Scholar
Jul Nielsen, Bent. 1986. Om pronominet sin i jysk [‘On the pronoun sin in Jutish (dialects)’]. Danske Folkemål 28: 41–101.Google Scholar
Lindström, Jan & Karlsson, Susanna. 2005. Verb-first constructions as a syntactic and functional resource in (spoken) Swedish. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 28: 97–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mackowiak, Klaus. 2008. Die 101 häufigsten Fehler im Deutschen: Und wie man sie vermeidet, 3rd edn. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
McWhorter, John. 2007. Language Interrupted. Signs of Non-native Acquisition in Standard Language Grammars. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Petersen, Hjalmar P. 2016. The spread of the phrasal clitic sa in Faroese. Arkiv för Nordisk Filologi 131: 105–128.Google Scholar
Rosenbach, Anette. 2005. Animacy versus weight as determinants of grammatical variation in English. Language 8: 613–644. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. Animacy and grammatical variation – Findings from English genitive variation. Lingua 118: 151–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. English genitive variation – The state of the art. English Language and Linguistics 18: 215–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Þráinsson, Höskuldur. 2005. Íslensk tunga, III: Setningar. Handbók um setningarfræði [‘Icelandic language, III: Sentences. Handbook about syntax’]. Reykjavík: Almenna Bókafélagið.Google Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur, Petersen, Hjalmar, Jacobsen, Jógvan í Lon & Hansen, Zakaris Svabo. 2004. Faroese. An Overview and Reference Grammar. Tórshavn: Føroya Fróðskaparfelag.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 2011. Sociolinguistic Typology: Social Determinants of Linguistic Complexity. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Vennemann gen. Nierfeld, Theo. 2012 Germania semitica [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 259], Patrizia Noel Aziz Hanna (ed.). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar