Chapter published in:Changing Structures: Studies in constructions and complementation
Edited by Mark Kaunisto, Mikko Höglund and Paul Rickman
[Studies in Language Companion Series 195] 2018
► pp. 151–167
Patterns of direct transitivization and differences between British and American English
Rohdenburg (2009) found that prepositions are increasingly omitted in several types of verbs, marking a shift in complementation from an intransitive pattern with a prepositional object to a transitive pattern featuring a direct object noun phrase. In particular, the decrease of prepositional objects after antagonistic verbs (appeal, battle, fight, protest) and verbs of leaving (depart, escape, flee, resign) has been interpreted in line with an ongoing tendency in the history of English to functionally expand the category of the direct object at the expense of prepositional phrases in particular. Other verbs that are said to allow the preposition-less variant are mentioned only sporadically in the literature but have not yet been examined systematically on a broader empirical basis. This chapter provides corpus data from British and American English suggesting that several other verbs may also be in the process of undergoing direct transitivization.
Keywords: verb complementation, direct transitivization, omission of prepositions, grammatical economy, British English, American English
- 1.Introduction: Direct transitivization
- 2.Lexicographic treatment of the different complementation patterns
- 2.1 Graduate
- 2.2 Impact
- 2.3 Shop
- 3.Data and methodology
- 4.1 Graduate
- 4.2 Impact
- 5.Discussion and conclusion
Published online: 22 May 2018
2007 Reference Guide for the British National Corpus (XML Edition) . < http://www.natcorp.ox.ac.uk/docs/URG/> (12 August 2016).
Corpus Resource Database
(CoRD) 2016 < http://www.helsinki.fi/varieng/CoRD/index.html>
2004- BYU-BNC. Based on the British National Corpus from Oxford University Press. < http://corpus.byu.edu/bnc>
2008- The Corpus of Contemporary American English , < http://corpus.byu.edu/coca>
2010- The Corpus of Historical American English, < http://corpus.byu.edu/coha>
2013- Corpus of Global Web-Based English: 1.9 Billion Words from Speakers in 20 Countries. < http://corpus.byu.edu/glowbe>
Davies, Mark & Fuchs, Robert
Herbst, Thomas, Heath, David, Roe, Ian F. & Götz, Dieter
Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English
Online version. < http://www.ldoceonline.com> (February 2017).
Marckwardt, Albert H. & Quirk, Randolph
Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary
Online version < http://www.m-w.com> (February 2017).
Merriam-Webster’s Learner’s Dictionary
< http://www.learnersdictionary.com> (February 2017).
Oxford English Dictionary
3rd ed. Revised and updated online version < http://www.oed.com> (February 2017).
Rohdenburg, Günter & Schlüter, Julia
Cited by 2 other publications
Vartiainen, Turo & Mikko Höglund
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 march 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.