The development of infinitival complementation with or without language contact
Certain contact languages previously lacking a finiteness contrast have developed infinitival complementation. The late Old English and Sri Lankan Malay (SLM) constructions both involve to-infinitives seemingly based on prepositional phrases, specifically infinitival to + lexical verb in Old English and infinitival nang + lexical verb in SLM. There is no evidence, however, that these verbs were ever nominalized in SLM, and Los (2005) has argued that the apparently dativized forms we find in Old English belie the fact that their syntactic status was verbal and the constituents containing them clausal. The SLM infinitival prefix is etymologically irrealis, paralleling the subjunctives that the English to-infinitive progressively replaced. Identifying cross-linguistically parallel changes that are explainable based on textual attestations in one of the languages examined will aid in reconstructing the development of underattested languages that lack diachronic corpora.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Cross-linguistic variation in interclausal symmetry
- 3.The historical English analogy with Sri Lankan Malay
- 4.The view that restoration of infinitival marking is improbable
- 5.The development of infinitival complementation in Sri Lankan Malay
- 6.Conclusion
-
Notes
-
Abbreviations
-
References
References (15)
References
Bickerton, Derek. 1984. The language bioprogram hypothesis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7: 173–221.
Blom, Wilhelmina Bernardina Theodora. 2003. From Root Infinitive to Finite Sentence: The Acquisition of Verbal Inflections and Auxiliaries. PhD dissertation, University of Utrecht.
Haspelmath, Martin. 1989. From purposive to infinitive: A universal path of grammaticization. Folia Linguistica Historica 10(1–2): 287–310.
Los, Bettelou. 2005. The Rise of the To-Infinitive. Oxford: OUP.
Mufwene, Salikoko. 1989. On the so-called ‘infinitive’ in Atlantic creoles. Lingua 77: 297–330.
Nordhoff, Sebastian. 2009. A Grammar of Upcountry Sri Lanka Malay. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Slomanson, Peter. 2006. Sri Lankan Grammars: Lankan or Malay? In Structure and Variation in Contact Languages [Creole Language Library 29], Ana Deumert & Stéphanie Durrleman (eds), 135–158. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Slomanson, Peter. 2008. The perfect construction and complexity drift in Sri Lankan Malay. Lingua 118(10), 1640–1655.
Slomanson, Peter. 2013. Known, inferable, and discoverable in Sri Lankan Malay research. In The Genesis of Sri Lanka Malay - A Case of Extreme Language Contact, Sebastian Nordhoff (ed.), 85–119. Leiden: Brill.
Slomanson, Peter. 2016. New information structuring processes and morphosyntactic change. In Information Structure and Spoken Language in Cross-Linguistic Perspective, M. M. Jocelyn Fernandez-Vest & Robert D. Van Valin Jr. (eds), 305–326. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Smith, Ian & Paauw, Scott. 2006. Sri Lanka Malay: creole or convert? In Structure and Variation in Contact Languages [Creole Language Library 29], Ana Deumert & Stéphanie Durrleman (eds), 159–182. John Benjamins.
Stassen, Leon. 1985. Comparison and Universal Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.
van Minde, Don. 1997. Malayu Ambong: Phonology, Morphology, Syntax. Leiden: Research School CNWS.
Weinreich, Uriel. 1953. Languages in Contact: Findings and Problems. New York NY: Linguistic Circle of New York. (reprinted in 1979 by Walter de Gruyter).
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Alexander Adelaar & Antoinette Schapper
2024.
The Oxford Guide to the Malayo-Polynesian Languages of Southeast Asia,
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.