In:Essays on Linguistic Realism:
Edited by Christina Behme and Martin Neef
[Studies in Language Companion Series 196] 2018
► pp. 139–184
Chapter 6Languages and other abstract structures
Published online: 26 July 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.196.06nef
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.196.06nef
Abstract
My aim in this chapter is to extend the Realist account of the foundations of linguistics offered by Postal, Katz and others. I first argue against the idea that naive Platonism can capture the necessary requirements on what I call a ‘mixed realist’ view of linguistics, which takes aspects of Platonism, Nominalism and Mentalism into consideration. I then advocate three desiderata for an appropriate ‘mixed realist’ account of linguistic ontology and foundations, namely (1) linguistic creativity and infinity, (2) linguistics as a theory of types (and not tokens) and (3) independence but structural respect between language and the linguistic competence thereof. My own brand of mixed realism, what I call ante rem realism, is defended along the lines of an ante rem or non-eliminative structuralism, the likes of which has been offered for mathematics by Resnik (1997) and Shapiro (1997). In other words, grammars describe a mind-independent (but not necessarily unconnected) linguistic reality in terms of linguistic patterns or structures also known as natural languages. I further amend this picture to allow for the possibility of a naturalistic account of language acquisition and evolution by arguing against a particular view of the type-token distinction.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Three desiderata for Mixed Realism
- 2.1Linguistic creativity and infinity
- 2.1.1Creativity
- 2.1.2Rule-following and infinity
- 2.2Of tokens and types
- 2.3Mixed Realism and respect
- 2.4Taking stock
- 2.4.1Mixed Realism and Modified Realism
- 2.1Linguistic creativity and infinity
- 3.Against Platonism
- 3.1The right kind of ‘wrong view’
- 3.2Benacerraf’s dilemma and respect
- 3.3Conceptual distinctness
- 4.
Ante Rem realism and the foundations of linguistics
- 4.1Mathematical structuralism
- 4.2Linguistic structures
- 4.3Natural types
- 5.Conclusion
Acknowledgements Notes References
References (85)
Awodey, Steven. 1996. Structure in mathematics and logic: A categorical perspective. Philosophia Mathematica (3)4: 209–237.
Boolos, Geoffrey. 2000. Must we believe in set theory? In Between Logic and Intuition: Essays in Honor of Charles Parsons, Gila Sher & Richard Tieszen (eds), 257–268. Cambridge: CUP.
Bromberger, Sylvain. 1989. Types and tokens in linguistics. In Reflections on Chomsky, Alexander L. George (ed.), 58–90. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
. 1964. Current issues in linguistic theory. In The Structure of Language, Jerry A. Fodor & Jerrold J. Katz (eds), 50–118. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice Hall.
. 1966. Cartesian Linguistics: A Chapter in the History of Rationalist Thought. New York NY: Harper & Row.
Chomsky, Noam. 1982. A note on the creative aspect of language use. The Philosophical Review XCI(3): 423–434.
. 1990. Language and the problems of knowledge. In The Philosophy of Language, Aloysius P. Matinich (ed.), 581–598. Oxford: OUP.
Drach, Margaret. 1981. The creative aspect of Chomsky’s use of the notion of creativity. Philosophical Review 90: 44–65.
Evans, Gareth. 1981[1985]. Semantic theory and tacit knowledge. In Gareth Evans: Collected Papers, Antonia Philipps (ed.), 322–342. Oxford: Clarendon.
Fodor, Jerrold A. 1981. Some notes on what linguistics is about. In Readings in the Philosophy of Psychology, Vol. II, Ned Block (ed.), 197–207. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Greenberg, Joseph. 1963. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Universals of Language, Joseph Greenberg (ed.), 73–113. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Hellman, Geoffrey. 1989. Mathematics without Numbers: Towards a Modal-Structural Interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Hilbert, David. 1899. Grundlagen der Geometrie. Leipzig: Teubner; Foundations of Geometry, trans. by E. J. Townsend. 1959. La Salle Il: Open Court.
Iemhoff, Rosalie. 2015. Intuitionism in the philosophy of mathematics. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta (ed.). <[URL]>
Katz, Jerrold J. 1971. Linguistic Philosophy: The Underlying Reality of Language and its Philosophical Import. London: Allen & Unwin.
1984. An outline of Platonist grammar. In Talking Minds: The Study of Language in the Cognitive Sciences, Thomas G. Bever, John M. Carroll & Lance A. Miller (eds.), 17–48. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Katz, Jerrold J. & Postal, Paul M.. 1991. Realism vs. conceptualism in linguistics. Linguistics and Philosophy 14(5): 515–554.
Kaufman, Daniel. 2002. Composite objects and the abstract/concrete distinction. Journal of Philosophical Research 27: 215–238.
Kirby, Simon. 1999. Learning, bottlenecks and infinity: A working model of evolution of syntactic communication. In Proceedings of the AISB’99 Symposium on Imitation in Animals and Artifacts, Kerstin Dautenhahn & Chrystopher Nehaniv (eds). Hove: Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and Simulation of Behavior.
Langendoen, Terence. 2003. Merge. In Formal Approaches to Functional Phenomena: In Honor of Eloise Jelinek [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 62], Andrew Carnie, Mary Willie & Heidi Harley (eds), 307–318. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Langendoen, D. Terence. 2018. Languages as complete and distinct systems of reference. In Essays on Linguistic Realism, Christina Behme & Martin Neef (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (this volume).
Lawrence, Stephen. 2003. Is linguistics a branch of psychology? In Epistemology of Language, Alex Barber (ed.), 69–106. Oxford: OUP.
Lewis, David. 1975. Languages and language. In The Philosophy of Language, Aloysius P. Matinich (ed.), 3–35. Oxford: OUP.
Lieb, Hans-Heinrich. 1992. The case for a New Structuralism. In Prospects for a New Structuralism [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 96], Hans-Heinrich Lieb (ed.), 33–72. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2018. Describing linguistic objects in a realist way. In Essays on Linguistic Realism, Christina Behme & Martin Neef (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (this volume).
Linsky, Bernhard & Edward N. Zalta. 1995. Naturalized Platonism vs. Platonized naturalism. Journal of Philosophy xcii(10): 525–555.
Neef, Martin. 2018. Autonomous declarative phonology: A realist approach to the phonology of German. In Essays on Linguistic Realism, Christina Behme & Martin Neef (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (this volume).
Nefdt, Ryan. 2016a. Linguistic modelling and the scientific enterprise. Language Sciences 54: 43–57.
. 2016b. Scientific modelling in generative grammar and the dynamic turn in syntax. Linguistics and Philosophy 39(5): 357–394.
Peirce, Charles. 1958. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vol. 4. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Pullum, Geoffrey. 2011. On the mathematical foundations of syntactic structures. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 20(3): 277–296.
Pullum, Geoffrey & Scholz, Barbara. 2010. Recursion and the infinitude claim. In Recursion in Human Language [Studies in Generative Grammar 104], Harry van der Hulst (ed.), 113–138. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Pylyshyn, Zenon. 1973. What the mind’s eye tells the mind’s brain: A critique of mental imagery. Psycholological Bulletin 80: 1–24.
Quine, Willard. 1972. Methodological reflections on current linguistic theory. In Semantics of Natural Language, Donald Davidson & Gilbert Harman (eds), 442–454. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Rey, Georges. 2006. Conventions, intuitions and linguistic inexistents: A reply to Devitt. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 6: 549–569.
Shieber, Stuart. 1985. Evidence against the context-freeness of natural language. In The Formal Complexity of Natural Language [Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy 33], Walter J. Savitch, Emmon Bach, William E. Marsh & Gila Safran-Naveh (eds), 320–334. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Shieber, Stuart & Schabes, Yves. 1991. Synchronous tree-adjoining grammars. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Hans Karlgren (ed.). Helsinki: Helsingiensis Universitas.
Stainton, Robert. 2014. Philosophy of Linguistics. Oxford Handbooks Online. <[URL]>
Stanley, Jason & Szabó, Zoltan. 2000. On quantifier domain restriction. Mind & Language 15(2–3): 219–261.
Wetzel, Linda. 2014. Types and Tokens. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta, (ed.). <[URL]>
Cited by (7)
Cited by seven other publications
Balari, Sergio
Forker, Diana
Lieb, Hans-Heinrich
2021. Theories of language, language comparison, and grammatical description. In Linguistic Categories, Language Description and Linguistic Typology [Typological Studies in Language, 132], ► pp. 137 ff.
Nefdt, Ryan M.
Nefdt, Ryan M.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 october 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
