Chapter 8
Explaining linguistic facts in a realist theory of word formation
The present paper examines foundational issues of a realist word-formation theory. A realist linguistic theory, as it is understood here, takes linguistic units and the linguistic systems that determine them to be abstract entities. With respect to such a word-formation theory, the following two questions are discussed:
-
What are the word-formation facts to be described and explained or predicted?
-
What linguistic objects are those word-formation facts about?
Presupposing the axiomatically formalized Pattern-and-Restriction Theory (PR), it is proposed that the word-formation facts to be described and explained or predicted are true statements of word-formation relations in the linguistic system under consideration, and that those facts are about abstract lexical units in the sense of the realist framework of Integrational Linguistics (IL). On the example of a word-formation pattern in some spoken Modern German system it is shown how deductive-nomological (DN) explanations or predictions of word-formation facts can be logically derived from theorems of the PR theory and theorems of a grammar and a dictionary of the linguistic system.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Lexical units
- 3.Word-formation relations, processes, and patterns
- 4.Explanation and prediction of statements of word-formation relations
- 5.Summary and conclusions
-
Acknowledgements
-
Notes
-
References
-
Appendix
References (34)
Anderson, Stephen R.
1992 A-Morphous Morphology. Cambridge: CUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aronoff, Mark
1976 Word Formation in Generative Grammar [
Linguistic Inquiry Monographs 1]. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Beard, Robert
1995 Lexeme Morpheme Base Morphology: A General Theory of Inflection and Word Formation. Albany NY: State University of New York Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Becker, Thomas
1990 Analogie und morphologische Theorie [
Studien zur Theoretischen Linguistik 11]. München: Fink.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Becker, Thomas
1998 Das Vokalsystem der deutschen Standardsprache [
Arbeiten zur Sprachanalyse 32]. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Blank, Andreas
1997 Prinzipien des lexikalischen Bedeutungswandels am Beispiel der romanischen Sprachen [
Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie 285]. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Blank, Andreas
2003 Polysemy in the lexicon and in discourse. In
Polysemy: Flexible Patterns of Meaning in Mind and Language [
Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs 142],
Brigitte Nerlich,
Zazie Todd,
Vimala Herman &
David D. Clarke (eds.), 267–296. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Budde, Monika
2000 Wortarten: Definition und Identifikation. PhD thesis, Freie Universität Berlin.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cruse, D. Alan
1986 Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: CUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eisenberg, Peter
2013 Grundriss der deutschen Grammatik, Vol. 1: Das Wort, 4th edn. Stuttgart: Metzler.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eschenlohr, Stefanie
1999 Vom Nomen zum Verb: Konversion, Präfigierung und Rückbildung im Deutschen [
Germanistische Linguistik: Monographien 3]. Hildesheim: Olms.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fuhrhop, Nanna
1998 Grenzfälle morphologischer Einheiten [
Studien zur deutschen Grammatik 57]. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hempel, Carl G.
1965 Aspects of scientific explanation. In
Aspects of Scientific Explanation and other Essays in the Philosophy of Science,
Carl G. Hempel, 331–496. New York NY: The Free Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Katz, Jerrold J. & Postal, Paul M.
1991 Realism vs. conceptualism in linguistics.
Linguistics and Philosophy 14: 515–554.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Klappenbach, Ruth & Steinitz, Wolfgang
(eds.) 1980 Wörterbuch der deutschen Gegenwartssprache, 6 Vols. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Koefoed, Geert & van Marle, Jaap
2000 Productivity. In
Morphologie/Morphology: Ein Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung/A Handbook on Inflection and Word Formation, Vol. 1 [
Handbücher zur Sprach und Kommunikationswissenschaft 17.1],
Geert Booij,
Christian Lehmann &
Joachim Mugdan (eds), 303–311. Berlin: De Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lieb, Hans-Heinrich
1983 Integrational Linguistics, Vol. 1: General Outline [
Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 17]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lieb, Hans-Heinrich
1985 Conceptual meaning in natural language.
Semiotica 57: 1–12.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lieb, Hans-Heinrich
1999a Morph, Wort, Silbe: Umrisse einer Integrativen Phonologie des Deutschen. In
Variation und Stabilität in der Wortstruktur: Untersuchungen zu Entwicklung, Erwerb und Varietäten des Deutschen und anderer Sprachen [
Germanistische Linguistik: Monographien 141–142],
Matthias Butt &
Nanna Fuhrhop (eds.), 334–407. Hildesheim: Olms.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lieb, Hans-Heinrich
1999b Was ist Wortakzent? Eine Untersuchung am Beispiel des Deutschen. In
Grippe, Kamm und Eulenspiegel: Festschrift für Elmar Seebold zum 65. Geburtstag,
Wolfgang Schindler &
Jürgen Untermann (eds), 225–261. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lieb, Hans-Heinrich
2005 Notions of paradigm in grammar. In
Lexikologie/Lexicology: Ein internationales Handbuch zur Natur und Struktur von Wörtern und Wortschätzen/An International Handbook on the Nature and Structure of Words and Vocabularies, Vol. 2 [
Handbücher zur Sprach und Kommunikationswissenschaft 21.2],
D. Alan Cruse,
Franz Hundsnurscher,
Michael Job &
Peter Rolf Lutzeier (eds), 1613–1646. Berlin: De Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lieb, Hans-Heinrich
2013 Towards a general theory of word formation: The Process Model. Ms, Freie Universität Berlin.
[URL]> (
5 August 2013).
Marzo, Daniela
2015 Motivation, compositionality, idiomatization. In
Word-Formation: An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe, Vol. 2 [
Handbücher zur Sprach und Kommunikationswissenschaft 40.2],
Peter O. Müller,
Franz Rainer,
Susan Olsen &
Ingeborg Ohnheiser (eds), 984–1001. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mel’čuk, Igor A.
1995 The future of the lexicon in linguistic description and the explanatory combinatorial dictionary. In
Linguistics in the Morning Calm 3: Selected Papers from SICOL-1992,
Ik-Hwan Lee (ed.), 181–270. Seoul: Hanshin.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mourelatos, Alexander P. D.
1978 Events, processes, and states.
Linguistics and Philosophy 2: 415–434.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nolda, Andreas
2012 Konversion im Deutschen – Muster und Beschränkungen: Mit einem Grundriss einer allgemeinen Theorie der Wortbildung. Habilitation thesis, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin 2013.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rapp, Irene
2006
Was den Besuch zum Ereignis macht – eine outputorientierte Analyse für die Verb-Nomen-Konversion im Deutschen.
Linguistische Berichte 208: 407–437.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Restle, David
2003 Silbenschnitt – Quantität – Kopplung: Zur Geschichte, Charakterisierung und Repräsentation der Anschlußprosodie. Paderborn: Fink.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stegmüller, Wolfgang
1983 Probleme und Resultate der Wissenschaftstheorie und der Analytischen Philosophie, Vol. 1: Erklärung – Begründung – Kausalität, 2nd edn. Berlin: Springer.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Teuber, Oliver
2005 Analytische Verbformen im Deutschen: Syntax – Semantik – Grammatikalisierung [
Germanistische Linguistik: Monographien 18]. Hildesheim: Olms.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thieroff, Rolf & Vogel, Petra M.
2012 Flexion, 2nd edn. [
Kurze Einführungen in die germanistische Linguistik 7]. Heidelberg: Winter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wiese, Richard
2000 The Phonology of German. Oxford: OUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (3)
Cited by 3 other publications
Zhang, Shuhua & Chunlei Yang
2024.
Ulrike Freywald, Horst J. Simon and Stefan Müller (eds.), Headedness and/or grammatical anarchy? (Empirically Oriented Theoretical Morphology and Syntax 11). Berlin: Language Science Press, 2022. Pp. ii + 386..
Journal of Linguistics ► pp. 1 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Nolda, Andreas
2019.
Wortbildung und Flexion in Morphologie und Syntax,
► pp. 359 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.