Chapter published in:
Tense, Aspect, Modality, and Evidentiality: Crosslinguistic perspectives
Edited by Dalila Ayoun, Agnès Celle and Laure Lansari
[Studies in Language Companion Series 197] 2018
► pp. 239260
References

Data sources

CCLL
Corpus of the Contemporary Lithuanian Languagehttp://​tekstynas​.vdu​.lt/
CorALit
Corpus of Academic Lithuanian (Corpus Academicum Lithuanicum – http://​coralit​.lt/)

References

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2004Evidentiality. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Ambrazas, Vytautas
1990Lietuvių kalbos dalyvių istorinė sintaksė [Historical Syntax of Participles in the Lithuanian Language]. Vilnius: Mokslas.Google Scholar
Anderson, John M.
2011The Domain of Syntax. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Arkadiev, Peter
2012Participial complementation in Lithuanian. In Clause-linkage in Cross- linguistic Perspective: Data-driven Approaches to Cross-clausal Syntax, Volker Gast & Holger Diessel (eds), 285–334. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Borkin, Ann
1973 To be or not to be . Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting Chicago Linguistic Society, Claudia Corum, T. Cedric Smith-Stark & Ann Weiser (eds), 44–56. Chicago IL: CLS.Google Scholar
Boye, Kasper & Harder, Peter
2009Evidentiality. Linguistic categories and grammaticalization. Functions of Language 6(1): 9–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boye, Kasper
2012Epistemic Meaning. A Crosslinguistic and Functional-cognitive Study. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cuzzolin, Pierluigi
1994 Sull’origine della costruzione dicere quod: Aspetti sintattici e semantici . Florence: La nuova Italia.Google Scholar
Dik, Simon C. & Hengeveld, Kees
1991The hierarchical structure of the clause and the typology of perception-verb complements. Linguistics 29: 231–259. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Duffley, Patrick J.
1992The English Infinitive. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Felser, Claudia
1998Perception and control: A Minimalist analysis of English direct perception complements. Journal of Linguistics 34: 351–385. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Greco, Paolo
2013Latin Accusativus cum Participio: Syntactic description, evidential values and diachronic development. Journal of Latin Linguistics 12: 173–198. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gronemeyer, Claire
1997Evidentiality in Lithuanian. Lund University Working Papers 46: 93–112.Google Scholar
Holvoet, Axel
2007Mood and Modality in Baltic. Krakow: Wydawnictwo uniwersytetu Jagiellonskiego.Google Scholar
Lavine, E. James
2010Mood and a transitivity restriction in Lithuanian: The case of the inferential evidential. Baltic Linguistics 1: 115–142.Google Scholar
Leumann, von Manu, Hofmann, Johann & Szantyr, Anton
1972Lateinische Grammatik. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Lowe, John M.
2015Participles in Rigvedic Sanskrit. The Syntax and Semantics of Adjectival Verb Forms. Oxford: OUP.Lyons, John 1977 Semantics, Vol. 2. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, John
1977Semantics. Vol.2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nikolaeva, Irina
Ed. 2007Finiteness. Theoretical and Empirical Foundations. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Noël, Dik
2001The passive matrices of English infinitival complement clauses. Evidentials on the road to auxiliarihood. Studies in Language 25: 255–296. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Noël, Dirk & Colleman, Timothy
2010 Believe-type raising-to-object and raising-to-subject verbs in English and Dutch. A contrastive investigation in diachronic construction grammar. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 15(2): 157–182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Noonan, Michael
1987Complementation. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Vol. 2, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 42–140. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Nuyts, Jan
2001Epistemic Modality, Language, and Conceptualization. A Cognitive-Pragmatic Perspective [Human Cognitive Processing 5]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ørsnes, Bjarne
2011Passives and evidentiality: Danish reportive passives and their equivalents in German. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 43(1): 21–59. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spraunienė, Birutė, Razanovaitė, Auksė & Jasionytė, Erika
2015Solving the puzzle of the Lithuanian passive. In Voice and Argument Structure in Baltic [Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic 3], Axel Holvoet & Nicole Nau (eds), 323–365. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tasmowski, Liliane
1989A look at sembler + infinitive from different Angles. In Sentential Complementation and the Lexicon. Studies in Honour of Wim de Geest, Dany Jaspers, Dany, Wim Klooster, Yvan Putseys & Pieter Seuren (eds), 403–438. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Usonienė, Aurelija & Šinkūnienė, Jolanta
2017Potential vs use: Revisiting an evidential participial construction in Lithuanian. In Evidentiality Revisited: Cognitive Grammar, Functional and Discourse-Pragmatic Perspectives [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 271], Juana I. Marín-Arrese, Gerda Haβler & Marta Carretero (eds), 297–340. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verspoor, Marjolijn
1996The story of –ing: A subjective perspective. In The Construal of Space in Language and Thought, Martin Pütz & René Dirven (eds), 417–454. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000Iconicity in English complement constructions. In Complementation. Cognitive and Functional Perspectives [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 1] Kaoru Horie (ed.), 199–225. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wälchli, Bernhard
2000Infinite predication as a marker of evidentiality and modality in the languages of the Baltic Region. STUF 53(2): 186–210.Google Scholar
Wiemer, Björn
2006Grammatical evidentiality in Lithuanian (A typological assessment). Baltistica 36: 33–49.Google Scholar
2010Hearsay in European languages: Toward an integrative account of grammatical and lexical marking. In Linguistic Realization of Evidentiality in European Languages, Gabriele Diewald & Elena Smirnova, 59–130. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Wiemer, Björn & Stathi, Katerina
2010The database of evidential markers in European languages. A bird’s eye view of the conception of the database (The template and problems hidden beneath it). STUF 63(4): 275–289.Google Scholar
Willett, Thomas
1988A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticization of evidentiality. Studies in Language 12(1): 51–97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Woodcock, Eric Charles
1959A New Latin Syntax. London: Methuen.Google Scholar