Chapter published in:
Explorations in English Historical Syntax
Edited by Hubert Cuyckens, Hendrik De Smet, Liesbet Heyvaert and Charlotte Maekelberghe
[Studies in Language Companion Series 198] 2018
► pp. 23–50

“Permissive” subjects and the decline of adverbial linking in the history of English

| University of Edinburgh
Earlier work by Los and Dreschler (2012) and Komen et al. (2014) offered quantitative evidence of a decline in clause-initial adverbials as discourse linkers in the history of English, and argued that subjects have taken over much of the function of discourse linking that was earlier performed by adverbials. The greater functional load of the subject called for more flexibility in which types of thematic roles could be expressed by subjects, and for more strategies to create subjects, such as crosslinguistically rare passives. The present paper draws attention to another mechanism that facilitates “permissive subjects” in Present-day English: causative/ergative valency alternations of the type Amazon shipped the order/The order has shipped. I present the morphosyntactic origin of the alternation and report in more detail on the workings of discourse linking in Old English texts, explaining why “permissive subjects” were not required at that stage.
Keywords: Old English clause structure, information structure, Old English style, adverbials, subjects, valency
Published online: 13 August 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.198.02los
References

References

Allen, Cynthia L.
1995 Case-marking and Reanalysis: Grammatical Relations from Old to Early Modern English. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bergen, Linda van
2003 Pronouns and Word Order in Old English, with Particular Reference to the Indefinite Pronoun man. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johannsson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finnegan, Edward
1999 The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa & van Kemenade, Ans
2013 Subject positions and information-structural diversification in the history of English. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 10: 17–69.Google Scholar
Birner, Betty & Ward, Gregory
1998 Information Status and Canonical Word Order in English [Studies in Language Companion Series 40]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002 Information packaging. In The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, Rodney Huddleston & Geoffrey K. Pullum (eds), 1363–447. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Bouwmans, Justine
2009 Het zandmannetje is walking naar het water: The spoken description of narratives by Dutch and English speakers and by Dutch students of English. MA thesis, Radboud University Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Brinkmann, Ursula
1997 The Locative Alternation in German: Its Structure and Acquisition [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 15]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
BNC (The British National Corpus), version 3, BNC XML Edition
2007 Distributed by Oxford University Computing Services on behalf of the BNC Consortium. http://​www​.natcorp​.ox​.ac​.uk/
Carroll, Mary & Lambert, Monique
2003 Information structure in narratives and the role of grammaticised knowledge: A study of adult French and German learners of English. In Information Structure and the Dynamics of Language Acquisition [Studies in Bilingualism 26], Christine Dimroth & Marianne Starren (eds), 267–87. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Mary, von Stutterheim, Christiane & Nuese, Ralph
2004 The language and thought debate: A psycholinguistic approach. In Multidisciplinary Approaches to Language Production, Thomas Pechmann & Christopher Habel (eds), 183–218. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L.
1976 Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and point of view. In Subject and Topic, Charles N. Li (ed.), 27–55. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Downing, Angela & Locke, Philip
1995 A University Course in English Grammar. Hemel Hampstead: Phoenix ELT.Google Scholar
Dreschler, Gea
2015 Passives and the Loss of Verb Second: A Study of Syntactic and Information-structural Factors [LOT Dissertations in Linguistics 402]. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Fanego, Teresa
1992 Infinitive Complements in Shakespeare’s English. Santiago de Compostela: Universidade de Santiago de Compostela (Servicio de Publicacións e Intercambio Científico).Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga
1989 The origin and spread of the accusative and infinitive construction in English. Folia Linguistica Historica 8: 143–217.Google Scholar
Francis, Gill & Sinclair, John McHardy
1994 I bet he drinks Carling Black Label: A riposte to Owen on corpus grammar. Applied Linguistics 15: 190–200. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gelderen, Elly van
2011 Valency changes in the history of English. Journal of Historical Linguistics 1(1): 106–143. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haeberli, Eric
2002 Observations on the loss of verb second in the history of English. In Studies in Comparative Germanic syntax: Proceedings from the 15th Workshop on Comparative Germanic Syntax [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 53], C. Jan-Wouter Zwart & Werner Abraham (eds), 245–72. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K.
1967 Notes on transitivity and theme in English (parts I and II). Journal of Linguistics 3: 37–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1968 Notes on transitivity and theme in English (Part III), Journal of Linguistics 4: 153–308. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Härtl, Holden
2003 Conceptual and grammatical characteristics of argument alternations: The case of decausative verbs. Linguistics 41(5): 883–916. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hasselgård, Hilde
2010 Adjunct Adverbials in English. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, John
1986 A Comparative Typology of English and German. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Healey, Antonette diPaolo & Venezky, Richard L.
1985[1980] A Microfiche Concordance to Old English. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.Google Scholar
Hinterhölzl, Roland & Petrova, Svetlana
2010 From V1 to V2 in West Germanic. Lingua 120: 315–328. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K.
2002 The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Hundt, Marianne
2007 English Mediopassive Constructions: A Cognitive, Corpus-based Study of their Origin, Spread, and Current Status. Amsterdam: Rodopi. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ierland, Suzan van
2009 Grammatical Features Influencing Information Structure: The Case of L1 and L2 Dutch and English. Utrecht: Lot Dissertations Series.Google Scholar
James, H. R.
1897 Consolatio Philosophiae. London. Project Gutenburg, HTML conversion.Google Scholar
Kemenade, Ans van
1987 Syntactic Case and Morphological Case in the History of English. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
1997 V2 and embedded topicalisation in Old and Middle English. In Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change, Ans van Kemenade & Nigel Vincent (eds), 326–352. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2000 Jespersen’s cycle revisited: Formal properties of grammaticalization. In Diachronic Syntax: Models and Mechanisms, Susan Pintzuk, George Tsoulas & Anthony Warner (eds), 51–74. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Kemenade, Ans van & Westergaard, Marit
2012 Syntax and information structure: Verb-second variation in Middle English. In Information Structure and Syntactic Change in the History of English, Anneli Meurman-Solin, Maria José López-Couso & Bettelou Los (eds), 87–118. New York NY: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Komen, Erwin, Hebing, Rosanne, Kemenade, Ans van & Los, Bettelou
2014 Quantifying information structure change in English. In Information Structure and Syntactic Change in Germanic and Romance languages [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 213], Kristin Bech & Kristine Gunn Eide (eds), 81–110. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koopman, Willem
1998 Inversion after single and multiple topics in Old English. In Advances in English Historical Linguistics, Jacek Fisiak & Marcin Krygier (eds), 135–149. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Koster, Jan
2008 A reappraisal of classical V2 and scrambling in Dutch. Groninger Arbeiten zur germanistischen Linguistik 46: 27–54.Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred
2007 Basic notions of information structure. In The Notions of Information Structure [Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure 6; Working Papers of The Sonderforschungsbereich 632], Caroline Féry, Gisbert Fanselow & Manfred Krifka (eds), 13–55. Potsdam: Potsdam Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony, Santorini, Beatrice & Diertani, Ariel
2010 Penn Parsed Corpus of Modern British English. http://​www​.ling​.upenn​.edu​/hist​-corpora​/PPCMBE​-RELEASE​-1​/index​.html
Kytö, Merja
1997 Be/Have + past participle: The choice of the auxiliary with intransitives from Late Middle to Modern English. In English in Transition: Corpus-based Studies in Linguistic Variation and Genre Styles, Matti Rissanen & Merja Kytö (eds), 17–86. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levin, Beth
2006 English object alternations: A unified account. Ms, Stanford University. http://​web​.stanford​.edu​/~bclevin​/pubs​.html
Los, Bettelou
2002 The loss of the indefinite pronoun man: Syntactic change and information structure. In English Historical Syntax and Morphology [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 223], Teresa Fanego, María José López-Couso & Javier Pérez-Guerra (eds), 181–202. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005  The Rise of the To-Infinitive . Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009 The consequences of the loss of verb-second in English: Information structure and syntax in interaction. English Language and Linguistics 13(1): 97–125. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 The loss of verb-second and the switch from bounded to unbounded systems. In Information Structure and Syntactic Change in the History of English [Oxford Studies in the History of English], Anneli Meurman-Solin, Maria José López-Couso & Bettelou Los (eds), 21–46. New York NY: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Los, Bettelou & Dreschler, Gea
2012 The loss of local anchoring: From adverbial local anchors to “permissive subjects”. In The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth C. Traugott (eds), 859–871. New York NY: OUP.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Bruce, Ball, Catherine & Cameron, Angus
(eds) 1975 Short titles of Old English texts. Anglo-Saxon England 4: 207–221. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(eds) 1979 Addenda and corrigenda. Anglo-Saxon England 8: 331–333. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Möhlig-Falke, Ruth
2012 The Early English Impersonal Construction: An Analysis of Verbal and Constructional Meaning. New York NY: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
OED Online
2004 Oxford: OUP. http://​www​.oed​.com/> (30 October 2015).
O’Donnell, James J.
(ed.) 1990 Boethius’ Consolatio Philosophiae, 2nd edn (Bryn Mawr Latin Commentaries). Bryn Mawr PA: Bryn Mawr College.Google Scholar
Pérez-Guerra, Javier
2005 Word order after the loss of the verb-second constraint or the importance of early Modern English in the fixation of syntactic and informative (un-)markedness. English Studies 86: 342–69. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pintzuk, Susan & Taylor, Ann
2006 The loss of OV-order in the history of English. In The Handbook of the History of English, Ans van Kemenade & Bettelou Los (eds), 249–78. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Postal, Paul M.
1974 On Raising: One Rule of English Grammar and its Theoretical Implications. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ringe, Don
2006 From Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Germanic: A linguistic history of English I. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rohdenburg, Gunther
1974 Sekundäre Subjektivierungen im Englischen und Deutschen: Vergleichende Untersuchungen zur Verb- und Adjektivsyntax [PAKS-Arbeitsbericht Nr. 8]. Bielefeld: Cornelson-Velhagen and Klasing.Google Scholar
Rydén, Mats & Brorström, Sverker
1987  The be/have Variation with Intransitives in English, with Special Reference to the Late Modern Period [Acta Universitatis Stockholmiensis 70]. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Santos, Diana
1988 An MT prototype from English to Portuguese. IBM report. www​.linguateca​.pt​/Diana​/download​/Santos88IBMThornwood​.pdf
Schler, Jonathan, Koppel, Moshe, Argamon, Schlomo & Pennebaker, James W.
2006 Effects of age and gender on blogging. In Computational Approaches to Analyzing Weblogs: Papers from the 2006 AAAI Spring Symposium, Nicolas Nicolov, Franco Salvetti, Mark Liberman & James H. Martin (eds), 199–205. Menlo Park CA: AAAI Press.Google Scholar
Seoane Posse, Elena
2000 Impersonalising strategies in early Modern English. English Studies 81: 102–116. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Ann & Pintzuk, Susan
2012 The effect of information structure on object position in Old English: A pilot study. In Information Structure and Syntactic Change in the History of English, Anneli Meurman-Solin, Maria José López-Couso & Bettelou Los (eds), 47–65. New York NY: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Travis, Lisa
1984 Parameters and Effects of Word Order Variation. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Van de Velde, Freek
2014 Degeneracy: The maintenance of constructional networks. In The Extending Scope of Construction Grammar, Ronny Boogaart, Timothy Colleman & Gijsbert Rutten (eds), 141–179. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Virtanen, Tuija
1992 Discourse Functions of Adverbial Placement in English: Clause-initial Adverbials of Time and Place in Narratives and Procedural Place Descriptions. Åbo: Åbo Akademi University Press.Google Scholar
Warner, Anthony R.
1982 Complementation in Middle English and the Methodology of Historical Syntax. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
2007 Parameters of variation between verb-subject and subject-verb order in late Middle English. English Language and Linguistics 11: 81–111. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

DRESCHLER, GEA
2020. ‘Fifty pounds will buy me a pair of horses for my carriage’: the history of permissive subjects in English. English Language and Linguistics 24:4 ► pp. 719 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 december 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.