Cover not available
Part of
Explorations in English Historical Syntax
Edited by Hubert Cuyckens, Hendrik De Smet, Liesbet Heyvaert and Charlotte Maekelberghe
[Studies in Language Companion Series 198] 2018
► pp. 23–50

Chapter 1
“Permissive” subjects and the decline of adverbial linking in the history of English

 | University of Edinburgh
Earlier work by Los and Dreschler (2012) and Komen et al. (2014) offered quantitative evidence of a decline in clause-initial adverbials as discourse linkers in the history of English, and argued that subjects have taken over much of the function of discourse linking that was earlier performed by adverbials. The greater functional load of the subject called for more flexibility in which types of thematic roles could be expressed by subjects, and for more strategies to create subjects, such as crosslinguistically rare passives. The present paper draws attention to another mechanism that facilitates “permissive subjects” in Present-day English: causative/ergative valency alternations of the type Amazon shipped the order/The order has shipped. I present the morphosyntactic origin of the alternation and report in more detail on the workings of discourse linking in Old English texts, explaining why “permissive subjects” were not required at that stage.
Keywords: Old English clause structure, information structure, Old English style, adverbials, subjects, valency
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.“Permissive subjects”
  • 3.Adverbial positions and discourse linking in Old English
  • 4.The rise of valency alternations
  • 5.Adverbial discourse links, “late subjects”, and flexible argument structure in PDE
  • 6.Tail–head linking in Dutch and German narratives
  • 7.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 13 August 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.198.02los
References (66)
References
Allen, Cynthia L. 1995. Case-marking and Reanalysis: Grammatical Relations from Old to Early Modern English. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bergen, Linda van. 2003. Pronouns and Word Order in Old English, with Particular Reference to the Indefinite Pronoun man. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johannsson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finnegan, Edward. 1999. The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa & van Kemenade, Ans. 2013. Subject positions and information-structural diversification in the history of English. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 10: 17–69.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Birner, Betty & Ward, Gregory. 1998. Information Status and Canonical Word Order in English [Studies in Language Companion Series 40]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002. Information packaging. In The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, Rodney Huddleston & Geoffrey K. Pullum (eds), 1363–447. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Bouwmans, Justine. 2009. Het zandmannetje is walking naar het water: The spoken description of narratives by Dutch and English speakers and by Dutch students of English. MA thesis, Radboud University Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Brinkmann, Ursula. 1997. The Locative Alternation in German: Its Structure and Acquisition [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 15]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
BNC (The British National Corpus), version 3, BNC XML Edition. 2007. Distributed by Oxford University Computing Services on behalf of the BNC Consortium. <[URL]>
Carroll, Mary & Lambert, Monique. 2003. Information structure in narratives and the role of grammaticised knowledge: A study of adult French and German learners of English. In Information Structure and the Dynamics of Language Acquisition [Studies in Bilingualism 26], Christine Dimroth & Marianne Starren (eds), 267–87. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Mary, von Stutterheim, Christiane & Nuese, Ralph. 2004. The language and thought debate: A psycholinguistic approach. In Multidisciplinary Approaches to Language Production, Thomas Pechmann & Christopher Habel (eds), 183–218. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L. 1976. Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and point of view. In Subject and Topic, Charles N. Li (ed.), 27–55. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Downing, Angela & Locke, Philip. 1995. A University Course in English Grammar. Hemel Hampstead: Phoenix ELT.Google Scholar
Dreschler, Gea. 2015. Passives and the Loss of Verb Second: A Study of Syntactic and Information-structural Factors [LOT Dissertations in Linguistics 402]. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Fanego, Teresa. 1992. Infinitive Complements in Shakespeare’s English. Santiago de Compostela: Universidade de Santiago de Compostela (Servicio de Publicacións e Intercambio Científico).Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga. 1989. The origin and spread of the accusative and infinitive construction in English. Folia Linguistica Historica 8: 143–217.Google Scholar
Francis, Gill & Sinclair, John McHardy. 1994. I bet he drinks Carling Black Label: A riposte to Owen on corpus grammar. Applied Linguistics 15: 190–200. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gelderen, Elly van. 2011. Valency changes in the history of English. Journal of Historical Linguistics 1(1): 106–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haeberli, Eric. 2002. Observations on the loss of verb second in the history of English. In Studies in Comparative Germanic syntax: Proceedings from the 15th Workshop on Comparative Germanic Syntax [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 53], C. Jan-Wouter Zwart & Werner Abraham (eds), 245–72. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. 1967. Notes on transitivity and theme in English (parts I and II). Journal of Linguistics 3: 37–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1968. Notes on transitivity and theme in English (Part III), Journal of Linguistics 4: 153–308. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Härtl, Holden. 2003. Conceptual and grammatical characteristics of argument alternations: The case of decausative verbs. Linguistics 41(5): 883–916. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hasselgård, Hilde. 2010. Adjunct Adverbials in English. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, John. 1986. A Comparative Typology of English and German. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Healey, Antonette diPaolo & Venezky, Richard L. 1985[1980]. A Microfiche Concordance to Old English. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.Google Scholar
Hinterhölzl, Roland & Petrova, Svetlana. 2010. From V1 to V2 in West Germanic. Lingua 120: 315–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K.. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hundt, Marianne. 2007. English Mediopassive Constructions: A Cognitive, Corpus-based Study of their Origin, Spread, and Current Status. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ierland, Suzan van. 2009. Grammatical Features Influencing Information Structure: The Case of L1 and L2 Dutch and English. Utrecht: Lot Dissertations Series.Google Scholar
James, H. R. 1897. Consolatio Philosophiae. London. Project Gutenburg, HTML conversion.Google Scholar
Kemenade, Ans van. 1987. Syntactic Case and Morphological Case in the History of English. Dordrecht: Foris.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1997. V2 and embedded topicalisation in Old and Middle English. In Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change, Ans van Kemenade & Nigel Vincent (eds), 326–352. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
. 2000. Jespersen’s cycle revisited: Formal properties of grammaticalization. In Diachronic Syntax: Models and Mechanisms, Susan Pintzuk, George Tsoulas & Anthony Warner (eds), 51–74. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Kemenade, Ans van & Westergaard, Marit. 2012. Syntax and information structure: Verb-second variation in Middle English. In Information Structure and Syntactic Change in the History of English, Anneli Meurman-Solin, Maria José López-Couso & Bettelou Los (eds), 87–118. New York NY: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Komen, Erwin, Hebing, Rosanne, Kemenade, Ans van & Los, Bettelou. 2014. Quantifying information structure change in English. In Information Structure and Syntactic Change in Germanic and Romance languages [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 213], Kristin Bech & Kristine Gunn Eide (eds), 81–110. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koopman, Willem. 1998. Inversion after single and multiple topics in Old English. In Advances in English Historical Linguistics, Jacek Fisiak & Marcin Krygier (eds), 135–149. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Koster, Jan. 2008. A reappraisal of classical V2 and scrambling in Dutch. Groninger Arbeiten zur germanistischen Linguistik 46: 27–54.Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred. 2007. Basic notions of information structure. In The Notions of Information Structure [Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure 6; Working Papers of The Sonderforschungsbereich 632], Caroline Féry, Gisbert Fanselow & Manfred Krifka (eds), 13–55. Potsdam: Potsdam Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony, Santorini, Beatrice & Diertani, Ariel. 2010. Penn Parsed Corpus of Modern British English. <[URL]>
Kytö, Merja. 1997. Be/Have + past participle: The choice of the auxiliary with intransitives from Late Middle to Modern English. In English in Transition: Corpus-based Studies in Linguistic Variation and Genre Styles, Matti Rissanen & Merja Kytö (eds), 17–86. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levin, Beth. 2006. English object alternations: A unified account. Ms, Stanford University. <[URL]>
Los, Bettelou. 2002. The loss of the indefinite pronoun man: Syntactic change and information structure. In English Historical Syntax and Morphology [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 223], Teresa Fanego, María José López-Couso & Javier Pérez-Guerra (eds), 181–202. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. The Rise of the To-Infinitive . Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. The consequences of the loss of verb-second in English: Information structure and syntax in interaction. English Language and Linguistics 13(1): 97–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. The loss of verb-second and the switch from bounded to unbounded systems. In Information Structure and Syntactic Change in the History of English [Oxford Studies in the History of English], Anneli Meurman-Solin, Maria José López-Couso & Bettelou Los (eds), 21–46. New York NY: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Los, Bettelou & Dreschler, Gea. 2012. The loss of local anchoring: From adverbial local anchors to “permissive subjects”. In The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth C. Traugott (eds), 859–871. New York NY: OUP.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Bruce, Ball, Catherine & Cameron, Angus (eds). 1975. Short titles of Old English texts. Anglo-Saxon England 4: 207–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(eds). 1979. Addenda and corrigenda. Anglo-Saxon England 8: 331–333. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Möhlig-Falke, Ruth. 2012. The Early English Impersonal Construction: An Analysis of Verbal and Constructional Meaning. New York NY: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
OED Online. 2004. Oxford: OUP. <[URL]> (30 October 2015).
O’Donnell, James J. (ed.). 1990. Boethius’ Consolatio Philosophiae, 2nd edn (Bryn Mawr Latin Commentaries). Bryn Mawr PA: Bryn Mawr College.Google Scholar
Pérez-Guerra, Javier. 2005. Word order after the loss of the verb-second constraint or the importance of early Modern English in the fixation of syntactic and informative (un-)markedness. English Studies 86: 342–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pintzuk, Susan & Taylor, Ann. 2006. The loss of OV-order in the history of English. In The Handbook of the History of English, Ans van Kemenade & Bettelou Los (eds), 249–78. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Postal, Paul M. 1974. On Raising: One Rule of English Grammar and its Theoretical Implications. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ringe, Don. 2006. From Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Germanic: A linguistic history of English I. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rohdenburg, Gunther. 1974. Sekundäre Subjektivierungen im Englischen und Deutschen: Vergleichende Untersuchungen zur Verb- und Adjektivsyntax [PAKS-Arbeitsbericht Nr. 8]. Bielefeld: Cornelson-Velhagen and Klasing.Google Scholar
Rydén, Mats & Brorström, Sverker. 1987. The be/have Variation with Intransitives in English, with Special Reference to the Late Modern Period [Acta Universitatis Stockholmiensis 70]. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Santos, Diana. 1988. An MT prototype from English to Portuguese. IBM report. <[URL]>
Schler, Jonathan, Koppel, Moshe, Argamon, Schlomo & Pennebaker, James W. 2006. Effects of age and gender on blogging. In Computational Approaches to Analyzing Weblogs: Papers from the 2006 AAAI Spring Symposium, Nicolas Nicolov, Franco Salvetti, Mark Liberman & James H. Martin (eds), 199–205. Menlo Park CA: AAAI Press.Google Scholar
Seoane Posse, Elena. 2000. Impersonalising strategies in early Modern English. English Studies 81: 102–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Ann & Pintzuk, Susan. 2012. The effect of information structure on object position in Old English: A pilot study. In Information Structure and Syntactic Change in the History of English, Anneli Meurman-Solin, Maria José López-Couso & Bettelou Los (eds), 47–65. New York NY: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Travis, Lisa. 1984. Parameters and Effects of Word Order Variation. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Van de Velde, Freek, 2014. Degeneracy: The maintenance of constructional networks. In The Extending Scope of Construction Grammar, Ronny Boogaart, Timothy Colleman & Gijsbert Rutten (eds), 141–179. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Virtanen, Tuija. 1992. Discourse Functions of Adverbial Placement in English: Clause-initial Adverbials of Time and Place in Narratives and Procedural Place Descriptions. Åbo: Åbo Akademi University Press.Google Scholar
Warner, Anthony R. 1982. Complementation in Middle English and the Methodology of Historical Syntax. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
2007. Parameters of variation between verb-subject and subject-verb order in late Middle English. English Language and Linguistics 11: 81–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

LOS, BETTELOU, GEA DRESCHLER, ANS VAN KEMENADE, ERWIN KOMEN & STEFANO CORETTA
2023. The decline of local anchoring: a quantitative investigation. English Language and Linguistics 27:2 ► pp. 345 ff. DOI logo
DRESCHLER, GEA
2020. ‘Fifty pounds will buy me a pair of horses for my carriage’: the history of permissive subjects in English. English Language and Linguistics 24:4 ► pp. 719 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.