Cover not available
Part of
Explorations in English Historical Syntax
Edited by Hubert Cuyckens, Hendrik De Smet, Liesbet Heyvaert and Charlotte Maekelberghe
[Studies in Language Companion Series 198] 2018
► pp. 139–158

Chapter 5
Causative make and its infinitival complements in Early Modern English

| Kyoto University
The present paper discusses the variability between to- and bare infinitives in the complement of causative make in Early Modern English, with a focus on make used in the active voice. Although bare infinitives are almost exclusively used with active causative make in Present-day English, this has not always been the case in the history of English. Throughout the Early Modern English period, to-infinitives were still encountered to a noticeable extent. Moreover, various linguistic factors were relevant to the choice of to- and bare infinitives. The present paper examines complexity in general, the objects/causees of make, coordination of infinitives, and lexical items used as infinitives.
Keywords: causative make , complementation, bare infinitives, to-infinitives, complexity
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Data and methods
  • 3.Causative make plus to- and bare infinitives in Early Modern English: A historical overview
  • 4.Linguistic factors affecting the choice of to- and bare infinitives
    • 4.1Preliminary remarks
    • 4.2Complexity in general
    • 4.3The object/causee of make
    • 4.4Coordination of infinitives
    • 4.5Infinitives of different verbs
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 13 August 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.198.06iye
References (24)
References
Andersson, Evert. 1985. On Verb Complementation in Written English. Malmö: CWK Gleerup.Google Scholar
Ando, Sadao. 1976. A Descriptive Syntax of Christopher Marlowe’s Language. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar
Egan, Thomas. 2008. Non-finite Complementation: A Usage-based Study of Infinitive and -ing Clauses in English . Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fanego, Teresa. 1994. Infinitive marking in Early Modern English. In English Historical Linguistics 1992: Papers from the 7th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics, Valencia, 22–26 September 1992 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 113], Francisco Fernández, Miguel Fuster & Juan José Calvo (eds), 191–203. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1996. Verbal complementation in early ME: How do the infinitives fit in? In English Historical Linguistics 1994: Papers from the 8th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (8 ICEHL, Edinburgh, 19–23 September 1994) [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 135], Derek Britton (ed.), 247–270. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1997. Infinitive marking in Late Middle English: Transitivity and changes in the English system of case. In Studies in Middle English Linguistics, Jacek Fisiak (ed.), 109–134. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1991. Isomorphism in the grammatical code: Cognitive and biological consideration. Studies in Language 15: 85–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iyeiri, Yoko. 2010. Verbs of Implicit Negation and Their Complements in the History of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins & Tokyo: Yushodo Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Early Modern English prose selections: Directions in historical corpus linguistics. Memoirs of the Faculty of Letters, Kyoto University 50: 133–199.Google Scholar
. 2012. The complements of causative make in Late Middle English. In Middle and Modern English Corpus Linguistics: A Multi-dimensional Approach [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 50], Manfred Markus, Yoko Iyeiri, Reinhard Heuberger & Emil Chamson (eds), 59–73. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1987. On theory and interpretation. In The Linguistics of Writing: Arguments between Language and Literature, Nigel Fabb, Derek Attridge, Alan Durant & Colin MacCabe (eds), 185–198. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Los, Bettelou. 2005. The Rise of the To-Infinitive . Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lowrey, Brian. 2013. Syntactic and semantic variation: Middle English causatives and complement types. In Periphrasis, Replacement and Renewal: Studies in English Historical Linguistics, Irén Hegedűs & Dóra Pődör (eds), 92–124. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Mustanoja, Tauno F. 1960. A Middle English Syntax, Part 1: Parts of Speech. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Rohdenburg, Günter. 1995. On the replacement of finite complement clauses by infinitives in English. English Studies 76: 367–388. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1996. Cognitive complexity and increased grammatical explicitness in English. Cognitive Linguistics 7: 149–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1998. Syntactic complexity and the variable use of to be in 16th to 18th century English. Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik 23: 199–228.Google Scholar
. 2000. The complexity principle as a factor determining grammatical variation and change in English. In Language Use, Language Acquisition and Language History: (Mostly) Empirical Studies in Honour of Rüdiger Zimmermann, Ingo Plag & Klaus Peter Schneider (eds), 25–44. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.Google Scholar
Rohdenburg, Günter & Schlüter, Julia. 2000. Determinanten grammatischer Variation im Früh- und Spätneuenglischen. Sprachwissenschaft 25: 443–496.Google Scholar
Sawada, Mayumi. 1997. Causative verbs in Chaucer. ERA (The English Research Association of Hiroshima) 15: 1–16.Google Scholar
Schlüter, Julia. 2005. Rhythmic Grammar: The Influence of Rhythm on Grammatical Variation and Change in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Svartvik, Jan & Quirk, Randolph. 1970. Types and uses of non-finite clause in Chaucer. English Studies 51: 393–411. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sugiyama, Ryuichi. 1988. Jugo seiki sanbun no shieki kobun niokeru futeishi hyoshiki nitsuite (On the marker of the infinitive governed by causative verbs in fifteenth-century prose). Studies in Medieval English Language and Literature 3: 43–55.Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Rohdenburg, Günter
2021. Ambiguity Avoidance by Means of Function Words in English? Providing Additional Corpus-based Counterevidence. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 69:3 ► pp. 207 ff. DOI logo
Tichý, Ondřej
2021. Corpus driven identification of lexical bundle obsolescence in Late Modern English. In Lost in Change [Studies in Language Companion Series, 218], ► pp. 101 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Corpus driven identification of lexical bundle obsolescence in Late Modern English. In Lost in Change [Studies in Language Companion Series, 218], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.