Chapter published in:
Explorations in English Historical Syntax
Edited by Hubert Cuyckens, Hendrik De Smet, Liesbet Heyvaert and Charlotte Maekelberghe
[Studies in Language Companion Series 198] 2018
► pp. 139158
References

References

Andersson, Evert
1985On Verb Complementation in Written English. Malmö: CWK Gleerup.Google Scholar
Ando, Sadao
1976A Descriptive Syntax of Christopher Marlowe’s Language. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar
Egan, Thomas
2008 Non-finite Complementation: A Usage-based Study of Infinitive and -ing Clauses in English . Amsterdam: Rodopi. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fanego, Teresa
1994Infinitive marking in Early Modern English. In English Historical Linguistics 1992: Papers from the 7th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics, Valencia, 22–26 September 1992 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 113], Francisco Fernández, Miguel Fuster & Juan José Calvo (eds), 191–203. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Olga
1995The distinction between to and bare infinitival complements in Late Middle English. Diachronica 12: 1–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1996Verbal complementation in early ME: How do the infinitives fit in? In English Historical Linguistics 1994: Papers from the 8th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (8 ICEHL, Edinburgh, 19–23 September 1994) [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 135], Derek Britton (ed.), 247–270. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997Infinitive marking in Late Middle English: Transitivity and changes in the English system of case. In Studies in Middle English Linguistics, Jacek Fisiak (ed.), 109–134. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1991Isomorphism in the grammatical code: Cognitive and biological consideration. Studies in Language 15: 85–114. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Iyeiri, Yoko
2010Verbs of Implicit Negation and Their Complements in the History of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins & Tokyo: Yushodo Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Early Modern English prose selections: Directions in historical corpus linguistics. Memoirs of the Faculty of Letters, Kyoto University 50: 133–199.Google Scholar
2012The complements of causative make in Late Middle English. In Middle and Modern English Corpus Linguistics: A Multi-dimensional Approach [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 50], Manfred Markus, Yoko Iyeiri, Reinhard Heuberger & Emil Chamson (eds), 59–73. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul
1987On theory and interpretation. In The Linguistics of Writing: Arguments between Language and Literature, Nigel Fabb, Derek Attridge, Alan Durant & Colin MacCabe (eds), 185–198. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Los, Bettelou
2005The Rise of the To-Infinitive. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lowrey, Brian
2013Syntactic and semantic variation: Middle English causatives and complement types. In Periphrasis, Replacement and Renewal: Studies in English Historical Linguistics, Irén Hegedűs & Dóra Pődör (eds), 92–124. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Mustanoja, Tauno F.
1960A Middle English Syntax, Part 1: Parts of Speech. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Rohdenburg, Günter
1995On the replacement of finite complement clauses by infinitives in English. English Studies 76: 367–388. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1996Cognitive complexity and increased grammatical explicitness in English. Cognitive Linguistics 7: 149–182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1998Syntactic complexity and the variable use of to be in 16th to 18th century English. Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik 23: 199–228.Google Scholar
2000The complexity principle as a factor determining grammatical variation and change in English. In Language Use, Language Acquisition and Language History: (Mostly) Empirical Studies in Honour of Rüdiger Zimmermann, Ingo Plag & Klaus Peter Schneider (eds), 25–44. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.Google Scholar
Rohdenburg, Günter & Schlüter, Julia
2000Determinanten grammatischer Variation im Früh- und Spätneuenglischen. Sprachwissenschaft 25: 443–496.Google Scholar
Sawada, Mayumi
1997Causative verbs in Chaucer. ERA (The English Research Association of Hiroshima) 15: 1–16.Google Scholar
Schlüter, Julia
2005Rhythmic Grammar: The Influence of Rhythm on Grammatical Variation and Change in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Svartvik, Jan & Quirk, Randolph
1970Types and uses of non-finite clause in Chaucer. English Studies 51: 393–411. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sugiyama, Ryuichi
1988Jugo seiki sanbun no shieki kobun niokeru futeishi hyoshiki nitsuite (On the marker of the infinitive governed by causative verbs in fifteenth-century prose). Studies in Medieval English Language and Literature 3: 43–55.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

No author info given
2021.  In Lost in Change [Studies in Language Companion Series, 218], Crossref logo
Rohdenburg, Günter
2021. Ambiguity Avoidance by Means of Function Words in English? Providing Additional Corpus-based Counterevidence. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 69:3  pp. 207 ff. Crossref logo
Tichý, Ondřej
2021.  In Lost in Change [Studies in Language Companion Series, 218],  pp. 101 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.