Part of
Explorations in English Historical Syntax
Edited by Hubert Cuyckens, Hendrik De Smet, Liesbet Heyvaert and Charlotte Maekelberghe
[Studies in Language Companion Series 198] 2018
► pp. 179202
References
Bäcklund, Ingegerd
1984 Conjunction-headed Abbreviated Clauses in English . Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis [ Studia Anglistica Upsaliensia 50]. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Berent, Gerald P.
1973Absolute constructions as ‘subordinate clauses’. In You Take the High Node and I’ll Take the Low Node: Papers from the Comparative Syntax Festival, Claudia Corum, Cedric Smith-Stark & Ann Weiser (eds), 147–154. Chicago IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Beukema, Frits H.
1982On the internal structure of free adjuncts. In Linguistics in the Netherlands 1982, Saskia Daalder & Marinel Gerritsen (eds), 71–82. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Bouzada-Jabois, Carla & Pérez-Guerra, Javier
2014Regularising the nonfinite periphery in English: Absolutes, free adjuncts and constructionalisation in Modern English. Paper delivered at the 38th International Conference of AEDEAN, Alcalá de Henares, 12–14 November.
Breivik, Leiv Egil & Swan, Toril
1994Initial adverbials and word order in English with special reference to the Early Modern English Period. In Studies in Early Modern English, Dieter Kastovsky (ed.), 11–43. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace
1984How people use adverbial clauses. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Claudia Brugman & Monica Macaulay (eds), 437–449. Berkeley CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan & Kytö, Merja
2010Early Modern English Dialogues: Spoken Interaction as Writing. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Curme, George O.
1947English Grammar. New York NY: Barnes & Noble.Google Scholar
Declerck, Renaat
1991A Comprehensive Descriptive Grammar of English. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
De Smet, Hendrik
2010English -ing-clauses and their problems: The structure of grammatical categories. Linguistics 48(6): 1153–1193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014Constrained confusion: The gerund/participle distinction in Late Modern English. In Late Modern English Syntax, Marianne Hundt (ed.), 224–238. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dik, Simon C.
1997The Theory of Functional Grammar, Part 2: Complex and Derived Constructions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fonteyn, Lauren & van de Pol, Nikki
2016Divide and conquer: The formation and functional dynamics of the Modern English ing-clause network. English Language and Linguistics 20(2): 185–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hasselgård, Hilde
2010Adjunct Adverbials in English. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1995The converb as a cross-linguistically valid category. In Converbs in cross-linguistic perspective: Structure and Meaning of Adverbial Verb Forms – Adverbial Participles and Gerunds, Martin Haspelmath & Ekkehard König (eds), 1–55. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K.
2002The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Killie, Kristin & Swan, Toril
2009The grammaticalization and subjectification of adverbial -ing (converb clauses) in English. English Language and Linguistics 13: 337–363. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd
1991Free Adjuncts and Absolutes in English: Problems of Control and Interpretation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1995Adverbial participial clauses in English. In Converbs in cross-linguistic perspective: Structure and Meaning of Adverbial Verb Forms – Adverbial Participles and Gerunds, Martin Haspelmath & Ekkehard König (eds), 189–237. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony, Santorini, Beatrice & Diertani, Ariel
(comp.) 2010Penn Parsed Corpus of Modern British English.Google Scholar
Kruisinga, Etsko
1932A Handbook of Present Day English, Vol. II: English Accidence and Syntax 3. Groningen: P. Noordhoff.Google Scholar
Pérez-Guerra, Javier
1999Historical English Syntax: A Statistical Corpus-based Study on the Organisation of Early Modern English Sentences. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Pérez-Guerra, Javier & Bouzada-Jabois, Carla
2015Patterning verbal absolutes and free adjuncts in Contemporary English, with a grain of history. Paper delivered at the 6th Biennial International Conference on the Linguistics of Contemporary English (B-ICLCE 6), Madison, WI, 19–23 August.
Pérez Quintero, María Jesús
2002Adverbial Subordination in English: A Functional Approach. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Río-Rey, Carmen
2002Subject control and coreference in Early Modern English free adjuncts and absolutes. English Language and Linguistics 6(2): 309–323. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stump, Gregory T.
1985The Semantic Variability of Absolute Constructions. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A.
1983Grammar and discourse: The English detached participial clause. In Discourse Perspectives on Syntax, Flora Klein-Andreu (ed.), 43–65. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
van de Pol, Nikki & Cuyckens, Hubert
2013Gradualness in change in English augmented absolutes. In Synchrony and Diachrony: A Dynamic Interface [Studies in Language Companion Series 133], Anna Giacalone Ramat, Caterina Mauri & Piera Molinelli (eds), 341–366. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Visser, Fredericus Theodorus
1972An Historical Syntax of the English Language, Part two: Syntactical Units with One Verb. Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Varga, Mónika
2020. Funkcionális variáció és átmenetiség a határozói igenevek köréből. Jelentés és Nyelvhasználat 7:1  pp. 75 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 march 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.