Chapter published in:
Information Structure in Lesser-described Languages: Studies in prosody and syntax
Edited by Evangelia Adamou, Katharina Haude and Martine Vanhove
[Studies in Language Companion Series 199] 2018
► pp. 85118
References

References

Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar
2016Intonation Units Revisited. Ccesuras in Talk-in-interaction [Studies in Language and Social Interaction 29]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beckman, Mary E. & Edwards, Jan
1990Lengthenings and shortenings and the nature of prosodic constituency. In Papers in Laboratory Phonology, I: Between the Grammar and Physics of Speech, John Kingston & Mary E. Beckman (eds), 152–178. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beckman, Mary E. & Pierrehumbert, Janet B.
1986Intonational structure in Japanese and English. Phonology Yearbook 3: 255–309.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berrendonner, Alain
1990Pour une macro-syntaxe. Travaux de Linguistique 21: 25–36.Google Scholar
Blanche-Benveniste, Claire
2000Le français parlé: Un regard sur sa syntaxe. In Histoire de la langue française 1945–2000, Gérald Antoine & Bernard Cerquiglini (eds), 195–197. Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David
2015Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer. Version 5.4.09. [Computer Program]. http://​www​.praat​.org
Brazil, David
1997The Communicative Value of Intonation in English. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Büring, Daniel
2003On D-trees, beans, and B-accents. Linguistics and Philosophy 26(5): 511–545.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Caron, Bernard, Lux, Cécile, Manfredi, Stefano & Pereira, Christophe
2015The intonation of topic and focus: Zaar (Nigeria), Tripoli Arabic (Lybia), Juba Arabic (South Sudan) and Tamasheq (Niger). In Corpus-based Studies of Lesser-described Languages: The CorpAfroAs Corpus of Spoken AfroAsiatic Languages [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 68], Amina Mettouchi, Martine Vanhove & Dominique Caubet (eds), 63–115. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace
1980The deployment of consciousness in the production of narrative. In The Pear Stories. Cognitive, Cultural, and Linguistic Aspects of Narrative Production, Wallace Chafe (ed.), 9–50. Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
1994Discourse, Consciousness, and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, William E., Eady, Stephen J. & Mueller, Pamela R.
1985Acoustical aspects of contrastive stress in question-answer contexts. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 77: 2142–2156.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cresti, Emanuela
2000Corpus di italiano parlato, Vol. I-II, CD-ROM. Firenze: Accademia della Crusca.Google Scholar
Cresti, Emanuela & Moneglia, Massimo
2010Informational patterning theory and the corpus based description of spoken language. The compositionality issue in the topic comment pattern. In Bootstrapping Information from Corpora in a Cross Linguistic Perspective, Massimo Moneglia & Alessandro Panunzi (eds), 13–46. Firenze: FUP.Google Scholar
Cruttenden, Alan
1997Intonation. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crystal, David
1969Prosodic Systems and Intonation in English. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2003A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics, 5th edn. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dik, Simon C.
1997The Theory of Functional Grammar, Part 1: The Structure of the Clause, 2nd edn [Functional Grammar Series 20], Kees Hengeveld (ed.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Downing, Pamela & Noonan, Michael
(eds) 1995Word Order in Discourse [Typological Studies in Language 30]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W.
1991Transcription design principles for spoken discourse research. Pragmatics 1: 71–106.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W., Chafe, Wallace, Thompson, Sandra A. & Meyers, Charles
2000Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English, Part I. DVD. Philadelphia PA: Linguistic Data Consortium.Google Scholar
Ewing, Michael
2005Hierarchical constituency in conversational language: The case of Cirebon Javanese. Studies in Language 29(1): 89–112.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Firbas, Jan
1964On defining the theme in functional sentence analysis. Travaux Linguistiques de Prague 1: 267–280.Google Scholar
Fletcher, Janet
2014Intonation and prosody in Dalabon. In Prosodic Typology II, Sun-Ah Jun (ed.), 252–272. Oxford: OUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Antony
2000Prosodic Features and Prosodic Structure: The Phonology of Suprasegmentals. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Frascarelli, Mara & Hinterhölzl, Roland
2007Types of topics in German and Italian. In On Information Structure, Meaning and Form: Generalisations Across Languages [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 100], Kerstin Schwabe & Susanne Winkler (eds), 87–116. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Genetti, Carol
2007A Reference Grammar of Dolakha Newar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, Michelle L. & Michaelis, Laura A.
2001Topicalization and left dislocation: A functional opposition revisited. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 1665–1706.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gundel, Jeanette K., Hedberg, Nancy & Zacharski, Ron
1993Cognitive status and he form of referring expressions in discourse. Language 69: 274–307.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gundel, Jeanette K.
1985Shared knowledge and topicality. Journal of Pragmatics 9: 83–107 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1988Universals of topic-comment structure. In Studies in Syntactic Typology [Typologial Studies in Language 17], Michael Hammond, Edith A. Moravcsik & Jessica Wirth (eds), 209–242. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K.
1967Notes on transitivity and theme in English, Parts 1 and 2. Journal of Linguistics 3: 37–81, 199–244.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heath, Jeffrey G.
1984Functional Grammar of Nunggubuyu. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
1985Discourse in the field: Clause structure in Ngandi. In Grammar Inside and Outside the Clause: Some Approaches to Theory from the Field, Johanna Nichols & Anthony C. Woodbury (eds), 89–110. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P., Sandler, Meytal, Strunk, Jan & Volker Unterladstetter
. Submitted. On the robustness of intonational phrases in spontaneous speech – a cross-linguistic interrater study. http://​ifl​.phil​-fak​.uni​-koeln​.de​/28387​.html​?&L​=1> (21 December 2017)
Hirst, Daniel & Di Cristo, Albert
(eds) 1998Intonation Systems. A Survey of Twenty Languages. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Holzgrefe-Lang, Julia, Wellmann, Caroline, Petrone, Caterina, Räling, Romy, Truckenbrodt, Hubert, Höhle, Barbara, & Wartenburger, Isabell
2016How pitch change and final lengthening cue boundary perception in German: Converging evidence from ERPs and prosodic judgments. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 31: 904–920.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ishihara, Shunichi
2004An Acoustic Phonetic Descriptive Analysis of Kagoshima Japanese Tonal Phenomena. PhD dissertation, the Australian National University.Google Scholar
Iwasaki, Shoichi
1993The structure of the intonation unit in Japanese. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 3: 39–53.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Joachim
2001The dimensions of topic-comment. Linguistics 39(4): 641–681.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Caroline
1995Draft sketch grammar of Ngarinyman [Ngarinyman], ms. https://​trove​.nla​.gov​.au​/work​/33785844​?q​&versionId​=41559251 (14 May 2018)
Krifka, Manfred
2007Basic notions of information structure. Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure (ISIS) 6: 13–55.Google Scholar
Ladd Jr., D. Robert
1980The Structure of Intonational Meaning: Evidence from English. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter & Maddieson, Ian
1986Some of the sounds of the world’s languages: Preliminary version. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 64.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud
1994Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1997Constituency, dependency, and conceptual grouping. Cognitive Linguistics 8(1): 1–32.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laughren, Mary
2002Syntactic constraints in a “free word order” language. In Language Universals and Variation, Mengistu Amberber & Peter Collins (eds), 83–130. Westport CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Legate, Julie Anne
2008Warlpiri and the theory of second position clitics. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 26(1): 3–60.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lehiste, Ilse
1965The function of quantity in Finnish and Estonian. Language 41: 447–456.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, Philip
1967Intonation, Perception, and Language. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Liberman, Mark Y. & Sag, Ivan A.
1974Prosodic form and discourse function. Chicago Linguistics Society 10: 416–427.Google Scholar
Liu, Fang, Xu, Yi, Prom-on, Santitham & Yu, Alan C. L.
2013Morpheme like prosodic functions: Evidence from acoustic analysis and computational modelling. Journal of Speech Sciences, 3(1), 85–140.Google Scholar
Martin, Philippe
2015The Structure of Spoken Language. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maslova, Elena & Bernini, Giuliano
2006Sentence topics in the languages of Europe and beyond. In Pragmatic Organization of Discourse in the Languages of Europe: EUROTYP, Giuliano Bernini & Marcia L. Schwartz (eds), 67–120. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McConvell, Patrick & Laughren, Mary
2004Ngumpin-Yapa Languages. In Australian Languages: Reconstruction and Subgrouping [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 249], Harold Koch & Claire Bowern (eds), 151–177. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McConvell, Patrick
1980Hierarchical variation in pronominal clitic attachment in the Eastern Ngumpin languages. In Papers in Australian Linguistics No. 13, Bruce Rigsby & Peter Sutton (eds), 31–117. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
1996The functions of split-Wackernagel clitic systems: Pronominal clitics in the Ngumpin languages (Pama-Nyungan family, Northern Australia). In Approaching Second: Second Position Clitics and Related Phenomena [CSLI Lecture Notes 61], Aaron L. Halpern & Arnold M. Zwicky (eds), 299–331. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Meakins, Felicity & Nordlinger, Rachel
2013A Grammar of Bilinarra, an Australian Aboriginal Language of the Victoria River District (NT). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Mertens, Piet
2006A predictive approach to the analysis of intonation in discourse in French. In Prosody and Syntax. Cross-linguistic Perspectives [Usage-Based Linguistic Informatics 3], Yuji Kawaguchi, Ivan Fónagy & Tsunekazu Moriguchi (eds), 64–101. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mettouchi, Amina, Lacheret-Dujour, Anne, Silber-Varod, Vered & Izre’el, Shlomo
2008Only prosody? Perception of speech segmentation in Kabyle and Hebrew. Nouveaux Cahiers de Linguistique Française 28: 207–218.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne
1987Is basic word order universal? In Coherence and Grounding in Discourse [Typological Studies in Language 11], Russel S. Tomlin (ed.), 281–328. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Reprinted 1995 in Pragmatics of Word Order Flexibility [Typological Studies in Language 11], Doris Payne (ed.), 15–61. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Jim & Weinert, Regina
1998/2009Spontaneous Spoken Language. Syntax and Discourse. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Molnár, Valeria
2006On different kinds of contrast. In The Architecture of Focus, Valeria Molnár & Susanne Winkler (eds), 197–233. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mushin, Ilana
2006Motivations for second position: Evidence from North-Central Australia. Linguistic Typology 10: 287–326.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mushin, Ilana & Baker, Brett
(eds) 2008Discourse and Grammar in Australian Languages [Studies in Language Companion Series 104], 25–58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet
1980The Phonology and Phonetics of English Intonation. PhD dissertation, MIT. Distributed 1988, Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Pike, Kenneth L.
1946The Intonation of American English. Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Raso, Tommaso & Mello, Heliana
(eds) 2014Spoken Corpora and Linguistic Studies [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 61]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya
1981Pragmatics and linguistics: An analysis of sentence topics. Philosophica 27: 53–94.Google Scholar
Rooth, Mats
1985Association with Focus. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
1992A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1: 75–116.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schultze-Berndt, Eva
2002Constructions in language description. Functions of Language 9: 267–308.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth O.
1986On derived domains in sentence phonology. Phonology Yearbook 3: 371–405.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Siebenhaar, Beat & Leemann, Adrian
2012: Methodological reflections on the phonetic – phonological continuum, illustrated on the prosody of Swiss German dialects. In Methods in Contemporary Linguistics [Trends in Linguistics 247], Andrea Ender, Adrian Leemann & Bernhard Wälchli (eds), 21–44. Berlin: De Gruyter CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Simard, Candide
2010The Prosodic Contours of Jaminjung, a Language of Northern Australia. PhD dissertation, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Simpson, Jane
2007Expressing pragmatic constraints on word order in Warlpiri. In Architectures, Rules, and Preferences. Variations on Themes by Joan W. Bresnan, Annie Zaenen, Jane Simpson, Tracy Holloway King, Jane Grimshaw & Joan Maling (eds), 403–427. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Simpson, Jane & Mushin, Ilana
2008Clause-initial position in four Australian languages. In Mushin & Baker (eds), 25–58.Google Scholar
Steedman, Mark
2000Information structure and the syntax-phonology interface. Linguistic Inquiry 31: 649–689.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Szczepek Reed, Beatrice
2010Prosody, syntax and action formation: Intonation phrases and action components. In Prosody and Visual Signals. Approaches Towards Usage-based Grammar Theories, Pia Bergmann, Jana Brenning, Martin Pfeiffer & Elisabeth Reber (eds). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Turk, Alice, Satsuki, Nakai & Sugahara, Mariko
2006Acoustic segment durations in prosodic research: A practical guide. In Methods in Empirical Prosody Research, Stefan Sudhoff, Denisa Lenertová, Roland Meyer, Sandra Pappert, Petra Augurzky, Ina Mleinek, Nicole Richter & Johannes Schließer (eds), 1–28. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vaissière, Jacqueline
1983Language-independent prosodic features. In Prosody: Models and Measurements, Anne Cutler & D. Robert Ladd Jr. (eds), 53–66. Berlin: Springer.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vaissière, Jacqueline & Michaud, Alexis
2006Prosodic constituents in French: A data-driven approach. In Prosody and Syntax. Cross-linguistic Perspectives [Usage-Based Linguistic Informatics 3], Yuji Kawaguchi, Ivan Fónagy & Tsunekazu Moriguchi (eds), 47–64. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vallduví, Enric & Engdahl, Elisabet
1996The linguistic realization of information packaging. Linguistics 34: 459–510.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vermeulen, R.
2013On the position of topics in Japanese. Linguistic Review 30(1): 117–159.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, Michael & Crivellaro, Serena
2010Relative prosodic boundary strength and prior bias in disambiguation. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2010. Chicago IL: University of Illinois.Google Scholar
Wichmann, Anne
2000Intonation in Text and Discourse. London: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Xu, Yi
1999Effects of tone and focus on the formation and alignment of f0 contours. Journal of Phonetics 27: 55–105.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005Speech melody as articulatorily implemented communicative functions. Speech Communication 46: 220–251.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013ProsodyPro: A tool for large scale systematic prosody analysis. In Proceedings of Tools and Resources for the Analysis of Speech Prosody (TRASP 2013), Brigitte Bigl & Daniel Hirst (eds), 7–10. Aix-en-Provence: Laboratoise Parole et Langue.Google Scholar
Xu, Yi & Prom-on, Santitham
2014Toward invariant functional representations of variable surface fundamental frequency contours: Synthesizing speech melody via model-based stochastic learning. Speech Communication 57: 181–208.CrossrefGoogle Scholar