Chapter published in:
Information Structure in Lesser-described Languages: Studies in prosody and syntax
Edited by Evangelia Adamou, Katharina Haude and Martine Vanhove
[Studies in Language Companion Series 199] 2018
► pp. 245264
References

References

Campbell, Lyle, Kaufman, Terrence & Smith-Stark, Thomas
1986Meso-America as a linguistic area. Language 62(3): 530–570.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Declerck, Renaat
1988Studies on Copular Sentences, Clefts and Pseudo-clefts. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Delin, Judy & Oberlander, Jon
1995Syntactic constraints on discourse structure: The case of it-clefts. Linguistics 33(3): 465–500.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005Cleft constructions in context: Some suggestions for research methodology. Ms.Google Scholar
Delin, Judy
1995Presupposition and shared knowledge in it-clefts. Language and Cognitive Processes 10(2): 97–120.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
den Dikken, Marcel
2005Specificational copular sentences and pseudoclefts. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Martin Everaert, Henk Van Riemsdijk, Rob Goedemans, & Bart Hollebrandse (eds), 292–409. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Drubig, Hans-Bernhard & Schaffer, Wolfram
2001Focus constructions. In Language Typology and Language Universals, Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard Koenig & Wulf Osterreicher (eds), 1079–1104. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Drubig, Hans-Bernhard
2003Toward a typology of focus and focus constructions. Linguistics 41(1): 1–50.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Faarlund, Jan Terje
1988A typology of subjects. In Studies in Syntactic Typology [Typological Studies in Language 17], Michael Hammond, Edith Moravcsik & Jessica Wirth (eds), 193–209. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Foley, William A. & Van Valin Jr., Robert D.
1984Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar [Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 38]. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy
(ed.) 1979Discourse and Syntax: Syntax and Semantics 12. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1983aTopic continuity in discourse: an introduction. In Topic Continuity in Discourse. A Quantitative Cross-language Study [Typological Studies in Language 3], Talmy Givón (ed.), 4–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1983bTopic continuity in spoken English. In Topic Continuity in Discourse. A Quantitative Cross-language Study [Typological Studies in Language 3], Talmy Givón (ed.), 343–363. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1990Syntax: A Functional Typological Introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Gundel, Jeanette K.
1988aUniversals of topic-comment structure. In Studies in Syntactic Typology [Typological Studies in Language 17], Michael Hammond, Edith Moravcsik, & Jessica Wirth (eds), 209–241. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1988bThe Role of Topic and Comment in Linguistic Theory. New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1949Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles, Part VII: Syntax. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Mikkelsen, Line
2005Copular Clauses: Specification, Predication and Equation [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 85]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud
1986Topic, Focus, and the Grammar of Spoken French. PhD dissertation, University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar
1994Information Structure and Sentence Form. Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents [Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 71]. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001A framework for the analysis of cleft constructions. Linguistics 39(3): 463–516.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oberlander, Jon & Delin, Judy
1996The function and interpretation of reverse wh-clefts in spoken discourse. Language and Speech 39(2–3): 185–227.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Palancar, Enrique L.
2018Clefts in Otomi: Extended uses of the copular construction. International Journal of American Linguistics 84(1): 93–145.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Patten, Amanda
2012The English It-cleft: A Constructional Account and a Diachronic Investigation [Topics in English Linguistics 79]. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Sasse, Hans-Jürgen
1987The thetic/categorical distinction revisited. Linguistics 25(2): 511–580.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi
1991Grammaticalization of topic into subject. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. II: Types of Grammatical Markers [Typological Studies in Language 19:2], Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 93–134. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wehr, Barbara
1984Diskursstrategien im Romanischen. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Malte
2008Contrastive focus and emphasis. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 55: 347–60.CrossrefGoogle Scholar