Cover not available
Part of
Information Structure in Lesser-described Languages: Studies in prosody and syntax
Edited by Evangelia Adamou, Katharina Haude and Martine Vanhove
[Studies in Language Companion Series 199] 2018
► pp. 329–356

Chapter 12
Information structure in a spoken corpus of Cameroon Pidgin English

 | University of Sussex
 | University of Sheffield
We explore information structure in a spoken corpus of Cameroon Pidgin English, addressing the broad question of how far the corpus method addresses the needs of research in this area. Focusing on marked pronouns used in focus/topic constructions and the copula/focus marker na, we detail a method for investigating information structure in the corpus. Corpus analysis not only confirms but elaborates an emergent description allowed by the elicitation stage, demonstrating that while elicitation reveals what is possible, corpus analysis reveals what is preferred. However, we conclude that qualitative analysis is still required to identify instances of focus in the absence of marked morphosyntactic features, as well as interpretations governed by context.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background
    • 2.1CPE
    • 2.2A spoken corpus of Cameroon Pidgin English
    • 2.3Information structure
  • 3.Methodology
    • 3.1Elicitation
      • 3.1.1Topic
      • 3.1.2Focus
      • 3.1.3Emergent description and research questions
    • 3.2Extraction of tokens from the corpus
    • 3.3Coding
      • 3.3.1Marked topic/focus pronouns
      • 3.3.2Copula/focus marker na
  • 4.Findings
    • 4.1Marked topic/focus pronouns
    • 4.2Copula/focus marker na
  • 5.Discussion
    • 5.1RQ1: Distribution of marked topic/focus pronouns
    • 5.2RQ2: Repeat pronoun construction
    • 5.3RQ3: Distribution of na copula/focus marker
    • 5.4RQ4: Preference for focus fronting over clefting?
    • 5.5RQ5: Predicate focus construction
    • 5.6Advantages and limitations of the corpus method
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations and transcription
  • References
Published online: 2 August 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.199.12gre
References (23)
References
Anthony, Laurence. 2014. AntConc (Version 3.4.3) [Computer Software]. Tokyo: Waseda University. <[URL]>
Ayafor, Miriam & Green, Melanie. 2017. Cameroon Pidgin English: A Comprehensive Grammar [London Oriental and African Language Library 20]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bruyn, Adrienne. 2009. Grammaticalization in creoles: Ordinary and not-so-ordinary cases. Studies in Language 33: 312–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L. 1976. Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and point of view. In Subject and Topic, Charles N. Li (ed.), 27–55. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Creissels, Denis, Dimmendaal, Gerrit J., Frajzyngier, Zygmunt & König, Christa. 2007. Africa as a morphosyntactic area. In A Linguistic Geography of Africa, Bernd Heine & Derek Nurse (eds), 86–150. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Finney, Malcolm Awadajin. 2004. Substratal influence on the morphosyntactic properties of Krio. Linguistic Discovery 2: 58–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Green, Melanie. 2007. Focus in Hausa [Publications of the Philological Society 40]. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Green, Melanie, Ayafor, Miriam & Ozón, Gabriel. 2016. A spoken corpus of Cameroon Pidgin English: Pilot study. <[URL]>
Harris, Alice C. 2001. Focus and universal principles governing simplification of cleft structures. In Grammatical Relations in Change [Studies in Language Companion Series 56], Jan Terje Faarlund (ed.), 159–170. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, Alice C. & Campbell, Lyle. 1995. Historical Syntax in Cross-linguistic Perspective. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania. 2005. Language Contact and Grammatical Change. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holm, John. 1988. Pidgins and Creoles, Vol. 1: Theory and Structure. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Kiss, Katalin É. 1998. Identificational focus versus information focus. Language 74: 345–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Charles N. & Thompson, Sandra A. 1976. Subject and Topic. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Matić, Dejan & Wedgwood, Daniel. 2013. The meanings of focus. Journal of Linguistics 49: 127–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Gerald. 2002. Markup manual for spoken texts. Available online at [URL]. Accessed 13/04/2018.Google Scholar
Ozón, Gabriel, Ayafor, Miriam, Green, Melanie & FitzGerald, Sarah. 2017. A spoken corpus of Cameroon Pidgin English. World Englishes 36(3): 427–447. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parkvall, Mikael. 2000. Out of Africa: African Influences in Atlantic Creoles. London: Battlebridge.Google Scholar
Rooth, Mats. 1992. A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1: 75–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, John Robert. 1967. Constraints on Variables in Syntax. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Simons, Gary F. & Fennig, Charles D. (eds.). 2017. Ethnologue: Language of the World, 20th edn. Dallas, TX: SIL International. <[URL]>
Stalnaker, Robert. 2002. Common ground. Linguistics and Philosophy 25: 701–721. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Ozón, Gabriel, Sarah FitzGerald & Melanie Green
2019. Chapter 1.6. Addressing a coverage gap in African Englishes. In Corpus Linguistics and African Englishes [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 88], ► pp. 144 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2023. , DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.