Cover not available
Part of
Non-Canonically Case-Marked Subjects: The Reykjavík-Eyjafjallajökull papers
Edited by Jóhanna Barðdal, Na'ama Pat-El and Stephen Mark Carey
[Studies in Language Companion Series 200] 2018
► pp. 1–20

Chapter 1
Introduction

The Reykjavík-Eyjafjallajökull papers

| Ghent University
Article outline
  • 1.Background
  • 2.The Reykjavík-Eyjafjallajökull conference
  • 3.Summaries
  • 4.Relevance for current research
  • 5.Visions for future research
  • Acknowledgements
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 2 November 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.200.01bar
References
Abraham, Werner
2006 Bare and prepositional differential case marking: The exotic case of German (and Icelandic) among all of Germanic. In Kulikov, Malchukov & de Swart (eds), 115–145.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y., Dixon, Robert M. W. & Onishi, Masayuki
(eds) 2001 Non-Canonical Marking of Subjects and Objects [Typological Studies in Language 46]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aissen, Judith
2003 Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 21: 435–448.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andrews, Avery D.
1976 The VP complement analysis in Modern Icelandic. North Eastern Linguistic Society 6: 1–21.Google Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna
2000 The subject is nominative! On obsolete axioms and their deep-rootedness. In 17th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, Carl-Erik Lindberg & Steffen Nordahl Lund (eds), 93–117. Odense: Institute of Language and Communication.Google Scholar
2004 The semantics of the impersonal construction in Icelandic, German and Faroese: Beyond thematic roles. In Focus on Germanic Typology, Werner Abraham (ed.), 105–137. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
2006 Construction-specific properties of syntactic subjects in Icelandic and German. Cognitive Linguistics 17(1): 39–106.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 The development of case in Germanic. In Barðdal & Chelliah (eds), 123–159.Google Scholar
2011 The rise of dative substitution in the history of Icelandic: A diachronic construction grammar approach. Lingua 121(1): 60–79.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 Syntax and syntactic reconstruction. In The Routledge Handbook of Historical Linguistics, Claire Bowern & Bethwyn Evans (eds), 343–373. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna, Arnett, Carlee, Carey, Stephen Mark, Eythórsson, Thórhallur, Jenset, Gard B., Kroonen, Guus & Oberlin, Adam
2016 Dative subjects in Germanic: A computational analysis of lexical semantic verb classes across time and space. STUF: Language Typology and Universals 69(1): 49–84.Google Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna, Bjarnadóttir, Valgerður, Danesi, Serena, Dewey, Tonya Kim, Eythórsson, Thórhallur, Fedriani, Chiara & Smitherman, Thomas
2013 The story of ‘Woe’. Journal of Indo-European Studies 41(3–4): 321–377.Google Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna & Chelliah, Shobhana L.
(eds) 2009 The Role of Semantic, Pragmatic and Discourse Factors in the Development of Case [Studies in Language Companion Series 108]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna & Eythórsson, Thórhallur
2009 The origin of the oblique subject construction: An Indo-European comparison. In Grammatical Change in Indo-European Languages [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 305], Vit Bubenik, John Hewson & Sarah Rose (eds), 179–193. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna, Eythórsson, Thórhallur & Dewey, Tonya Kim
2014 Alternating predicates in Icelandic and German: A sign-based construction grammar account. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 93: 50–101.Google Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna & Smitherman, Thomas
2013 The quest for cognates: A reconstruction of oblique subject constructions in Proto-Indo-European. Language Dynamics and Change 3(1): 28–67.Google Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna, Smitherman, Thomas, Bjarnadóttir, Valgerður, Danesi, Serena, Jenset, Gard B. & McGillivray, Barbara
2012 Reconstructing constructional semantics: The dative subject construction in Old Norse-Icelandic, Latin, Ancient Greek, Old Russian and Old Lithuanian. Studies in Language 36(3): 511–547.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bhaskararao, Peri & Subbarao, Karumuri Venkata
(eds) 2004 Non-Nominative Subjects, Vols. I–II [Typological Studies in Language 60–61]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar
2004 The syntax of experiencers in the Himalayas. In Bhaskararao & Subbarao, Vol. 1, 77–111.Google Scholar
2011 Grammatical relations typology. In The Oxford Handbook of Language Typology, Jae Jung Song (ed.), 399–444. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Bjarnadóttir, Valgerður
2014 The oblique anticausative in Lithuanian. Baltistica 49(1): 15–39.DOI logo.Google Scholar
Cennamo, Michela, Barðdal, Jóhanna & van Gelderen, Elly
(eds) 2012 Variation and change in argument realization. A special guest-edited issue in Transactions of the Philological Society 110(3): 311–442.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cennamo, Michela, Eythórsson, Thórhallur & Barðdal, Jóhanna
2015 Semantic and (morpho)syntactic constraints on anticausativization: Evidence from Latin and Old Norse-Icelandic. Linguistics 53(4): 677–729.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1973 The ergative: Variations on a theme. Lingua 32: 239–253.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Conti, Luz
2008 Synchronie und Diachronie des altgriechischen Genitivs als Semisubjekt. Historische Sprachforschung 121: 94–113.Google Scholar
Croft, William
2001 Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culicover, Peter W. & Jackendoff, Ray
2005 Simpler Syntax. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Danesi, Serena, Johnson, Cynthia A. & Barðdal, Jóhanna
2017 Between the historical languages and the reconstructed language: An alternative approach to the Gerundive + “Dative of Agent” construction in Indo-European. Indogermanische Forschungen 122: 143–188.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Danesi, Serena, Cynthia A. Johnson & Jóhanna Barðdal
2018 Where does the modality of Ancient Greek modal verbs come from? The relation between modality and oblique case marking. Journal of Greek Linguistics 18(1): 45–92.Google Scholar
Dik, Simon C.
1997 The Theory of Functional Grammar, Part 1: The Structure of the Clause, 2nd edn. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W.
1997 The Rise and Fall of Languages. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Donohue, Cathryn & Barðdal, Jóhanna
(eds) 2011 Empirical approaches to morphological case. A special guest-edited issue in Morphology 21(3–4): 481–654.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Martin
2006 Descriptive theories, explanatory theories, and basic linguistic theory. In Catching Language: The Standard Challenge of Grammar Writing, Felix Ameka, Alan Charles Dench & Nicholas Evans (eds), 207–234. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S.
1997 Are grammatical relations universal? In Essays on Language Function and Language Type. Dedicated to T. Givón, Joan Bybee, John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 117–143. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eythórsson, Thórhallur & Barðdal, Jóhanna
2005 Oblique subjects: A common Germanic inheritance. Language 81(4): 824–881.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Farrell, Patrick
2005 Grammatical Relations. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Faarlund, Jan Terje
2001 The notion of oblique subject and its status in the history of Icelandic. In Grammatical Relations in Change [Studies in Language Companion Series 56], Jan Terje Faarlund (ed.), 99–135. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fedriani, Chiara
2011 Experiential metaphors in Latin: Feelings were containers, movements and things possessed. Transactions of the Philological Society 109(3): 307–326.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 Experiential Constructions in Latin. Leiden: Brill.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Gelderen, Elly, Cennamo, Michela & Barðdal, Jóhanna
(eds) 2013 Argument Structure in Flux: The Naples-Capri Papers [Studies in Language Companion Series 131]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph
1963 Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Universals of Language, Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), 73–113. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hansen, Björn
2016 Beyond b-subjects: Testing subjecthood in Croatian modal constructions. Talk presented at the workshop “Forty Years after Keenan 1976: Subject Properties and Subject Tests”, 7–9 September, Ghent.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2004 Does linguistic explanation presuppose linguistic description? Studies in Language 28: 554–579.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa & Huumo, Tuomas
(eds) 2015 Subjects in Constructions – Canonical and Non-Canonical [Constructional Approaches to Language 16]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hermon, Gabriella
1985 Syntactic Modularity. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
von Heusinger, Klaus & Kaiser, Georg A.
2011 Affectedness and differential object marking in Spanish. Morphology 21(3–4): 593–617.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hock, Hans H.
1990 Oblique subjects in Sanskrit? In Verma & Mohanan (eds), 119–139.Google Scholar
Hock, Hans Heinrich & Bashir, Elena
2016 The Languages and Linguistics of South Asia: A Comprehensive Guide. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Holvoet, Axel
2013 Obliqueness, quasi-subjects and transitivity in Baltic and Slavonic. In Seržant & Kulikov (eds), 257–282.Google Scholar
de Hoop, Helen & de Swart, Peter
(eds) 2008 Differential Subject Marking. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Iemmolo, Giorgio & Klumpp, Gerson
(eds) 2014 Differential object marking: Theoretical and empirical issues. A special issue of Linguistics 52(2): 271–602.Google Scholar
Jónsson, Jóhannes Gísli
1996 Clausal Architecture and Case in Icelandic. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Jónsson, Jóhannes G. & Eythórsson, Thórhallur
2005 Variation in subject case marking in insular Scandinavian. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 28(2): 223–245.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keenan, Edward L.
1976 Towards a universal definition of subject. In Li (ed.), 303–333.Google Scholar
Kikusawa, Ritsuko
2002 Proto Central Pacific Ergativity: Its Reconstruction and Development in the Fijian, Rotuman and Polynesian languages. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Kulikov, Leonid, Malchukov, Andrej & de Swart, Peter
(eds) 2006 Case, Valency and Transitivity [Studies in Language Companion Series 77]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Landau, Idan
2009 The Locative Syntax of Experiencers. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Le Mair, Esther, Johnson, Cynthia A., Frotscher, Michael, Eythórsson, Thórhallur & Barðdal, Jóhanna
2017 Position as a behavioral property of subjects: The case of Old Irish. Indogermanische Forschungen 122: 111–142.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Charles N.
(ed.) 1976 Subject and Topic. New York NY: Academic press.Google Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia
2016 The dative of agent in Indo-European languages. STUF – Language Typology and Universals 69(1): 15–47.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej L.
2008 Animacy and asymmetries in differential case marking. Lingua 118(2): 203–221.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej L. & de Hoop, Helen
2011 Tense, aspect, and mood based differential case marking. Lingua 121(1): 35–47.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej L. & Spencer, Andrew
(eds) 2009 The Oxford Handbook of Case. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Masica, Colin P.
1976 Defining a Linguistic Area: South Asia. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne
2008 The emergence of agentive systems. In The Typology of Semantic Alignment Systems, Mark Donohue & Søren Wichmann (eds), 297–333. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moore, John & Perlmutter, David M.
2000 What does it take to be a dative subject? Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 373–416.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mørck, Endre
1994 The distribution of subject properties and the acquisition of subjecthood in the West Scandinavian languages. In Language Change and Language Structure: Older Germanic Languages in a Comparative Perspective, Toril Swan, Endre Mørck & Olaf J. Westwik (eds), 159–194. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Onishi, Masayuki
2001 Introduction: Non-canonically marked subjects and objects; parameters and properties. In Aikhenvald, Dixon & Onishi (eds), 1–51.Google Scholar
Primus, Beatrice
2011 Case marking typology. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology, Jae Jung Song (ed.), 303–321. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Queixalós, Francesc & Gildea, Spike
2010 Manifestations of Ergativity in Amazonia. In Ergativity in Amazonia [Typological Studies in Language 89], Spike Gildea & Francesc Queixalós (eds), 1–25. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rákosi, György
2006 Dative Experiencer Predicates in Hungarian. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Reis, Marga
1982 Zum Subjektbegriff im Deutschen. In Satzglieder im Deutschen. Vorschläge zur syntaktischen, semantischen und pragmatischen Fundierung, Werner Abraham (ed.), 171–211. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Sandal, Catrine
2011 Akkusative subjekt og antikausativitet i norrønt (Accusative Subjects and Anticausativity in Old Norse). MA thesis, University of Bergen.Google Scholar
Sasse, Hans-Jürgen
1978 Subjekt und Ergativ: Zur pragmatischen Grundlage primärer grammatischer Relationen. Folia Linguistica 12: 219–252.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seržant, Ilja
2013 The diachronic typology of non-canonical subjects. In Seržant & Kulikov (eds), 313–360.Google Scholar
Seržant, Ilja A. & Kulikov, Leonid
(eds) 2013 The Diachronic Typology of Non-Canonical Subjects [Studies in Language Companion Series 140]. Amsterdam. John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi
1999 Dative subject constructions twenty-two years later. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 29(2): 45–76.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann
1989 Verbal Syntax and Case in Icelandic. PhD dissertation, Lund University.Google Scholar
1991 Icelandic case-marked PRO and the licensing of lexical arguments. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9: 327–362.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Á.
2003 Case: Abstract vs. morphological. In New Perspectives on Case Theory, Ellen Brandner & Heike Zinsmeister (eds), 223–268. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Steever, Sanford B.
(ed.) 1998 The Dravidian Languages. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Svenonius, Peter
2002 Icelandic case and the structure of events. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 5(1–3): 197–225.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsunoda, Tasaku
1985 Remarks on transitivity. Journal of Linguistics 21(2): 385–396.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Valin Jr., Robert D.
1991 Another look at Icelandic case marking and grammatical relations. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9: 145–194.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005 Exploring the Syntax–Semantics Interface. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 Case in role and reference grammar. In The Handbook of Case, Andrej L. Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds), 102–120. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Van Valin Jr., Robert D. & LaPolla, Randy J.
1997 Syntax: Structure, Meaning and Function. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verma, Mahendra K. & Mohanan, Karravanur Puthanvettil
(eds) 1990 Experiencer Subjects in South Asian Languages. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Woolford, Ellen
2006 Lexical case, inherent case, and argument structure. Linguistic Inquiry 37(1): 111–130.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yoon, James H.
2004 Non-nominative (major) subjects and case stacking in Korean. In Bhaskararao & Subbarao, Vol. 2, 265–314.Google Scholar
Zaenen, Annie, Maling, Joan & Thráinsson, Höskuldur
1985 Case and grammatical functions: The Icelandic passive. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3: 441–483.DOI logoGoogle Scholar