Chapter 8
Case marking of predicative possession in Vedic
The genitive, the dative, the locative
Possession is an abstract domain of human conceptualization whose expression may be based on different cognitive structures. Heine (1997) identifies a small set of basic conceptual patterns that express predicative possession across the languages of the world. Vedic has three of these patterns exemplified by (i) a genitive construction (with a genitive possessor), (ii) a dative construction (with a dative possessor, a nominative possessee, and a form of ‘be’), and (iii) a locative construction (with a locative possessor and a form of ‘be’). In later stages of the language, the three constructions reduce to one and the structure with the genitive becomes the conventional expression for possession. Despite the importance of the Vedic data for shedding light on the Indo-European linguistic expression of possession, the situation in Vedic has not received proper attention. In this article, we describe and analyze the three early Vedic constructions, their syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic properties, showing that the locative construction is the most marginal of the three, the genitive construction conveys a possessee-oriented relation and is the canonical expression for possession, while the dative construction, expressing a possessor-oriented relation, is a multifunctional construction of which possession is only one of its possible meanings. We further show that claims in the literature that the dative experiencer construction developed from the dative possessive construction are not confirmed by the situation in Vedic.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The notion of possession
- 2.1The possessive relation
- 2.2Predicative possession:
Have- vs belong- relation
- 3.Expression of possession in Early Vedic
- 3.1The genitive construction and ‘canonical’ possession
- 3.1.1
‘genitive + ásti’
- 3.1.2
‘genitive + bhávati’
- 3.2The dative construction
- 3.2.1
‘dative + ásti’
- 3.2.2
‘dative + bhávati’
- 3.2.3The dative construction: An affected referent in a target domain
- 3.3The locative construction: A spatial metaphor for possession
- 3.4Clitic personal pronouns: An ambiguous area for the grammar of possession
- 3.5The interaction between the genitive, the dative and the locative
- 4.Conclusions
-
Acknowledgements
-
Notes
-
References
References
Baldi, Pierluigi & Nuti, Andrea
2010 Possession. In
New Perspectives on Historical Latin Syntax, Vol. 3:
Constituent Syntax: Quantification, Numerals, Possession, Anaphora,
Philip Baldi &
Pierluigi Cuzzolin (eds), 239–388. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Barðdal, Jóhanna
2001a The perplexity of Dat-Nom verbs in Icelandic.
Nordic Journal of Linguistics 24: 47–70.
Barðdal, Jóhanna
2001b Case in Icelandic: A Synchronic, Diachronic and Comparative Approach [
Lundastudier i Nordisk Språkvetenskap A 57]. Lund: Department of Scandinavian Languages.
Barðdal, Jóhanna
2004 The semantics of the impersonal construction in Icelandic, German and Faroese: Beyond thematic roles. In
Focus on Germanic Typology,
Werner Abraham (ed.), 105–137. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
Barðdal, Jóhanna
2011 The rise of dative substitution in the history of Icelandic: A diachronic construction grammar approach.
Lingua 121(1): 60–79.
Barðdal, Jóhanna & Eythórsson, Thórhallur
2012 ‘Hungering and lusting for women and fleshly delicacies’: Reconstructing grammatical relations for Proto-Germanic.
Transactions of the Philological Society 110(3): 363–393.
Barðdal, Jóhanna, Eythórsson, Thórhallur & Dewey, Tonya Kim
2014 Alternating predicates in Icelandic and German: A sign-based construction grammar account.
Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 93: 50–101.
Barðdal, Jóhanna, Smitherman, Thomas, Bjarnadóttir, Valgerður, Danesi, Serena, Jenset, Gard B. & McGillivray, Barbara
Bauer, Brigitte
2000 Archaic Syntax in Indo-European: The Spread of Transitivity in Latin and French. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Baron, Irène
2001 Possession in noun phrases: A functional analysis. In
Baron, Herslund &
Sørensen (eds), 115–130.
Baron, Irène, Herslund, Michael, Sørensen, Finn
Benveniste, Émile
1966 “Être” et “avoir” dans leurs fonctions linguistiques. In
Problèmes de Linguistique générale, 140–148. Paris: Gallimard.
Benvenuto, Maria Carmela & Pompeo, Flavia
2012 Expressions of predicative possession in Ancient Greek: “εἶναι plus dative” and “εἶναι plus genitive constructions.
AION – Annali del Dipartimento di Studi Letterari, Linguistici e Comparati 1: 77–104.
Bolkestein, A. Machtelt
1983 Genitive and dative possessors in Latin. In
Advances in Functional Grammar,
Simon C. Dik (ed.), 55–91. Dordrecht: Foris.
Bolkestein, A. Machtelt
2001 Possessors and experiencers in Classical Latin. In
Baron, Herslund &
Sørensen (eds), 275–290.
Brugmann, Karl
1911 Vergleichende Laut-, Stammbildungs- und Flexionslehre der indogermanischen Sprachen. Zweiter Band: Lehre von der Wortformen und ihrem Gebrauch. Strassburg: Karl J. Trübner.
Bugenhagen, Robert D.
1986 Possession in Mangap-Mbula: Its syntax and semantics.
Oceanic Linguistics 25: 124–166.
Clark, Eve V.
1978 Existential, locative, and possessive construction. In
Universals of Human Language,
Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), 85–126. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.
Croft, William
1998 Event structure in argument linking. In
The Projection of Arguments; Lexical and Compositional Factors,
Miriam Butt &
Wilhelm Geuder (eds), 1–43. Stanford CA: CSLI.
Croft, William
2001 Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: OUP.
Croft, William
2012 Verbs: Aspect and Clausal Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Danesi, Serena, Johnson, Cynthia A. & Barðdal, Jóhanna
2018 Where does the modality of Ancient Greek modal verbs come from? The relation between modality and oblique case marking.
Journal of Greek Linguistics 18(1): 45–92.
Delbrück, Bertold
1869 Ueber den indogermanischen, speciell den vedischen Dativ.
Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung auf dem Gebiete des Deutschen, Griechischen und Lateinischen 18(2): 81–106
Delbrück, Bertold
1888 Altindische Syntax. Halle: Verlag der Buchhandlung des Waisenhauses.
Elizarenkova, Tatyana
1995 The possessivity in the Rigveda.
Cracow Indological Studies 1: 109–119.
Eythórsson, Thórhallur & Barðdal, Jóhanna
2005 Oblique subjects: A common Germanic inheritance.
Language 81(4): 824–881.
Fedriani, Chiara
2011 Experiential metaphors in Latin: Feelings were containers, movements and things possessed.
Transactions of the Philological Society 109(3): 307–326.
Gaedicke, Carl
1880 Der Akkusativ im Veda. Breslau: Koebner.
Geldner, Karl Friedrich
1951 Der Rig-Veda: Aus dem Sanskrit ins Deutsche Übersetzt und mit einem laufenden Kommentar versehen. Erster Teil. Erster bis vierter Liederkreis. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Geldner, Karl Friedrich
1951 Der Rig-Veda: Aus dem Sanskrit ins Deutsche Übersetzt und mit einem laufenden Kommentar versehen, Zweiter Teil: Fünfter bis achter Liederkreis. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Geldner, Karl Friedrich
1951 Der Rig-Veda: Aus dem Sanskrit ins Deutsche Übersetzt und mit einem laufenden Kommentar versehen, Dritter Teil:
Neunter bis zehnter Liederkreis. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Grassmann, Hermann
1873 Wörterbuch zum Rig-Veda. Leipzig: F. A. Brockhaus.
Grassmann, Hermann
1887 Rig-Veda. Übersetzt und mit kritischen und erläuternden anmerkungen versehen von Hermann Grassmann, Zweiter Teil. Leipzig: F. A. Brockhaus.
Havers, Wilhelm
1911 Untersuchungen zur Kasussyntax der indogermanischen Sprachen. Strassburg: Trübner.
Heine, Bernd
1997 Possession: Cognitive Sources, Forces and Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP.
Herslund, Michael & Baron, Irène
2001 Introduction: Dimensions of possession. In
Baron, Herslund &
Sørensen (eds), 1–27.
Hettrich, Heinrich
2007 Materialien zu einer Kasussyntax des Ṛgveda. Würzburg: Institut für Altertumswissenschaften Lehrstuhl für Vergleichende Sprachwissenschaft.
[URL]
Hopkins, E. Washburn
1906 The Vedic dative reconsidered.
Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 37: 87–120.
Hopkins, E. Washburn
1907 Aspects of the Vedic dative.
Journal of the American Oriental Society 28: 360–406.
Lakoff, George & Johnson, Mark
1980 Metaphors We Live By. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
Langacker, Ronald W.
1987 Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 1:
Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, Ronald W.
1991 Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 2:
Descriptive Application. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, Ronald W.
2003 Strategies of clausal possession.
Contrastive Cognitive Linguistics 3(2): 1–34.
Lyons, John
1967 A note on possessive, existential and locative sentences.
Foundations of Language 3(4): 390–396.
Macdonell, Arthur Anthony
1910 Vedic Grammar. Strassburg: Verlag von Karl J. Trübner.
Macdonell, Arthur Anthony
[1916]1993 A Vedic Grammar for Students. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
Magni, Elisabetta
1999 La significazione del possesso in latino. Il tipo MIHI EST ALIQUID come manifestazione della transitività ridotta.
Archivio Glottologico Italiano 84: 44–66.
Müller, Friedrich Max
1859 A History of Ancient Sanskrit Literature So Far as it Illustrates the Primitive Religion of the Brahmans. London: Williams & Norgate.
Nuti, Andrea
2005 Possessive sentences in Early Latin: Dative vs. genitive constructions.
Archivio Glottologico Italiano 27(2): 145–173.
Renou, Louis
1961 Grammaire Sanscrite. Paris: Adrien-Maisonneuve.
Seiler, Hansjakob
1973 Zum Problem der sprachlichen Possessivität.
Folia Linguistica 6: 231–250.
Seiler, Hansjakob
1983 Possession as an Operational Dimension of Language. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
Speijer, Jakob Samuel
1886 Sanskrit Syntax. Leiden: Brill.
Stassen, Leon
2009 Predicative Possession. Oxford: OUP.
Taylor, John
1989 Linguistic Categorization: Prototypes in Linguistic Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Viti, Carlotta
2004 Funzioni semantiche e pragmatiche nelle strategie di possesso dell’ antico Indico.
Archivio Glottologico Italiano, 89(1): 41–83.
Watkins, Calvert
1967 Remarks on the genitive.
To Honor Roman Jakobson: Essays on the Occasion of his 70th birthday, Vol III, 2191–2198. The Hague: Mouton.
Whitney, William Dwight
[1889]1955 Sanskrit Grammar: Including Both the Classical Language, and the Older Dialects, of Veda and Brahmana. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Cited by
Cited by 3 other publications
Friedman, Victor A. & Brian D. Joseph
Ilioaia, Mihaela
2024.
Constructing Meaning: Historical Changes in mihi est and habeo Constructions in Romanian.
Languages 9:2
► pp. 38 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.