Chapter published in:
Focus Realization in Romance and Beyond
Edited by Marco García García and Melanie Uth
[Studies in Language Companion Series 201] 2018
► pp. 203228
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra
2004Evidentiality. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2012Essence of mirativity. Linguistic Typology 16: 435–485.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bänziger, Tanja & Scherer, Klaus R.
2005The role of intonation in emotional expressions. Speech Communication 46(3–4): 252–267.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Behrens, Leila
2012Evidentiality, modality, focus and other puzzles. In Practical Theories and Empirical Practice [Human Cognitive Processing 40], Andrea C. Schalley (ed.), 185–243. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bianchi, Valentina, Bocci, Giuliano & Cruschina, Silvio
2016Focus fronting, unexpectedness, and evaluative implicatures. Semantics and Pragmatics 9(3): 1–54.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight
1989Intonation and Its Uses: Melody in Grammar and Discourse. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace
1976Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and point of view. In Subject and Topic, Charles Li (ed.), 27–55. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro & McConnell-Ginet, Sally
1990Meaning and Grammar: An Introduction to Semantics. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cruttenden, Alan
1986Intonation. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott
1997Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected information. Linguistic Typology 1: 33–52.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Estebas-Vilaplana, Eva & Prieto, Pilar
2010Castilian Spanish intonation. In Transcription of Intonation of the Spanish Language, Pilar Prieto & Paolo Roseano (eds), 17–48. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Faller, Martina T.
2002Semantics and Pragmatics of Evidentials in Cuzco Quechua. PhD dissertation, Stanford University. http://​personalpages​.manchester​.ac​.uk​/staff​/Martina​.T​.Faller​/documents​/Thesis​-A4​.pdf
Faller, Martin
2004The deictic core of ‘Non-Experienced Past’ in Cuzco Quechua. Journal of Semantics 21(1): 45–85.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Féry, Caroline
1993German Intonational Patterns. Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grice, Herbert Paul
1989Logic and conversation. In Studies in the Way of Words, Herbert Paul Grice, 22–40. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Grice, Martine & Baumann, Stefan
2002Deutsche Intonation und GToBI. Linguistische Berichte 191: 267–298.Google Scholar
Grice, Martine & Savino, Michelina
1995Intonation and communicative function in a regional variety of Italian. Phonus 1: 19–32.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, Carlos
2004The Phonology of Tone and Intonation. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees & Olbertz, Hella
2012Didn’t you know? Mirativity does exist! Linguistic Typology 17: 487–503.Google Scholar
Hintz, Daniel & Hintz, Diane
2017The evidential category of mutual knowledge in Quechua. Lingua 186–187: 88–109.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Horn, Laurence R.
1989A Natural History of Negation. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kadmon, Nirit
2001Formal Pragmatics. Semantics, Pragmatics, Presupposition, and Focus. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Karttunen, Lauri
1974Presuppositions and linguistic context. Theoretical Linguistics 1: 181–194.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kohler, Klaus
1987Categorical pitch perception. Proc. XIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences 5, 331–333. Tallinn.Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred
2007Basic notions of information structure. In The Notions of Information Structure [Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure 6], Caroline Féry, Gisbert Fanselow & Manfred Krifka (eds), 13–56. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert
1996Intonational Phonology. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Leonetti, Manuel & Escandell Vidal, Victoria
2009Fronting and Verum-Focus in Spanish. In Focus and Background in Romance Languages [Studies in Language Companion Series 112], Andreas Dufter & Daniel Jacob (eds), 155–204. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
2000Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Language, Speech, and Communication. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Liberman, Mark
1979The Intonational System of English. New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar
Moraes, João
2008The pitch accents in Brazilian Portuguese: Analysis by synthesis. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2008, Plinio Barbosa, Sandra Madureira & César Reis (eds.), 389–398. Campinas: Unicamp.Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank R.
2 2001Mood and Modality. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Parker, Gary
1976Gramática quechua: Ancash-Huailas. Lima: Ministerio de Educación.Google Scholar
Portner, Paul
2009Modality. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Potts, Christopher
2007Conventional implicatures, a distinguished class of meanings. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces, Gillian Ramchand & Charles Reiss (eds), 475–501. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2015Presupposition and implicature. In The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory, 2nd edn, 168–202, Shalom Lappin & Chris Fox (eds), Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Selkirk, Elizabeth
2002Contrastive FOCUS vs. Presentational Focus: Prosodic evidence from the right node raising in English. In Speech Prosody 2002, 643–646, Bernard Bel & Isabelle Marlien (eds). Aix en Provence.Google Scholar
Scherer, Klaus R.
2003Vocal communication of emotion: A review of research paradigms. Speech Communication 40: 227–256.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert C.
1973Presuppositions. Journal of Philosophical Logic 2(4): 447–457.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1974Pragmatic presuppositions. In Semantics and Philosophy, Milton K. Munitz & Peter K. Unger (eds), 197–213. New York NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar
2002Common ground. Linguistics and Philosophy 25: 701–721.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tonhauser, Judith, Beaver, David, Roberts, Craige & Simons, Mandy
2013Toward a taxonomy of projective content. Language 89(1): 66–109.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Uth, Melanie
2014Spanish preverbal subjects in contexts of narrow information focus: Non-contrastive focalization or epistemic-evidential marking? Grazer Linguistische Studien 81: 87–104.Google Scholar
In press. F0 contours in data from picture-based elicitation experiments: Evidence from contrastive cleft sentences in Yucatecan Spanish. In Empirical Methods in Romance Prosody Research, Ingo Feldhausen, Jan Fließbach & Maria del Mar Vanrell Bosch eds Berlin Language Science Press
Vanrell Bosch, Maria del Mar
2011The Phonological Relevance of Tonal Scaling in the Intonational Grammar of Catalan. PhD dissertation, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Malte
2008Contrastive focus and emphasis. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 55: 347–360.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Favaro, Marco
2020.  In Information-Structural Perspectives on Discourse Particles [Studies in Language Companion Series, 213],  pp. 112 ff. Crossref logo
García García, Marco
2018.  In Focus Realization in Romance and Beyond [Studies in Language Companion Series, 201],  pp. 229 ff. Crossref logo
Uth, Melanie & Marco García García
2018.  In Focus Realization in Romance and Beyond [Studies in Language Companion Series, 201],  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.