Chapter 7
Presupposed modality
My contribution explores the possibility to treat meanings that have intuitively been called surprise and obviousness within a theory of presupposed modal operators. A bird’s eye review of the literature on relevant intonational, morphological and syntactic expressions gathered from a broad range of languages is meant to give an impression both of the importance of these meanings as well as of the lack of a common pragmatic account. The case of miratives in Quechua is discussed considering some new data. The theory is developed in the form of language games and compares the behavior of presupposed modal operators both with the behavior of canonical modal expressions and with presuppositions triggered by lexical items.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Expressions of surprise and obviousness in the linguistic literature
- 2.1Phonology: Epistemic tunes
- 2.2Morphology: Mirativity – and some obviousness
- 2.3Syntax
- 2.4Empirical trouble
- 3.Presupposed modality
- 3.1Expected worlds
- 3.2Forbidden worlds
- 3.3Emotional worlds
- 3.4Presupposed modality mirrors the logical and pragmatic relations of modal operators in at-issue meanings
- 3.5Heritage properties
- 3.6Rhetorical uses
- 4.Conclusions and perspectives
-
Acknowledgements
-
Notes
-
References
References (46)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aikhenvald, Alexandra. 2012. Essence of mirativity. Linguistic Typology 16: 435–485.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bänziger, Tanja & Scherer, Klaus R. 2005. The role of intonation in emotional expressions. Speech Communication 46(3–4): 252–267.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bianchi, Valentina, Bocci, Giuliano & Cruschina, Silvio. 2016. Focus fronting, unexpectedness, and evaluative implicatures. Semantics and Pragmatics 9(3): 1–54.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bolinger, Dwight. 1989. Intonation and Its Uses: Melody in Grammar and Discourse. London: Arnold.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chafe, Wallace. 1976. Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and point of view. In Subject and Topic, Charles Li (ed.), 27–55. New York NY: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chierchia, Gennaro & McConnell-Ginet, Sally. 1990. Meaning and Grammar: An Introduction to Semantics. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cruttenden, Alan. 1986. Intonation. Cambridge: CUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
DeLancey, Scott. 1997. Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected information. Linguistic Typology 1: 33–52.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Estebas-Vilaplana, Eva & Prieto, Pilar. 2010. Castilian Spanish intonation. In Transcription of Intonation of the Spanish Language, Pilar Prieto & Paolo Roseano (eds), 17–48. Munich: Lincom.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Faller, Martina T. 2002. Semantics and Pragmatics of Evidentials in Cuzco Quechua. PhD dissertation, Stanford University. <[URL]>
Faller, Martin 2004. The deictic core of ‘Non-Experienced Past’ in Cuzco Quechua. Journal of Semantics 21(1): 45–85.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Féry, Caroline. 1993. German Intonational Patterns. Tübingen: Niemeyer.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grice, Herbert Paul. 1989. Logic and conversation. In Studies in the Way of Words, Herbert Paul Grice, 22–40. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grice, Martine & Baumann, Stefan. 2002. Deutsche Intonation und GToBI. Linguistische Berichte 191: 267–298.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grice, Martine & Savino, Michelina. 1995. Intonation and communicative function in a regional variety of Italian. Phonus 1: 19–32.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gussenhoven, Carlos 2004. The Phonology of Tone and Intonation. Cambridge: CUP.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hengeveld, Kees & Olbertz, Hella. 2012. Didn’t you know? Mirativity does exist! Linguistic Typology 17: 487–503.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hintz, Daniel & Hintz, Diane. 2017. The evidential category of mutual knowledge in Quechua. Lingua 186–187: 88–109.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Horn, Laurence R. 1989. A Natural History of Negation. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hyslop, Gwendolyn. 2011. A Grammar of Kurtöp. Eugene OR: UO Libraries. <[URL]>
Kadmon, Nirit. 2001. Formal Pragmatics. Semantics, Pragmatics, Presupposition, and Focus. London: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Karttunen, Lauri. 1974. Presuppositions and linguistic context. Theoretical Linguistics 1: 181–194.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kohler, Klaus. 1987. Categorical pitch perception. Proc. XIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences 5, 331–333. Tallinn.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Krifka, Manfred 2007. Basic notions of information structure. In The Notions of Information Structure [Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure 6], Caroline Féry, Gisbert Fanselow & Manfred Krifka (eds), 13–56. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ladd, D. Robert. 1996. Intonational Phonology. Cambridge: CUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leonetti, Manuel & Escandell Vidal, Victoria. 2009. Fronting and Verum-Focus in Spanish. In Focus and Background in Romance Languages [Studies in Language Companion Series 112], Andreas Dufter & Daniel Jacob (eds), 155–204. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levinson, Stephen C. 2000. Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Language, Speech, and Communication. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Liberman, Mark. 1979. The Intonational System of English. New York NY: Garland.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Moraes, João. 2008. The pitch accents in Brazilian Portuguese: Analysis by synthesis. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2008, Plinio Barbosa, Sandra Madureira & César Reis (eds.), 389–398. Campinas: Unicamp.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Palmer, Frank R.
2
2001. Mood and Modality. Cambridge: CUP.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Parker, Gary. 1976. Gramática quechua: Ancash-Huailas. Lima: Ministerio de Educación.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Portner, Paul. 2009. Modality. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Potts, Christopher. 2007. Conventional implicatures, a distinguished class of meanings. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces, Gillian Ramchand & Charles Reiss (eds), 475–501. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Potts, Christopher. 2015. Presupposition and implicature. In The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory, 2nd edn, 168–202, Shalom Lappin & Chris Fox (eds), Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Selkirk, Elizabeth. 2002. Contrastive FOCUS vs. Presentational Focus: Prosodic evidence from the right node raising in English. In Speech Prosody 2002, 643–646, Bernard Bel & Isabelle Marlien (eds). Aix en Provence.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Scherer, Klaus R. 2003. Vocal communication of emotion: A review of research paradigms. Speech Communication 40: 227–256.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stalnaker, Robert C. 1973. Presuppositions. Journal of Philosophical Logic 2(4): 447–457.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stalnaker, Robert C. 1974. Pragmatic presuppositions. In Semantics and Philosophy, Milton K. Munitz & Peter K. Unger (eds), 197–213. New York NY: New York University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stalnaker, Robert C. 2002. Common ground. Linguistics and Philosophy 25: 701–721.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tonhauser, Judith, Beaver, David, Roberts, Craige & Simons, Mandy. 2013. Toward a taxonomy of projective content. Language 89(1): 66–109.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Uth, Melanie. 2014. Spanish preverbal subjects in contexts of narrow information focus: Non-contrastive focalization or epistemic-evidential marking? Grazer Linguistische Studien 81: 87–104.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Uth, Melanie. In press. F0 contours in data from picture-based elicitation experiments: Evidence from contrastive cleft sentences in Yucatecan Spanish. In Empirical Methods in Romance Prosody Research, Ingo Feldhausen, Jan Fließbach & Maria del Mar Vanrell Bosch (eds). Berlin: Language Science Press.
Vanrell Bosch, Maria del Mar. 2011. The Phonological Relevance of Tonal Scaling in the Intonational Grammar of Catalan. PhD dissertation, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zimmermann, Malte. 2008. Contrastive focus and emphasis. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 55: 347–360.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Uth, Melanie & Marco García García
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.