Part of
New Trends in Grammaticalization and Language Change
Edited by Sylvie Hancil, Tine Breban and José Vicente Lozano
[Studies in Language Companion Series 202] 2018
► pp. 207230
Anthonissen, Lynn, De Wit
, Astrid & Mortelmans, Tanja 2016Aspect meets modality: A semantic analysis of the German am-progressive. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 28(1): 1-30.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bertinetto, Pier Marco
2000The progressive in Romance, as compared with English. In Dahl (ed.), 559-604.Google Scholar
Boogaart, Ronny
1999Aspect and Temporal Ordering: A Contrastive Analysis of Dutch and English. The Hague: HAG.Google Scholar
Bühler, Karl
1982The deictic field of language and deictic words. In Speech, Place, and Action: Studies in Deixis and Related Topics, Robert J. Jarvella & Wolfgang Klein (eds), 9-30. New York NY: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan & Fleischman, Suzanne
1995Modality in Grammar and Discourse [Typological Studies in Language 32]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Perkins, Revere Dale & Pagliuca, William
1994The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Curme, George O
1977A Grammar of the German Language. New York NY: Frederick Unger.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen
2000Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology EUROTYP 20–6]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Wit, Astrid & Patard, Adeline
De Wit, Astrid, Patard, Adeline & Brisard, Frank
2013A contrastive analysis of the present progressive in French and English. Studies in Language 37: 846-879.Google Scholar
Ebert, Karen H
2000Progressive markers in Germanic languages. In Dahl (ed.), 605-653.Google Scholar
Eckardt, Regine
2006Meaning Change in Grammaticalization: An Enquiry into Semantic Reanalysis. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Olga
1992Syntax. In The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. II: 1066-1476, Norman Blake (ed.), 207-408. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1991The evolution of dependent clause morpho-syntax in Biblical Hebrew. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. II: Types of Grammatical Markers [Typological Studies in Language 19:2], Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 257-310. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hasegawa, Yoko & Hirose, Yukio
2005What the Japanese language tells us about the alleged Japanese relational self. Australian Journal of Linguistics 25(2): 219-251.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd
1993Auxiliaries: Cognitive Forces and Grammaticalization. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Hirose, Yukio
1995Direct and indirect speech as quotations of public and private expression. Lingua 95(4): 223-238.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000Public and private self as two aspects of the speaker: A contrastive study of Japanese and English. Journal of Pragmatics 32(11): 1623-1656.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J
1991On some principles of grammaticization. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. I: Theoretical and Methodological Issues [Typological Studies in Language 19:1], Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 17-35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
1993 Grammaticalization . Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2003Grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Joseph, Brian D. & Janda, Richard D
2003The Handbook of Historical Linguistics. Malden MA: Blackwell.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kashino, Kenji
1993Imiron kara Mita Gohoo (Usage as Seen from Semantics). Tokyo: Kenkyusha.Google Scholar
Kranich, Svenja
2010The Progressive in Modern English: A Corpus-Based Study of Grammaticalization and Related Changes [Languages and Computers: Studies in Practical Linguistics 72]. Amsterdam: Rodopi.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W
2001The English present tense. English Language and Linguistics 5(2): 251-271.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larreya, Paul
2001Modal verbs and the expression of futurity in English, French and Italian. In Modal Verbs in Germanic and Romance Languages [Belgian Journal of Linguistics 14], Johan van der Auwera & Patrick Dendale (eds), 115-129. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
1985Grammaticalization: Synchronic variation and diachronic change. Lingua e Stile 20(3): 303-318.Google Scholar
Narrog, Heiko & Heine, Bernd
2011The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Nicolle, Steve
2012Diachrony and grammaticalization. In The Oxford Handbook of Tense and Aspect , Robert I. Binnick (ed.), 370-397. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
van Olmen, Daniël & Mortelmans, Tanja
2009Movement futures in English and Dutch: A contrastive analysis of be going to and gaan . In Studies on English Modality, Anastasios Tsangalidis & Roberta Facchinetti (eds), 357-386. Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Pagliuca, William
1994Perspectives on Grammaticalization [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 109]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Searle, John R
1983Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Heine, Bernd
1991Approaches to Grammaticalization, 2 Vols [Typological Studies in Language 19]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Vandelanotte, Lieven
2009Speech and Thought Representation in English: A Cognitive-Functional Approach [Topics in English Linguistics 65]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wada, Naoaki
2001Interpreting English Tenses: A Compositional Approach. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
2008Kootekiziko Tyuusinsei no Doai to Seioosyogo no Hoo/Zisei Gensyoo no Sooi (The degree of public-self-centeredness and differences of mood and tense phenomena in West-European languages). In Kotoba no Dainamizumu (The Dynamism of Language), Yu-ichi Mori, Yoshiki Nishimura, Susumu Yamada & Mitsu-aki Yoneyama (eds), 277-294. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
2013A unified model of tense and modality and the three-tier model of language use. Tsukuba English Studies 32: 29-70.Google Scholar
2015Differences in the semantic range of the English, Dutch, and German perfects and C-gravitation, paper presented at ICLC 13, Northumbria University, UK.Google Scholar