Part of
New Trends in Grammaticalization and Language Change
Edited by Sylvie Hancil, Tine Breban and José Vicente Lozano
[Studies in Language Companion Series 202] 2018
► pp. 259290
References (57)
References
Primary sources
Behaghel, Otto & Taeger, Burkhard (eds). 1984. Heliand und Genesis. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer [Heliand].DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(eds). 1996. Heliand und Genesis. Berlin: De Gruyter [Genesis].DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dobbie, Elliott Van Kirk (ed.). 1942. The Anglo-Saxon Minor Poems [Anglo-Saxon Poetic Records 6]. New York NY: Columbia University Press; London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
(ed.). 1953 Beowulf and Judith [Anglo-Saxon Poetic Records 4]. New York NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Krapp, George Philip & Dobbie, Elliott Van Kirk (eds). 1936. The Exeter Book [Anglo-Saxon Poetic Records 3]. New York NY: Columbia University Press; London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Krapp, George Philip (ed.). 1931. The Junius Manuscript [Anglo-Saxon Poetic Records 1]. New York NY: Columbia University Press; London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
(ed.). 1932a. The Paris Psalter and the Meters of Boethius [Anglo-Saxon Poetic Records 5]. New York NY: Columbia University Press; London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
(ed.). 1932b. The Vercelli Book [Anglo-Saxon Poetic Records 2]. New York NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Secondary sources
Abraham, Werner. 1991. The grammaticization of the German modal particle. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. II: Types of Grammatical Markers [Typological Studies in Language 19:2], Elizabeth Closs Traugot & Bernd Heine (eds), 331–380. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aijmer, Karin. 1997. I think: An English modal particle. In Modality in Germanic Languages. Historical and Comparative Perspective, Toril Swan & Olaf Jansen Westvik (eds), 1–47. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002. English Discourse Particles: Evidence from a Corpus [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 10]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Auer, Peter & Maschler, Yael. 2016. The family of NU and NÅ across the languages of Europe and beyond: Structure, function, and history. In Auer & Maschler (eds), 1–47.Google Scholar
(eds). 2016. NU & NÅ: A Family of Discourse Markers across the Languages of Europe and Beyond. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Betten, Anne. 1992. Sentence connection as an expression of medieval principles of representation. In Internal and External Factors in Syntactic Change, Marinel Gerritsen & Dieter Stein (eds), 157–174. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. 1990. The development of discourse markers in English. In Historical Linguistics and Philology, Jacek Fisiak [Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs 46], 45–71. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Discourse markers. In Historical Pragmatics, Andreas H. Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen (eds), 285–314. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cichosz, Anna. 2010. The Influence of Text Type on Word Order of Old Germanic Languages: A Corpus-based Contrastive Study of Old English and Old High German [Studies in English Medieval Language and Literature 27]. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Defour, Tine. 2007. A Diachronic Study of the Pragmatic Markers Well and Now: Fundamental Research into Semantic Development and Grammaticalisation by Means of a Corpus Study. PhD dissertation, University of Gent.Google Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth, Cornillie, Bert & Pietrandrea, Paola (eds). 2013. Discourse Markers and Modal Particles: Categorization and Description [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 234]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dostie, Gaétane. 2004. Pragmaticalisation et marqueurs discursifs: Analyse sémantique et traitement lexicographique. Brussels: De Boeck.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enkvist, Nils Erik & Wårvik, Brita. 1987. Old English þa, temporal claims, and narrative structure. In Papers from the 7th International Conference on Historical Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 48], Anna Giacolone Ramat, Onofrio Carruba & Giuliano Bernini (eds), 221–237. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enkvist, Nils Erik. 1994. Problems raised by Old English þa . In Writing vs Speaking: Language, Text, Discourse, Communication [Tübinger Beiträge zur Linguistik 392], Světla Čmejrková, František Daneš & Eva Havlová (eds) 55–62. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Erman, Britt & Kotsinas, Ulla-Britt. 1993. Pragmaticalization: The case of ba’ and you know . Studier i Modernspråkvetenskap 10: 76–93.Google Scholar
Fries, Udo. 1993. Towards a description of text deixis in Old English. In Anglo-Saxonica. Hans Schabram zum 65. Geburtstag, Klaus R. Grinda & Claus-Dieter Wetzel (eds), 527–540. Munich: Wilhelm Fink.Google Scholar
Gardner, Faith F. 1971. An Analysis of Syntactic Patterns of Old English. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Golato, Andrea. 2016. Nu(n) in standard German: Its functions as a temporal adverbial, as an adverbial structuring discourse, and as a modal particle and discourse marker. In Auer & Maschler (eds), 320–355.Google Scholar
Günthner, Susanne & Mutz, Katrin. 2004. Grammaticalization vs. pragmaticalization? The development of pragmatic markers in German and Italian. In What Makes Grammaticalization? A Look from its Fringes and its Components, Walter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer (eds), 77–107. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Claudi, Ulrike & Hünnemeyer, Friederike. 1991. Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hilmisdóttir, Helga. 2011. Giving a tone of determination: The interactional functions of as a tone particle in Icelandic conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 43: 261–287.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, Taejin. 1992. The Particle ‘þa’ in the West-Saxon Gospels: A Discourse-Level Analysis [Europäische Hochschulschriften 14, Angelsächsische Sprache und Literatur 249]. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Hans. 1933. Zur Wortstellung und –betonung im Altgermanischen. Beiträge zur Geschichte der Deutschen Sprache und Literatur 57: 1–109.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lenker, Ursula. 2000. Soþlice and witodlice: Discourse markers in Old English. In Pathways of Change. Grammaticalization in English [Studies in Language Companion Series 53], Olga Fischer, Anette Rosenbach & Dieter Stein (eds), 229–249. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Argument and Rhetoric: Adverbial Connectors in the History of English [Topics in English Linguistics 64]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Louviot, Elise. Forthcoming. Semantic bleaching of Nu in Old Saxon. Folia Linguistica Historica.
Mazeland, Harrie. 2016. The positionally sensitive workings of the Dutch particle nou . In Auer & Maschler (eds), 377–408.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, John. 1983. Old English Syntax: A Handbook. Tübingen: Niemeyer.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Metrich, René et al.. 1998. Les Invariables Difficiles : Dictionnaire allemand-français des particules, connecteurs, interjections et autres « mots de la communication », vol. 3. Richardmenil: Association des Nouveaux Cahiers d’Allemand.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Bruce. 1985. Old English Syntax. Oxford: Clarendon Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Molencki, Rafał. 1991. Complementation in Old English. Katowice: Uniwersytet Śląski.Google Scholar
Ocampo, Francisco. 2006. Movement towards discourse is not grammaticalization: The evolution of claro from adjective to discourse particle in spoken Spanish. In Selected Proceedings of the 9th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, Nuria Sagarra & Almeida Jacqueline Toribio (eds), 308–319. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Pérennec, Marcel. 1995. Von Zeitdeiktika zu Text-und Diskurskonnektoren: Überlegungen zur sprachlichen Temporalität. In Rand und Band: Abgrenzung und Verknüpfung als Grundtendenzen des Deutschen, Festschrift für Eugène Faucher zum 60. René Metrich and Marcel Vuillaume (eds), 299–314. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Petrova, Svetlana. 2006. A discourse-based approach to verb placement in early West-Germanic. In Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure 5, Shinichiro Ishihara, Michaela Schmitz & Anne Schwarz (eds), 153–185. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Pintzuk, Susan. 1996. Cliticization in Old English. In Approaching Second: Second Position Clitics and Related Phenomena, Aaron L. Halpern & Arnold M. Zwicky (eds), 375–409. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Saari, Mirja & Lehti-Eklund, Hanna. 2016. The Swedish nu: A historical perspective. In Auer & Maschler (eds), 409–441.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Trousdale, Graeme. 2013. Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1982. From propositional to textual and expressive meanings: Some semantic-pragmatic aspects of grammaticalization. In Perspectives on Historical Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 24], Winfred P. Lehman & Yakov Malkiel (eds), 245–271. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1989. On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 65: 31–55.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1995. The role of the development of discourse markers in a theory of grammaticalization. Paper presented at the ICHL XII, Manchester. Version of 11/97. <[URL]>
. 2003. From subjectification to intersubjectification. In Motives for Language Change, Raymond Hickey (ed.), 124–139. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Discussion article: Discourse markers, modal particles, and contrastive analysis, synchronic and diachronic. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 6: 139–157.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Gelderen, Elly. 2001. The syntax of mood particles in the history of English. Folia Linguistica Historica 22(1–2): 301–330.Google Scholar
van Kemenade, Ans. 1987. Syntactic Case and Morphological Case in the History of English. Dordrecht: Foris.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waltereit, Richard & Detges, Ulrich. 2007. Different functions, different histories: Modal particles and discourse markers from a diachronic point of view. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 6: 61–80.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wårvik, Brita. 1994. Participants tracking narrative structure: Old English þa and topicality. In Topics and Comments: Papers from the Discourse Project [Anglicana Turkuensia 13], Sanna-Kaisa Tanskanen & Brita Wårvik (eds), 115–139. Turku: University of Turku.Google Scholar
. 2011. Connective or ‘disconnective’ discourse marker? Old English þa, Multifunctionality and narrative structuring. In Connectives in Synchrony and Diachrony in European Languages [Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English 8], Anneli Meurman-Solin & Ursula Lenker (eds). <[URL]>Google Scholar
Wischer, Ilse. 2000. Grammaticalization vs. lexicalization. “methinks” there is some confusion. In Pathways of Change. Grammaticalization in English [Studies in Language Companion Series 53], Olga Fischer, Anette Rosenbach & Dieter Stein (eds), 355–370. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Cichosz, Anna, Łukasz Grabowski & Piotr Pęzik
2024. Formulaic language in Old English prose. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 25:3  pp. 467 ff. DOI logo
Xu, Na
2023.  Old English hæleð and the authorship of The Dream of the Rood . Studia Neophilologica  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.