Chapter published in:
New Trends in Grammaticalization and Language Change
Edited by Sylvie Hancil, Tine Breban and José Vicente Lozano
[Studies in Language Companion Series 202] 2018
► pp. 381430
References

References

Aijmer, Karin
2002English Discourse Particles. Evidence from a Corpus [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 10]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Understanding Pragmatic Markers. A Variational Pragmatic Approach. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
Aitken, Adam Jack
1979Scottish speech: A historical view, with special reference to the Standard English of Scotland. In Languages of Scotland, Adam Jack Aitken & Tom McArthur (eds), 85–118. Edinburgh: W. & R. Chambers.Google Scholar
Algeo, John
2006British or American English? A Handbook of Word and Grammar Patterns. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Allerton, David J.
2009Tag questions. In One Language, Two Grammars? Günter Rohdenburg & Julia Schlüter (eds), 306–323. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Amador-Moreno, Carolina P.
2010An Introduction to Irish English. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Amador-Moreno, Carolina. P.
2015 “There’s, like, total silence again, roysh, and no one says anything”: Fictional representations of “new” pragmatic markers and quotatives in Irish English. In Amador-Moreno, McCafferty & Vaughan (eds), 370–389.Google Scholar
Amador-Moreno, Carolina. P., McCafferty, Kevin & Vaughan, Elaine
2015aIntroduction. In Amador-Moreno, McCafferty & Vaughan (eds), 1–16.Google Scholar
(eds) 2015bPragmatic Markers in Irish English [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 258]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, Gisle
2001Pragmatic Markers and Sociolinguistic Variation. A Relevance-Theoretic Approach to the Language of Adolescents [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 84]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Anderwald, Lieselotte
2004The varieties of English spoken in the Southeast of England: Morphology and syntax. In A Handbook of Varieties of English, Vol. 2: Morphology & Syntax, Bernd Kortmann, Kate Burridge, Rajend Mesthrie, Edgar W. Schneider & Clive Upton (eds), 175–195. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Axelsson, Karin
2011Tag Questions in Fiction Dialogue. PhD dissertation, University of Gothenburg.Google Scholar
Barron, Anne
2015“And your wedding is the twenty-second <.> of June is it?” Tag questions in Irish English. In Amador-Moreno, McCafferty & Vaughan (eds), 203–228.Google Scholar
Barron, Anne & Pandarova, Irina
2016The sociolinguistics of language use in Ireland. In Sociolinguistics in Ireland. Raymond Hickey (ed.), 107–130. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Barron, Anne, Pandarova, Irina & Muderack, Karoline
2015Tag questions across Irish and British English: A corpus analysis of form and function. Multilingua 34(4): 495–525.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beal, Joan
2004English dialects in the North of England: Morphology and syntax. In A Handbook of Varieties of English, Vol. 2: Morphology & Syntax, Bernd Kortmann, Kate Burridge, Rajend Mesthrie, Edgar W. Schneider & Clive Upton (eds.), 114–141. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward
1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Binchy, James
2005 Three forty two so please: Politeness for sale in Southern-Irish service encounters. In The Pragmatics of Irish English, Anne Barron & Klaus P. Schneider (eds), 313–335. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blumenthal-Dramé, Alice
2013Entrenchment in Usage-Based Theories. What Corpus Data Do and Do Not Reveal about the Mind. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J.
1996Pragmatic Markers in English. Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brinton Laurel J.
2008The Comment Clause in English. Syntactic Origins and Pragmatic Development. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Patricia J., Tomasello, Michael, Dodson, Kelly & Lewis, Lawrence B.
1999Children’s tendency to overgeneralize their argument structure constructions: The entrenchment hypothesis. Child Development 70: 1325–1337.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L.
2007Frequency of Use and the Organization of Language. Oxford: OUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carter, Ronald & McCarthy, Michael
2006The Cambridge Grammar of English. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Christensen, Lis
1996A First Glossary of Hiberno-English. Odense: Odense University Press.Google Scholar
Clancy, Brian & Vaughan, Elaine
2012 “It’s lunacy now”: A corpus-based pragmatic analysis of the use of ‘now’ in contemporary Irish English. In New Perspectives on Irish English [Varieties of English around the World G44], Bettina Migge & Máire Ní Chiosáin (eds), 225–245. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clancy, Patricia M., Thompson, Sandra A., Suzuki, Ryoko & Tao, Hongyin
1996The conversational use of reactive tokens in English, Japanese, and Mandarin. Journal of Pragmatics 26: 355–387.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Columbus, Georgie
2009aA corpus-based analysis of invariant tags in five varieties of English. In Corpus Linguistics. Refinements and Reassessments, Antoinette Renouf & Andrew Kehoe (eds), 401–414. Amsterdam: Rodopi.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009bIrish like as an invariant tag: Evidence from ICE-Ireland. Paper presented at American Association for Corpus Linguistics (AACL) 2009. Edmonton, Canada. http://​www​.ualberta​.ca​/~aacl2009​/PDFs​/Columbus2009AACL​.pdf> (27 September 2015).Google Scholar
Corrigan, Karen P.
2010Dialects of English. Irish English, Vol. 1: Northern Ireland. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
2015 “I always think of people here, you know, saying like after every sentence”: The dynamics of discourse-pragmatic markers in Northern Irish English. In Amador-Moreno, McCafferty & Vaughan (eds.), 37–64. Google Scholar
Croft, William
2001Radical Construction Grammar. Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: OUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
D’Arcy, Alexandra
2005LIKE: Syntax and Development. PhD dissertation, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
2007LIKE and language ideology: Disentangling the fact from fiction. American Speech 82(4): 386–419.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Denis, Derek & Tagliamonte, Sali A.
2016Innovation, right? Change, you know? Utterance-final tags in Canadian English. In Discourse-Pragmatic Variation and Change in English. New Methods and Insights, Heike Pichler (ed.), 86–112. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dolan, Terence P.
2012A Dictionary of Hiberno-English, 3rd edn. Dublin: Gill & MacMillan.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W., Schuetze-Coburn, Stephan, Cumming, Susanna & Paolino, Danae
1993Outline of discourse transcription. In Talking Data. Transcription and Coding in Discourse Research, Jane A. Edwards & Martin D. Lampert (eds), 45–89. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W., Chafe, Wallace L., Meyer, Charles & Thompson, Sandra A.
2000Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English, Part One. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium. http://​www​.linguistics​.ucsb​.edu​/research​/santa​-barbara​-corpusGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W., Chafe, Wallace L., Meyer, Charles, Thompson, Sandra A. & Martey, Nii
2003Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English, Part Two. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium. http://​www​.linguistics​.ucsb​.edu​/research​/santa​-barbara​-corpusGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W. & Englebretson, Robert
2004Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English, Part Three. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium. http://​www​.linguistics​.ucsb​.edu​/research​/santa​-barbara​-corpusGoogle Scholar
2005Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English, Part Four. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium. http://​www​.linguistics​.ucsb​.edu​/research​/santa​-barbara​-corpusGoogle Scholar
Evans, Vyvyan & Green, Melanie
2006Cognitive Linguistics. An Introduction. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J., Kay, Paul & O’Connor, Mary Catherine 1988Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions. Language 64: 501–538.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Kerstin
(ed.) 2006Approaches to Discourse Particles. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E. & Thompson, Sandra A.
1996Interactional units in conversation: Syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the management of turns. In Interaction and Grammar, Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 134–184. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Bruce
1996Pragmatic markers. Pragmatics 6(2): 167–190.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fried, Mirjam
2008Constructions and constructs: Mapping a diachronic process. In Constructions and Language Change, Alexander Bergs & Gabriele Diewald (eds), 47–79. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Fried, Mirjam, Östman, Jan-Ola & Verschueren, Jef
2010Variation and Change. Pragmatic Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gisborne, Nikolas & Patten, Amanda
2011Construction grammar and grammaticalization. In The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds), 92–104. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E.
1995Constructions. A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Haiman, John
1994Ritualization and the development of language. In Perspectives on Grammaticalization, William Pagliuca (ed.), 3–28. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hancil, Sylvie, Haselow, Alexander & Post, Margje
2015Final Particles. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harris, John
1991Conservatism versus substratal transfer in Irish English. In Dialects of English. Studies in Grammatical Variation, Peter Trudgill & Jack K. Chambers (eds), 191–212. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Haselow, Alexander
2012Discourse organization and the rise of final then in the history of English. In English Historical Linguistics 2010. Selected Papers from the Sixteenth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (ICEHL 16), Pécs, 23–27 August 2010 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 325], Irén Hegedűs & Alexandra Fodor (eds), 153–175. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
2016A processual view on grammar: Macrogrammar and the final field in spoken syntax. Language Sciences 54: 77–101.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hedevind, Bertil
1967The Dialect of Dentdale in the West Riding of Yorkshire[Studia anglistica upsaliensia 5]. Uppsala: University of Uppsala.Google Scholar
Hewings, Ann & Hewings, Martin
2005Grammar and Context. An Advanced Resource Book. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond
2007Irish English. History and Present Forms. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015The pragmatics of Irish English and Irish. In Amador-Moreno, McCafferty & Vaughan (eds), 17–36.Google Scholar
Hilpert, Martin
2013Constructional Change in English. Developments in Allomorphy, Word Formation, and Syntax. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus
2004Lexicalization and grammaticalization: opposite or orthogonal? In What Makes Grammaticalization. A Look from its Fringes and its Components, Walter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer (eds), 21–42. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
1993Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K.
2002The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Izutsu, Mitsuko N. & Izutsu, Katsunobu
2014Truncation and backshift: Two pathways to sentence-final coordinating conjunctions. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 15(1): 62–92.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. & Smith, Sara W.
1998And people just you know like ‘wow’: Discourse markers as negotiating strategies. In Discourse Markers. Descriptions and Theory [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 57], Andreas H. Jucker & Yael Ziv (eds), 171–201. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kallen, Jeffrey L.
2005Silence and mitigation in Irish English discourse. In The Pragmatics of Irish English, Anne Barron & Klaus P. Schneider (eds), 47–71. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006 Arrah, like, you know: The dynamics of discourse marking in ICE-Ireland. Presented at the Sociolinguistics Symposium 16, University of Limerick 6–8 July 2006 <http://​www​.tara​.tcd​.ie​/bitstream​/handle​/2262​/50586​/Arrah%20like%20y%27know​.pdf​?sequence​=1​&isAllowed​=y (29 September, 2015).Google Scholar
2013Irish English, Vol. 2: The Republic of Ireland. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2015“Actually, it’s unfair to say that I was throwing stones”: Comparative perspectives on uses of actually in ICE-Ireland. In Amador-Moreno, McCafferty & Vaughan (eds), 135–155.Google Scholar
Kallen, Jeffrey L. & Kirk, John M.
2012SPICE-Ireland. A User’s Guide. Belfast: Cló Ollscoil na Banríona.Google Scholar
Kirk, John M. & Kallen, Jeffrey L.
2010How Scottish is Irish Standard English? In Northern Lights, Northern Words. Selected Papers from the FRLSU Conference, Kirkwall 2009, Robert McColl Millar (ed.), 178–213. Aberdeen: Forum for Research on the Languages of Scotland and Ireland. https://​www​.abdn​.ac​.uk​/pfrlsu​/documents​/Kirk%20and%20Kallen,%20How%20Scottish%20is%20Irish%20Standard%20English​.pdf> (25 August 2015).Google Scholar
Kirk, John M., Kallen, Jeffrey L., Lowry, Orla, Rooney, Anne & Mannion, Margaret
2011The SPICE-Ireland Corpus. Systems of Pragmatic Annotation for the Spoken Component of ICE-Ireland. Version 1.2.2. Belfast: Queen’s University Belfast and Dublin: Trinity College Dublin.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1987Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 1: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lenker, Ursula
2010Argument and Rhetoric. Adverbial Connectors in the History of English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lucek, Stephen
2011 “I came up and I seen this haze of smoke, like”: How Irish are invariant tags? Trinity College Dublin Journal of Postgraduate Research 18: 95–108.Google Scholar
Migge, Bettina
2015 Now in the speech of newcomers to Ireland. In Amador-Moreno, McCafferty & Vaughan (eds), 390–407.Google Scholar
Miller, Jim & Weinert, Regina
1995The function of LIKE in dialogue. Journal of Pragmatics 23: 365–393.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mulder, Jean & Thompson, Sandra A.
2008The grammaticization of but as a final particle in English conversation. In Crosslinguistic Studies of Clause Combining [Typological Studies in Language 80], Ritva Laury (ed.), 179–204. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mulder, Jean, Thompson, Sandra A. & Penry Williams, Cara
2009Final but in Australian English conversation. In Comparative Studies in Australian and New Zealand English. Grammar and Beyond [Varieties of English around the World G39], Pam Peters, Peter Collins & Adam Smith (eds), 339–359. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Bróna
2015A corpus-based investigation of pragmatic markers and sociolinguistic variation in Irish English. In Amador-Moreno, McCafferty & Vaughan (eds), 65–88.Google Scholar
Noël, Dirk
2007Diachronic construction grammar and grammaticalization theory. Functions of Language 14: 177–202.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norrick, Neal R.
1995 Hunh-tags and evidentiality in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 23: 687–692.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Overstreet, Maryann
1999Whales, Candlelight, and Stuff Like That. General Extenders in English Discourse. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Paradis, Carita
2003Between epistemic modality and degree: The case of really . In Modality in Contemporary English, Roberta Facchinetti, Manfred Krug & Frank Palmer (eds), 191–220. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Jan, Svartvik
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team
2016R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://​www​.r​-project​.orgGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah
1987Discourse Markers. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, Hans-Jörg
2000English Abstract Nouns as Conceptual Shells. From Corpus to Cognition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Does frequency in text instantiate entrenchment in the cognitive system? In Quantitative Methods in Cognitive Semantics. Corpus-Driven Approaches, Dylan Glynn & Kerstin Fischer (eds), 101–133. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016A framework for understanding linguistic entrenchment and its psychological foundations. In Entrenchment and the Psychology of Language Learning. How We Reorganize and Adapt Linguistic Knowledge, Hans-Jörg Schmid (ed.), 9–35. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Schneider, Klaus P. & Barron, Anne
2008Variational Pragmatics. A Focus on Regional Varieties in Pluricentric Languages [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 178]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schweinberger, Martin
2012The discourse marker LIKE in Irish English. In New Perspectives on Irish English [Varieties of English around the World G44], Bettina Migge & Máire Ní Chiosáin (eds.), 179–201. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014The Discourse Marker LIKE: A Corpus-based Analysis of Selected Varieties of English. PhD dissertation, University of Hamburg.Google Scholar
2015A comparative study of the pragmatic marker like in Irish English and in south-eastern varieties of British English. In Amador-Moreno, McCafferty & Vaughan (eds), 114–134.Google Scholar
Siemund, Peter, Maier, Georg & Schweinberger, Martin
2009Towards a more fine-grained analysis of the areal distributions of non-standard features of English. In Language Contacts Meet English Dialects. Studies in Honour of Markku Filppula, Esa Penttilä & Heli Paulasto (eds), 20–45. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Siertsema, Berthe
1980Sidelights on tag questions. In The Melody of Language, Linda R. Waugh & Cornelis H. van Schooneveld (eds), 299–314. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Stenström, Anna-Brita
1986What does really really do? Strategies in speech and writing. In English in Speech and Writing. A Symposium, Gunnel Tottie & Ingegerd Bäcklund (eds), 149–163. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A.
2005 So who? Like how? Just what?: Discourse markers in the conversations of young Canadians. Journal of Pragmatics 37: 1896–1915.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A.
2012Roots of English. Exploring the History of Dialects. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tottie, Gunnel & Hoffmann, Sebastian
2006Tag questions in British and American English. Journal of English Linguistics 34(4): 283–311.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Tag questions in English: The first century. Journal of English Linguistics. 37(2): 130–161.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2014Toward a constructional framework for research on language change. In Grammaticalization –Theory and Data [Studies in Language Companion Series 162], Sylvie Hancil & Ekkehard König (eds), 87–105. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
2015Toward a coherent account of grammatical constructionalization. In Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Grammar 18], Jóhanna Barðdal, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer & Spike Gildea (eds), 51–79. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016On the rise of types of clause-final pragmatic markers in English. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 17(1): 26–54.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Trousdale, Graeme
2013Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: OUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Walshe, Shane
2016Irish society as portrayed in Irish film. In Sociolinguistics in Ireland, Raymond Hickey (ed.), 320–343. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Izutsu, Mitsuko Narita & Katsunobu Izutsu
2020. American and Irish English speakers’ perceptions of the final particlessoandbut. World Englishes Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.