References
Bergmann, Rolf & Nerius, Dieter
1997Die Entwicklung der Großschreibung im Deutschen. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Birkmann, Thomas
1987Präteritopräsentia: Morphologische Entwicklungen einer Sonderklasse in den altgermanischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L.
1985Morphology. A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form [Typological Studies in Language 9]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007Frequency of Use and the Organization of Language. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, John L.
2010Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. & Hopper, Paul
(eds) 2001Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure [Typological Studies in Language 45]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew
1994Inflection classes, gender, and the principle of contrast. Language 70: 737–788.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Eve
1993The Lexicon in Acquisition. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William
2000Explaining Language Change. An Evolutionary Approach. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Curzan, Anne
2014Fixing English. Prescriptivism and Language History. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen
2004The Growth and Maintenance of Linguistic Complexity [Studies in Language Companion Series 71]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dammel, Antje
2011Konjugationsklassenwandel: Prinzipien des Ab-, Um- und Ausbaus verbalflexivischer Allomorphie in germanischen Sprachen. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dammel, Antje, Nowak, Jessica & Schmuck, Mirjam
2010Strong verb paradigm leveling in four Germanic languages. A category frequency approach. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 22(4): 341–365.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Vogelaer, Gunther & Seiler, Guido
(eds) 2012The Dialect Laboratory: Dialects as a Testing Ground for Theories of Language Change [Studies in Language Companion Series 128]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Demske, Ulrike
2001Grammatische Merkmale und Relationen. Diachrone Studien zur Nominalphrase des Deutschen. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang U.
2000Subtraction. In Morphology. An International Handbook on Inflection and Word-Formation, Geert E. Booij, Christian Lehmann, Joachim Mugdan & Stavros Skopetea (eds), 581–587. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dufter, Andreas, Fleischer, Jürg & Seiler, Guido
(eds) 2009Describing and Modeling Variation in Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ebert, Robert P.
1999Historische Syntax des Deutschen II: 1300–1750, 2nd edn. Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Eitelmann, Matthias
2016Support for end-weight as a determinant of linguistic variation and change. Support Strategies in Language Variation and Change. Special issue of English Language and Linguistics 20(3): 395–420.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enger, Hans-Olav
2004bA possible constraint on non-affixal inflection. Lingua 114: 59–75.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fanego, Teresa, Pérez Guerra, Javier & López-Couso, María José
(eds) 2002English Historical Syntax and Morphology: Selected Papers from 11 ICEHL, Santiago de Compostela, 7–11 September 2000 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 223]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fleischer, Jürg & Simon, Horst J.
(eds) 2013Comparing Diachronies. Berlin: De Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Golston, Chris & Wiese, Richard
1996Zero morphology and constraint interaction: subtraction and epenthesis in German dialects. Yearbook of Morphology 1995: 143–159.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holsinger, David & Houseman, Paul
1999Lenition in Hessian: Cluster reduction and ‘subtractive plurals’. Yearbook of Morphology 1998: 159–174.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2008Creating economical morphosyntactic patterns in language change. In Language Universals and Language Change, Jeff Good (ed.), 185–214. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Hawkins, John A.
1994A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2004Efficiency and Complexity in Grammars. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kranich, Svenja & Breban, Tine
2018Lost in Change: Causes and Processes in the Loss of Grammatical Constructions and Categories. Workshop at the 40th DGfS-Conference, Stuttgart, 7–9 March, 2018. [URL] (14 April 2018).
Kroch, Anthony
1989Function and grammar in the history of English: Periphrastic do. In Language Change and Variation [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 52], Ralph W. Fasold & Deborah Schiffrin (eds), 132–172. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krug, Manfred
2003Frequency as a determinant in grammatical variation and change. In Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English, Günter Rohdenburg & Britta Mondorf (eds), 7–68. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kürschner, Sebastian
2008Deklinationsklassen-Wandel. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lass, Roger
1990How to do things with junk: Exaptation in language evolution. Journal of Linguistics 26: 79–102.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, David
1999The Development of Language. Acquisition, Change, and Evolution. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, Brian, Malchukov, Andrej & Moravcsik, Edith
(eds) 2015Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Mondorf, Britta
Mondorf, Britta & Pérez-Guerra, Javier
(eds) 2016aSupport Strategies in Language Variation and Change. Special issue of English Language and Linguistics 20(3).DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016bIntroduction. In Support Strategies in Language Variation and Change, Britta Mondorf & Javier Pérez-Guerra (eds). Special issue of English Language and Linguistics 20(3): 383–393.Google Scholar
Nedergaard Thomsen, Ole
(ed.) 2006Competing Models of Linguistic Change. Evolution and Beyond [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 279]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nübling, Damaris
2000Prinzipien der Irregularisierung. Eine kontrastive Untersuchung von zehn Verben in zehn germanischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nübling, Damaris
2008Was tun mit Flexionsklassen? Deklinationsklassen und ihr Wandel im Deutschen und seinen Dialekten. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 75(3): 282–330.Google Scholar
Norde, Muriel
1997The History of the Genitive in Swedish. A Case Study in Degrammaticalization. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Norde, Muriel & Van de Velde, Freek
(eds) 2016Exaptation and Language Change [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 336]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paul, Hermann
1920[1995]Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte, 5th edn, 10th printing. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Rohdenburg, Günter
1996Cognitive complexity and increased grammatical explicitness in English. Cognitive Linguistics 7(2): 149–182.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rohdenburg, Günter & Mondorf, Britta
(eds) 2003Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rohdenburg, Günter & Schlüter, Julia
(eds) 2009One Language – Two Grammars: Grammatical Differences between British and American English. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosenbach, Anette
2002Genitive Variation in English: Conceptual Factors in Synchronic and Diachronic Studies. Berlin: De Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seiler, Guido
2007Microvariation in LFG and OT. In Architectures, Rules and Preferences: Variations on Themes by Joan W. Bresnan, Annie Zaenen, Jane Simpson, Tracy Holloway King, Jane Grimshaw, Joan Maling & Chris Manning (eds), 529–547. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Simon, Horst J.
2010Exaptation in der Sprachwandeltheorie. Eine Begriffspräzisierung. In Prozesse sprachlicher Verstärkung. Typen formaler Resegmentierung und semantischer Remotivierung, Rüdiger Harnisch (ed.), 41–58. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Simon, Horst J. & Wiese, Heike
2011What are exceptions and what can be done about them? In Expecting the Unexpected. Exceptions in Grammar, Horst J. Simon & Heike Wiese (eds), 3–30. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stein, Dieter
1990The Semantics of Syntactic Change. Aspects of the Evolution of ‘do’ in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thornton, Anna Maria
2012Reduction and maintenance of overabundance. A case study on Italian verb paradigms. Word Structure 5(2): 183–207.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tiersma, Peter M.
1982Local and general markedness. Language 58: 832–849.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wurzel, Wolfgang U.
2001Flexionsmorphologie und Natürlichkeit. Ein Beitrag zur morphologischen Theoriebildung. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Heinemann, Sabine
2021. Hochfrequenz und Irregularität – zur Stammallomorphie bei (a)frz. al(l)er/(a)it. andare, (a)frz. venir/(a)it. venire und afrz. ester/(a)it. stare . Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie 137:4  pp. 961 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 february 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.