Chapter published in:
Reorganising Grammatical Variation: Diachronic studies in the retention, redistribution and refunctionalisation of linguistic variants
Edited by Antje Dammel, Matthias Eitelmann and Mirjam Schmuck
[Studies in Language Companion Series 203] 2018
► pp. 17–56

Plural inflection in North Sea Germanic languages

A multivariate analysis of morphological variation

| University of Amsterdam | Fryske Akademy
| University of Wuppertal | Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań
The present study explores the variation in the plural inflection of eight varieties of Frisian and English, focusing on irregular plural formations. The aim of the study is to identify and assess the significance of the factors which contributed to the preservation and emergence of irregular plural patterns in the investigated varieties. Multivariate regression analysis, which was employed to weigh the significance of individual factors, reveals that the retention and emergence of irregular plural patterns is primarily determined by a combination of three major factors: relative frequency, absolute frequency and salience. These factors can be reduced to underlying cognitive processes, including the storage and retrieval of linguistic information in the human brain. Another relevant factor, semantics, affects the lemma frequency profile, but can gain momentum as a factor in its own right due to analogical co-activation in language processing.
Keywords: irregular plurals, frequency, salience, English, Scots, Frisian, multivariate analysis
Published online: 24 October 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.203.02ver
References

References

Adamczyk, Elżbieta
2010 Morphological reanalysis and the Old English u-declension. Anglia. Zeitschrift für Englische Philologie 128(3): 365–390.Google Scholar
2013 On morphological realignments in Old English root nouns. Transactions of the Philological Society 111(3): 274–300.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 Patterns of reorganization of the early English nominal inflection. The case of Old English consonantal stems. NOWELE 67(3): 51–75.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018 Reshaping of the Nominal Inflection in Early Northern West Germanic [Nowele Supplement Series 31]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Åkerberg, Bengt
2012 Älvdalsk grammatik. Älvdalen: Ulum Dalska.Google Scholar
Berman, Ruth A.
2003 Children’s lexical innovations: Developmental perspectives on Hebrew verb structure. In Language Processing and Acquisition in Languages of Semitic, Root-Based, Morphology [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 28], Joseph Shimron (ed.), 243–292. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bremmer Jr., Rolf H.
2009 An Introduction to Old Frisian: History, Grammar, Reader, Glossary. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
BNC: The British National Corpus, version 3 (BNC XML Edition)
2007 Distributed by Oxford University Computing Services on behalf of the BNC Consortium. http://​www​.natcorp​.ox​.ac​.uk (1 September 2014).
Bybee, Joan L.
1985 Morphology: A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form [Typological Studies in Language 9]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1995 Are stem changes as natural as affixes? Linguistics 33(4): 633.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. & Hopper, Paul J.
2001 Introduction to Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure. In Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure [Typological Studies in Language 45], Joan Bybee & Paul Hopper (eds), 1–26. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Ryan, Svare, Ragnar & Salmons, Joseph C.
2012 Quantifying the evolutionary dynamics of German verbs. Journal of Historical Linguistics 2(2): 153–172.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Corbett, Greville, Hippisley, Andrew R., Brown, Dunstan & Marriott, Paul
2001 Frequency, regularity and the paradigm: A perspective from Russian on a complex relation. In Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure [Typological Studies in Language 45], Joan L. Bybee & Paul J. Hopper (eds), 201–226. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Daelemans, Walter
2002 A comparison of analogical modeling of language to memory-based language processing. In Analogical Modelling: An Exemplar-based Approach to Language [Human Cognitive Processing 10], Royal Skousen, Deryle Lonsdale & Dilworth B. Parkinson (eds), 157–179. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dammel, Antje & Kürschner, Sebastian
2008 Complexity in nominal plural allomorphy. In Language Complexity: Typology, Contact, Change [Studies in Language Companion Series [Studies in Language Companion Series 94], Matti Miestamo, Kaius Sinnemäki & Fred Karlsson (eds), 244–261. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dammel, Antje, Kürschner, Sebastian & Nübling, Damaris
2010 Pluralallomorphie in zehn germanischen Sprachen; Konvergenzen und Divergenzen in Ausdrucksverfahren und Konditionierung. In Kontrastive germanistische Linguistik, Vol. 2 [Germanistische Linguistik 206–209], Damaris Nübling (ed.), 587–642. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Diessel, Holger
2007 Frequency effects in language acquisition, language use, and diachronic change. New Ideas in Psychology 25(2): 104–123.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dehaene, Stanislas
2003 The neural basis of Weber-Fechner’s law: Neuronal recordings reveal a logarithmic scale for number. Trends in Cognitive Science 7: 145–147.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eekman, Stephan
2013 The Diachronic Development of Irregular Noun Morphology in North Germanic Languages: A Logistic Regression Analysis (MA-paper). Universiteit van Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Ekwall, Eilert
1975 A History of Modern English Sounds and Morphology, Alan Ward (trans.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Enger, Hans-Olav
2004 On the relation between gender and declension. A diachronic perspective from Norwegian. Studies in Language 28: 51–82.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ernestus, Mirjam T. C.
2000 Voice Assimilation and Segment Reduction in Casual Dutch: A Corpus-Based Study of the Phonology-Phonetics Interface. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Fertig, David
2013 Analogy and Morphological Change. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
Gardani, Francesco
2013 Dynamics of Morphological Productivity. The Evolution of Noun Classes from Latin to Italian. Leiden: Brill.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldschneider, Jennifer & DeKeyser, Robert
2001 Explaining the ‘natural order of L2 morpheme acquisition’ in English: A meta-analysis of multiple determinants. Language Learning 51: 1–50.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H.
1966 Language Universals, with Special Reference to Feature Hierarchies. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2006 Against markedness (and what to replace it with). Journal of Linguistics 42(1): 25–70.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 Reply to Haiman and Croft. Cognitive Linguistics 19(1): 59–66.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Healey, Antonette di Paolo, Holland, John, McDougall, David, McDougall, Ian & Xiang, Xin
(eds) 2009 The Dictionary of Old English Corpus in Electronic Form. Toronto: Toronto University Press.http://​www​.doe​.utoronto​.ca​/pages​/pub​/web​-corpus​.html
Hogg, Richard M. & Fulk, Robert D.
2011 A Grammar of Old English, Vol. 2: Morphology. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kastovsky, Dieter
1995 Morphological reanalysis and typology: The case of the German r-plural and why English did not develop it. In Historical Linguistics: Selected Papers from the 11th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Los Angeles, 16–20 August 1993 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 124], Henning Andersen (ed.), 227–238. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
1997 Morphological classification in English historical linguistics: The interplay of diachrony, synchrony and morphological theory. In To Explain the Present: Studies in the Changing English Language in Honour of Matti Rissanen [Mémoires de La Société Néophilologique de Helsinki 52], Terttu Nevalainen & Leena Kahlas-Tarkka (eds), 63–75. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Kürschner, Sebastian
2008 Deklinationsklassen-Wandel: Eine diachron-kontrastive Studie zur Entwicklung der Pluralallomorphie im Deutschen, Niederländischen, Schwedischen und Dänischen. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Erez, Michel, Jean-Baptiste, Jackson, Joe, Tang, Tina & Nowak, Martin A.
2007 Quantifying the evolutionary dynamics of language. Nature 449 (7163): 713–716.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Loey, A.
1976 Middelnederlandse spraakkunst, Deel I: Vormleer. Groningen: H.D. Tjeenk Willink.Google Scholar
Munske, Horst Haider
(ed.) 2001 Handbuch des Friesischen (Handbook of Frisian Studies). Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, Hans Frede
1981 Old English and the Continental Germanic Languages: A Survey of Morphological and Phonological Interrelations. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck.Google Scholar
2000 The Early Runic Language of Scandinavia: Studies in Germanic Dialect Geography. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Paul, Hermann
1920 Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte, 5th edn. Halle (Saale): Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Pezzullo, John C.
Logistic Regression. http://​statpages​.org​/logistic​.html (4 January 2015)
Ringe, Don
2006 A Linguistic History of English, Vol.1: From Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Germanic. Oxford: OUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Mairi
1987 The Concise Scots Dictionary. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press.Google Scholar
de Saussure, Ferdinand
1916 Cours de linguistique générale, Charles Bally, Albert Sechehaye & Albert Riedlinger (eds). Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Schwink, Frederick W.
2004 The Third Gender. Studies in the Origin and History of Germanic Grammatical Gender. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Simpson, John A. & Weiner, Edmund
(eds) 1989 The Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: OUP. http://​www​.oed​.com/Google Scholar
(eds) 1989 The Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: OUP. http://​www​.oed​.com/
Skousen, Royal
1989 Analogical Modeling of Language. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Steller, Walther
1928 Abriss der altfriesischen Grammatik, mit Berücksichtigung der westgermanischen Dialecte des altenglischen, altsächsischen und althochdeutschen. Halle (Saale): Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Stolz, Thomas, Otsuka, Hitomi, Urdze, Aina, van der Auwera, Johan
2012 Introduction: Irregularity – glimpses of a ubiquitous phenomenon. In Irregularity in Morphology (and Beyond), Thomas Stolz, Otsuka Hitomi, Urdze Aina & Johan van der Auwera (eds), 7–37. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Strik, Oscar
2015 Modelling Analogical Change: A History of Swedish and Frisian Verb Inflection. Groningen: University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Tiersma, Peter M.
1982 Local and general markedness. Language 58(4): 832–849.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Versloot, Arjen P.
2008 Mechanisms of Language Change: Vowel Reduction in 15th century West Frisian. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
2014 Die -ar-Plurale im Altwestfriesischen mit einem Exkurs über die sächlichen Plurale im Westfriesischen. Us Wurk 63: 93–114.Google Scholar
Versloot, Arjen P. & Adamczyk, Elżbieta
2014 Corpus size and composition: Evidence from the inflectional morphology of nouns in Old English and Old Frisian. In Directions for Old Frisian Philology, Rolf H. Bremmer Jr., Stephen Laker & Oebele Vries (eds). Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik 73: 539–569.Google Scholar
Versloot, Arjen P. & Nijdam, Han
(eds) 2011 Integrated Frisian Language Database 2.0. Language Database. http://​tdb​.fryske​-akademy​.eu​/tdb​/index​-en​.html
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Adamczyk, Elżbieta
2021. A multifactorial account of analogical developments in Old English nominal paradigms. NOWELE. North-Western European Language Evolution 74:1 Crossref logo
Hoekstra, Eric & Arjen P. Versloot
2019. Factors promoting the retention of irregularity. Morphology 29:1 ► pp. 31 ff. Crossref logo
Versloot, Arjen P.
2019. Reduction of unstressed vowels in Proto-Frisian and the Germanic ‘Auslautgesetze’. NOWELE. North-Western European Language Evolution 72:1 ► pp. 78 ff. Crossref logo
Versloot, Arjen P. & Eric Hoekstra
2019.  In Competition in Inflection and Word-Formation [Studies in Morphology, 5], ► pp. 145 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.