Cover not available
Part of
Reorganising Grammatical Variation: Diachronic studies in the retention, redistribution and refunctionalisation of linguistic variants
Edited by Antje Dammel, Matthias Eitelmann and Mirjam Schmuck
[Studies in Language Companion Series 203] 2018
► pp. 17–56

Plural inflection in North Sea Germanic languages

A multivariate analysis of morphological variation

| University of Amsterdam | Fryske Akademy
| University of Wuppertal | Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań
The present study explores the variation in the plural inflection of eight varieties of Frisian and English, focusing on irregular plural formations. The aim of the study is to identify and assess the significance of the factors which contributed to the preservation and emergence of irregular plural patterns in the investigated varieties. Multivariate regression analysis, which was employed to weigh the significance of individual factors, reveals that the retention and emergence of irregular plural patterns is primarily determined by a combination of three major factors: relative frequency, absolute frequency and salience. These factors can be reduced to underlying cognitive processes, including the storage and retrieval of linguistic information in the human brain. Another relevant factor, semantics, affects the lemma frequency profile, but can gain momentum as a factor in its own right due to analogical co-activation in language processing.
Keywords: irregular plurals, frequency, salience, English, Scots, Frisian, multivariate analysis
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.State of the art
    • 2.1The origin of present-day irregular plurals
    • 2.2Controlling factors
  • 3.Methodology and database
    • 3.1Corpus data
    • 3.2Interpretative problems
    • 3.3Statistical methods
    • 3.4Operationalising the controlling factors
  • 4.Results of the analyses
    • 4.1Results of the analysis of the historical data
    • 4.2Results of the statistical analyses
      • 4.2.1Archaisms
        • 4.2.1.1Frisian
        • 4.2.1.2English and Scots
      • 4.2.2New irregularities
      • 4.2.3Synchronic complexity of plural formations
  • 5.Discussion: Frequency and semantics
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
  • Abbreviations
Published online: 24 October 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.203.02ver
References (55)
References
Adamczyk, Elżbieta. 2010. Morphological reanalysis and the Old English u-declension. Anglia. Zeitschrift für Englische Philologie 128(3): 365–390.Google Scholar
. 2013. On morphological realignments in Old English root nouns. Transactions of the Philological Society 111(3): 274–300.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. Reshaping of the Nominal Inflection in Early Northern West Germanic [Nowele Supplement Series 31]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Åkerberg, Bengt. 2012. Älvdalsk grammatik. Älvdalen: Ulum Dalska.Google Scholar
Berman, Ruth A. 2003. Children’s lexical innovations: Developmental perspectives on Hebrew verb structure. In Language Processing and Acquisition in Languages of Semitic, Root-Based, Morphology [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 28], Joseph Shimron (ed.), 243–292. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bremmer Jr., Rolf H. 2009. An Introduction to Old Frisian: History, Grammar, Reader, Glossary. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
BNC: The British National Corpus, version 3 (BNC XML Edition). 2007. Distributed by Oxford University Computing Services on behalf of the BNC Consortium. <[URL]> (1 September 2014).
Bybee, Joan L. 1985. Morphology: A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form [Typological Studies in Language 9]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995. Are stem changes as natural as affixes? Linguistics 33(4): 633.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. & Hopper, Paul J. 2001. Introduction to Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure. In Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure [Typological Studies in Language 45], Joan Bybee & Paul Hopper (eds), 1–26. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Ryan, Svare, Ragnar & Salmons, Joseph C. 2012. Quantifying the evolutionary dynamics of German verbs. Journal of Historical Linguistics 2(2): 153–172.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corbett, Greville, Hippisley, Andrew R., Brown, Dunstan & Marriott, Paul. 2001. Frequency, regularity and the paradigm: A perspective from Russian on a complex relation. In Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure [Typological Studies in Language 45], Joan L. Bybee & Paul J. Hopper (eds), 201–226. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Daelemans, Walter. 2002. A comparison of analogical modeling of language to memory-based language processing. In Analogical Modelling: An Exemplar-based Approach to Language [Human Cognitive Processing 10], Royal Skousen, Deryle Lonsdale & Dilworth B. Parkinson (eds), 157–179. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dammel, Antje & Kürschner, Sebastian. 2008. Complexity in nominal plural allomorphy. In Language Complexity: Typology, Contact, Change [Studies in Language Companion Series [Studies in Language Companion Series 94], Matti Miestamo, Kaius Sinnemäki & Fred Karlsson (eds), 244–261. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dammel, Antje, Kürschner, Sebastian & Nübling, Damaris. 2010. Pluralallomorphie in zehn germanischen Sprachen; Konvergenzen und Divergenzen in Ausdrucksverfahren und Konditionierung. In Kontrastive germanistische Linguistik, Vol. 2 [Germanistische Linguistik 206–209], Damaris Nübling (ed.), 587–642. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Diessel, Holger. 2007. Frequency effects in language acquisition, language use, and diachronic change. New Ideas in Psychology 25(2): 104–123.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dehaene, Stanislas. 2003. The neural basis of Weber-Fechner’s law: Neuronal recordings reveal a logarithmic scale for number. Trends in Cognitive Science 7: 145–147.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eekman, Stephan. 2013. The Diachronic Development of Irregular Noun Morphology in North Germanic Languages: A Logistic Regression Analysis (MA-paper). Universiteit van Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Ekwall, Eilert. 1975. A History of Modern English Sounds and Morphology, Alan Ward (trans.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Enger, Hans-Olav. 2004. On the relation between gender and declension. A diachronic perspective from Norwegian. Studies in Language 28: 51–82.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ernestus, Mirjam T. C. 2000. Voice Assimilation and Segment Reduction in Casual Dutch: A Corpus-Based Study of the Phonology-Phonetics Interface. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Fertig, David. 2013. Analogy and Morphological Change. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
Gardani, Francesco. 2013. Dynamics of Morphological Productivity. The Evolution of Noun Classes from Latin to Italian. Leiden: Brill.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldschneider, Jennifer & DeKeyser, Robert, 2001. Explaining the ‘natural order of L2 morpheme acquisition’ in English: A meta-analysis of multiple determinants. Language Learning 51: 1–50.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1966. Language Universals, with Special Reference to Feature Hierarchies. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2006. Against markedness (and what to replace it with). Journal of Linguistics 42(1): 25–70.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. Reply to Haiman and Croft. Cognitive Linguistics 19(1): 59–66.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Healey, Antonette di Paolo, Holland, John, McDougall, David, McDougall, Ian & Xiang, Xin (eds) 2009. The Dictionary of Old English Corpus in Electronic Form. Toronto: Toronto University Press.<[URL]>
Hogg, Richard M. & Fulk, Robert D. 2011. A Grammar of Old English, Vol. 2: Morphology. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kastovsky, Dieter. 1995. Morphological reanalysis and typology: The case of the German r-plural and why English did not develop it. In Historical Linguistics: Selected Papers from the 11th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Los Angeles, 16–20 August 1993 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 124], Henning Andersen (ed.), 227–238. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 1997. Morphological classification in English historical linguistics: The interplay of diachrony, synchrony and morphological theory. In To Explain the Present: Studies in the Changing English Language in Honour of Matti Rissanen [Mémoires de La Société Néophilologique de Helsinki 52], Terttu Nevalainen & Leena Kahlas-Tarkka (eds), 63–75. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Kürschner, Sebastian. 2008. Deklinationsklassen-Wandel: Eine diachron-kontrastive Studie zur Entwicklung der Pluralallomorphie im Deutschen, Niederländischen, Schwedischen und Dänischen. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Erez, Michel, Jean-Baptiste, Jackson, Joe, Tang, Tina & Nowak, Martin A. 2007. Quantifying the evolutionary dynamics of language. Nature 449 (7163): 713–716.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Loey, A. 1976. Middelnederlandse spraakkunst, Deel I: Vormleer. Groningen: H.D. Tjeenk Willink.Google Scholar
Munske, Horst Haider (ed.). 2001. Handbuch des Friesischen (Handbook of Frisian Studies). Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, Hans Frede. 1981. Old English and the Continental Germanic Languages: A Survey of Morphological and Phonological Interrelations. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck.Google Scholar
. 2000. The Early Runic Language of Scandinavia: Studies in Germanic Dialect Geography. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Paul, Hermann. 1920. Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte, 5th edn. Halle (Saale): Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Pezzullo, John C. Logistic Regression. <[URL]> (4 January 2015)
Ringe, Don. 2006. A Linguistic History of English, Vol.1: From Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Germanic. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Mairi. 1987. The Concise Scots Dictionary. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press.Google Scholar
de Saussure, Ferdinand. 1916. Cours de linguistique générale, Charles Bally, Albert Sechehaye & Albert Riedlinger (eds). Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Schwink, Frederick W. 2004. The Third Gender. Studies in the Origin and History of Germanic Grammatical Gender. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Simpson, John A. & Weiner, Edmund (eds). 1989. The Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: OUP. <[URL]>Google Scholar
(eds). 1989. The Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: OUP. <[URL]>
Skousen, Royal. 1989. Analogical Modeling of Language. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Steller, Walther. 1928. Abriss der altfriesischen Grammatik, mit Berücksichtigung der westgermanischen Dialecte des altenglischen, altsächsischen und althochdeutschen. Halle (Saale): Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Stolz, Thomas, Otsuka, Hitomi, Urdze, Aina, van der Auwera, Johan. 2012. Introduction: Irregularity – glimpses of a ubiquitous phenomenon. In Irregularity in Morphology (and Beyond), Thomas Stolz, Otsuka Hitomi, Urdze Aina & Johan van der Auwera (eds), 7–37. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strik, Oscar. 2015. Modelling Analogical Change: A History of Swedish and Frisian Verb Inflection. Groningen: University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Tiersma, Peter M. 1982. Local and general markedness. Language 58(4): 832–849.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Versloot, Arjen P. 2008. Mechanisms of Language Change: Vowel Reduction in 15th century West Frisian. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
2014. Die -ar-Plurale im Altwestfriesischen mit einem Exkurs über die sächlichen Plurale im Westfriesischen. Us Wurk 63: 93–114.Google Scholar
Versloot, Arjen P. & Adamczyk, Elżbieta. 2014. Corpus size and composition: Evidence from the inflectional morphology of nouns in Old English and Old Frisian. In Directions for Old Frisian Philology, Rolf H. Bremmer Jr., Stephen Laker & Oebele Vries (eds). Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik 73: 539–569.Google Scholar
Versloot, Arjen P. & Nijdam, Han (eds). 2011. Integrated Frisian Language Database 2.0. Language Database. <[URL]>
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Adamczyk, Elżbieta
2021. A multifactorial account of analogical developments in Old English nominal paradigms. NOWELE. North-Western European Language Evolution 74:1 ► pp. 4 ff. DOI logo
Heinemann, Sabine
2021. Hochfrequenz und Irregularität – zur Stammallomorphie bei (a)frz. al(l)er/(a)it. andare, (a)frz. venir/(a)it. venire und afrz. ester/(a)it. stare . Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie 137:4 ► pp. 961 ff. DOI logo
Adamczyk, Elżbieta & Arjen P. Versloot
2019. Phonological constraints on morphology: Evidence from Old English nominal inflection. Folia Linguistica 53:s40-s1 ► pp. 153 ff. DOI logo
Hoekstra, Eric & Arjen P. Versloot
2019. Factors promoting the retention of irregularity. Morphology 29:1 ► pp. 31 ff. DOI logo
Versloot, Arjen P.
2019. Reduction of unstressed vowels in Proto-Frisian and the Germanic ‘Auslautgesetze’. NOWELE. North-Western European Language Evolution 72:1 ► pp. 78 ff. DOI logo
Versloot, Arjen P. & Eric Hoekstra
2019. Blocking as a Function of the Nature of Linguistic Representations: Where Psycholinguistics and Morphology Meet. In Competition in Inflection and Word-Formation [Studies in Morphology, 5], ► pp. 145 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.