Chapter published in:
Substance-based Grammar – The (Ongoing) Work of John Anderson
Edited by Roger Böhm and Harry van der Hulst
[Studies in Language Companion Series 204] 2018
► pp. 113198
References

References

Aarsleff, Hans
1982From Locke to Saussure. Essays on the Study of Language and Intellectual History. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
1983The Study of Language in England. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, John M.
1968aErgative and nominative in English. Journal of Linguistics 4: 1–32.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1968bOn the status of ‘lexical formatives’. Foundations of Language 4(3): 308–318.Google Scholar
1969Adjectives, datives and ergativisation. Foundations of Language 5: 301–322.Google Scholar
Anderson, John R.
1970aJust for the record. General Linguistics 10: 12–17.Google Scholar
Anderson, John M.
1970bThe case for cause: A preliminary enquiry. Journal of Linguistics 6(1): 99–104.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1971aDependency and grammatical functions. Foundations of Language 7: 30–37.Google Scholar
1971bThe Grammar of Case. Towards a Localistic Theory. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
1971cA proposal concerning the lexicalisation of complex structures. Studia Linguistica 25: 1–8.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1972aA Study of Grammatical Functions in English and Other Languages. PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
1972bRemarks on the hierarchy of quasi-predications. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique 17: 23–44, 121–140, 193–202, 319–335.Google Scholar
1973aMaximi Planudes in memoriam. In Generative Grammar in Europe, Ferenc Kiefer & Nicolas Ruwet (eds), 20–47. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1973bAn Essay Concerning Aspect. Some Considerations of a General Character Arising from the Abbé Darrigol’s Analysis of the Basque Verb. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
1975aLa grammaire casuelle. Langages 38: 18–64.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1975bA non-argument for deep structure. York Papers in Linguistics 5: 87–96.Google Scholar
1977On Case Grammar. Prolegomena to a Theory of Grammatical Relations. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
1979On Being Without a Subject. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
1980Anti-unaccusative, or: Relational grammar is case grammar. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique 25: 193–225.Google Scholar
1984Objecthood. In Objects. Towards a Theory of Grammatical Relations, Frans Plank (ed), 29–54. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1987Case grammar and the localist hypothesis. In Concepts of Case, René Dirven & Günter Radden (eds), 103–121. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
1990On the status of auxiliaries in notional grammar. Journal of Linguistics 26: 341–362.Google Scholar
1991Notional grammar and the redundancy of syntax. Studies in Language 15: 301–333.Google Scholar
1992Linguistic Representation: Structural Analogy and Stratification. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
1994Localism. In The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Vol. 4, Ronald E. Asher & Joy M. Y. Simpson (eds), 2276–2282. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
1997A Notional Theory of Syntactic Categories. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1998The domain of semantic roles. In The Diversity of Linguistic Description. Studies in Linguistics in Honour of Béla Korponay, József Andor, Béla Hollósy, Tibor Laczkó & Péter Pelyvás (eds), 1–38. Debrecen: Kossuth University, Angol-Amerikai Intézete.Google Scholar
2000“What became of Waring?” Questioning the predicator in English. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 35: 53–80.Google Scholar
2005aThe argument structure of morphological causatives. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 40: 27–89.Google Scholar
2005bModern Grammars of Case: Preliminaries to a Personal History [Carnets de Grammaire, Rapport No. 15]. Toulouse: Université de Toulouse-le Mirail, CLLE-ERSS. http://​w3​.erss​.univ​-tlse2​.fr​/publications​/CarnetsGrammaire​/carnGram15​.pdfGoogle Scholar
2006Modern Grammars of Case. A Retrospective. Oxford: OUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Case in localist case grammar. In The Oxford Handbook of Case, Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds), 121–135. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2011The Substance of Language, Vols. I-III. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R.
1971On the role of deep structure in semantic interpretation. Foundations of Language 7: 387–396.Google Scholar
Andor, József
2010Discussing frame semantics: The state of the art. An interview with Charles Fillmore. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 8(1): 157–176.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
this volume. Investigating substance-based grammar: The grammar of semantic and grammatical relations – An interview with John M. Anderson. In Substance-based Grammar – The (Ongoing) Work of John Anderson [Studies in Language Companion Series 204], Roger Böhm & Harry van der Hulst eds Amsterdam John Benjamins
Arabyan, Marc
2014Un drôle de petit drame. Cahiers de Praxématique (online) 63: document 2.Google Scholar
Aristotle
1957The Physics, trans. by Philip H. Wicksteed & Francis M. Cornford [Loeb Classical Library]. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
1957 On the Soul. Parva Naturalia. On Breath, trans. by Walter S. Hett [Loeb Classical Library]. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Arnauld, Antoine & Lancelot, Claude
1969 [1660] Grammaire Générale et Raisonnée. Paris: Republications Paulet.Google Scholar
Arnauld, Antoine & Nicole, Pierre
1981 [1662] La Logique ou l’Art de Penser. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Asbury, Anna, Dotlacil, Jakub, Gehrke, Berit & Nouwen, Rick
(eds) 2008Syntax and Semantics of Spatial P [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 120]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Auer, Peter
2015Reflections on Hermann Paul as a usage-based grammarian. In Hermann Paul’s Principles of Language History Revisited. Translations and Reflections, Peter Auer & Robert W. Murray (eds), 177–207. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Auroux, Sylvain
1993La Logique des Idées. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
1994La Révolution Technologique de la Grammatisation. Introduction à l’Histoire des Sciences du Langage. Liège: Mardaga.Google Scholar
1995Argumentation et anti-rhétorique. La mathématisation de la logique classique. Hermès 15: 129–143.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Auroux, Sylvain, Colombat, Bernard, Rosier, Irène & Lallot, Jean
1998Article “Préposition”. Histoire Épistémologie Langage 20(1): 147–165.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bachmann, Ludwig
1828Anecdota Graeca. Leipzig: J.C. Hinrichs.Google Scholar
Beauzée. Nicolas
1786Préposition. Encyclopédie méthodique: Grammaire et littérature, Tome 3, 200–216. Paris: Panckoucke.Google Scholar
Becker, Karl Ferdinand
1841 [1827] Organism der Sprache. Frankfurt: Kettembeil.Google Scholar
Bertoloni Meli, Ludovico
2006Mechanics. In The Cambridge History of Science. Early Modern Science, Katharine Park & Lorraine Daston (ed), 632–672. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard
1933Language. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Böhm, Roger
1993Predicate-argument Structure, Relational Typology and (Anti)passives: Towards an Integrated Localist Case Grammar Account [Series A, No. 336]. Duisburg: LAUD.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight
1977Meaning and Form. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Bopp, Franz
1826Vergleichende Zergliederung des Sanskrits und der mit ihm verwandten Sprachen. Dritte Abhandlung: Über das Demonstrativum und den Ursprung der Casuszeichen. Abhandlungen der Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Philologisch-Historische Klasse, 65–102. Berlin: Buchdruckerei der Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Boyle, Robert
1999–2000 The Origin of Forms and Qualities According to the Corpuscular Philosophy. In The Works of Robert Boyle 5, Michael Hunter & Edward B. Davis (eds). London: Pickering and Chatto.Google Scholar
Brower, Jeffrey
2015Medieval theories of relation. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta (ed). https://​plato​.stanford​.edu​/entries​/relations​-medieval/Google Scholar
Burkard, Thorsten
2003Die lateinische Grammatik im 18. und frühen 19. Jahrhundert. Von einer Wortarten- zu einer Satzgliedgrammatik. Ellipsentheorie, Kasuslehre, Satzglieder. In Germania Latina – Latinitas Teutonica. Politik, Wissenschaft, humanistische Kultur vom späten Mittelalter bis in unsere Zeit, Eckhard Keßer & Heinrich C. Kuhn (eds), 781–830. Munich: Wilhelm Fink.Google Scholar
Bursill-Hall, Geofrey L.
1971Speculative Grammars of the Middle Ages. The Doctrine of Partes Orationis of the Modistae. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L.
2010Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst
1953 [1923] Substance and Function. New York NY: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L.
1962Phonetics, semantics, and language. Language 38(4): 335–344.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1970aMeaning and the Structure of Language. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1970bA Semantically Based Sketch of Onondaga [Indiana University Publications in Anthropology and Linguistics, Memoir 25]. Bloomington IN: Waverly Press.Google Scholar
Chanet, Anne-Marie
1985Maxime Planude, localiste? Histoire Epistémologie Langage 7(1): 127–148.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1965Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1966Cartesian Linguistics. New York NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
1972Studies on Semantics in Generative Grammar. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
1981Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Cienki, Alan
199519th and 20th century theories of case. A comparison of localist and cognitive approaches. Historiographia Linguistica XXII(1–2): 123–162.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo & Rizzi, Luigi
(eds) 2010Mapping Spatial PPs. Oxford: OUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H.
1973Space, time, semantics and the child. In Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language, Timothy E. Moore (ed), 27–63. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Colombat, Bernard
1981Préposition, cas et syntaxe latine dans l’Encyclopédie. Histoire Epistémologie Langage 3(2): 3–20.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1999La Grammaire Latine en France à la Renaissance et à l’Âge Classique. Grenoble: Ellug.Google Scholar
2003La problématique de la ‘transitivité’ dans la tradition grammaticale latine. Quelques jalons de Priscien aux premiers humanistes. Histoire Epistémologie Langage 25(1): 151–172.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Les fondements sémantiques de la transitivité: A la recherche de la personne. In Représentations du sens linguistique, 3: Actes du Colloque International RSL III, Ivan Evrard, Michel Pierrard, Laurence Rosier & Dan Van Raemdonck (eds), 285–318. Bruxelles: De Boeck-Duculot.Google Scholar
Colombat, Bernard, Fournier, Jean-Marie & Puech, Christian
2010Histoire des idées sur le langage et les langues. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Condillac, Etienne Bonnot de
1775Cours d’étude pour l’instruction du prince de Parme, Tome Premier: Grammaire. Parma: Imprimerie Royale.Google Scholar
Couturat, Louis
1985 [1901] La Logique de Leibniz. Hildesheim: Georg Olms.Google Scholar
Creissels, Denis
2008Spatial cases. In The Oxford Handbook of Case, Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds), 609–625. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Croft, William
1991Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations. The Cognitive Organization of Information. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Curtius, Georg
1864Über die localistische Auffassung der Casus. Verhandlungen der Einundzwanzigsten Versammlung Deutscher Philologen und Schulmänner, 30. September-2. October 1863, 45–50. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Darrigol, Jean-Pierre
1827Dissertation Critique et Apologétique sur la Langue Basque. Bayonne: Duhart-Fauvet.Google Scholar
Dascal, Marcelo
1990Leibniz on particles. Linguistic form and comparatism. In Leibniz, Humboldt, and the Origins of Comparativism. Proceedings of the international conference, Rome, 25–28 September 1986 [Studies in the History of the Language Sciences 49], Tullio de Mauro & Lia Formigari (eds), 31–60. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, Hannah
2007Locke, Language and Early Modern Philosophy. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Delbrück, Berthold
1901Die Grundfragen der Sprachforschung. Strassburg: Verlag von Karl J. Trübner.Google Scholar
De Sacy, Silvestre
18032. Principes de Grammaire Générale, Mis à la Portée des Enfants et Propres à Servir d’Introduction à l’Étude de Toutes les Langues. Paris: Delange & Lesueur.Google Scholar
Despautère, Jean
1527 [1509] Sintaxis. Paris: G. Davoust.Google Scholar
Dirr, Adolf
1912Rutulskij jazyk (The Rutul Language). Sbornik Materialov dlya Opisaniya Mestnostey y Plemen Kavkaza (Tbilisi) 42(3): 1–204.Google Scholar
1928Einführung in das Studium der kaukasischen Sprachen. Leipzig: Verlag der Asia Major.Google Scholar
Dod, Bernard G.
1982Aristoteles Latinus. In The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy, Norman Kretzmann, Anthony Kenny & Jan Pinborg (eds), 45–79. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Doeleke, Wilhelm Heinrich
1814 Versuche Philosophisch-grammatischer Bemerkungen, II: Über die Casus, die Tempora, das Pronomen und das Verbum Substantivum. Leipzig: Joh. Ambrosius Barth.Google Scholar
Dominicy, Marc
1992Le programme scientifique de la grammaire générale. In Histoire des Idées Linguistiques, Tome 2, Sylvain Auroux (ed), 424–441. Liège: Mardaga.Google Scholar
Dumarsais, César Chesneau
1751aArticle ‘Cas’. L’Encyclopédie, 1ère éd., Tome 2, Denis Diderot & Jean Le Rond D’Alembert (eds), 734–739. Paris: Briasson, David, Le Breton, Duran. Reprinted in Du Marsais, César Chesneau 1987 [1729–1756] Les Véritables principes de la grammaire et autres textes, Françoise Douay-Soublin (ed). Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
1751bArticle ‘Construction’. In L’Encyclopédie, 1ère éd., Tome 4, Denis Diderot & Jean Le Rond D’Alembert (eds), 73–100. Paris: Briasson, David, Le Breton, Duran. Reprinted in Du Marsais, César Chesneau 1987 [1729–1756] Les Véritables principes de la grammaire et autres textes, Françoise Douay-Soublin (ed). Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Elson, Benjamin & Pickett, Velma
1964An Introduction to Morphology and Syntax. Santa Ana CA: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Fagard, Benjamin
2010Espace et Grammaticalisation: L’Évolution des Prépositions dans les Langues Romanes. Saarbrücken: Editions Universitaires Européennes.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J.
1966a A proposal concerning English prepositions. In Report on the Seventh Annual Meeting of GURT on Linguistics and Language Studies, Francis P. Dinneen (ed), 19–33. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
1966bToward a modern theory of case. The Ohio State University Project on Linguistic Analysis, Report No. 13: 1–24.Google Scholar
1968The case for case. In Universals in Linguistic Theory, Emmon Bach & Robert Thomas Harms (eds), 1–88. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
1969Types of lexical information. In Studies in Syntax and Semantics, Ferenc Kiefer (ed), 109–137. Dordrecht: Reidel. Reprinted in Fillmore, Charles J. 2003 Form and Meaning in Language, Vol. 1, 141–174. Stanford CA: CSLI.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J.
1971Some problems for case grammar. Georgetown University Monograph Series on Languages and Linguistics 23: 35–56.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J.
1975An alternative to checklist theories of meaning. BLS 1: 123–132.Google Scholar
1977The case for case reopened. In Grammatical Relations [Syntax and Semantics 8], Peter Cole & Jerrold Sadock (eds), 59–91. New York NY: Academic Press. Reprinted in Fillmore, Charles J. 2003 Form and Meaning in Language, Vol. 1, 175–199. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
1982Frame semantics. In Linguistics in the Morning Calm, The Linguistic Society of Korea (ed), 111–137. Seoul: Hanshin.Google Scholar
1985Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica 6(2): 222–254.Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry A.
1970Three reasons for not deriving “kill” from “cause to die.” Linguistic Inquiry 1(4): 429–438.Google Scholar
Formigari, Lia
1988Language and Experience in 17th Century British Philosophy [Studies in the History of the Language Sciences 48]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fortis, Jean-Michel
2010De la grammaire générative à la Grammaire Cognitive: Origines et formation de la théorie de Ronald Langacker. Histoire Epistémologie Langage 32(2): 109–149.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015Generative grammar and cognitive linguistics: On the grounds of a theoretical split in American linguistics. In Metalinguistic Discourses, Viviane Arigne & Christiane Migette (eds), 53–88. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
To appear a. Prototype theory: On the origins of a theoretical patchwork and its transfer to linguistics.
To appear b. Le changement linguistique selon Joan Bybee, ou Hermann Paul redivivus.
François, Jacques, Gilbert, Eric, Guimier, Calude & Krause, Maxi
(eds) 2009Autour de la préposition. Caen: Presses Universitaires de Caen.Google Scholar
Fraser, J. Bruce
1971A note on the spray paint cases. Linguistic Inquiry 2: 604–607.Google Scholar
Garrod, Simon, Ferrier, Gillian & Campbell, Siobhan
1999 In and on: Investigating the functional geometry of spatial prepositions. Cognition 72: 167–189.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1976Topic, pronoun and grammatical agreement. In Subject and Topic, Charles N. Li (ed), 149–188. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1979On Understanding Grammar. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gruber, Jeffrey S.
1965Studies in Lexical Relations. PhD thesis, MIT. Published in Gruber, Jeffrey S. 1975. Lexical Structures in Syntax and Semantics, Part I, 1–210. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
1997aArgument projection, thematic configurationality, and case theory. In Projections and Interface Conditions. Essays on Modularity, Anna-Maria DiSciullo (ed), 130–154. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
1997bModularity in a configurational theta theory. In Projections and Interface Conditions. Essays on Modularity, Anna-Maria DiSciullo (ed), 155–200. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2001Thematic relations in syntax. In The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, Mark Baltin & Chris Collins (eds), 257–298. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hagège, Claude
2010Adpositions. Oxford: OUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hale, Kenneth & Keyser, Samuel J.
2002Prolegomena to a Theory of Argument Structure. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Barbara
1965Subject and Object in Modern English. PhD thesis, MIT.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K.
1967/68Notes on transitivity and theme. Journal of Linguistics 3: 37–81, 199–244; 4: 179–215.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harris, James
1773 [1751] Hermes or a Philosophical Inquiry Concerning Universal Grammar. London: John Nourse & Paul Vaillant.Google Scholar
Harris, Randy Allen
1993The Linguistic Wars. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Hartung, Johann Adam
1831Über die Casus, ihre Bildung und Bedeutung in der griechischen und lateinischen Sprache. Erlangen: Palm und Enke.Google Scholar
Hays, David G.
1964Dependency theory: A formalism and some observations. Language 40(4): 511–525.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd
1997Cognitive Foundations of Grammar. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Claudi, Ulrike & Hünnemeyer, Friederike
1991Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Helbig, Gerhard & Schenkel, Wolfgang
1973Wörterbuch zur Valenz und Distribution deutscher Verben. Leipzig: VEB Verlag Enzyklopädie.Google Scholar
von Herder, Johann Gottfried
1978 [1772] Abhandlung über den Ursprung der Sprache. München: Hanser.Google Scholar
1799Metakritik. Leipzig: J. F. Hartknoch.Google Scholar
Hjelmslev, Louis
1935/7 [1972] La catégorie des cas. Acta Jutlandica 7. i–xii, 1–184; 9. i–vii, 1–78. Reprinted 1972. Munich: Wilhelm Fink.Google Scholar
Holzweissig Friedrich W.
1877Wahrheit und Irrthum der localistischen Casustheorie. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul
1996Recent trends in grammaticalization. Annual Review of Anthropology 25: 217–236.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Householder, Fred W.
1981The Syntax of Apollonius Dyscolus [Studies in the History of the Language Sciences 23]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hübschmann, Heinrich
1875Zur Casuslehre. Munich: Theodor Ackermann.Google Scholar
Huck, Geoffrey J. & Goldsmith, John A.
1995Ideology and Linguistic Theory: Noam Chomsky and the Deep Structure Debate. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
von Humboldt, Wilhelm
1830Über die Verwandtschaft der Ortsadverbien mit dem Pronomen in einigen Sprachen. Berlin: Druckerei der Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
1907 [1830–35]Über die Verschiedenheit des menschlichen Sprachbaues und ihren Einfluß auf die geistige Entwicklung des Menschengeschlechts. In Wilhelm von Humbolds Werke, Vol. I, Albert Leitzmann (ed), 1–349. Berlin: B. Behr’s Verlag.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell H. & Fought, John G.
1981American Structuralism. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Ildefonse, Frédérique
1997La Naissance de la Grammaire dans l’Antiquité Grecque. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray S.
1969Some Rules of Semantic Interpretation for English. PhD thesis, MIT.Google Scholar
1972Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
1976Toward an explanatory semantic representation. Linguistic Inquiry 7(1): 89–150.Google Scholar
1983Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1990Semantic Structures. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Mark
1981Introduction: Metaphor in the philosophical tradition. In Philosophical Perspectives on Metaphor, Mark Johnson (ed), 3–47. Minneapolis MN: The University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
1987The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination and Reason. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel
1998 [1781–1787] Critique of Pure Reason, trans. by Paul Guyer & Allen W. Wood. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Jerrold J. & Postal, Paul M.
1964An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Descriptions. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward L.
1976Remarkable subjects in Malagasy. In Subject and Topic, Charles N. Li (ed), 248–301. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, Louis G.
1977La physique d’Aristote et la phrase simple dans les ouvrages de grammaire spéculative. In La Grammaire Générale, des Modistes aux Idéologues, Andre Joly & Jean Stéfanini (ed), 107–124. Villeneuve d’Ascq: Publications de l’Université de Lille III.Google Scholar
Kuryłowicz, Jerzy
1949Le problème du classement des cas. Biuletyn Polskiego Towarzystwa Językonawczego 9: 20–43.Google Scholar
1964The Inflectional Categories of Indo-European. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George
1970 [1965] Irregularity in Syntax. New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston. First published as Lakoff, George 1965 On the Nature of Syntactic Irregularity [National Science Foundation Report, PhD thesis]. Bloomington IN: Indiana University.Google Scholar
1970Linguistics and natural logic. Synthese 22: 151–271.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1973Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. Journal of Philosophical Logic 2: 458–508.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1976 [1963] Toward generative semantics. In Notes from the Linguistic Underground [Syntax and Semantics 7], James D. McCawley (ed), 43–63. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1987Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, Robin
1989The way we were or the real actual truth about generative semantics. A memoir. Journal of Pragmatics 13: 939–988.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George & Johnson, Mark
1980Metaphors We Live By. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lallot, Jean
1997Apollonius Dyscole: De la Construction. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Lancelot, Claude
1653Nouvelle Méthode pour Apprendre Facilement et en Peu de Temps la Langue Latine. Paris: A. Vitré.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1968Observations on French possessives. Language 44(1): 51–75.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1973Review of Anderson: The grammar of case. Towards a localistic theory. Journal of Linguistics 9(2): 319–331.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1976Semantic representations and the linguistic relativity hypothesis. Foundations of Language 14: 307–357.Google Scholar
1978The form and meaning of the English auxiliary. Language 54(4): 853–882.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1979Grammar as image. Linguistic Notes from La Jolla 6: 87–126.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
1982Thoughts on Grammaticalization. A Programmatic Sketch, Vol. I [Arbeiten des Kölner Universalienprojekts 48]. Köln: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität.Google Scholar
Leibniz Gottfried Wilhelm
1999 [1685–1686] Analysis particularum. In Sämtliche Schriften und Briefe, Vierter Band: 1677 – Juni 1690, Teil A., Leibniz-Forschungsstelle der Universität Münster (ed), 646–667. Berlin: Akadamie Verlag.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm
1999 [1687–1688] De lingua philosophica. In Sämtliche Schriften und Briefe, Vierter Band: 1677 – Juni 1690, Teil A., Leibniz-Forschungsstelle der Universität Münster (ed), 881–908. Berlin: Akadamie Verlag.Google Scholar
1966 [1765] Nouveaux Essais sur l’Entendement Humain. Paris: Garnier Flammarion.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
2003Space in Language and Cognition: Explorations in Cognitive Diversity. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C., Meira, Sérgio
& 2003‘Natural concepts’ in the spatial topological domain – adpositional meanings in crosslinguistic perspective: An exercise in cognitive typology. Language 79(3): 485–516.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lindner, Susan J.
1981A Lexico-Semantic Analysis of English Verb-Particle Constructions with UP and OUT. PhD thesis, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
Locke, John
1975 [1700] An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Lyons, John
1967A note on possessive, existential and locative sentences. Foundations of Language 3: 390–396.Google Scholar
1968Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1977Semantic, 2 Vols. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Matthews, Peter H.
1993Grammatical Theory in the United States from Bloomfield to Chomsky. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McCawley, James D.
1971Prelexical syntax. Georgetown University Monograph Series on Languages and Linguistics 24: 19–33.Google Scholar
1976aGrammar and Meaning. Papers on Syntactic and Semantic Topics. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
(ed) 1976bNotes from the Linguistic Underground [Syntax and Semantics 7]. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Meillet, Antoine
1912L’évolution des formes grammaticales. Scientia (Rivista di Scienza) 12(26.6): 130–148. Reprinted in Meillet, Antoine 1958 Linguistique historique et linguistique générale. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Michelsen, Conrad
1843Philosophie der Grammatik unter steter Leitung der Geschichte, Band I: Kasuslehre der Lateinischen Sprache vom kausal-lokalen Standpunkte aus. Berlin: T. Trautwein.Google Scholar
Morgan, Jerry L.
1969On arguing about semantics. Papers in Linguistics 1: 49–70.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nagy, William Elmer
1974Figurative Patterns and Redundancy in the Lexicon. PhD thesis, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
Neisser, Ulric
1967Cognitive Psychology. New York NY: Meredith Corporation.Google Scholar
Nuchelmans, Gabriel
1986The historical background to Locke’s account of particles. Logique et Analyse 113: 53–70.Google Scholar
Nunberg, Geoffrey D.
1978The Pragmatics of Reference. Bloomington IN: IULC.Google Scholar
Oyharçabal, Beñat
1989Les travaux de grammaire basque avant Larramendi. Anuario del Seminario de Filología Vasca “Julio de Urquijo” 23(1): 69–73.Google Scholar
Parret, Herman
1989Cognition, the localist hypothesis and back to Kant. In Worlds Behind Words. Essays in Honour of Professor F. G. Droste on the Occasion of his Sixtieth Birthday, F. J. Heyvaert & F. Steurs (eds), 37–49. Leuven: Leuven University Press.Google Scholar
Pike, Kenneth L.
1943Taxemes and immediate constituents. Language 19(2): 65–82.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Postal, Paul M.
1974On Raising: One Rule of English Grammar and its Theoretical Implications. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pottier, Bernard
1962Systématique des Eléments de Relation. Etude de Morphosyntaxe Structurale Romane. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Ramus, Petrus
1564Grammatica. Paris: A Wechel.Google Scholar
Ricken, Ulrich
1977L’ordre naturel du français. Naissance d’une théorie. In La Grammaire Générale, des Modistes aux Idéologues, André Joly & Jean Stéfanini (ed), 201–216. Villeneuve d’Ascq: Publications de l’Université de Lille III.Google Scholar
Robins, Robert Henry
1993Maximus Planudes: A Byzantine theoretician. In The Byzantine Grammarians: Their Place in History, Robert Henry Robins, 201–234. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Jane J.
1970Case, category, and configuration. Journal of Linguistics 6(1): 57–80.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rosier, Irène
1983La Grammaire Spéculative des Modistes. Lille: Presses Universitaires de Lille.Google Scholar
Rosier-Catach, Irène
(ed) 2003Les syncatégorèmes. Histoire Epistémologie Langage 25(2).Google Scholar
Rumpel Theodor
1845Die Casuslehre in besonderer Beziehung auf die Griechische Sprache. Halle: Eduard Anton.Google Scholar
Rumpel, Theodor
1866Zur Casustheorie. In Programm des Evangelischen Gymnasiums zu Gütersloh, Theodor Rumpel (ed), 3–25. Gütersloh: C. Bertelsmann.Google Scholar
Saint-Dizier, Patrick
(ed) 2006Dimensions of the Syntax and Semantics of Prepositions. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sanctius (Sánchez de las Brozas), Franciscus
1587Minerva seu de Causis Linguae Latinae. Salmanticae: J. & A. Renaut. Reprinted with an introduction by M. Breva-Claramonte 1986 Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
Scaliger, Jules-César
1540De Causis Linguae Latinae Libri Tredecim. Lyon: S. Gryphius.Google Scholar
Schachter, Paul
1976The subject in Philippine languages: Actor, topic, actor-topic, or none of the above? In Subject and Topic, Charles N. Li (ed), 491–518. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Karl Ernst August
1847Zur Erklärung und Würdigung der Grammatischen Kunstausdrücke. Zeitschrift für die Wissenschaft der Sprache 2(1): 57–75. Albert Hoefer (ed). Berlin: G. Reimer.Google Scholar
1859Beiträge zur Geschichte der Grammatik des Griechischen und Lateinischen. Halle: Buchhandlung des Waisenhauses.Google Scholar
Seely, Jonathan
1977An ergative historiography. Historiographia Linguistica 4(2): 191–206.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Serbat, Guy
1981Cas et Fonctions. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Seuren, Pieter
1998Western Linguistics: An Historical Introduction. Malden MA: Blackwell.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Starosta, Stanley
1973The faces of case. Language Sciences 25: 1–14.Google Scholar
1976A place for case. Language Learning 26(1): 1–36.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1978The one per sent solution. In Valence, Semantic Case, and Grammatical Relations. [Studies in Language Companion Series 1], Werner Abraham (ed), 459–576. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1982Case relations, perspective and patient centrality. Hawaii University Working Papers in Linguistics 14: 1–33.Google Scholar
1985aMandarin case marking: A localistic lexicase analysis. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 13(2): 216–266.Google Scholar
1985bRelator nouns as a source of case inflection. Oceanic Linguistics Special Publications No. 20. For Gordon H. Fairbanks, 111–133. Honolulu HI: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
1988The Case for Lexicase. An Outline of Lexicase Grammatical Theory. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Steinthal, Heymann
1890–18912. Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft bei den Griechen und Römern mit besonderer Rücksicht auf die Logik. Berlin: Dümmler.Google Scholar
Strömqvist, Sven & Verhoeven, Ludo
2004Relating Events in Narrative: Typological and Contextual Perspectives. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Svorou, Soteria
1993The Grammar of Space [Typological Studies in Language 25]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
1972Semantic Structures in English and Atsugewi. PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
1975Semantics and syntax of motion. In Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 4, John P. Kimball (ed). 181–238. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
2000 [1988]The relation of grammar to cognition. In Toward a Cognitive Semantics, Vol. 1, Leonard Talmy (ed), 21–96. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tesnière, Lucien
1959Éléments de syntaxe structurale. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C.
1975Spatial expressions of tense and temporal sequencing: A contribution to the study of semantic fields. Semiotica 15(3): 207–230.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Uhlenbeck, Christianus C.
1901Agens und Patiens im Kasussystem der indogermanischen Sprachen. Indogermanische Forschungen 12: 170–171.Google Scholar
Uhlenbeck, Eugenius M.
1979Linguistics in America 1924–1974. A detached view. In The European Background of American Linguistics, Henry M. Hoenigswald (ed), 121–144. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Valin Jr., Robert D.
2005Exploring the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Willems, Klaas
1997Kasus, grammatische Bedeutung und kognitive Linguistik. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Wüllner, Franz
1827Die Bedeutung der sprachlichen Casus und Modi. Münster: Theissigsche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
1831Über Ursprung und Urbedeutung der sprachlichen Formen. Münster: Theissigsche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Wundt, Wilhelm
19123. Völkerpsychologie. Eine Untersuchung der Entwicklungsgesetze von Sprache, Mythos und Sitte, 2. Bd, 2. Teil. Leipzig: Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Böhm, Roger
2018.  In Substance-based Grammar – The (Ongoing) Work of John Anderson [Studies in Language Companion Series, 204],  pp. 261 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 june 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.