Chapter published in:
Substance-based Grammar – The (Ongoing) Work of John Anderson
Edited by Roger Böhm and Harry van der Hulst
[Studies in Language Companion Series 204] 2018
► pp. 201224
References

References

Alexiadou, Artemis & Grimshaw, Jane
2008Verbs, nouns and affixation. SinSpeC [Working Papers of the SFB 732] Incremental Specification in Context ) 1: 1–16. Stuttgart: Universität Stuttgart. http://​elib​.uni​-stuttgart​.de​/opus​/volltexte​/2008​/3544​/pdf​/SinSpeC1​_volume​.pdfGoogle Scholar
Anderson, John M.
1968Ergative and nominative in English. Journal of Linguistics 4(1): 1–32.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1992Linguistic Representation: Structural Analogy and Stratification. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997A Notional Theory of Syntactic Categories. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004Concepts and consequences of Case Grammar. Lecture, 18 June 2004. Toulouse: Université de Toulouse-Le Mirail. http://​www​.fb10​.uni​-bremen​.de​/linguistik​/dpng​/ng​_papers (26 November 2016).
2006Modern Grammars of Case. Oxford: OUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011The Substance of Language, Vol. I: The Domain of Syntax. Oxford: OUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Types of complexity in English: Syntactic categories and the lexicon. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 47(4): 3–51.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Andor, József
this volume. Investigating substance-based grammar: The grammar of semantic and grammatical relations – An interview with John M. Anderson. In Substance-based Grammar – The (Ongoing) Work of John Anderson [Studies in Language Companion Series 204], Roger Böhm & Harry van der Hulst eds Amsterdam John Benjamins
Asher, Nicholas
2011Lexical Meaning in Context. A Web of Words. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bassac, Christian & Bouillon, Pierrette
2002Middle transitive alternations in English: A Generative Lexicon approach. In Many Morphologies, Paul Boucher (ed), 29–47. Sommerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Bassac, Christian, Méry, Bruno & Rétoré Christian
2010Towards a type theoretical account of lexical semantics. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 19: 229–245.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bassac, Christian & Çiçek, Mehmet
2013On the derivation of nominals in -(y)Is¸ and -mE in Turkish. Lingua 133: 230–261.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bisetto, Antonietta & Melloni, Chiara
2007Result nominals: A lexical-semantic investigation. In On-line Proceedings of the Fifth Mediterranean Morphology Meeting (MMM5) Fréjus, 15–18 September 2005, Geert Booij, Luca Ducceschi, Bernard Fradin, Emiliano Guevara, Angela Ralli & Sergio Scalise (eds), 393–412. http://​www​.lilec​.it​/mmm​/wp​/?page​_id​=71Google Scholar
Böhm, Roger
1993Predicate-argument Structure, Relational Typology and (Anti)passives: Towards an Integrated Localist Case Grammar Account [Series A, No. 336]. Duisburg: LAUD.Google Scholar
1994Deriving derived intransitivity: Structural analogy and mutation vs. mutilation of lexical argument structure. Paper presented on 16/06/1994 at the Institute for Functional Language Research (IFOTT), University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit
1998Morphology and syntax. In Handbook of Morphology, Andrew Spencer & Arnold Zwicky (eds), 151–190. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Croft, William & Cruse, Alan
2004Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cruse, Alan
1999Meaning in Language: An Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Culicover, Peter & Jackendoff, Ray
2005Simpler Syntax. Oxford: OUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Donald
1967The logical form of action sentences. In The Logic of Decision and Action, Nicholas Rescher (ed), 81–94. Pittsburgh PA: Pittsburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Fagan, Sarah
1992The Syntax and Semantics of Middle Constructions: A Study with Special Reference to German. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Girard, Jean-Yves, Taylor, Paul, & Lafont, Yves
1989Proofs and Types. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele & Ackerman, Farrel
2001The pragmatics of obligatory adjuncts. Language 77(4): 798–814.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane
1990Argument Structure. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2004Why can’t a noun be more like a verb? Paper presented at the International Conference on Deverbal Nouns. Lille. September 2004.Google Scholar
Gupta, Kalyan Moy & Aha, David
2003Nominal concept représentation in sublanguage ontologies. In Second International Workshop on Generative Approaches to the Lexicon. University of Geneva: Geneva.Google Scholar
2005Interpreting events using generative sublanguage ontologies. In Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Generative Approaches to the Lexicon, 72–81. University of Geneva: Geneva.Google Scholar
Havasi, Catherine, Rumshiky, Anna & Pustejovsky, James
2007An evaluation of the Brandeis semantic ontology. In Fourth International Workshop on Generative Approaches to the Lexicon. Paris.Google Scholar
Kamp, Hans & Reyle, Uwe
1993From Discourse to Logic. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Kahrel, Peter
1985Some Aspects of Derived Intransitivity [Working Papers in Functional Grammar 4]. University of Amsterdam: Institute for General Linguistics.Google Scholar
Melloni, Chiara
2010Action nominals inside: Lexical-semantic issues. In The Semantics of Nominalizations across Languages and Frameworks [Interface Explorations 22], Monika Rathert & Artemis Alexiadou (eds), 141–168. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nishida, Chiyo
1991Superfluous se in Spanish transitive constructions. Ms, University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, James
1995The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, James, Bouillon, Pierrette, Hisahara, Hitoshi, Kanzaki, Kyoko & Lee, Chungmin
2013Advances in Generative Lexicon Theory. Heidelberg: Springer.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quine, Willard Van Orman
1960Word and Object. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Réal-Coelho, Livy-Maria & Retoré, Christian
2014Deverbal semantics and the Montagovian generative lexicon. ΛTyn. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 23(3): 347–366.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stalmaszczyk, Piotr
1997Thematic and conceptual semantics of English middle verbs. Folia Linguistica 36: 135–156Google Scholar
Stroik, Thomas
1992Middles and movement. Linguistic Inquiry 23(1): 127–137.Google Scholar
van der Hulst, Harry & van de Weijer, Jeroen
this volume. Degrees of complexity in phonological segments. In Substance-based Grammar – The (Ongoing) Work of John Anderson [Studies in Language Companion Series 204], Roger Böhm & Harry van der Hulst eds Amsterdam John Benjamins
Vendler, Zeno
1967Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca CA: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna
1996Semantics: Primes and Universals. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar