Cover not available
Part of
Substance-based Grammar – The (Ongoing) Work of John Anderson
Edited by Roger Böhm and Harry van der Hulst
[Studies in Language Companion Series 204] 2018
► pp. 225–259

Entitatives and Indo-European n-stems

Conversion, subjunction, and the substance-based coherence of old English weak declension classes

This chapter shows that the Indo-European morphophonological class of n-stems was increased by lexical derivation by conversion. The participation of members of the notionally defined set of entitatives in these conversions accords with the association of the feature ‘identification’ with this class, whose reflexes appear in the Old English, and other Germanic, weak declensions classes. Conversion of an item to a non-functional primary category involves the adoption of morphosyntactic categories available to the target category. These are secondary categories of functional primary categories, expressed either by adjunction (with head and dependent in linear syntactic sequence) or by inflection. Inflectional expression reflects conversion to functional categories, expressed by subjunction (with head and dependent in a single wordform).
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.On notional content of morphophonological classes – The attraction of n-stems
  • 3.Conversions to n-stems
  • 4.Lexical derivation: conversion to non-functional categories
  • 5.Lexical derivation: entitatives and conversion to functional categories
  • 6.On the notional substance of conversion to n-stems
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 12 December 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.204.05col
References (67)
References
Adams, Douglas Q. 1980. Towards a history of PIE n-stems in Tocharian. Journal of the American Oriental Society 100(4): 439–443.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anarioti, Nikolaos P. 1990 (published under his name in Greek: Αναριώτι, Νικόλαος Π). Ετυμολογικό Λέξικο της Κοινής Νεοελληνικής. Thessaloniki: Aristotle University.Google Scholar
Anderson, John M. 1984. Case Grammar and the Lexicon [Occasional Papers in Linguistics and Language Learning 10]. Coleraine: University of Ulster.Google Scholar
1985a. Structural analogy and dependency phonology. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 19: 5–44. Revised version 1987. In Explorations in Dependency Phonology, John M. Anderson & Jacques Durand (eds), 15–48. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
1985b. The case system of Old English. Studia Linguistica 39: 1–22.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1992. Linguistic Representation. Structural Analogy and Stratification. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997. A Notional Theory of Syntactic Categories. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006. Modern Grammars of Case. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007a. The Grammar of Names. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007b. Finiteness, mood, and morphosyntax. Journal of Linguistics 43: 1–32.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011. The Substance of Language, Vol. I: The Domain of Syntax. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011. The Substance of Language, Vol. II: Morphology, Paradigms, and Periphrases. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011. The Substance of Language, Vol. III: Phonology-Syntax Analogies. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014. The grammar of figurativeness, with illustrations drawn from English. English Studies 95(8): 971–989.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderson, John M. & Colman, Fran. 2000. The importance of being Leofwine Horn. In Words: Structure, Meaning, Function: A Festschrift for Dieter Kastovsky, Christiane Dalton-Puffer & Nikolaus Ritt (eds), 7–16. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R. 1992. A-morphous Morphology. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andor, József. this volume. Investigating substance-based grammar: The grammar of semantic and grammatical relations – An interview with John M. Anderson. In Substance-based Grammar – The (Ongoing) Work of John Anderson [Studies in Language Companion Series 204], Roger Böhm & Harry van der Hulst (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bammesberger, Alfred. 1984. A Sketch of Diachronic English Morphology. Regensburg: Friedrich Pustet.Google Scholar
Börjars, Kersti, Harries, Pauline & Vincent, Nigel. 2016. Growing syntax: The development of a DP in North Germanic. Language 92: e1–e37.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Böhm, Roger. 1993. Predicate-argument Structure, Relational Typology and (Anti)passives: Towards an Integrated Localist Case Grammar Account [Series A, No. 336]. Duisburg: LAUD.Google Scholar
. 1998. Notional Grammar, Wortklassen und Dependenz [BLicK 7]. Bremen: University of Bremen, IAAS.Google Scholar
. this volume. Just for the record: Dependency (vs. constituency) for the umpteenth time – A concise guide for the confused with an appended how-(not)-to-read Tesnière’s Éléments . In Substance-based Grammar – The (Ongoing) Work of John Anderson [Studies in Language Companion Series 204], Roger Böhm & Harry van der Hulst (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Clark, Cecily. 1992. Onomastics. In The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. I: The Beginnings to 1066, Richard M. Hogg (ed), 452–489. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Colman, Fran. 1996. Morphology: Old and Middle English – Derivational and inflectional. In Middle English Miscellany: From Vocabulary to Linguistic Variation, Jacek Fisiak (ed), 3–28. Poznań: Motivex.Google Scholar
. 1988. What is in a name? In Historical Dialectology, Fisiak Jacek (ed), 111–137. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Review of Brylla, Eva and Wahlberg, Mats (eds). 2005. Proceedings of the 21st International Congress of Onomastic Sciences, Uppsala, August 19–24, 2002, Vol. 1. Uppsala: Språk- och Folkminnesinstitutet. Nomina 29: 133–145.Google Scholar
. 2008. Names, derivational morphology, and Old English gender. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 44: 29–52.Google Scholar
. 2014. The Grammar of Names in Anglo-Saxon England: The Linguistics and Culture of the Old English Onomasticon. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. First, catch your name … On names and word classes, especially in Old English. English Studies 96(3): 1–27.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Colman, Fran & Anderson, John M. 2004. On metonymy as word-formation: with special reference to Old English. English Studies 85(6): 547–565.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corbett, Greville G. 1991. Gender. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006. Agreement. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Davis, Norman (ed). 1953. Sweet’s Anglo-Saxon Primer, 9th edn. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Dolberg, Florian. 2012. Gender change from Old to Middle English. In English Historical Linguistics 2010: Selected Papers from the Sixteenth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (ICEHL 16) , Pécs, 23–27 August 2010 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 325], Irén Hegedűs & Alexandra Fodor (eds), 263–288. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
von Feilitzen, Olof. 1937. The Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book [Nomina Germanica 3]. Uppsala: Almqvist Wiksell.Google Scholar
Forssner, Thorvald. 1916. Continental Germanic Personal Names in England. Uppsala: K.W. Appelbergs Boktrykeri.Google Scholar
Gildersleeve, Basil L. & Lodge, Gonzales B. 1968 [1895]. Latin Grammar, 3rd edn. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hewitt Key, Thomas. 1874. Language: Its Origin and Development. London: George Bell and Sons.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1924. The Philosophy of Grammar. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Kastovsky, Dieter. 1993. Inflection, derivation and zero – or: What makes OE and German derived de-nominal verbs verbs? Vienna English Working Papers 2(2): 71–81.Google Scholar
. 1996. Categorial restructuring of the weak verbs in late Old English and Middle English. In Middle English Miscellany: from Vocabulary to Linguistic Variation Fisiak Jacek (ed), 29–45. Poznań: Motivex.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Henning. 1968. Altdeutsche Personennamen: Ergänzungsband [Supplement to Förstemann, Ernst. 1856. Altdeutsches Namenbuch, Band I: Personennamen. Nordhausen: E. Förstemann]. Munich: Wilhelm Fink; Hildesheim: Georg Olms.Google Scholar
Kemble, John Mitchell 1846. ‘The name, surnames and nicnames [sic] of the Anglo-Saxons’. Royal Archaeological Institute of Great Britain: Proceedings at Winchester 1845, 81–102. London: Longman, Brown, Green and Longmans.Google Scholar
Krahe, Hans & Meid, Wolfgang (eds). 1969. Germanische Sprachwissenschaft, Band II: Formenlehre. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Krause, Wolfgang. 1968. Handbuch des Gotischen, 3rd edn. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Kuryłowicz, Jerzy. 1964. The Inflectional Categories of Indo-European. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Lass, Roger. 1994. Old English: A Historical Linguistic Companion. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics, 2 Vols. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Matthews, Peter H. 1970. Recent developments in morphology. In New Horizons in Linguistics, John Lyons (ed), 96–114. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
1972. Inflectional Morphology: A Theoretical Study Based on Aspects of Latin Verb Conjugation. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
1974. Morphology: An Introduction to the Theory of Word Structure. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1919. A System of Logic: Ratiocinative and Inductive. London: Longman, Green and Co.Google Scholar
Νεοελληνική Γραμματική (της Δημοτικής). 1991. Modern Greek Grammar (of the Demotic). Produced by: Ιδρυμα Μανόλη Τριανταφύλλιδη, Ινστιτούτο Νεοελληνικών Σπουδών, Αριστοτέλειο Πανεπιστήμιο Θεσσαλονίκης.Google Scholar
Osthoff, Hermann. 1875. Zur Geschichte des schwachen Deutschen Adjectivums. Jena: Pätz.Google Scholar
Pernot, Laurent. 2005 [2002]. Rhetoric in Antiquity, trans. by W. E. Higgins. Washington DC: The Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Persson, Gunnar. 1990. Meanings, Models and Metaphors: A Study in Lexical Semantics in English. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.Google Scholar
Prokosch, Eduard. 1938. A Comparative Germanic Grammar. Philadelphia PA: Linguistic Society of America, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Pulgram, Ernst. 1954. Theory of Names. Berkeley CA: American Name Society.Google Scholar
Remmer, Ulla. 2009. Germanisch. In Indogermanische Frauennamen, Karin Stüber, Thomas Zehnder & Ulla Remmer (eds), 279–318. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Ringe, Don. 2006. From Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Germanic: A Linguistic History of English, Vol. I. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sandred, Karl Inge. 1997. Reading a Kentish charter. In Names, Places and People: an Onomastic Miscellany in Memory of John McNeal Dodgson, Rumble Alexander R. & Mills A.D. (eds), 320–325. Stamford: Paul Watkins.Google Scholar
Sayce, Olive L. (ed). 1954. Wright’s Grammar of the Gothic Language. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Schrijnen, Jos. 1921. Einführung in das Studium der Indogermanischen Sprachwissenschaft. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Smart, Veronica. 1990. Osulf Theinn and other double moneyers names on the late Anglo-Saxon coinage. In Studies in Late Anglo-Saxon Coinage, Kenneth Jonsson (ed), 435–453. Stockholm: Swedish Numismatic Society.Google Scholar
Sweet, Henry. 1891. New English Grammar, Part I. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Van Langendonck, Willy. 2005. Proprial names and proprial lemmas. In Proceedings of the 21st International Congress of Onomastic Sciences (Uppsala 199–24 August 2002), Vol. 1, Eva Bryller & Mats Wahlberg (eds), 315–323. Uppsala: Språk- och Folkminnesinstitutet.Google Scholar
Wright, Joseph. 1907. Historical German Grammar, I: Phonology, Word-Formation and Accidence. London: Henry Frowde & OUP.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Böhm, Roger
2018. Just for the record. In Substance-based Grammar – The (Ongoing) Work of John Anderson [Studies in Language Companion Series, 204], ► pp. 261 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.