Under a stipulative/persuasive redefinition that has been offered in recent syntax handbook work (among other places) as a purported sharpening of the distinction between dependency vs. constituency-based descriptions of syntactic constructions impeccable dependency descriptions can be fallaciously categorized as constituency-based. The present chapter demonstrates that the alleged key property, which the persuasive redefinition attributes to the dependency vs. constituency distinction, is ill-founded on conceptual and elementary graph-theoretical grounds and is illegitimately averse to, in particular, dependency-based syntactic descriptions of polycategoriality, which in terms of Anderson’s notionally-grounded dependency grammar involve dependency between linearly coincident syntactic categories. The chapter concludes with a ‘dissection’ of Tesniere’s classical Éléments de syntaxe structurale and a refutation of its interpretation (based on the stipulative/persuasive redefinition of dependency) as a hybrid dependency~constituency grammar.
Article outline
1.Introduction
2.Dependency vs. constituency in the nutshell of received wisdom
2.1Dependency and constituency – the conceptual essence
2.2Dependency and constituency – the graph-theoretical essence
3.Dependency and constituency stipulatively/persuasively redefined
3.1The one-to-one(-or-more) ratio of words to nodes
3.2On stipulative/persuasive (re)definitions and their argumentative nature
3.3Dependency ≠ 1:1 ratio of words to nodes
3.4Dependency ≠ 1:1 ratio of words to phrases
3.5Conclusion: dependency ≠ 1:1 ratio of words to nodes or phrases
4.How-(not)-to-read Tesnière’s Éléments de syntaxe structurale
4.1An introductory note on the Éléments
4.2Word classes in the Éléments
4.3The nucleus
4.4Transposing categories: transference and the mixed nucleus
4.5The Éléments through the dull lens of the ‘one-to-one ratio of words to nodes’: a dependency~constituency hybrid
Aberdein, Andrew. 1998. Persuasive Definition. St. Andrews: University of St. Andrews, Department of Logic and Metaphysics.
Ágel, Vilmos & Fischer, Klaus. [2010]
2
2015. Dependency grammar and valency theory. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds), 225–257. Oxford: OUP.
Anderson, John M.1971a. Outline of a proposal for the lexicalisation of complex structures. Studia Linguistica 25: 1–8.
Anderson, John M.1971b. The Grammar of Case. Towards a Localistic Theory. Cambridge: CUP.
Anderson, John M.1976. On Serialization in English Syntax [Ludwigsburg Studies in Language and Linguistics 1]. Ludwigsburg: R.O.U. Strauch.
Anderson, John M.1977. On Case Grammar. Prolegomena to a Theory of Grammatical Relations. London: Croom Helm.
Anderson, John M.1979. Syntax and the single mother. Journal of Linguistics 15: 267–287.
Anderson, John M.1981. How to Get a Head in Grammar. Paper given at the Linguistics Department, University of Ulster at Coleraine, 23February 1981.
Anderson, John M.1984. Case Grammar and the Lexicon [Occasional Papers in Linguistics and Language Learning 10]. Coleraine: University of Ulster.
Anderson, John M.1986. Old English morphology and the structure of noun phrases, Folia Linguistica Historica 7(1): 219–224.
Anderson, John M.1989a. The localist basis for syntactic categories. In 2nd Symposium on English and Greek: Description and/or Comparison of the Two Languages, Athanasios Kakouriotis (ed), 7–32. Thessaloniki: Aristotle University.
Anderson, John M.1989b. Reflexions on notional grammar. In Essays on Grammatical Theory and Universal Grammar, Douglas G. Arnold, Martin Atkinson, Jacques Durand, Claire Glover & Louisa Sadler (eds), 13–36. Oxford: OUP.
Anderson, John M.1990. On the status of auxiliaries in notional grammar. Journal of Linguistics 26: 241–262.
Anderson, John M.1992. Linguistic Representation. Structural Analogy and Stratification. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Anderson, John M.1997. A Notional Theory of Syntactic Categories. Cambridge: CUP.
Anderson, John M.2000. Markedness and the ontogenesis of syntax. Folia Linguistica XXXIV(3–4): 147–183.
Anderson, John M.2001. Finiteness, in Greek, and elsewhere. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 37: 5–33.
Anderson, John M.2006. Modern Grammars of Case. A Retrospective. Oxford: OUP.
Anderson, John M.2007. The Grammar of Names. Oxford: OUP.
Anderson, John M.2011. The Substance of Language, Vol. I: The Domain of Syntax. Oxford: OUP.
Anderson, John M.2011. The Substance of Language, Vol. II: Morphology, Paradigms, and Periphrases. Oxford: OUP.
Anderson, John M.2011. The Substance of Language, Vol. III: Phonology-Syntax Analogies. Oxford: OUP.
Anderson, John M.2012. Types of lexical complexity in English: Syntactic categories and the lexicon. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 47(4): 3–51.
Anderson, John M.2013. On so-called “conjunctions” in English. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 49(1): 21–77.
Anderson, John M. & Ewen, Colin J.1987. Principles of Dependency Phonology. Cambridge: CUP.
Andor, József. this volume. Investigating substance-based grammar: The grammar of semantic and grammatical relations – An interview with John M. Anderson. In Substance-based Grammar – The (Ongoing) Work of John Anderson [Studies in Language Companion Series 204], Roger Böhm & Harry van der Hulst (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Askedal, Jan Ole. 2003. Das Valenz- und Dependenzkonzept bei Lucien Tesnière. In Dependenz und Valenz: Ein internationales Handbuch der zeitgenössischen Forschung/Dependency and Valency: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, Vol. 1, Vilmos Ágel, Ludwig M. Eichinger, Hans Werner Eroms, Peter Hellwig, Hans Jürgen Heringer & Henning Lobin (eds), 80–99. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Bally, Charles. 1932. Linguistique générale et linguistique française. Paris: Leroux.
Baum, Richard. 1976. Dependenzgrammatik. Tesnières Modell der Sprachbeschreibung in wissenschaftsgeschichtlicher und kritischer Sicht [Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie, Beiheft, Bd. 151]. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Bernhardi, August F.1805. Anfangsgründe der Sprachwissenschaft. Berlin: Heinrich Frölich.
Böhm, Roger. 1993. Predicate-argument Structure, Relational Typology and (Anti)passives: Towards an Integrated Localist Case Grammar Account [Series A, No. 336]. Duisburg: LAUD.
Böhm, Roger. 1998. Notional Grammar, Wortklassen und Dependenz [BLIcK 7]. Bremen: Universität Bremen, IAAS.
Böhm, Roger. 1999. Kategorien, Konfigurationen und ‘Kasus’ in einer notionalen Grammatik. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 52(2): 207–231.
Brody, Michael. 1997. Mirror theory. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 9: 179–222.
Brody, Michael. 2000. Mirror theory: Syntactic representation in perfect syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 31(1): 29–56. Reprinted in: Brody, Michael. 2003. Towards an Elegant Syntax. 205–231. London: Routledge.
Colman, Fran. 2014. The Grammar of Names in Anglo-Saxon England: The Linguistics and Culture of the Old English Onomasticon. Oxford: OUP.
Colman, Fran. this volume. Entitatives and Indo-European n-stems: conversion, subjunction, and the substance-based coherence of Old English weak declension classes. In Substance-based Grammar – The (Ongoing) Work of John Anderson [Studies in Language Companion Series 204], Roger Böhm & Harry van der Hulst (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Čop, Bojan, Orešnik, Janez, Skubic, Mitja & Tekavčic, Pavao (eds). 1994. Mélanges Lucien Tesnière [Linguistica 34(1)]. Ljubljana: Ljubljana University Press.
Engel, Ulrich. 1972. Bemerkungen zur Dependenzgrammatik. In Neue Grammatiktheorien und ihre Anwendung auf das heutige Deutsch [Sprache der Gegenwart 20], Hugo Moser (ed), 111–155. Düsseldorf: Schwann.
Engel, Ulrich. 1996. Tesnière mißverstanden. In Lucien Tesnière. Syntaxe structurale et opérations mentales. Akten des deutsch-französischen Kolloquiums anläßlich der 100. Wiederkehr seines Geburtstages. Strasbourg 1993 [Linguistische Arbeiten 348], Gertrud Gréciano & Helmut Schumacher (eds), 53–61. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Engelen, Bernd. 2003. Die Wortartenlehre bei Lucien Tesnière. In Dependenz und Valenz: Ein internationales Handbuch der zeitgenössischen Forschung/Dependency and Valency: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, Vol. 1, Vilmos Ágel, Ludwig M. Eichinger, Hans Werner Eroms, Peter Hellwig, Hans Jürgen Heringer & Henning Lobin (eds), 100–108. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Fortis, Jean-Michel. this volume. Anderson’s Case Grammar and the history of localism. In Substance-based Grammar – The (Ongoing) Work of John Anderson [Studies in Language Companion Series 204], Roger Böhm & Harry van der Hulst (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Fraser, Norman M.1990. Prolegomena to a formal theory of dependency grammar. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 2: 298–319.
Garde, Paul1994. Syntaxe et sémantique chez Tesnière. In Mélanges Lucien Tesnière [Linguistica 34(1)], Bojan Čop, Janez Orešnik, Mitja Skubic & Pavao Tekavčic (eds), 95–99. Ljubljana: Ljubljana University Press.
Gréciano, Gertrud. 1977. Inhalt und Funktion als Klassifizierungskriterium für Tesnières Knoten. In Beiträge zur Klassifizierung der Wortarten [Linguistische Studien], Gerhard Helbig (ed), 66–78. Leipzig: VEB Enzyklopädie.
Gréciano, Gertrud & Schumacher, Helmut (eds). 1996. Lucien Tesnière. Syntaxe structurale et opérations mentales. Akten des deutsch-französischen Kolloquiums anläßlich der 100. Wiederkehr seines Geburtstages. Strasbourg 1993 [Linguistische Arbeiten 348]. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Gross, Thomas & Osborne, Timothy. 2009. Toward a practical dependency grammar theory of discontinuities. SKY Journal of Linguistics 22: 43–90.
Gruber, Jeffrey S.1967. Functions of the Lexicon in Formal Descriptive Grammars [TM-3370/000/00]. Santa Monica CA: Systems Development Corporation. Published in Gruber, Jeffrey S. 1975. Lexical Structures in Syntax and Semantics, 211–367. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Gupta, Anil. 2015. Definitions. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta (ed). <[URL]>
Hays, David G.1964. Dependency theory: A formalism and some observations. Language 40(4): 511–525.
Heringer, Hans-Jürgen. 1993. Dependency syntax. Formalized models. In Syntax. Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung/An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, Vol. 1, Joachim Jacobs, Arnim von Stechow, Wolfgang Sternefeld & Theo Vennemann (eds), 316–328. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Holthus, Günter. 1980. Les ‘Éléments de syntaxe structurale’ de Lucien Tesnière. Remarques sur la réception de son modèle de grammaire dépendantielle. Revue Romane 15(1): 128–148.
Honderich, Ted (ed). 1995. The Oxford Companion to Philosophy. Oxford: OUP.
Hudson, Richard A.1990. English Word Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hudson, Richard A.2004. Are determiners heads?Functions of Language 11: 7–43.
Hudson, Richard A.2007. Language Networks: The New Word Grammar. Oxford: OUP.
Jespersen, Otto. 1924. The Philosophy of Grammar. London: Allen & Unwin.
Kahane, Sylvain & Osborne, Timothy. 2015. Translators’ introduction. In Lucien Tesnière, Elements of Structural Syntax, trans. by Timothy Osborne & Sylvain Kahane, xxix–lxxiii. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Koch, Peter & Krefeld, Thomas. 1991. Dependenz und Valenz in romanischen Sprachen. In Connexiones Romanicae. Dependenz und Valenz in romanischen Sprachen [Linguistische Arbeiten 268], Peter Koch & Thomas Krefeld (eds), 5–38. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Koch, Peter & Krefeld, Thomas. 1993. Gibt es Translationen?Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie 109: 148–166.
Koch, Peter & Krefeld, Thomas. 1995. La translation: Illusions perdues. In Lucien Tesnière aujourd’hui. Actes du Colloque International C.N.R.S. URA 1164 – Université de Rouen 16–18 Novembre 1992, Françoise Madray-Lesigne & Jeannine Richard-Zappella (eds), 239–248. Louvain: Éditions Peeters.
Kreps, Christian. 1996. Dependency, licensing and the nature of grammatical relations. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 8: 1–37.
Lago GarabatosJesús. 1997. Sur le concept de translation en linguistique. Thélème. Revista Complutense de Estudios Franceses 11: 483–489.
Lambertz, Thomas. 1991. Kritische Anmerkungen zu Tesnières Translationstheorie. In Connexiones Romanicae. Dependenz und Valenz in romanischen Sprachen [Linguistische Arbeiten 268], Peter Koch & Thomas Krefeld (eds), 52–79. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Lambertz, Thomas. 1995a. Translation et dépendance. In Lucien Tesnière aujourd’hui. Actes du Colloque International C.N.R.S. URA 1164 – Université de Rouen 16–18 Novembre 1992, Françoise Madray-Lesigne & Jeannine Richard-Zappella (eds), 221–228. Louvain: Éditions Peeters.
Lambertz, Thomas. 1995b. Translation et dépendance. Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie 111: 523–553.
Lambertz, Thomas. 1996. Translationen und kein Ende. Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie 112: 39–79.
Langacker, Ronald W.1994. Structural syntax: The view from Cognitive Grammar. Sémiotiques 6–7(4): 69–84.
Lauwers, Peter. 2003. De la transposition à la translation. Une analyse historiographique et métathéorique d’un ‘passage’ crucial dans l’histoire de la syntaxe structurale en Europe. Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure 56: 257–287.
Maas, Utz. 1974. Dependenztheorie. In Grundzüge der Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaft, Band 2: Sprachwissenschaft, Heinz Ludwig Arnold & Volker Sinemus (eds), 257–275. Munich: DTV.
Macagno, Fabrizio & Walton, Douglas. 2008a. The argumentative structure of persuasive definitions. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 11: 525–549.
Madray-Lesigne, Françoise & Richard-Zappella, Jeannine (eds). 1995. Lucien Tesnière aujourd’hui. Actes du Colloque International C.N.R.S. URA 1164 – Université de Rouen 16–18 Novembre 1992. Louvain: Éditions Peeters.
de Marneffe, Marie-Catherine, Dozat, Timothy, Silveira, Natalia, Haverinen, Katri, Ginter, Filip, Nivre, Joakim & Manning, Christopher D.2014. Universal Stanford dependencies: A cross-linguistic typology. Proceedings of 9th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2014), Reyjavik, 26–31 May 2014. <[URL]>
Matthews, Peter H. [1974]
2
1991. Morphology. Cambridge: CUP.
Matthews, Peter H.1981. Syntax. Cambridge: CUP.
Mulder, Jan F. W.1980. Some difficult cases in syntactic description. In The Strategy of Linguistics. Papers on the Theory and Methodology of Axiomatic Functionalism, Jan F. W. Mulder & Sándor G. J. Hervey, 161–175. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.
Osborne, Timothy. 2005b. Coherence: A dependency grammar analysis. SKY Journal of Linguistics 18: 223–286.
Osborne, Timothy. 2006. Parallel conjuncts. Studia Linguistica 60(1): 64–96.
Osborne, Timothy. 2007. The weight of predicates: A dependency grammar analysis of predicate weight in German. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 19(1): 23–72.
Osborne, Timothy. 2008. Major constituents and two dependency grammar constraints on sharing in coordination. Linguistics 46(6): 1109–1165.
Osborne, Timothy. 2013. A look at Tesnière’s Éléments through the lens of modern syntactic theory. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Dependency Linguistics (Depling 2013), Eva Hajičová, Kim Gerdes & Leo Wanner (eds), 262–271. Prague: Charles University/Matfyzpress.
Osborne, Timothy. 2014. Dependency grammar. In The Routledge Handbook of Syntax, Andrew Carnie, Yosuke Sato & Daniel Siddiqi (eds), 604–626. London: Routledge.
Osborne, Timothy. 2015a. Dependency grammar. In Syntax – Theory and Analysis, Vol. 2. [Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft/Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 42.2], Tibor Kiss & Artemis Alexiadou (eds), 1027–1044. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Osborne, Timothy. 2015b. The transfer schema as constituency. In Translators’ introduction to Tesnière, Lucien. 2015. Elements of Structural Syntax, trans. by Timothy Osborne & Sylvain Kahane, liv–lvii. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Osborne, Timothy & Gross, Thomas. 2012a. Antecedent containment: A dependency grammar solution in terms of catenae. Studia Linguistica 66(2): 94–127.
Osborne, Timothy & Gross, Thomas. 2012b. Constructions are catenae: Construction grammar meets dependency grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 23(1): 165 – 216.
Osborne, Timothy & Maxwell, Daniel. 2015. A historical overview of the status of function words in dependency grammar. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Dependency Linguistics (Depling 2015), Eva Hajičová & Joakim Nivre (eds), 241–250. Uppsala: University of Uppsala, Department of Linguistics and Philology.
Osborne, Timothy, Putnam, Michael & Gross, Thomas M.2011. Bare phrase structure, label-less trees, and specifier-less syntax. Is minimalism becoming a dependency grammar?The Linguistic Review 28: 315–364.
Osborne, Timothy, Putnam, Michael & Gross, Thomas. 2012. Catenae: Introducing a novel unit of syntactic analysis. Syntax 15(4): 354–396.
Partee, Barbara Hall, ter Meulen, Alice G. B. & Wall, Robert Eugene. 1990. Mathematical Methods in Linguistics [Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy 30]. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Perrot, Jean. 1995. Sur la translation. In Lucien Tesnière aujourd’hui. Actes du Colloque International C.N.R.S. URA 1164 – Université de Rouen 16–18 Novembre 1992, Françoise Madray-Lesigne & Jeannine Richard-Zappella (eds), 215–220. Louvain: Éditions Peeters.
Richardson, John F.1982. Constituency and sublexical syntax. CLS 18: 466–476.
Spencer, Andrew. 2013. Lexical Relatedness. A Paradigm-based Model. Oxford: OUP.
Svenonius, Peter. 2012. Spanning. Tromsø: CASTL, University of Tromsø.
Svenonius, Peter. 2016. Words and spans. In Morphological Metatheory, Daniel Siddiqi & Heidi Harley (eds), 201–222. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Tesnière, Lucien. 1959. Éléments de syntaxe structurale. Paris: Klincksieck.
Tesnière, Lucien. 1980. Grundzüge der strukturalen Syntax, trans. by Ulrich Engel. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.
Tesnière, Lucien. 2015. Elements of Structural Syntax, trans. by Timothy Osborne & Sylvain Kahane. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
van der Hulst, Harry (ed). 2010. Recursion and Human Language [Studies in Generative Grammar 104]. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Vennemann, Theo. 1977. Konstituenz und Dependenz in einigen neueren Grammatiktheorien. Sprachwissenschaft 3: 259–301.
Wall, Robert Eugene. 1972. Introduction to Mathematical Linguistics. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Walton, Douglas & Macagno, Fabrizio. 2009. Reasoning from classifications and definitions. Argumentation 23(1): 81–107.
Walton, Douglas & Macagno, Fabrizio. 2010. Defeasible classifications and inferences from definitions. Informal Logic 30(1): 34–61.
Werner, Edeltraud. 1996. Ist die Annahme von Translationen sinnvoll? Kritisch-reinterpretative Überlegungen zu den Eléments de syntaxe structurale von Lucien Tesnière. Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie 112: 80–123.
Werner, Edeltraud. 2003. Das Translationskonzept Lucien Tesnières. Dependenz und Valenz: Ein internationales Handbuch der zeitgenössischen Forschung/Dependency and Valency: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, Vol. 1, Vilmos Ágel, Ludwig M. Eichinger, Hans Werner Eroms, Peter Hellwig, Hans Jürgen Heringer & Henning Lobin (eds), 115–129. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Wescoat, Michael T.1994. Phrase structure, lexical sharing, partial ordering, and the English gerund. BLS 20: 587–598.
Wescoat, Michael T.1995. Lexical sharing in a monostratal syntax of English wh-constructions. CLS 31: 490–507.
Wescoat, Michael T.2007. Preposition-determiner contractions: An analysis in optimality-theoretic lexical-functional grammar with lexical sharing. In Proceedings of the LFG07 Conference, Miriam Butt & Tracy Holloway King (eds), 439–459. Stanford CA: CSLI.
Zwicky, Arnold M.1992. Some choices in the theory of morphology. In Formal Grammar: Theory and Implementation, Robert Levine (ed), 327–371. Oxford: OUP.
Cited by (38)
Cited by 38 other publications
Basbøll, Hans
2022. Phonology in Glossematics in Northern and Western Europe. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 331 ff.
Battistella, Edwin
2022. The Prague School. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 221 ff.
Bohas, Georges & Jean Lowenstamm
2022. Thetaṣrīfin the medieval Arabic grammatical tradition. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 83 ff.
Calabrese, Andrea
2022. Historical notes on constraint-and-repair approaches. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 530 ff.
Chandlee, Jane & Adam Jardine
2022. Phonological theory and computational modelling. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 656 ff.
de Boer, Bart
2022. Phonology and evolution. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 694 ff.
Dresher, B. Elan & Daniel Currie Hall
2022. Developments leading towards generative phonology. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 372 ff.
Dresher, B. Elan & Harry van der Hulst
2022. Introduction. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 1 ff.
B. Elan Dresher & Harry van der Hulst
2022. The Oxford History of Phonology,
Duanmu, San & Haruo Kubozono
2022. The East Asian tradition. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 64 ff.
Fruehwald, Josef
2022. The study of variation. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 569 ff.
Hall, Kathleen Currie
2022. Corpora and phonological analysis. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 619 ff.
Heinz, Jeffrey & Jonathan Rawski
2022. Learnability in phonology. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 677 ff.
Hulst, Harry van der
2022. The (early) history of sign language phonology. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 284 ff.
Iosad, Pavel
2022. Phonology in the Soviet Union. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 309 ff.
Joseph, John E.
2022. Saussure and structural phonology. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 203 ff.
Kenstowicz, Michael J.
2022. The Sound Pattern of Englishand early generative phonology. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 396 ff.
Kenstowicz, Michael J. & Charles W. Kisseberth
2022. Phonological derivation in early generative phonology. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 419 ff.
Kingston, John
2022. Phonetic explanation in phonology. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 593 ff.
Kiparsky, Paul
2022. Pāṇini. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 38 ff.
Kisseberth, Charles W.
2022. Representations in generative phonology in the 1970s and 1980s. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 440 ff.
Ladd, D. Robert
2022. Mid-century American phonology. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 356 ff.
Lahiri, Aditi & Frans Plank
2022. Phonological phrasing. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 134 ff.
Moro, Elena Battaner & Richard Ogden
2022. John R. Firth and the London School. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 242 ff.
Pierrehumbert, Janet B.
2022. More than seventy years of probabilistic phonology. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 639 ff.
Radwańska-Williams, Joanna
2022. The Kazan School. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 179 ff.
Ritter, Nancy A.
2022. Government Phonology in historical perspective. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 509 ff.
Salmons, Joseph
2022. Nineteenth-century historical linguists’ contributions to phonology. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 163 ff.
Scheer, Tobias
2022. The interaction between phonology and morphosyntax in generative grammar. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 462 ff.
Sen, Ranjan
2022. The Greco-Roman tradition. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 109 ff.
Silverstein, Michael
2022. Boas—Sapir—Bloomfield. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 260 ff.
Sproat, Richard
2022. Writing systems. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 19 ff.
Staun, Jørgen
2022. Dependency Phonology. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 485 ff.
van Oostendorp, Marc
2022. Optimality Theory. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 551 ff.
2022. List of Abbreviations. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. xiii ff.
[no author supplied]
2022. Copyright Page. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. iv ff.
[no author supplied]
2022. List of Figures and Tables. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. ix ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.