Under a stipulative/persuasive redefinition that has been offered in recent syntax handbook work (among other places) as a purported sharpening of the distinction between dependency vs. constituency-based descriptions of syntactic constructions impeccable dependency descriptions can be fallaciously categorized as constituency-based. The present chapter demonstrates that the alleged key property, which the persuasive redefinition attributes to the dependency vs. constituency distinction, is ill-founded on conceptual and elementary graph-theoretical grounds and is illegitimately averse to, in particular, dependency-based syntactic descriptions of polycategoriality, which in terms of Anderson’s notionally-grounded dependency grammar involve dependency between linearly coincident syntactic categories. The chapter concludes with a ‘dissection’ of Tesniere’s classical Éléments de syntaxe structurale and a refutation of its interpretation (based on the stipulative/persuasive redefinition of dependency) as a hybrid dependency~constituency grammar.
Article outline
1.Introduction
2.Dependency vs. constituency in the nutshell of received wisdom
2.1Dependency and constituency – the conceptual essence
2.2Dependency and constituency – the graph-theoretical essence
3.Dependency and constituency stipulatively/persuasively redefined
3.1The one-to-one(-or-more) ratio of words to nodes
3.2On stipulative/persuasive (re)definitions and their argumentative nature
3.3Dependency ≠ 1:1 ratio of words to nodes
3.4Dependency ≠ 1:1 ratio of words to phrases
3.5Conclusion: dependency ≠ 1:1 ratio of words to nodes or phrases
4.How-(not)-to-read Tesnière’s Éléments de syntaxe structurale
4.1An introductory note on the Éléments
4.2Word classes in the Éléments
4.3The nucleus
4.4Transposing categories: transference and the mixed nucleus
4.5The Éléments through the dull lens of the ‘one-to-one ratio of words to nodes’: a dependency~constituency hybrid
1998Persuasive Definition. St. Andrews: University of St. Andrews, Department of Logic and Metaphysics.
Ágel, Vilmos & Fischer, Klaus
[2010]
2
2015 Dependency grammar and valency theory. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds), 225–257. Oxford: OUP.
Anderson, John M.
1971aOutline of a proposal for the lexicalisation of complex structures. Studia Linguistica 25: 1–8.
Anderson, John M.
1971bThe Grammar of Case. Towards a Localistic Theory. Cambridge: CUP.
Anderson, John M.
1976On Serialization in English Syntax [Ludwigsburg Studies in Language and Linguistics 1]. Ludwigsburg: R.O.U. Strauch.
Anderson, John M.
1977On Case Grammar. Prolegomena to a Theory of Grammatical Relations. London: Croom Helm.
Anderson, John M.
1979Syntax and the single mother. Journal of Linguistics 15: 267–287.
Anderson, John M.
1981How to Get a Head in Grammar. Paper given at the Linguistics Department, University of Ulster at Coleraine 23February 1981.
Anderson, John M.
1984Case Grammar and the Lexicon [Occasional Papers in Linguistics and Language Learning 10]. Coleraine: University of Ulster.
Anderson, John M.
1986Old English morphology and the structure of noun phrases, Folia Linguistica Historica 7(1): 219–224.
Anderson, John M.
1989aThe localist basis for syntactic categories. In 2nd Symposium on English and Greek: Description and/or Comparison of the Two Languages, Athanasios Kakouriotis (ed), 7–32. Thessaloniki: Aristotle University.
Anderson, John M.
1989bReflexions on notional grammar. In Essays on Grammatical Theory and Universal Grammar, Douglas G. Arnold, Martin Atkinson, Jacques Durand, Claire Glover & Louisa Sadler (eds), 13–36. Oxford: OUP.
Anderson, John M.
1990On the status of auxiliaries in notional grammar. Journal of Linguistics 26: 241–262.
1992Linguistic Representation. Structural Analogy and Stratification. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Anderson, John M.
1997A Notional Theory of Syntactic Categories. Cambridge: CUP.
Anderson, John M.
2000Markedness and the ontogenesis of syntax. Folia Linguistica XXXIV(3–4): 147–183.
Anderson, John M.
2001Finiteness, in Greek, and elsewhere. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 37: 5–33.
Anderson, John M.
2006Modern Grammars of Case. A Retrospective. Oxford: OUP.
Anderson, John M.
2007The Grammar of Names. Oxford: OUP.
Anderson, John M.
2011The Substance of Language, Vol. I: The Domain of Syntax. Oxford: OUP.
Anderson, John M.
2011The Substance of Language, Vol. II: Morphology, Paradigms, and Periphrases. Oxford: OUP.
Anderson, John M.
2011The Substance of Language, Vol. III: Phonology-Syntax Analogies. Oxford: OUP.
Anderson, John M.
2012Types of lexical complexity in English: Syntactic categories and the lexicon. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 47(4): 3–51.
Anderson, John M.
2013On so-called “conjunctions” in English. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 49(1): 21–77.
Anderson, John M. & Ewen, Colin J.
1987Principles of Dependency Phonology. Cambridge: CUP.
Andor, József.
this volume. Investigating substance-based grammar: The grammar of semantic and grammatical relations – An interview with John M. Anderson. In Substance-based Grammar – The (Ongoing) Work of John Anderson [Studies in Language Companion Series 204], Roger Böhm & Harry van der Hulst eds Amsterdam John Benjamins
Askedal, Jan Ole
2003Das Valenz- und Dependenzkonzept bei Lucien Tesnière. In Dependenz und Valenz: Ein internationales Handbuch der zeitgenössischen Forschung/Dependency and Valency: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, Vol. 1, Vilmos Ágel, Ludwig M. Eichinger, Hans Werner Eroms, Peter Hellwig, Hans Jürgen Heringer & Henning Lobin (eds), 80–99. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Bally, Charles
1932Linguistique générale et linguistique française. Paris: Leroux.
Baum, Richard
1976Dependenzgrammatik. Tesnières Modell der Sprachbeschreibung in wissenschaftsgeschichtlicher und kritischer Sicht [Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie, Beiheft, Bd. 151]. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Bernhardi, August F.
1805Anfangsgründe der Sprachwissenschaft. Berlin: Heinrich Frölich.
Böhm, Roger
1993Predicate-argument Structure, Relational Typology and (Anti)passives: Towards an Integrated Localist Case Grammar Account [Series A, No. 336]. Duisburg: LAUD.
Böhm, Roger
1998Notional Grammar, Wortklassen und Dependenz [BLIcK 7]. Bremen: Universität Bremen, IAAS.
Böhm, Roger
1999Kategorien, Konfigurationen und ‘Kasus’ in einer notionalen Grammatik. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 52(2): 207–231.
Brody, Michael
1997Mirror theory. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 9: 179–222.
Brody, Michael
2000Mirror theory: Syntactic representation in perfect syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 31(1): 29–56. Reprinted in: Brody, Michael 2003 Towards an Elegant Syntax. 205–231. London: Routledge.
Carnie, Andrew
2008Constituent Structure. Oxford: OUP.
Colman, Fran
2014The Grammar of Names in Anglo-Saxon England: The Linguistics and Culture of the Old English Onomasticon. Oxford: OUP.
Colman, Fran
this volume. Entitatives and Indo-European n-stems: conversion, subjunction, and the substance-based coherence of Old English weak declension classes. In Substance-based Grammar – The (Ongoing) Work of John Anderson [Studies in Language Companion Series 204], Roger Böhm & Harry van der Hulst eds Amsterdam John Benjamins
Čop, Bojan, Orešnik, Janez, Skubic, Mitja & Tekavčic, Pavao
(eds)1994Mélanges Lucien Tesnière [Linguistica 34(1)]. Ljubljana: Ljubljana University Press.
Engel, Ulrich
1972Bemerkungen zur Dependenzgrammatik. In Neue Grammatiktheorien und ihre Anwendung auf das heutige Deutsch [Sprache der Gegenwart 20], Hugo Moser (ed), 111–155. Düsseldorf: Schwann.
Engel, Ulrich
1996Tesnière mißverstanden. In Lucien Tesnière. Syntaxe structurale et opérations mentales. Akten des deutsch-französischen Kolloquiums anläßlich der 100. Wiederkehr seines Geburtstages. Strasbourg 1993 [Linguistische Arbeiten 348], Gertrud Gréciano & Helmut Schumacher (eds), 53–61. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Engelen, Bernd
2003Die Wortartenlehre bei Lucien Tesnière. In Dependenz und Valenz: Ein internationales Handbuch der zeitgenössischen Forschung/Dependency and Valency: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, Vol. 1, Vilmos Ágel, Ludwig M. Eichinger, Hans Werner Eroms, Peter Hellwig, Hans Jürgen Heringer & Henning Lobin (eds), 100–108. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Fortis, Jean-Michel
this volume. Anderson’s Case Grammar and the history of localism. In Substance-based Grammar – The (Ongoing) Work of John Anderson [Studies in Language Companion Series 204], Roger Böhm & Harry van der Hulst eds Amsterdam John Benjamins
Fraser, Norman M.
1990Prolegomena to a formal theory of dependency grammar. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 2: 298–319.
Garde, Paul
1994Syntaxe et sémantique chez Tesnière. In Mélanges Lucien Tesnière [Linguistica 34(1)], Bojan Čop, Janez Orešnik, Mitja Skubic & Pavao Tekavčic (eds), 95–99. Ljubljana: Ljubljana University Press.
Gréciano, Gertrud
1977Inhalt und Funktion als Klassifizierungskriterium für Tesnières Knoten. In Beiträge zur Klassifizierung der Wortarten [Linguistische Studien], Gerhard Helbig (ed), 66–78. Leipzig: VEB Enzyklopädie.
Gréciano, Gertrud & Schumacher, Helmut
(eds)1996Lucien Tesnière. Syntaxe structurale et opérations mentales. Akten des deutsch-französischen Kolloquiums anläßlich der 100. Wiederkehr seines Geburtstages. Strasbourg 1993 [Linguistische Arbeiten 348]. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Gross, Thomas & Osborne, Timothy
2009Toward a practical dependency grammar theory of discontinuities. SKY Journal of Linguistics 22: 43–90.
Gruber, Jeffrey S.
1967Functions of the Lexicon in Formal Descriptive Grammars [TM-3370/000/00]. Santa Monica CA: Systems Development Corporation. Published in Gruber, Jeffrey S. 1975 Lexical Structures in Syntax and Semantics, 211–367. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Gupta, Anil
2015Definitions. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta (ed). [URL]
Hays, David G.
1964Dependency theory: A formalism and some observations. Language 40(4): 511–525.
Heringer, Hans-Jürgen
1993Dependency syntax. Formalized models. In Syntax. Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung/An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, Vol. 1, Joachim Jacobs, Arnim von Stechow, Wolfgang Sternefeld & Theo Vennemann (eds), 316–328. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Heringer, Hans-Jürgen, Strecker, Bruno & Wimmer, Rainer
1980Les ‘Éléments de syntaxe structurale’ de Lucien Tesnière. Remarques sur la réception de son modèle de grammaire dépendantielle. Revue Romane 15(1): 128–148.
Honderich, Ted
(ed)1995The Oxford Companion to Philosophy. Oxford: OUP.
Hudson, Richard A.
1990English Word Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hudson, Richard A.
2004Are determiners heads?Functions of Language 11: 7–43.
Hudson, Richard A.
2007Language Networks: The New Word Grammar. Oxford: OUP.
Jespersen, Otto
1924The Philosophy of Grammar. London: Allen & Unwin.
Kahane, Sylvain & Osborne, Timothy
2015Translators’ introduction. In Lucien Tesnière, Elements of Structural Syntax, trans. by Timothy Osborne & Sylvain Kahane, xxix–lxxiii. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Koch, Peter & Krefeld, Thomas
1991Dependenz und Valenz in romanischen Sprachen. In Connexiones Romanicae. Dependenz und Valenz in romanischen Sprachen [Linguistische Arbeiten 268], Peter Koch & Thomas Krefeld (eds), 5–38. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Koch, Peter & Krefeld, Thomas
1993Gibt es Translationen?Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie 109: 148–166.
Koch, Peter & Krefeld, Thomas
1995La translation: Illusions perdues. In Lucien Tesnière aujourd’hui. Actes du Colloque International C.N.R.S. URA 1164 – Université de Rouen 16–18 Novembre 1992, Françoise Madray-Lesigne & Jeannine Richard-Zappella (eds), 239–248. Louvain: Éditions Peeters.
Kreps, Christian
1996Dependency, licensing and the nature of grammatical relations. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 8: 1–37.
Lago GarabatosJesús
1997Sur le concept de translation en linguistique. Thélème. Revista Complutense de Estudios Franceses 11: 483–489.
Lambertz, Thomas
1991Kritische Anmerkungen zu Tesnières Translationstheorie. In Connexiones Romanicae. Dependenz und Valenz in romanischen Sprachen [Linguistische Arbeiten 268], Peter Koch & Thomas Krefeld (eds), 52–79. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Lambertz, Thomas
1995aTranslation et dépendance. In Lucien Tesnière aujourd’hui. Actes du Colloque International C.N.R.S. URA 1164 – Université de Rouen 16–18 Novembre 1992, Françoise Madray-Lesigne & Jeannine Richard-Zappella (eds), 221–228. Louvain: Éditions Peeters.
Lambertz, Thomas
1995bTranslation et dépendance. Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie 111: 523–553.
Lambertz, Thomas
1996Translationen und kein Ende. Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie 112: 39–79.
Langacker, Ronald W.
1994Structural syntax: The view from Cognitive Grammar. Sémiotiques 6–7(4): 69–84.
Lauwers, Peter
2003De la transposition à la translation. Une analyse historiographique et métathéorique d’un ‘passage’ crucial dans l’histoire de la syntaxe structurale en Europe. Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure 56: 257–287.
Lewis, Geoffrey L.
1967Turkish Grammar. Oxford: OUP.
Maas, Utz
1974Dependenztheorie. In Grundzüge der Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaft, Band 2: Sprachwissenschaft, Heinz Ludwig Arnold & Volker Sinemus (eds), 257–275. Munich: DTV.
Macagno, Fabrizio & Walton, Douglas
2008aThe argumentative structure of persuasive definitions. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 11: 525–549.
(eds)1995Lucien Tesnière aujourd’hui. Actes du Colloque International C.N.R.S. URA 1164 – Université de Rouen 16–18 Novembre 1992. Louvain: Éditions Peeters.
de Marneffe, Marie-Catherine, Dozat, Timothy, Silveira, Natalia, Haverinen, Katri, Ginter, Filip, Nivre, Joakim & Manning, Christopher D.
2014Universal Stanford dependencies: A cross-linguistic typology. Proceedings of 9th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2014), Reyjavik, 26–31 May 2014 <[URL]
Matthews, Peter H.
[1974]
2
1991 Morphology. Cambridge: CUP.
Matthews, Peter H.
1981Syntax. Cambridge: CUP.
Mulder, Jan F. W.
1980Some difficult cases in syntactic description. In The Strategy of Linguistics. Papers on the Theory and Methodology of Axiomatic Functionalism, Jan F. W. Mulder & Sándor G. J. Hervey, 161–175. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.
Osborne, Timothy
2005aBeyond the constituent. Folia Linguistica XXXIX (3–4): 251–297.
Osborne, Timothy
2005bCoherence: A dependency grammar analysis. SKY Journal of Linguistics 18: 223–286.
Osborne, Timothy
2006Parallel conjuncts. Studia Linguistica 60(1): 64–96.
Osborne, Timothy
2007The weight of predicates: A dependency grammar analysis of predicate weight in German. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 19(1): 23–72.
Osborne, Timothy
2008Major constituents and two dependency grammar constraints on sharing in coordination. Linguistics 46(6): 1109–1165.
Osborne, Timothy
2013A look at Tesnière’s Éléments through the lens of modern syntactic theory. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Dependency Linguistics (Depling 2013), Eva Hajičová, Kim Gerdes & Leo Wanner (eds), 262–271. Prague: Charles University/Matfyzpress.
Osborne, Timothy
2014Dependency grammar. In The Routledge Handbook of Syntax, Andrew Carnie, Yosuke Sato & Daniel Siddiqi (eds), 604–626. London: Routledge.
Osborne, Timothy
2015aDependency grammar. In Syntax – Theory and Analysis, Vol. 2. [Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft/Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 42.2], Tibor Kiss & Artemis Alexiadou (eds), 1027–1044. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Osborne, Timothy
2015bThe transfer schema as constituency. In Translators’ introduction to Tesnière, Lucien. 2015. Elements of Structural Syntax, trans. by Timothy Osborne & Sylvain Kahane, liv–lvii. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Osborne, Timothy & Gross, Thomas
2012aAntecedent containment: A dependency grammar solution in terms of catenae. Studia Linguistica 66(2): 94–127.
Osborne, Timothy & Gross, Thomas
2012bConstructions are catenae: Construction grammar meets dependency grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 23(1): 165 – 216.
Osborne, Timothy & Maxwell, Daniel
2015A historical overview of the status of function words in dependency grammar. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Dependency Linguistics (Depling 2015), Eva Hajičová & Joakim Nivre (eds), 241–250. Uppsala: University of Uppsala, Department of Linguistics and Philology.
Osborne, Timothy, Putnam, Michael & Gross, Thomas M.
2011Bare phrase structure, label-less trees, and specifier-less syntax. Is minimalism becoming a dependency grammar?The Linguistic Review 28: 315–364.
Osborne, Timothy, Putnam, Michael & Gross, Thomas
2012Catenae: Introducing a novel unit of syntactic analysis. Syntax 15(4): 354–396.
Partee, Barbara Hall, ter Meulen, Alice G. B. & Wall, Robert Eugene
1990Mathematical Methods in Linguistics [Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy 30]. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Perrot, Jean
1995Sur la translation. In Lucien Tesnière aujourd’hui. Actes du Colloque International C.N.R.S. URA 1164 – Université de Rouen 16–18 Novembre 1992, Françoise Madray-Lesigne & Jeannine Richard-Zappella (eds), 215–220. Louvain: Éditions Peeters.
Richardson, John F.
1982Constituency and sublexical syntax. CLS 18: 466–476.
Spencer, Andrew
2013Lexical Relatedness. A Paradigm-based Model. Oxford: OUP.
Svenonius, Peter
2012Spanning. Tromsø: CASTL, University of Tromsø.
Svenonius, Peter
2016Words and spans. In Morphological Metatheory, Daniel Siddiqi & Heidi Harley (eds), 201–222. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Tesnière, Lucien
1959Éléments de syntaxe structurale. Paris: Klincksieck.
Tesnière, Lucien
1980Grundzüge der strukturalen Syntax, trans. by Ulrich Engel. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.
(ed)2010Recursion and Human Language [Studies in Generative Grammar 104]. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Vennemann, Theo
1977Konstituenz und Dependenz in einigen neueren Grammatiktheorien. Sprachwissenschaft 3: 259–301.
Wall, Robert Eugene
1972Introduction to Mathematical Linguistics. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Walton, Douglas & Macagno, Fabrizio
2009Reasoning from classifications and definitions. Argumentation 23(1): 81–107.
Walton, Douglas & Macagno, Fabrizio
2010Defeasible classifications and inferences from definitions. Informal Logic 30(1): 34–61.
Walton, Douglas, Reed, Chris & Macagno, Fabrizio
2008Argumentation Schemes. Cambridge: CUP.
Werner, Edeltraud
1996Ist die Annahme von Translationen sinnvoll? Kritisch-reinterpretative Überlegungen zu den Eléments de syntaxe structurale von Lucien Tesnière. Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie 112: 80–123.
Werner, Edeltraud
2003Das Translationskonzept Lucien Tesnières. Dependenz und Valenz: Ein internationales Handbuch der zeitgenössischen Forschung/Dependency and Valency: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, Vol. 1, Vilmos Ágel, Ludwig M. Eichinger, Hans Werner Eroms, Peter Hellwig, Hans Jürgen Heringer & Henning Lobin (eds), 115–129. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Wescoat, Michael T.
1994Phrase structure, lexical sharing, partial ordering, and the English gerund. BLS 20: 587–598.
Wescoat, Michael T.
1995Lexical sharing in a monostratal syntax of English wh-constructions. CLS 31: 490–507.
Wescoat, Michael T.
2007Preposition-determiner contractions: An analysis in optimality-theoretic lexical-functional grammar with lexical sharing. In Proceedings of the LFG07 Conference, Miriam Butt & Tracy Holloway King (eds), 439–459. Stanford CA: CSLI.
Zwicky, Arnold M.
1992Some choices in the theory of morphology. In Formal Grammar: Theory and Implementation, Robert Levine (ed), 327–371. Oxford: OUP.
Cited by
Cited by 38 other publications
Basbøll, Hans
2022. Phonology in Glossematics in Northern and Western Europe. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 331 ff.
Battistella, Edwin
2022. The Prague School. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 221 ff.
Bohas, Georges & Jean Lowenstamm
2022. Thetaṣrīfin the medieval Arabic grammatical tradition. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 83 ff.
Calabrese, Andrea
2022. Historical notes on constraint-and-repair approaches. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 530 ff.
Chandlee, Jane & Adam Jardine
2022. Phonological theory and computational modelling. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 656 ff.
2022. Phonology and evolution. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 694 ff.
Dresher, B. Elan & Daniel Currie Hall
2022. Developments leading towards generative phonology. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 372 ff.
Dresher, B. Elan & Harry van der Hulst
2022. Introduction. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 1 ff.
B. Elan Dresher & Harry van der Hulst
2022. The Oxford History of Phonology,
Duanmu, San & Haruo Kubozono
2022. The East Asian tradition. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 64 ff.
Fruehwald, Josef
2022. The study of variation. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 569 ff.
Hall, Kathleen Currie
2022. Corpora and phonological analysis. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 619 ff.
Heinz, Jeffrey & Jonathan Rawski
2022. Learnability in phonology. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 677 ff.
Hulst, Harry van der
2022. The (early) history of sign language phonology. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 284 ff.
Iosad, Pavel
2022. Phonology in the Soviet Union. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 309 ff.
Joseph, John E.
2022. Saussure and structural phonology. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 203 ff.
Kenstowicz, Michael J.
2022. The Sound Pattern of Englishand early generative phonology. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 396 ff.
Kenstowicz, Michael J. & Charles W. Kisseberth
2022. Phonological derivation in early generative phonology. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 419 ff.
Kingston, John
2022. Phonetic explanation in phonology. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 593 ff.
Kiparsky, Paul
2022. Pāṇini. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 38 ff.
Kisseberth, Charles W.
2022. Representations in generative phonology in the 1970s and 1980s. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 440 ff.
Ladd, D. Robert
2022. Mid-century American phonology. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 356 ff.
Lahiri, Aditi & Frans Plank
2022. Phonological phrasing. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 134 ff.
Moro, Elena Battaner & Richard Ogden
2022. John R. Firth and the London School. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 242 ff.
Pierrehumbert, Janet B.
2022. More than seventy years of probabilistic phonology. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 639 ff.
Radwańska-Williams, Joanna
2022. The Kazan School. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 179 ff.
Ritter, Nancy A.
2022. Government Phonology in historical perspective. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 509 ff.
Salmons, Joseph
2022. Nineteenth-century historical linguists’ contributions to phonology. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 163 ff.
Scheer, Tobias
2022. The interaction between phonology and morphosyntax in generative grammar. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 462 ff.
Sen, Ranjan
2022. The Greco-Roman tradition. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 109 ff.
Silverstein, Michael
2022. Boas—Sapir—Bloomfield. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 260 ff.
Sproat, Richard
2022. Writing systems. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 19 ff.
Staun, Jørgen
2022. Dependency Phonology. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 485 ff.
van Oostendorp, Marc
2022. Optimality Theory. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 551 ff.
[no author supplied]
2022. List of Abbreviations. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. xiii ff.
[no author supplied]
2022. Copyright Page. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. iv ff.
[no author supplied]
2022. List of Figures and Tables. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. ix ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.