Cover not available
Part of
Recent Developments in Functional Discourse Grammar
Edited by Evelien Keizer and Hella Olbertz
[Studies in Language Companion Series 205] 2018
► pp. 17–46

Negation in Functional Discourse Grammar

 | University of Amsterdam
 | VU University Amsterdam
The purpose of this chapter is to show that the model of Functional Discourse Grammar can be used to provide a detailed classification of expressions of negation by taking its hierarchical, layered structure as the point of departure. The chapter thus follows up on ideas first launched in Dik (1997) concerning the various layers of Functional Grammar at which polarity operators can apply. FDG has introduced a number of additional layers which can also host the negative operator to those recognized in FG, and it has furthermore introduced the distinction between the Representational (semantic) and Interpersonal (pragmatic) Levels. We will argue that operators with a negative value can be found at all layers of both the Interpersonal and the Representational Levels. We illustrate all these types and show how their scope properties and their formal manifestation and behaviour warrant their identification in the grammar.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Existing treatments of negation
  • 3.The Representational Level
    • 3.1P-negation
    • 3.2Ep-negation
    • 3.3E-negation
    • 3.4Fc-negation
    • 3.5Fl-negation
    • 3.6$-negation
    • 3.7Zero-quantification
    • 3.8Summary
  • 4.Negation at the Interpersonal Level
    • 4.1A-negation: Rejection
    • 4.2F-negation: Prohibition & co.
    • 4.3C-negation: Denial
    • 4.4T-negation: Metalinguistic negation
    • 4.5R-negation: Metalinguistic negation
    • 4.6Negation at IL – Summary
  • 5.Double occurrences of negation
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 22 November 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.205.02hen
References (42)
References
Bernini, Giuliano & Ramat, Paolo. 1996. Negative Sentences in the Languages of Europe: A Typological Approach. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bond, Oliver. 2011. Negation in clause linkages. In Language Documentation and Description 9, Julia Sallabank (ed.), 77–120. London: SOAS.Google Scholar
. 2013. A base for canonical negation. In Canonical Morphology and Syntax, Dunstan Brown, Marina Chumakina & Greville G. Corbett (eds), 20–47. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guillermo (ed.). 2002. Functional Structure in DP and IP, Vol. 1: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen. 2010. Typology of negation. In The Expression of Negation, Laurence R. Horn (ed.), 9–38. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
De Clercq, Karen. 2013. A Unified Syntax of Negation. PhD dissertation, University of Ghent.Google Scholar
De Clercq, Karen & Vanden Wyngaerd, Guido. 2017. Why affixal negation is syntactic. In Proceedings of the West Coast Conference in Formal Linguistics 34, 151–158. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Dik, Simon C. 1997. The Theory of Functional Grammar, Part II: Complex and Derived Constructions, Kees Hengeveld (ed.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 2005. Negative morphemes. In The World Atlas of Language Structures, Martin Haspelmath, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds), 454–457. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Fukushima, Kazuhiko. 2016. Morphological headedness and negation: Empirical/conceptual implications. Paper presented at the 2016 meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea.
Givón, Talmy. 2001. Syntax: An Introduction, 2 Vols. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Grygar-Rechziegel, Adela. 1988. Negative verbal units: Notes on negation and prefixation in Czech. Studies in Slavic and General Linguistics 11: 193–233.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane. 1995. The Syntax of Negation. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees & Dall’Aglio Hattnher, Marize Mattos. 2015. Four types of evidentiality in the native languages of Brazil. Linguistics 53(3): 479–524.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees & Mackenzie, J. Lachlan. 2008. Functional Discourse Grammar: A Typologically-based Theory of Language Structure. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horn, Laurence R. 1985. Metalinguistic negation and pragmatic ambiguity. Language 61: 121–174.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001. A Natural History of Negation, reissue edn. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Horn, Laurence R. & Wansing, Heinrich. 2016. Negation. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2016 edn), Edward N. Zalta (ed.). <[URL]>.
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1917. Negation in English and Other Languages. Copenhagen: Høst.Google Scholar
Johansson, Lars. 1995. On Turkic converb clauses. In Converbs in Cross-Linguistic Perspective, Martin Haspelmath & Ekkehard König (eds), 313–347. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Klima, Edward S. 1964. Negation in English. In The Structure of Language, Jerry A. Fodor & Jerrold J. Katz (eds), 246–323. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Kornfilt, Jaklin. 1997. Turkish. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. Negative attraction and negative concord in English grammar. Language 48: 773–818.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle. 2005. English word-formation processes. In Handbook of Word-Formation, Pavol Štekauer & Rochelle Lieber (eds), 375–427. Dordrecht: Springer.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Lorna. 1990. A Grammar of Tauya. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mackenzie, J. Lachlan. 2009. English fail to as a periphrastic negative: An FDG account. WP-FDG: Web Papers in Functional Discourse Grammar 82: The London Papers I: 1–28.Google Scholar
. 2013. The family of secondary predications in English: An FDG view. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 67: 43–58.Google Scholar
Miestamo, Matti. 2005. Standard Negation: The Negation of Declarative Verbal Main Clauses in a Typological Perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Olbertz, Hella & Honselaar, Wim. 2017. The grammaticalization of Dutch moeten: Modal and post-modal meanings. In The Grammaticalization of Tense, Aspect, Modality, and Evidentiality: A Functional Perspective, Kees Hengeveld, Heiko Narrog & Hella Olbertz (eds), 273–300. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ouhalla, Jamal. 1990. Sentential negation, relativised minimality and the aspectual status of auxiliaries. The Linguistic Review 7: 183–231.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2013. Is usage more than usage after all? The case of English not that. Linguistics 51(1): 75–116.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R. & Vanderveken, Daniel. 1985. Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Seki, Lucy. 2000. Gramática do Kamaiurá: Língua Tupi-Guarani do Alto Xingu. Campinas SP: Editora da Unicamp.Google Scholar
Smit, Niels & van Staden, Miriam. 2007. Representational layering in Functional Discourse Grammar. Alfa: Revista de Lingüística 51(2): 143–164.Google Scholar
Tikkanen, Bertil. 1995. Burushaski converbs in their South and Central Asian areal context. In Converbs in Cross-Linguistic Perspective, Martin Haspelmath & Ekkehard König (eds), 487–528. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan & Van Alsenoy, Lauren. 2016. On the typology of negative concord. Studies in Language 40(3): 473–512.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Valin Jr., Robert D. & LaPolla, Randy J. 1997. Syntax: Structure, Meaning and Function. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Willis, David, Lucas, Christopher & Breitbarth, Anne (eds). 2013. The History of Negation in the Languages of Europe and the Mediterranean. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zanuttini, Raffaella. 1997. Negation and Clausal Structure: A Comparative Study of Romance Languages. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Zeijlstra, Hedde. 2013. Not in the first place. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 31: 865–900.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Hasler, Felipe, Ricardo Pineda, Daniela Aristegui, Mariana Poblete & Consuelo Sandoval
2023. Negation in the Huarpean Languages: Millcayac and Allentiac. Forma y Función 36:1 DOI logo
Portero-Muñoz, Carmen
2022. “It’s way too intriguing!” The fuzzy status of emergent intensifiers: A Functional Discourse Grammar account. Open Linguistics 8:1 ► pp. 618 ff. DOI logo
Velasco, Daniel García
2022. Modification and context. Open Linguistics 8:1 ► pp. 524 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.