Cover not available
Part of
Recent Developments in Functional Discourse Grammar
Edited by Evelien Keizer and Hella Olbertz
[Studies in Language Companion Series 205] 2018
► pp. 47–88

Interpersonal adverbs in FDG

The case of frankly

 | University of Vienna
The aim of this chapter is to present an FDG analysis of interpersonal adverbs like frankly, fortunately and briefly. Although the literature on these adverbs (also referred to as parenthetical, disjunctive, or comment adverbs) is extensive, and their discourse-pragmatic functions and semantic properties, as well as their formal (syntactic, prosodic) behaviour, have been described in considerable detail, no unified, theoretically framed account has been proposed that captures all these different features, and the interaction between them, in a single model. Concentrating on the adverb frankly, and using data from a variety of English corpora (COCA, BYU-BNC and NOW), this chapter argues that the theory of FDG, with its distinction between an interpersonal (speaker-bound) and a representational (non-speaker-bound) level, offers the means to provide such an account. Its layered organization provides the means to distinguish between adverbs of different scope, while the distinction between adverbs functioning as modifiers within a Discourse Act and those that functioning as separate Discourse Acts makes it possible to distinguish between interpersonal adverbs that are prosodically integrated in the linear realization of the utterance and those that are prosodically independent. Moreover, in accordance with the dynamic, top-down approach of the model, the syntactic behaviour and prosodic realization of adverbs is shown to follow systematically from their functional (discourse-pragmatic and semantic) features.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Interpersonal vs. representational adverbs in FDG
  • 3.Interpersonal modifiers: Some previous accounts
    • 3.1Speech Act theory & Relevance Grammar
    • 3.2Descriptive grammars
    • 3.3Systemic Functional Grammar
    • 3.4Generative Grammar
    • 3.5Natural Language Semantics
    • 3.6Thetical Grammar vs. Sentence Grammar
    • 3.7Summary
  • 4.Adverbs in FDG: Modifiers vs Discourse Acts
    • 4.1Dimensions of integration
    • 4.2Discourse Acts: Three important properties
      • 4.2.1The internal structure of the Discourse Act
      • 4.2.2Discourse Acts as parts of a Move
      • 4.2.3The prosodic features of the Discourse Act
    • 4.3Adverbs as modifiers within a single Discourse Act
    • 4.4Adverbs as separate Discourse Acts
  • 5.Case study: Frankly
    • 5.1Within the Discourse Act: Interpersonal vs. representational frankly
      • 5.1.1Function
      • 5.1.2Truth-conditionality
      • 5.1.3Syntactic properties
        • 5.1.3.1Clefting, questioning and scope of proforms/ellipsis/negation
        • 5.1.3.2Clausal position and syntactic distribution
        • 5.1.3.3Coordination and modification
      • 5.1.4Summing up
    • 5.2Adverbs as separate Discourse Acts
      • 5.2.1Prosodic, syntactic and semantic integration
      • 5.2.2Interpersonal status
      • 5.2.3Discourse-pragmatic functions
      • 5.2.4Rhetorical functions
      • 5.2.5Summing up
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
  • Corpora
Published online: 22 November 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.205.03kei
References (62)
References
Ackema, Peter & Neeleman, Ad. 2004. Beyond Morphology. Interface Conditions and Word Formation. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Allerton, David J. & Cruttenden, Alan. 1974. English sentence adverbials: Their syntax and their intonation in British English. Lingua 34: 1–29.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Asher, Nicholas. 2000. Truth and discourse semantics for parentheticals. Journal of Semantics 17: 31–51.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Averintseva-Klisch, Maria. 2008. To the right of the clause: Right dislocation vs. afterthought. In ‘Subordination’ Versus ‘Coordination’ in Sentence and Text: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective [Studies in Language Companion Series 98], Cathrine Fabricius-Hansen & Wiebke Ramm (eds), 217–39. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bach, Kent. 1999. The myth of conventional implicature. Linguistics and Philosophy 22: 327–466.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bach, Kent & Harnish, Robert M. 1979. Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bellert, Irena. 1977. On semantic and distributional properties of sentential adverbs. Linguistic Inquiry 8(2): 337–50.Google Scholar
Blakemore, Diane. 2006. Divisions of labour: The analysis of parentheticals. Lingua 116: 1670–1687.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight. 1989. Intonation and its Uses. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Bonami, Olivier & Godard, Danièle. 2008. Lexical semantics and pragmatics of evaluative adverbs. In Adjectives and Adverbs. Syntax, Semantics, Discourse, Louise McNally & Christopher Kennedy (eds), 274–304. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Cieri, Christopher, Miller, David & Walker, Kevin. 2004. The Fisher Corpus: A resource for the next generations of speech-to-text. In Proceedings 4th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation. <[URL]>
Chafe, Wallace. 1986. Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing. In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, Wallace Chafe & Johanna Nichols (eds), 216–272. Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Contreras, Heles. 1976. A Theory of Word Order with Special Reference to Spanish. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Cruttenden, Alan. 1997. Intonation, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crystal, David. 1969. Prosodic Systems and Intonation in English. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
De Cesare, Anna-Maria. 2015. Defining focusing modifiers in a cross-linguistic perspective. A discussion based on English, German, French and Italian. In Adverbs: Functional and Diachronic Aspects [Studies in Language Companion Series 170], Karin Pittner, Daniela Elsner & Fabian Barteld (eds), 48–81. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dehé, Nicole. 2009. The relation between syntactic and prosodic parenthesis. In Parentheticals [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 106], Nicole Dehé & Yordanka Kavalova (eds), 261–284. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
. 2014. Parentheticals in Spoken English: The Syntax-Prosody Relation. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dik, Simon C. 1997. The Theory of Functional Grammar, Part II: Complex and Derived Constructions, edited by Kees Hengeveld. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ernst, Thomas. 2002. The Syntax of Adjuncts. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Espinal, Teresa. 1991. The representation of disjunct constituents. Language 67(4): 726–762.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Bruce. 1996. Pragmatic markers. Pragmatics 6: 167–190.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Speech Acts: Syntax and Semantics 3, Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds), 41–58. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, Carlos. 2004. The Phonology of Tone and Intonation. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane. 2009[1991]. Parenthetical adverbials: The radical orphanage approach. In Dislocated Elements in Discourse, Benjamin Shaer, Philippa Cook, Werner Frey & Claudia Maienborn (eds), 331–347. London: Routledge. Originally published 1991. In Aspects of Modern English linguistics, Shuki Chiba (ed.), 232–254. Tokyo: Kaitakushi.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane, Shaer, Benjamin & Frey, Werner. 2009. Postscript: problems and solutions for postscript analyses. In Dislocated Elements in Discourse, Benjamin Shaer, Philippa Cook, Werner Frey & Claudia Maienborn (eds), 348–365. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. 2014. An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 4th edn, revised by Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. London: Routledge.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hannay, Mike & Keizer, Evelien. 2005. A discourse-treatment of non-restrictive apposition in an FDG of English. In Studies in Functional Discourse Grammar [Linguistic Insights 26], María Á. Gómez-González & J. Lachlan Mackenzie (eds), 159–194. Berne: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Haselow, Alexander. 2015. Left vs. right periphery in grammaticalization: The case of anyway. In New Directions in Grammaticalization Research, Andrew Smith, Graeme Trousdale & Richard Waltereit (eds), 157–186. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Haumann, Dagmar. 2007. Adverb Licensing and Clause Structure in English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Kaltenböck, Gunther, Kuteva, Tania & Long, Haiping. 2013. An outline of Discourse Grammar. In Reflections on Functionalism in Linguistics, Shannon Bischoff & Carmen Jeny (eds), 155–206. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees & Mackenzie, Lachlan. 2008. Functional Discourse Grammar. A Typologically-based Theory of Language Structure. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney, Payne, John & Peterson, Peter. 2002. Coordination and supplementation. In The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, Rodney Huddleston & Geoffrey Pullum (eds), 1273–1362. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ifantidou, Elly. 1993. Sentential adverbs and relevance. Lingua 90(1-2): 69–90.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray S. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Keizer, Evelien. 2015. A Functional Discourse Grammar for English. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2018a. Semantic, syntactic, and prosodic integration. An FDG analysis of frankly and cleverly. Paper presented at the International Workshop ‘One Brain – Two Grammars?’, University of Rostock, 1-2 March 2018.
. 2018b. Truth-conditionality and non-restrictiveness in FDG. Paper presented at the Fifth International Conference on Functional Discourse Grammar, Salvador, Brazil, 26-28 July 2018.Google Scholar
Knowles, Gerry. 1991. Prosodic labelling: The problem of tone group boundaries. In English Computer Corpora: Selected Papers and Research Guide 3, Stig Johansson & Anna-Brita Stenström (eds), 149–63. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kroon, Caroline. 1995. Discourse Particles in Latin [Amsterdam Studies in Classical Philology 4]. Amsterdam: Gieben.Google Scholar
Laenzlinger, Christopher. 2004. The feature-based theory of adverb syntax. In Adverbials: The Interaction between Meaning, Context and Syntactic Structure [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 70], Jennifer R. Austin, Stefan Engelberg & Gisa Rauh (eds), 205–252. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. Comparative adverb syntax. A cartographic approach. In Adverbs: Functional and Diachronic Aspects [Studies in Language Companion Series 170], Karin Pittner, Daniela Elsner & Fabian Barteld (eds), 207–238. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mittwoch, Anita, Huddleston, Rodney & Collins, Peter. 2002. The clause: adjuncts. In The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, Rodney Huddleston & Geoffrey Pullum (eds), 663–784. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nespor, Marina & Vogel, Irene. 1986. Prosodic Phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Papafragou, Anna. 2006. Epistemic modality and truth conditions. Lingua 116: 1688–1702.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palmer, Frank R. 1986. Mood and modality. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Potts, Christopher. 2005. The Logic of Conventional Implicatures. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Pullum, Geoffrey K. & Huddleston, Rodney. 2002. Adjectives and adverbs. In The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, Rodney Huddleston & Geoffrey Pullum (eds), 525–595. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rouchota, Villy. 1998. Procedural meaning and parenthetical discourse markers. In Discourse Markers. Descriptions and Theory, A. Juncker & Y. Ziv (eds), 97–126. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schäfer, Martin. 2015. Adverbs in unusual places. In Adverbs: Functional and Diachronic Aspects [Studies in Language Companion Series 170], Karin Pittner, Daniela Elsner & Fabian Barteld (eds), 239–271. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strawson, Peter F. 1973. Austin and locutionary meaning. In Essays on J.L. Austin, Isaiah Berlin, L. W. Forguson & David Francis Pears (eds), 46–68. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. 2002. ‘Object complements’ and conversation: Towards a realistic account. Studies in language 26(1): 125–163.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Urmson, J. O. 1963. Parenthetical verbs. In Philosophy and Ordinary Language, Charles E. Catón (ed.), 220–249. Urbana IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Van de Velde, Freek. 2009. The emergence of modification patterns in the Dutch noun phrase. Linguistics 47: 1021–1049.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. A structural-functional account of NP-internal mood. Lingua 122(1): 1–23.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Vries, Mark. 2007. Invisible constituents? Parentheses as B-merged adverbial phrases. In Parentheticals [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 106], Nicole Dehé & Yordanka Kavalova (eds), 203–234. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre. 1975. Presuppositions and Non-Truth-Conditional Semantics. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Corpora
Davies, Mark. 2004-. BYU-BNC. (Based on the British National Corpus from Oxford University Press). <[URL]>
. 2008-. The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): 520 million words, 1990-present. <[URL]>
. 2013. Corpus of News on the Web (NOW): 3+ Billion Words from 20 Countries, Updated Every Day. <[URL]>
Cited by (8)

Cited by eight other publications

Keizer, Evelien
2023. Chapter 10. Enation and agnation in multi-level models. In Reconnecting Form and Meaning [Studies in Language Companion Series, 230], ► pp. 267 ff. DOI logo
Kaltenböck, Gunther & Evelien Keizer
2022. Insubordinateif-clauses in FDG: Degrees of independence. Open Linguistics 8:1 ► pp. 675 ff. DOI logo
Keizer, Evelien, Thomas Schwaiger & Elnora ten Wolde
2022. Modification in Functional Discourse Grammar: State of the art and issues addressed. Open Linguistics 8:1 ► pp. 512 ff. DOI logo
Kojadinović, Zlatan
2022. Variation in the prosody of illocutionary adverbs. Open Linguistics 8:1 ► pp. 593 ff. DOI logo
Olbertz, Hella
2022. American Spanish dizque from a Functional Discourse Grammar perspective. Open Linguistics 8:1 ► pp. 721 ff. DOI logo
Wolde, Elnora ten & Thomas Schwaiger
2022. Modification as a linguistic ‘relationship’: Ajust soproblem in Functional Discourse Grammar. Open Linguistics 8:1 ► pp. 699 ff. DOI logo
Giomi, Riccardo
2021. The Place of Interpersonal Lexemes in Linguistic Theory, with Special Reference to Functional Discourse Grammar. Corpus Pragmatics 5:2 ► pp. 187 ff. DOI logo
Giomi, Riccardo & Evelien Keizer
2020. Extra-clausal constituents in Functional Discourse Grammar: function and form. Revista da ABRALIN ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.