Chapter published in:
Recent Developments in Functional Discourse Grammar
Edited by Evelien Keizer and Hella Olbertz
[Studies in Language Companion Series 205] 2018
► pp. 132168
References

References

Boye, Kasper
2012Epistemic Meaning: A Crosslinguistic and Functional-Cognitive Study. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan & Perkins, Revere & Pagliuca, William
1994The Evolution of Grammar. Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dall’Aglio Hattnher, Marize M.
2008Campos semânticos modais: A modalidade dinâmica. In Estudos descritivos do português: História, uso, variação, Juliano Desiderato Antonio (ed.), 133–148. São Carlos: Editora Claraluz.Google Scholar
Dall’Aglio Hattnher, Marize M. & Hengeveld, Kees
2016The grammaticalization of modal verbs in Brazilian Portuguese. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 15(1): 1–14.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Haan, Ferdinand
1999Evidentiality and epistemic modality: Setting boundaries. Southwest Journal of Linguistics 18(1): 83–10.Google Scholar
Dendale, Patrick
1994 Devoir épistémique, marqueur modale ou évidentiel? Langue Française 102: 24–40.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Duffley, Patrick J.
1997Negation and the lexical semantics of the modal auxiliaries must and may in English. In La structuration conceptuelle du langage, Pierre Larrivé (ed.), 69–82. Louvain la Neuve: Peeters.Google Scholar
Finegan, Edward
1995Subjectivity and subjectivization: An introduction. In Subjectivity and Subjectivization, Dieter Stein & Susan Wright (eds), 1–15. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin & König, Ekkehard
Concessive conditionals in the languages of Europe. In Adverbial Constructions in the Languages of Europe [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology – Eurotype 20-3], Johan van der Auwera ed. 563 640 Berlin Mouton de Gruyter
Hengeveld, Kees
1988Illocution, mood and modality in a functional grammar of Spanish. Journal of Semantics 6: 227–269.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004Illocution, mood, and modality. In Morphology: A Handbook on Inflection and Word Formation, Gert Booij, Christian Lehmann & Joachim Mugdan (eds), Vol. 2: 1190–1202. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2011The grammaticalization of tense and aspect. In The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds), 580–594. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2017A hierarchical approach to grammaticalization. In The Grammaticalization of Tense, Aspect, Modality and Evidentiality: A Functional Perspective [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 311], Kees Hengeveld, Heiko Narrog & Hella Olbertz (eds), 13–37. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees & Mackenzie, J. Lachlan
2008Functional Discourse Grammar: A Typologically-Based Theory of Language Structure. Oxford: OUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika
1981The notional category of modality. In Worlds, Words, and Contexts, Hans-Jürgen Eikmeyer & Hannes Rieser (eds), 38–74. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Laca, Brenda
2014Epistemic modality and temporal anchoring. Special issue of Revista Virtual de Estudos da Linguagem – ReVEL 8: 76–103.Google Scholar
Lyons, John
1977Semantics, 2 Vols. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
1982Deixis and subjectivity: Loquor, ergo sum? In Speech, Place, and Action: Studies in Deixis and Related Topics, Robert J. Jarvella & Wolfgang Klein (eds), 101–124. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Matthews, Richard
2003Modal auxiliary constructions, TAM and interrogatives. In Modality in Contemporary English, Roberta Facchinetti, Manfred Krug & Frank Palmer (eds), 47–70. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Narrog, Heiko
2005Modality, mood, and change of modal meanings: A new perspective. Cognitive Linguistics 16(4): 677–731.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Modality, Subjectivity, and Semantic Change. A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Oxford: OUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nuyts, Jan
1992Subjective vs. objective modality: What is the difference? In Layered Structure and Reference in a Functional Perspective [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 23], Michael Fortescue, Peter Harder & Lars Kristoffersen (eds), 73–98. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001Subjectivity as an evidential dimension in epistemic modal expressions. Journal of Pragmatics 33(3): 383–400.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017Evidentiality reconsidered. In Evidentiality Reconsidered: Cognitive Grammar, Functional and Discourse-pragmatic Perspectives [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 271], Juana Isabel Marín Arrese, Gerda Haßler & Marta Carretero (eds), 57–83. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Olbertz, Hella
1998Verbal Periphrases in a Functional Grammar of Spanish [Functional Grammar Series 22]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017Periphrastic expressions of non-epistemic modality in Spanish. Web Papers in Functional Discourse Grammar 90. http://​home​.hum​.uva​.nl​/fdg​/working​_papers​/WP​-FDG​-90​.pdf
Olbertz, Hella & Gasparini Bastos, Sandra
2013Spanish auxiliaries of modal necessity: Objective vs. subjective? In Casebook in Functional Discourse Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series 137], J. Lachlan Mackenzie & Hella Olbertz (eds), 277–300. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Olbertz, Hella & Honselaar, Wim
2017The grammaticalization of Dutch moeten: Modal and post-modal meanings. In The Grammaticalization of Tense, Aspect, Modality and Evidentiality: A Functional Perspective [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 311], Kees Hengeveld, Heiko Narrog & Hella Olbertz (eds), 273–300. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oliveira, Fátima
2000Some issues about the Portuguese modals dever and poder . Belgian Journal of Linguistics 14: 167–184.Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank Robert
1986Mood and Modality. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Ramat, Paolo & Ricca, Davide
1998Sentence adverbs in the languages of Europe. In Adverbial Constructions in the Languages of Europe [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology – Eurotype 20-3], Johan van der Auwera (ed.), 187–275. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van der Auwera & Plungian, Vladimir A.
1998Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology 2: 79–124.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vendler, Zeno
1967Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe
2001Subjective and objective modality: Interpersonal and ideational functions in the English modal auxiliary system. Journal of Pragmatics 33(3): 1505–1528.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wanders, Gerry
1993¿Cómo actuar adverbialmente? La función de los adverbios terminados en -mente . MA thesis, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Wolf, Lavi
2012Epistemic modality and the subjective-objective distinction. In Proceedings of ConSOLE XIX, Enrico Boone, Kathrin Linke & Maartje Schulpen (eds), 331–342. Leiden: Universiteit Leiden.Google Scholar

Corpora

[Alcalá]Moreno Fernández, Francisco, Ana María Cestero Mancera, Isabel Molina Martos & Florentino Paredes García 2002-2007La lengua hablada en Alcalá de Henares, 3 Vols. Alcalá de Henares: Universidad de Alcalá.Google Scholar
[COCA]Davies, Mark. Online. Corpus of Contemporary American English 1990–present <http://​corpus​.byu​.edu​/coca/
[CREA]Real Academia Española. Online. Banco de datos CREA: Corpus de referencia del español actual. http://​corpus​.rae​.es​/creanet​.html
[CdE]Davies, Mark. Online. Corpus del Español. http://​www​.corpusdelespanol​.org/
[CdP]Davies, Mark. Online. Corpus do Português. http://​www​.corpusdoportugues​.org/
[Iboruna]Gonçalves, Sebastião Carlos Leite 2003-2007Banco de dados Iboruna: Amostras eletrônicas do português falado no interior paulista. http://​www​.iboruna​.ibilce​.unesp​.br/
[PEUL]Programa de Estudos sobre o Uso da Língua, Faculdade de Letras, Universidade Federal de Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) http://​www​.letras​.ufrj​.br​/peul/
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Fang, Hongmei & Kees Hengeveld
2020. A mitigator in Mandarin: the sentence-final particle ba (吧). Open Linguistics 6:1  pp. 284 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 july 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.