Cover not available
Part of
Recent Developments in Functional Discourse Grammar
Edited by Evelien Keizer and Hella Olbertz
[Studies in Language Companion Series 205] 2018
► pp. 131–168

On objective and subjective epistemic modality again

Evidence from Portuguese and Spanish modal auxiliaries

| University of Amsterdam,
| Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
This aim of this chapter is to prove the linguistic reality of the distinction between objective and subjective epistemic modality as made in FDG, according to which the former modifies the Episode and the latter the Propositional Content. The chapter studies the two basic Spanish modal auxiliaries poder ‘can, may’ and deber ‘must’ and its Portuguese cognates dever and poder in order to see (i) which of the criteria (proposed by Hengeveld (1988) for the lexical expression of this distinction) yield testable criteria for the grammatical expression of epistemic modality and (ii) if the objective-subjective dichotomy somehow relates to the degrees of possibility and necessity expressed by these modal auxiliaries. With respect to (i), it is argued that there are two testable criteria, i.e. non-locatability in time and space and the boundedness to the ‘locutionary agent’ of propositions, for the identification of subjective auxiliary expressions. As for (ii), it turns out that the expressions of auxiliaries of necessity are prone to express subjective epistemic modality, whereas those of probability and possibility generally express objective epistemic modality.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Objective vs. subjective epistemic modality: Definition and preliminary criteria
  • 3.Which criteria are applicable to Brazilian Portuguese and Spanish epistemic modals?
    • 3.1‘Subjectively modalized propositions cannot be questioned’
    • 3.2‘Subjectively modalized propositions cannot be hypothesized’
    • 3.3“Subjective modality can be formulated in positive terms only”
    • 3.4“Subjective modality is bound to the moment of speaking”
    • 3.5‘The source of the subjective modalization is the speaker’
    • 3.6Summary
  • 4.Objective and subjective modals in Brazilian Portuguese and Spanish
    • 4.1 Poder
    • 4.2 Dever and deber
    • 4.3Intermediate conclusion
  • 5.Subjective epistemic modality and inferential evidentiality
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
  • Corpora
Published online: 22 November 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.205.05olb
References (43)
References
Boye, Kasper. 2012. Epistemic Meaning: A Crosslinguistic and Functional-Cognitive Study. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan & Perkins, Revere & Pagliuca, William. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar. Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dall’Aglio Hattnher, Marize M. 2008. Campos semânticos modais: A modalidade dinâmica. In Estudos descritivos do português: História, uso, variação, Juliano Desiderato Antonio (ed.), 133–148. São Carlos: Editora Claraluz.Google Scholar
Dall’Aglio Hattnher, Marize M. & Hengeveld, Kees. 2016. The grammaticalization of modal verbs in Brazilian Portuguese. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 15(1): 1–14.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Haan, Ferdinand. 1999. Evidentiality and epistemic modality: Setting boundaries. Southwest Journal of Linguistics 18(1): 83–10.Google Scholar
Dendale, Patrick. 1994. Devoir épistémique, marqueur modale ou évidentiel? Langue Française 102: 24–40.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duffley, Patrick J. 1997. Negation and the lexical semantics of the modal auxiliaries must and may in English. In La structuration conceptuelle du langage, Pierre Larrivé (ed.), 69–82. Louvain la Neuve: Peeters.Google Scholar
Finegan, Edward. 1995. Subjectivity and subjectivization: An introduction. In Subjectivity and Subjectivization, Dieter Stein & Susan Wright (eds), 1–15. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin & König, Ekkehard. Concessive conditionals in the languages of Europe. In Adverbial Constructions in the Languages of Europe [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology – Eurotype 20-3], Johan van der Auwera (ed.), 563–640. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hengeveld, Kees. 1988. Illocution, mood and modality in a functional grammar of Spanish. Journal of Semantics 6: 227–269.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. Illocution, mood, and modality. In Morphology: A Handbook on Inflection and Word Formation, Gert Booij, Christian Lehmann & Joachim Mugdan (eds), Vol. 2: 1190–1202. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2011. The grammaticalization of tense and aspect. In The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds), 580–594. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2017. A hierarchical approach to grammaticalization. In The Grammaticalization of Tense, Aspect, Modality and Evidentiality: A Functional Perspective [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 311], Kees Hengeveld, Heiko Narrog & Hella Olbertz (eds), 13–37. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees & Mackenzie, J. Lachlan. 2008. Functional Discourse Grammar: A Typologically-Based Theory of Language Structure. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 1981. The notional category of modality. In Worlds, Words, and Contexts, Hans-Jürgen Eikmeyer & Hannes Rieser (eds), 38–74. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Laca, Brenda. 2014. Epistemic modality and temporal anchoring. Special issue of Revista Virtual de Estudos da Linguagem – ReVEL 8: 76–103.Google Scholar
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics, 2 Vols. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
. 1982. Deixis and subjectivity: Loquor, ergo sum? In Speech, Place, and Action: Studies in Deixis and Related Topics, Robert J. Jarvella & Wolfgang Klein (eds), 101–124. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Matthews, Richard. 2003. Modal auxiliary constructions, TAM and interrogatives. In Modality in Contemporary English, Roberta Facchinetti, Manfred Krug & Frank Palmer (eds), 47–70. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Narrog, Heiko. 2005. Modality, mood, and change of modal meanings: A new perspective. Cognitive Linguistics 16(4): 677–731.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Modality, Subjectivity, and Semantic Change. A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nuyts, Jan. 1992. Subjective vs. objective modality: What is the difference? In Layered Structure and Reference in a Functional Perspective [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 23], Michael Fortescue, Peter Harder & Lars Kristoffersen (eds), 73–98. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. Subjectivity as an evidential dimension in epistemic modal expressions. Journal of Pragmatics 33(3): 383–400.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. Evidentiality reconsidered. In Evidentiality Reconsidered: Cognitive Grammar, Functional and Discourse-pragmatic Perspectives [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 271], Juana Isabel Marín Arrese, Gerda Haßler & Marta Carretero (eds), 57–83. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Olbertz, Hella. 1998. Verbal Periphrases in a Functional Grammar of Spanish [Functional Grammar Series 22]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. Periphrastic expressions of non-epistemic modality in Spanish. Web Papers in Functional Discourse Grammar 90. <[URL]>
Olbertz, Hella & Gasparini Bastos, Sandra. 2013. Spanish auxiliaries of modal necessity: Objective vs. subjective? In Casebook in Functional Discourse Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series 137], J. Lachlan Mackenzie & Hella Olbertz (eds), 277–300. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Olbertz, Hella & Honselaar, Wim. 2017. The grammaticalization of Dutch moeten: Modal and post-modal meanings. In The Grammaticalization of Tense, Aspect, Modality and Evidentiality: A Functional Perspective [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 311], Kees Hengeveld, Heiko Narrog & Hella Olbertz (eds), 273–300. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oliveira, Fátima. 2000. Some issues about the Portuguese modals dever and poder . Belgian Journal of Linguistics 14: 167–184.Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank Robert. 1986. Mood and Modality. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Ramat, Paolo & Ricca, Davide. 1998. Sentence adverbs in the languages of Europe. In Adverbial Constructions in the Languages of Europe [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology – Eurotype 20-3], Johan van der Auwera (ed.), 187–275. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Auwera & Plungian, Vladimir A. 1998. Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology 2: 79–124.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vendler, Zeno. 1967. Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe. 2001. Subjective and objective modality: Interpersonal and ideational functions in the English modal auxiliary system. Journal of Pragmatics 33(3): 1505–1528.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wanders, Gerry. 1993. ¿Cómo actuar adverbialmente? La función de los adverbios terminados en -mente . MA thesis, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Wolf, Lavi. 2012. Epistemic modality and the subjective-objective distinction. In Proceedings of ConSOLE XIX, Enrico Boone, Kathrin Linke & Maartje Schulpen (eds), 331–342. Leiden: Universiteit Leiden.Google Scholar
Corpora
[Alcalá]Moreno Fernández, Francisco, Ana María Cestero Mancera, Isabel Molina Martos & Florentino Paredes García. 2002-2007. La lengua hablada en Alcalá de Henares, 3 Vols. Alcalá de Henares: Universidad de Alcalá.Google Scholar
[COCA]Davies, Mark. Online. Corpus of Contemporary American English, 1990–present. <[URL]>
[CREA]Real Academia Española. Online. Banco de datos CREA: Corpus de referencia del español actual. <[URL]>
[CdE]Davies, Mark. Online. Corpus del Español. <[URL]>
[CdP]Davies, Mark. Online. Corpus do Português. <[URL]>
[Iboruna]Gonçalves, Sebastião Carlos Leite. 2003-2007. Banco de dados Iboruna: Amostras eletrônicas do português falado no interior paulista. <[URL]>
[PEUL]Programa de Estudos sobre o Uso da Língua, Faculdade de Letras, Universidade Federal de Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) <[URL]>
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Aijón Oliva, Miguel Ángel
2023. Opciones múltiples, significados diferentes: las construcciones modales deónticas en el dis-curso oral y escrito de los medios de comunicación peninsulares. Dicenda. Estudios de lengua y literatura españolas 41 ► pp. 11 ff. DOI logo
González Vázquez, Mercedes
2022. Unhas notas sobre o sistema evidencial galego. Estudos de Lingüística Galega ► pp. 33 ff. DOI logo
Kaltenböck, Gunther & Evelien Keizer
2022. Insubordinateif-clauses in FDG: Degrees of independence. Open Linguistics 8:1 ► pp. 675 ff. DOI logo
Olbertz, Hella
2022. American Spanish dizque from a Functional Discourse Grammar perspective. Open Linguistics 8:1 ► pp. 721 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2024. Revisiting Modality [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 40], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.