Possessive -s in German
Development, variation and theoretical status
In several Germanic languages, such as English and Swedish, the former genitive morpheme -s has developed into a possessive marker, which has been described as a special clitic by some scholars. Synchronic and diachronic corpus data as well as a comparison with English and Dutch show that German possessive -s is going through a similar, though less radical change as its Germanic counterparts, resulting in morphosyntactic variation. This high amount of synchronic and diachronic variation makes it hard to categorize -s in German. However, the marker can best be described as a bound element that gradually loses its paradigmaticity. This gradual rather than categorial change in progress on an affix-clitic-continuum challenges both synchronic as well as diachronic morpheme-based theoretical approaches.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Empirical analysis
- 2.1The development of the superstable marker -s
- 2.1.1Paradigmatic deflexion
- 2.1.2Syntagmatic deflexion
- 2.2The current occurrences of possessive -s
- 2.3A contrastive comparison with English and Dutch
- 3.Theoretical considerations
- 3.1Morphological status of possessive -s
- 3.2Consequences for synchronic syntactic modelling
- 3.3Implications for diachronic modelling
- 3.3.1Degrammaticalization
- 3.3.2Constructionalization
- 3.3.3Exaptation
- 4.Conclusion
-
Notes
-
Corpora
-
References
References (76)
Corpora
Deutsches Textarchiv (DTA)
Ackermann, Tanja
2018b Grammatik der Namen im Wandel. Diachrone Morphosyntax der Personennamen im Deutschen [
Studia Linguistica Germanica 134]. Berlin: De Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ackermann, Tanja & Zimmer, Christian
2017 Morphologische Schemakonstanz. Eine empirische Untersuchung zum funktionalen Vorteil nominalmorphologischer Wortschonung im Deutschen. In
Sichtbare und hörbare Morphologie [
Linguistische Arbeiten 565],
Nanna Fuhrhop,
Karsten Schmidt &
Renata Szczepaniak (eds), 145–176. Berlin: De Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Allen, Cynthia L.
1997 The origins of the group genitive in English.
Transactions of the Philological Society 95: 111–131.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Allen, Cynthia L.
2003 Deflexion and the development of the genitive in English.
English Language and Linguistics 7: 1–28.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Anderson, Stephen R.
2005 Aspects of the Theory of Clitics. Oxford: OUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Anderson, Stephen R.
2008 The English “group genitive” is a special clitic.
English Linguistics 25(1): 1–20.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Askedal, John Ole
2003 Grammaticalization and the historical development of the genitive in Mainland Scandinavian. In
Papers from the 15th International Conference on Historical Linguistics [
Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 237],
Barry J. Blake &
Kate Burridge (eds), 21–32. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Booij, Geert
2010 Construction Morphology. Oxford: OUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Börjars, Kersti
2003 Morphological status and (de)grammaticalisation: The Swedish possessive.
Nordic Journal of Linguistics 26(2): 133–163.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Börjars, Kersti, Denison, David, Krajewski, Grzegorz & Scott, Alan
Börjars, Kersti, Vincent, Nigel & Walkden, George
2015 On constructing a theory of grammatical change.
Transactions of the Philological Society 113(3): 363–382.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bücking, Sebastian
2012 Kompositional flexibel.
Partizipianten und Modifikatoren in der Nominaldomäne [
Studien zur Deutschen Grammatik 83]. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carstairs, Andrew
1987 Diachronic evidence and the affix-clitic distinction. In
Papers from the 7th International Conference on Historical Linguistics [
Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 48],
Anna Giacalone Ramat,
Onofrio Carruba &
Giuliano Bernini (eds), 151–162. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dammel, Antje & Nübling, Damaris
2006 The superstable marker as an indicator of categorial weakness? Folia Linguistica 40: 97–113.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Demske, Ulrike
2001 Merkmale und Relationen. Diachrone Studien zur Nominalphrase im Deutschen [
Studia Linguistica Germanica 56]. Berlin: De Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Denison, David, Scott, Alan K. & Börjars, Kersti
Duden
2016 Die Grammatik [
Duden, Vol. 4]. Berlin: Dudenverlag.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fuß, Eric
2011 Eigennamen und adnominaler Genitiv im Deutschen.
Linguistische Berichte 225: 19–42.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gallmann, Peter
1996 Die Steuerung der Flexion in der DP.
Linguistische Berichte 164: 283–314.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harnisch, Rüdiger
2001 Grundform- und Stamm-Prinzip in der Substantivmorphologie des Deutschen. Synchronische und diachronische Untersuchung eines typologischen Parameters [
Germanistische Bibliothek 10]. Heidelberg: Winter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hartmann, Katharina & Zimmermann, Malte
2003 Syntactic and semantic adnominal genitive. In
(A-)symmetrien – (A)-symmetries. Beiträge zu Ehren von Ewald Lang,
Claudia Maienborn (ed.), 171–202. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hentschel, Elke
1994 Entwickeln sich im Deutschen Possessiv-Adjektive? Der -s-Genetiv bei Eigennamen.
In
Satz – Text – Diskurs. Akten des 27. Linguistischen Kolloquiums, Münster 1992
, Vol. 1 [
Linguistische Arbeiten 312],
Susanne Beckmann &
Sabine Frilling (eds), 17–25. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Herslund, Michael
2001 The Danish -s genitive: From affix to clitic.
Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 33(1): 7–18.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hopper, Paul & Traugott, Elizabeth C.
1993 Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Janda, Richard
1980 On the decline of declensional systems: the loss of OE nominal case and the ME reanalysis of -es and his
. In
Papers from the 4th International Conference on Historical Linguistics [
Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 14],
Elizabeth Traugott,
Rebecca Labrum &
Susan C. Shepard (eds), 243–252. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kasper, Simon
2015 Linking syntax and semantics of adnominal possession in the history of German. In
Language Change at the Syntax-Semantics Interface [
Trends in Linguistics – Studies and Monographs 278],
Chiara Gianollo,
Agnes Jäger &
Doris Penka (eds), 57–99. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria
2001 Adnominal possession. In
Language Typology and Language Universals, Vol. 2 [
Handbook of Linguistics and Communication Science 20.2],
Martin Haspelmath,
Ekkehard König,
Wulff Oesterreicher &
Wolfgang Raible (eds), 960–970. Berlin: De Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lass, Roger
1990 How to do things with junk: Exaptation in language evolution.
Journal of Linguistics 26: 79–102.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lehmann, Christian
2015 [1982]
Thoughts on Grammaticalization [
Classics in Linguistics 1], 3rd edn. Berlin: Language Science Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Meibauer, Jörg
2007 How marginal are phrasal compounds? Generalized insertion, expressivity, and I/Q-interaction.
Morphology 17(2): 233–259.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Neef, Martin
2006 Die Genitivflexion von artikellos verwendbaren Eigennamen als syntaktisch konditionierte Allomorphie.
Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 25(2): 273–299.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Norde, Muriel
1997 The History of the Genitive in Swedish. A Case Study in Degrammaticalization. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Norde, Muriel
2006 Demarcating degrammaticalization: The Swedish s-genitive revisited.
Nordic Journal of Linguistics 29(2): 201–238.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Norde, Muriel
2009 Degrammaticalization. Oxford: OUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Norde, Muriel
2011 Degrammaticalization. In
The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization,
Bernd Heine &
Heiko Narrog (eds), 475–487. Oxford: OUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nowak, Jessica & Nübling, Damaris
2017 Schwierige Lexeme und ihre Flexive im Konflikt: Hör- und sichtbare Wortschonungsstrategien. In
Sichtbare und hörbare Morphologie [
Linguistische Arbeiten 565],
Nanna Fuhrhop,
Renata Szczepaniak &
Karsten Schmidt (eds), 113–144. Berlin: De Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nübling, Damaris
1992 Klitika im Deutschen. Schriftsprache, Umgangssprache, alemannische Dialekte [
Script Oralia 42]. Tübingen: Narr.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nübling, Damaris
2012 Auf dem Weg zu Nicht-Flektierbaren: Die Deflexion der deutschen Eigennamen diachron und synchron. In
Nicht-flektierte und nicht-flektierbare Wortarten [
Linguistik – Impulse und Tendenzen 47],
Björn Rothstein (ed.), 224–246. Berlin: De Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nübling, Damaris
2014 Sprachverfall? Sprachliche Evolution am Beispiel des diachronen Funktionszuwachses des Apostrophs im Deutschen. In
Sprachverfall? Dynamik – Wandel – Variation [
Jahrbuch 2013 des Instituts Für Deutsche Sprache],
Albrecht Plewnia &
Andreas Witt (eds), 99–123. Berlin: De Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
O’Connor, Catherine, Maling, Joan & Skarabela, Barbora
Pafel, Jürgen
2015 Phrasal compounds are compatible with Lexical Integrity.
STUF – Language Typology and Universals 68(3): 263–280.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Paul, Hermann
1917 Deutsche Grammatik, Band II. Teil III:
Flexionslehre
. Halle (Saale): Niemeyer.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rauth, Philipp
2014 Die Entstehung von s-Plural und “Sächsischem Genitiv”.
Familien- und Personennamen als Brückenkonstruktionen.
Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur (PBB) 136(3): 341–373.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rosenbach, Anette
2008 Animacy and grammatical variation – Findings from English genitive variation.
Lingua 118(2): 151–171.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schäfer, Roland & Bildhauer, Felix
2012 Building large corpora from the web using a new efficient tool chain.
Proceedings of the LREC 2012 20–27 May 2012, 486–493. Istanbul.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schallert, Oliver
In press.
Portrait of the clitic as a young affix: Infinitivisches zu im Niemandsland zwischen Morphologie und Syntax. In
Syntax aus Saarbrücker Sicht 3. Beiträge der SaRDiS-Tagung zur Dialektsyntax [Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik - Beihefte],
Augustin Speyer &
Julia Hertel eds Stuttgart Steiner
Scherer, Carmen
2010 Das Deutsche und seine dräuenden Apostrophe. Zur Verbreitung von ’s im Gegenwartsdeutschen.
Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 38: 1–24.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Scott, Alan K.
2014 The Genitive Case in Dutch and German.
A Study of Morphosyntactic Change in Codified Languages [
Brill’s Studies in Historical Linguistics 2]. Leiden: Brill.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Simon, Horst J.
2010 “Exaptation” in der Sprachwandeltheorie. Eine Begriffspräzisierung. In
Prozesse sprachlicher Verstärkung. Typen formaler Resegmentierung und semantischer Remotivierung [
Linguistik – Impulse & Tendenzen 37],
Rüdiger Harnisch (ed.), 41–57. Berlin: De Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Spencer, Andrew & Luís, Ana R.
2012 Clitics. An Introduction. Cambridge: CUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Steche, Theodor
1927 Die neuhochdeutsche Wortbiegung unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Sprachentwicklung im 19. Jahrhundert. Breslau: Hirt.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Trousdale, Graeme
2013 Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: OUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Trousdale, Graeme & Norde, Muriel
2013 Degrammaticalization and constructionalization: two case studies. In
Current Trends in Grammaticalization Research. Special issue [
Language Sciences 36],
Muriel Norde,
Alexandra Lenz &
Karin Beijering (eds), 32–46.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van de Velde, Freek & Norde, Muriel
Vezzosi, Letizia
2000 The history of the genitive in Dutch: An evidence of the interference between language standardisation and spontaneous drift.
Studia Germanica Posnaniensia 26: 115–147.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vincent, Nigel & Börjars, Kersti
Wälchli, Bernhard
2005 Co-Compounds and Natural Coordination. Oxford: OUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wegera, Klaus-Peter, Waldenberger, Sandra & Lemke, Ilka
2018 Deutsch diachron. Eine Einführung in den Sprachwandel des Deutschen, 2nd edn. [
Grundlagen der Germanistik 52]. Berlin: Erich Schmidt.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Weiß, Helmut
2008 The possessor that appears twice. Variation, structure and function of possessive doubling in German. In
Microvariation in Syntactic Doubling [
Syntax and Semantics 36],
Sief Barbiers,
Olaf Koeneman,
Maria Lekakou &
Margreet van der Ham (eds), 381–401. Bingley: Emerald.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zifonun, Gisela
2001 Eigennamen in der Narrenschlacht. Oder: Wie man
Walther von der Vogelweide in den Genitiv setzt. Sprachreport
3: 2–5.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zifonun, Gisela
2005 Der Dativ ist dem Genitiv sein Tod: zur Analyse des adnominalen possessiven Dativs. In
Deutsche Syntax: Empirie und Theorie. Symposium in Göteborg 13.–15. Mai 2004 [
Göteborger Germanistische Forschungen 46],
Franz Josef d’Avis (ed.), 25–51. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zwicky, Arnold
1977 On Clitics. Bloomington IA: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zwicky, Arnold
1987 Suppressing the Zs.
Journal of Linguistics 23: 133–148.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zwicky, Arnold
1988 Direct reference to heads.
Folia Linguistica 22(3–4): 397–404.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zwicky, Arnold & Pullum, Geoffrey K.
1983 Cliticization vs. inflection: English n’t
.
Language 59(3): 502–513.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (2)
Cited by 2 other publications
Freywald, Ulrike & Antje Dammel
2023.
Morphologie: Das Wort. In
Deutsche Sprache der Gegenwart,
► pp. 193 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.