Possessive -s in German
Development, variation and theoretical status
In several Germanic languages, such as English and Swedish, the former genitive morpheme -s has developed into a possessive marker, which has been described as a special clitic by some scholars. Synchronic and diachronic corpus data as well as a comparison with English and Dutch show that German possessive -s is going through a similar, though less radical change as its Germanic counterparts, resulting in morphosyntactic variation. This high amount of synchronic and diachronic variation makes it hard to categorize -s in German. However, the marker can best be described as a bound element that gradually loses its paradigmaticity. This gradual rather than categorial change in progress on an affix-clitic-continuum challenges both synchronic as well as diachronic morpheme-based theoretical approaches.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Empirical analysis
- 2.1The development of the superstable marker -s
- 2.1.1Paradigmatic deflexion
- 2.1.2Syntagmatic deflexion
- 2.2The current occurrences of possessive -s
- 2.3A contrastive comparison with English and Dutch
- 3.Theoretical considerations
- 3.1Morphological status of possessive -s
- 3.2Consequences for synchronic syntactic modelling
- 3.3Implications for diachronic modelling
- 3.3.1Degrammaticalization
- 3.3.2Constructionalization
- 3.3.3Exaptation
- 4.Conclusion
-
Notes
-
Corpora
-
References
References (76)
Corpora
DECOW2012, DECOW2014 <[URL]>
Deutsches Textarchiv (DTA) <[URL]>
References
Ackermann, Tanja. 2018b. Grammatik der Namen im Wandel. Diachrone Morphosyntax der Personennamen im Deutschen [Studia Linguistica Germanica 134]. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Ackermann, Tanja & Zimmer, Christian. 2017. Morphologische Schemakonstanz. Eine empirische Untersuchung zum funktionalen Vorteil nominalmorphologischer Wortschonung im Deutschen. In Sichtbare und hörbare Morphologie [Linguistische Arbeiten 565], Nanna Fuhrhop, Karsten Schmidt & Renata Szczepaniak (eds), 145–176. Berlin: De Gruyter. 

Allen, Cynthia L. 1997. The origins of the group genitive in English. Transactions of the Philological Society 95: 111–131. 

Allen, Cynthia L. 2003. Deflexion and the development of the genitive in English. English Language and Linguistics 7: 1–28. 

Anderson, Stephen R. 2005. Aspects of the Theory of Clitics. Oxford: OUP. 

Anderson, Stephen R. 2008. The English “group genitive” is a special clitic. English Linguistics 25(1): 1–20. 

Askedal, John Ole. 2003. Grammaticalization and the historical development of the genitive in Mainland Scandinavian. In Papers from the 15th International Conference on Historical Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 237], Barry J. Blake & Kate Burridge (eds), 21–32. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Booij, Geert. 2010. Construction Morphology. Oxford: OUP.
Börjars, Kersti. 2003. Morphological status and (de)grammaticalisation: The Swedish possessive. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 26(2): 133–163. 

Börjars, Kersti, Vincent, Nigel & Walkden, George. 2015. On constructing a theory of grammatical change. Transactions of the Philological Society 113(3): 363–382. 

Bücking, Sebastian. 2012. Kompositional flexibel. Partizipianten und Modifikatoren in der Nominaldomäne [Studien zur Deutschen Grammatik 83]. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
Carstairs, Andrew. 1987. Diachronic evidence and the affix-clitic distinction. In Papers from the 7th International Conference on Historical Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 48], Anna Giacalone Ramat, Onofrio Carruba & Giuliano Bernini (eds), 151–162. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 

Dammel, Antje & Nübling, Damaris. 2006. The superstable marker as an indicator of categorial weakness? Folia Linguistica 40: 97–113. 

Demske, Ulrike. 2001. Merkmale und Relationen. Diachrone Studien zur Nominalphrase im Deutschen [Studia Linguistica Germanica 56]. Berlin: De Gruyter. 

Duden. 2016. Die Grammatik [Duden, Vol. 4]. Berlin: Dudenverlag.
Fuß, Eric. 2011. Eigennamen und adnominaler Genitiv im Deutschen. Linguistische Berichte 225: 19–42.
Gallmann, Peter. 1996. Die Steuerung der Flexion in der DP. Linguistische Berichte 164: 283–314.
Harnisch, Rüdiger. 2001. Grundform- und Stamm-Prinzip in der Substantivmorphologie des Deutschen. Synchronische und diachronische Untersuchung eines typologischen Parameters [Germanistische Bibliothek 10]. Heidelberg: Winter.
Hartmann, Katharina & Zimmermann, Malte. 2003. Syntactic and semantic adnominal genitive. In (A-)symmetrien – (A)-symmetries. Beiträge zu Ehren von Ewald Lang, Claudia Maienborn (ed.), 171–202. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
Hentschel, Elke. 1994. Entwickeln sich im Deutschen Possessiv-Adjektive? Der -s-Genetiv bei Eigennamen. In
Satz – Text – Diskurs. Akten des 27. Linguistischen Kolloquiums, Münster 1992
, Vol. 1 [Linguistische Arbeiten 312], Susanne Beckmann & Sabine Frilling (eds), 17–25. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 

Herslund, Michael. 2001. The Danish -s genitive: From affix to clitic. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 33(1): 7–18. 

Hopper, Paul & Traugott, Elizabeth C. 1993. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP.
Janda, Richard. 1980. On the decline of declensional systems: the loss of OE nominal case and the ME reanalysis of -es and his
. In Papers from the 4th International Conference on Historical Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 14], Elizabeth Traugott, Rebecca Labrum & Susan C. Shepard (eds), 243–252. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kasper, Simon. 2015. Linking syntax and semantics of adnominal possession in the history of German. In Language Change at the Syntax-Semantics Interface [Trends in Linguistics – Studies and Monographs 278], Chiara Gianollo, Agnes Jäger & Doris Penka (eds), 57–99. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria. 2001. Adnominal possession. In Language Typology and Language Universals, Vol. 2 [Handbook of Linguistics and Communication Science 20.2], Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulff Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds), 960–970. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Lass, Roger. 1990. How to do things with junk: Exaptation in language evolution. Journal of Linguistics 26: 79–102. 

Lehmann, Christian. 2015 [1982]. Thoughts on Grammaticalization [Classics in Linguistics 1], 3rd edn. Berlin: Language Science Press. 

Lindauer, Thomas. 1998. Attributive genitive constructions in German. In Possessors, Predicates and Movement in the Determiner Phrase [Linguistics Today 22], Artemis Alexiadou & Chris Wilder (eds), 109–140. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 

Meibauer, Jörg. 2007. How marginal are phrasal compounds? Generalized insertion, expressivity, and I/Q-interaction. Morphology 17(2): 233–259. 

Neef, Martin. 2006. Die Genitivflexion von artikellos verwendbaren Eigennamen als syntaktisch konditionierte Allomorphie. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 25(2): 273–299. 

Norde, Muriel. 1997. The History of the Genitive in Swedish. A Case Study in Degrammaticalization. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Norde, Muriel. 2006. Demarcating degrammaticalization: The Swedish s-genitive revisited. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 29(2): 201–238. 

Norde, Muriel. 2009. Degrammaticalization. Oxford: OUP. 

Norde, Muriel. 2011. Degrammaticalization. In The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds), 475–487. Oxford: OUP.
Nowak, Jessica & Nübling, Damaris. 2017. Schwierige Lexeme und ihre Flexive im Konflikt: Hör- und sichtbare Wortschonungsstrategien. In Sichtbare und hörbare Morphologie [Linguistische Arbeiten 565], Nanna Fuhrhop, Renata Szczepaniak & Karsten Schmidt (eds), 113–144. Berlin: De Gruyter. 

Nübling, Damaris. 1992. Klitika im Deutschen. Schriftsprache, Umgangssprache, alemannische Dialekte [Script Oralia 42]. Tübingen: Narr.
Nübling, Damaris. 2012. Auf dem Weg zu Nicht-Flektierbaren: Die Deflexion der deutschen Eigennamen diachron und synchron. In Nicht-flektierte und nicht-flektierbare Wortarten [Linguistik – Impulse und Tendenzen 47], Björn Rothstein (ed.), 224–246. Berlin: De Gruyter. 

Nübling, Damaris. 2014. Sprachverfall? Sprachliche Evolution am Beispiel des diachronen Funktionszuwachses des Apostrophs im Deutschen. In Sprachverfall? Dynamik – Wandel – Variation [Jahrbuch 2013 des Instituts Für Deutsche Sprache], Albrecht Plewnia & Andreas Witt (eds), 99–123. Berlin: De Gruyter. 

Pafel, Jürgen. 2015. Phrasal compounds are compatible with Lexical Integrity. STUF – Language Typology and Universals 68(3): 263–280.
Paul, Hermann. 1917. Deutsche Grammatik, Band II. Teil III: Flexionslehre
. Halle (Saale): Niemeyer.
Rauth, Philipp. 2014. Die Entstehung von s-Plural und “Sächsischem Genitiv”. Familien- und Personennamen als Brückenkonstruktionen. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur (PBB) 136(3): 341–373. 

Rosenbach, Anette. 2008. Animacy and grammatical variation – Findings from English genitive variation. Lingua 118(2): 151–171. 

Schäfer, Roland & Bildhauer, Felix. 2012. Building large corpora from the web using a new efficient tool chain. Proceedings of the LREC 2012, 20–27 May 2012, 486–493. Istanbul.
Schallert, Oliver. In press. Portrait of the clitic as a young affix: Infinitivisches zu im Niemandsland zwischen Morphologie und Syntax. In Syntax aus Saarbrücker Sicht 3. Beiträge der SaRDiS-Tagung zur Dialektsyntax [Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik - Beihefte], Augustin Speyer & Julia Hertel (eds). Stuttgart: Steiner.
Scherer, Carmen. 2010. Das Deutsche und seine dräuenden Apostrophe. Zur Verbreitung von ’s im Gegenwartsdeutschen. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 38: 1–24. 

Scott, Alan K. 2014. The Genitive Case in Dutch and German. A Study of Morphosyntactic Change in Codified Languages [Brill’s Studies in Historical Linguistics 2]. Leiden: Brill.
Simon, Horst J. 2010. “Exaptation” in der Sprachwandeltheorie. Eine Begriffspräzisierung. In Prozesse sprachlicher Verstärkung. Typen formaler Resegmentierung und semantischer Remotivierung [Linguistik – Impulse & Tendenzen 37], Rüdiger Harnisch (ed.), 41–57. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Spencer, Andrew & Luís, Ana R. 2012. Clitics. An Introduction. Cambridge: CUP. 

Steche, Theodor. 1927. Die neuhochdeutsche Wortbiegung unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Sprachentwicklung im 19. Jahrhundert. Breslau: Hirt.
Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Trousdale, Graeme. 2013. Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: OUP. 

Trousdale, Graeme & Norde, Muriel. 2013. Degrammaticalization and constructionalization: two case studies. In Current Trends in Grammaticalization Research. Special issue [Language Sciences 36], Muriel Norde, Alexandra Lenz & Karin Beijering (eds), 32–46.
Vezzosi, Letizia. 2000. The history of the genitive in Dutch: An evidence of the interference between language standardisation and spontaneous drift. Studia Germanica Posnaniensia 26: 115–147.
Vincent, Nigel & Börjars, Kersti. 2010. Grammaticalization and models of language change. In Gradience, Gradualness and Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 90], Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Graeme Trousdale (eds), 279–299. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 

Wälchli, Bernhard. 2005. Co-Compounds and Natural Coordination. Oxford: OUP. 

Wegera, Klaus-Peter, Waldenberger, Sandra & Lemke, Ilka. 2018. Deutsch diachron. Eine Einführung in den Sprachwandel des Deutschen, 2nd edn. [Grundlagen der Germanistik 52]. Berlin: Erich Schmidt.
Weiß, Helmut. 2008. The possessor that appears twice. Variation, structure and function of possessive doubling in German. In Microvariation in Syntactic Doubling [Syntax and Semantics 36], Sief Barbiers, Olaf Koeneman, Maria Lekakou & Margreet van der Ham (eds), 381–401. Bingley: Emerald.
Wurzel, Wolfgang Ullrich. 1987. System-dependent morphological naturalness in inflection. In Leitmotifs in Natural Morphology [Studies in Language Companion Series 10], Wolfgang Dressler, Willi Mayerthaler, Oswald Panagl & Wolfgang Ullrich Wurzel (eds), 59–96. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 

Zifonun, Gisela. 2001. Eigennamen in der Narrenschlacht. Oder: Wie man
Walther von der Vogelweide in den Genitiv setzt. Sprachreport
3: 2–5.
Zifonun, Gisela. 2005. Der Dativ ist dem Genitiv sein Tod: zur Analyse des adnominalen possessiven Dativs. In Deutsche Syntax: Empirie und Theorie. Symposium in Göteborg 13.–15. Mai 2004 [Göteborger Germanistische Forschungen 46], Franz Josef d’Avis (ed.), 25–51. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
Zwicky, Arnold. 1977. On Clitics. Bloomington IA: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
Zwicky, Arnold. 1987. Suppressing the Zs. Journal of Linguistics 23: 133–148. 

Zwicky, Arnold. 1988. Direct reference to heads. Folia Linguistica 22(3–4): 397–404.
Zwicky, Arnold & Pullum, Geoffrey K. 1983. Cliticization vs. inflection: English n’t
. Language 59(3): 502–513. 

Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Kopf, Kristin & Felix Bildhauer
2024.
The genitive alternation in German.
Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 
Freywald, Ulrike & Antje Dammel
2023.
Morphologie: Das Wort. In
Deutsche Sprache der Gegenwart,
► pp. 193 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.