Chapter published in:
Morphological Variation: Theoretical and empirical perspectives
Edited by Antje Dammel and Oliver Schallert
[Studies in Language Companion Series 207] 2019
► pp. 95134
References

References

Anderwald, Lieselotte
2009The Morphology of English Dialects. Verb-formation in Non-standard English. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Beckner, Clay, Blyth, Richard, Bybee, Joan, Christiansen, Morten H., Croft, William, Ellis, Nick, Holland, John, Ke, Jinyun, Larsen-Freeman, Diane & Schoenemann, Tom
2009Language is a complex adaptive system: Position paper. Language Learning 59(1): 1–26.Google Scholar
Birkmann, Thomas
1987Präteritopräsentia. Morphologische Entwicklungen einer Sonderklasse in den altgermanischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Boyd, Sally & Fraurud, Kari
2010Challenging the homogeneity assumption in language variation analysis: Findings from a study of multilingual urban spaces. In Language and Space. An International Handbook on Linguistic Variation, Vol. 1: Theories and Methods, Peter Auer & Jürgen Erich Schmidt (eds), 686–706. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Budin, Gerhard, Elspaß, Stephan, Lenz, Alexandra N., Newerkla, Stefan M. & Ziegler, Arne
. To appear. The Research Project (SFB) ‘German in Austria’. Variation – Contact – Perception. In Dimensionen des sprachlichen Raums: Variation – Mehrsprachigkeit – Konzeptualisierung, Lars Bülow, Kristina Herbert & Ann-Kathrin Fischer eds Wien: Peter Lang.
Bülow, Lars
2017Sprachdynamik im Lichte der Evolutionstheorie. Für ein integratives Sprachwandelmodell. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
Bülow, Lars, de Bot, Kees & Hilton, Nanna
2017Zum Nutzen der Complex Dynamic Systems Theory (CDST) für die Erforschung von Sprachvariation und Sprachwandel. In Räume, Grenzen, Übergänge. Akten des 5. Kongresses der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Dialektologie des Deutschen (IGDD), Helen Christen, Peter Gilles & Christoph Purschke (eds), 45–69. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
Bülow, Lars & Wallner, Dominik
. In preparation. Inter- and intra-individual variation in Bavarian base dialects. The case of the verb sein. In Variationist Linguistics Meets Contact Linguistics, Alexandra Lenz & Mateusz Maselko eds
Bybee, Joan L.
1985Morphology. A Study on the Relation between Meaning and Form [Typological Studies in Language 9]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Carroll, Ryan, Svare, Ragnar & Salmons, Joseph
2012Quantifying the evolutionary dynamics of German verbs. Journal of Historical Linguistics 2: 153–172.Google Scholar
Chambers, Jack K.
1995Sociolinguistic Theory. Linguistic Variation and its Social Significance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Chambers, Jack K. & Trudgill, Peter
2009Dialectology. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1965Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas
1984Accommodation at work: Some phonological data and their implications. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 46: 49–70.Google Scholar
Cukor-Avila, Patricia & Bailey, Guy
2013Real time and apparent time. In The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, Jack K. Chambers & Natalie Schilling (eds), 237–262. Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dammel, Antje
2011Konjugationsklassenwandel. Prinzipien des Ab-, Um- und Ausbaus verbalflexivischer Allomorphie in germanischen Sprachen. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
de Bot, Kees
2015A History of Applied Linguistics. From 1980 to the Present. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
de Bot, Kees, Lowie, Wander & Verspoor, Marjolijn
2007A Dynamic Systems Theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 10: 7–21.Google Scholar
DiÖ
2018 = Deutsch in Österreich. https://​dioe​.at/ (25 April 2018).Google Scholar
Ellis, Nick C.
2011The emergence of language as a complex adaptive system. In The Routledge Handbook of Applied Linguistics, James Simpson (ed.), 654–667. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fleischer, Jürg
2017Geschichte, Anlage und Durchführung der Fragebogen-Erhebungen von Georg Wenkers 20 Sätzen. Dokumentation, Entdeckungen und Neubewertungen. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Harrington, Jonathan, Palethorpe, Sallyanne & Watson, Catherine I.
2000Does the Queen speak the Queen's English? Nature 408: 927–928.Google Scholar
Kim, Agnes
. To appear. Multilingual Lower Austria. Historical sociolinguistic investigations on Wenker’s questionnaires. In Dimensionen des sprachlichen Raums: Variation – Mehrsprachigkeit – Konzeptualisierung, Lars Bülow, Kristina Herbert & Ann-Kathrin Fischer eds Wien: Peter Lang.
Koch, Günter
2007 Sprachatlas von Niederbayern, Band 5: Verbum . Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Labov, William
1966The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, Diane
2017Complexity Theory. The lessons continue. In Complexity Theory and Language Development: In Celebration of Diane Larsen-Freeman [Language Learning & Language Teaching 48], Lourdes Ortega & ZhaoHong Han (eds), 11–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Lessiak, Primus
1963Die Mundarten von Pernegg in Kärnten. Marburg: N.G. Elwert.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Erez, Michel, Jean-Baptiste, Jackson, Joe, Tang, Tina & Nowak, Martin A.
2007Quantifying the evolutionary dynamics of language. Nature 449: 713–716.Google Scholar
Lord, Frederic M. & Novick, Melvin R.
1968Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Lowie, Wander
2017Lost in state space? Methodological considerations in Complex Dynamic Theory approaches to second language development research. In Complexity Theory and Language Development: In Celebration of Diane Larsen-Freeman [Language Learning & Language Teaching 48], Lourdes Ortega & ZhaoHong Han (eds), 123–141. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Mauser, Peter
1998Die Morphologie im Dialekt des Salzburger Lungaus. Wien: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2007Dialektale Wortformen und Formsysteme. In Drent und herent. Dialekte im salzburgisch-bayerischen Grenzgebiet, Hannes Scheutz (ed.), 57–78. Salzburg: EuRegio.Google Scholar
Milroy, Lesley
1987Language and Social Networks. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Molenaar, Peter C. M.
2004A manifesto on psychology as idiographic science: Bringing the person back into scientific psychology. This time forever. Measurment Interdisciolinary Research and Perspectives 2: 201–218.Google Scholar
2008On the implications of the classical ergodic theorems: Analysis of developmental processes has to focus on intra-individual variation. Developmental Psychobiology 50: 60–69.Google Scholar
2009Can psychology be a quantitative science, or is Kant right after all? Normative issues in psychometrics. In Norms in Human Development, Leslie Smith & Jacques Vonèche (eds), 211–219. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Molenaar, Peter C. M. & Campbell, Cynthia G.
2009The new person-specific paradigm in psychology. Current Trends in Psychology 18: 112–117.Google Scholar
Nübling, Damaris & Dammel, Antje
2004Relevanzgesteuerter morphologischer Umbau im Frühneuhochdeutschen. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 126(2): 177–207.Google Scholar
Paul, Hermann et al.
2007Mittelhochdeutsche Grammatik. Überarbeitet von Thomas Klein, Hans-Joachim Solms und Klaus-Peter Wegera. Mit einer Syntax von Ingeborg Schöbler. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Penris, Wouters & Verspoor, Marjolijn
2017Academic writing development: A complex, dynamic process. In Applied Linguistics and the Future: A Medley of Perspectives. Simone Pfenninger & Judit Navracsics (eds), 215–242. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Rabanus, Stefan
2004Morphological change in German dialects. Two cases of rlural verbs in Alemannic. In Language Variation in Europe. Papers from the Second International Conference on Language Variation in Europe, ICLaVE 2, Britt-Louise Gunnarsson, Lena Bergström & Gerd Eklund (eds), 339–352. Uppsala: Uppsala University Press.Google Scholar
2005Dialektwandel im 20. Jahrhundert: Verbalplural in Südwestdeutschland. In Moderne Dialekte – Neue Dialektologie. Akten des 1. Kongresses der internationalen Gesellschaft für Dialektologie des Deutschen (IGDD), Eckhard Eggers, Jürgen Erich Schmidt & Dieter Stellmacher (eds), 267–290. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
2008Morphologisches Minimum. Distinktionen und Synkretisman im Minimalsatz hochdeutscher Dialekte. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
2010Areal variation in morphology. In Language and Space. An International Handbook on Linguistic Variation, Vol. 1: Theories and Methods, Peter Auer & Jürgen Erich Schmidt (eds), 804–821. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Rampton, Ben
1997Second language research in late modernity: A response to Firth and Wagner. The Modern Language Journal 81(3): 329–333.Google Scholar
Ritt, Nikolaus
2004Selfish Sounds and Linguistic Evolution. A Darwinian Approach to Language Change. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
SAND
= A Syntactic Atlas of the Dutch Dialects. http://​www​.meertens​.knaw​.nl​/projecten​/sand​/sandeng​.html (25 April 2018).Google Scholar
SAO
= Sprachatlas von Oberösterreich. https://​stifterhaus​.at​/index​.php​?id​=99 (16 August 2018).Google Scholar
Schallert, Oliver
2013Syntaktische Auswertung von Wenkersätzen: Eine Fallstudie anhand von Verbstellungsphänomenen in den bairischen (und alemannischen) Dialekten Österreichs. In Strömungen in der Entwicklung der Dialekte und ihrer Erforschung. Beiträge zur 11. Bayerisch-Österreichischen Dialektologentagung in Passau, September 2010, Rüdiger Harnisch (ed.), 208–233. Regensburg: Edition Vulpes.Google Scholar
Scheutz, Hannes
2007 Drent und herent. Dialekte im salzburgisch-bayerischen Grenzgebiet. Salzburg: EuRegio.Google Scholar
2016Insre Sprochh. Deutsche Dialekte in Südtirol. Bozen: Athesia.Google Scholar
2017Sprachatlas von Salzburg. https://​www​.sprachatlas​.at​/salzburg/ (25 April 2018).Google Scholar
Schirmunski, Viktor M.
1962[2010] Deutsche Mundartkunde. Vergleichende Laut- und Formenlehre der deutschen Mundarten. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Jürgen Erich & Herrgen, Joachim
2011Sprachdynamik. Eine Einführung in die moderne Regionalsprachenforschung. Berlin: Erich Schmidt.Google Scholar
Schuchardt, Hugo
1972[1885] On sound laws: Against the neogrammarians. In Schuchardt, the Neogrammarians, and the Transformational Theory of Phonological Change. Four Essays by Hugo Schuchardt, Theo Vennemann, Terence H. Wilbur, Theo Vennemann & Terence H. Wilbur (eds), 39–72. Frankfurt: Athenäum.Google Scholar
SyHD
= Syntax of Hessian Dialects http://​www​.syhd​.info​/en​/home/ (25 April 2018).Google Scholar
Siegler, Robert S. & Crowley, Kevin
1991The microgenetic method. A direct means for studying cognitive development. American Psychologist 46(6): 606–620.Google Scholar
van Geert, Paul
2011The contribution of complex dynamic systems to development. Child Development Perspectives 5(4): 273–278.Google Scholar
Vergeiner, Philip
2018Kookkurrenz – Kovariation – Kontrast. Formen und Funktionen individueller Dialekt-/Standardvariation in Beratungsgesprächen an der Universität Salzburg. Wien: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Verspoor, Marjolijn
2017Complex Dynamic Systems Theory and L2 pedagogy. In Complexity Theory and Language Development: In Celebration of Diane Larsen-Freeman [Language Learning & Language Teaching 48], Lourdes Ortega & ZhaoHong Han (eds), 143–162. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Werner, Ottmar
1987Natürlichkeit und Nutzen morphologischer Irregularität. In Beiträge zum 3. Essener Kolloquium über Sprachwandel und seine bestimmenden Faktoren, Norbert Boretzky, Werner Enninger & Thomas Stolz (eds), 289–316. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
Wiesinger, Peter
1983Die Einteilung der deutschen Dialekte. In Dialektologie. Ein Handbuch zur deutschen und allgemeinen Dialektforschung. Zweiter Halbband [Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft 1.2], Werner Besch, Ulrich Knoop, Wolfgang Putschke & Herbert E. Wiegand (eds), 807–900. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
1989Die Flexionsmorphologie des Verbums im Bairischen. Wien: Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt
2007Sociolinguistic myths in the study of African American English. Language and Linguistics Compass 1(4): 292–313.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt & Thomas, Erik
2002The Development of Afro-American English. Malden MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wurzel, Wolfgang
1984Flexionsmorphologie und Natürlichkeit. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar