Part of
Normativity in Language and Linguistics
Edited by Aleksi Mäkilähde, Ville Leppänen and Esa Itkonen
[Studies in Language Companion Series 209] 2019
► pp. 128
References (81)
References
Abhyankar, K. V. & Shukla, J. M. 1973. Patañjali’s Vyākaraṇa-mahābhāṣya, Āhnikas 1–3. Poona: Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute.Google Scholar
Anttila, Raimo. 1989. Historical and Comparative Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 6] Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baalbaki, Ramzi. 2008. The Legacy of the Kitāb. Sībawayhi’s Analytical Methods within the Context of the Arabic Grammatical Theory. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Bach, Emmon. 1974. Syntactic Theory. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Bartsch, Renate. 1987. Norms of Language. Theoretical and Practical Aspects. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Bicchieri, Christina. 2006. The Grammar of Society. The Nature and Dynamics of Social Norms. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Blank, David L. 1982. Ancient Philosophy and Grammar. The Syntax of Apollonius Dyscolus. Chico CA: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1936. Language or ideas? Language 12(1): 89–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brandenburg, Philipp. 2005. Apollonios Dyskolos. Über das Pronomen: Einführung, Text, Übersetzung und Erläuterungen. München: K. G. Saur. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brennan, Geoffrey, Eriksson, Lina, Goodin, Robert E. & Southwood, Nicholas. 2013. Explaining Norms. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carr, Philip. 2019. Syntactic knowledge and intersubjectivity. In Current Approaches to Syntax. A Comparative Handbook, András Kertész, Edith Moravcsik & Csilla Rákosi (eds), 423–439. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carter, Michael G. 1968. A Study of Sībawaihi’s Principles of Grammatical Analysis. Doctoral dissertation, University of Oxford. Photocopy supplied by the British Library.Google Scholar
Carter, M. G. 2004. Sībawayhi. London: I. B. Tauris.Google Scholar
Carter, Michael G. 2016. Sībawayhi’s Principles. Arabic Grammar and Law in Early Islamic Thought. Atlanta GA: Lockwood Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. [1975] 1977. The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory. New York NY: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
. 1976. Problems and mysteries in language study. In Language in Focus: Foundations, Methods and Systems. Essays in Memory of Yehoshua Bar-Hillel, Asa Kasher (ed.), 281–357. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1986. Knowledge of Language. Its Nature, Origin, and Use. New York NY: Praeger.Google Scholar
. 2009. Opening remarks. In Of Minds and Language. A Dialogue with Noam Chomsky in the Basque Country, Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini, Juan Uriagereka & Pello Salaburu (eds), 13–32. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. 1996. Using Language. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cohen, L. Jonathan. 1986. The Dialogue of Reason. An Analysis of Analytical Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Coseriu, Eugenio. 1974. Synchronie, Diachronie und Geschichte. (Spanish edition published 1958). München: Wilhelm Finck.Google Scholar
Gaus, Gerald. 2014. Review of Brennan et al. 2013. Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews (6 February 2014).Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Syntax and Semantics 3. Speech Acts, Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds), 41–58. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1970. Zur Logik der Sozialwissenschaften. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Harris, Zellig S. 1960. Structural Linguistics. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Haukioja, Jussi. 2000. Grammaticality, response-dependence and the ontology of linguistic objects. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 23: 3–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hjelmslev, Louis. [1943] 1976. Omkring sprogteoriens grundlæggelse. København: Akademisk Forlag.Google Scholar
Householder, Fred. 1981. The Syntax of Apollonius Dyscolus [Studies in the History of the Language Sciences 23]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyman, Malcolm D. 2007. From Pāṇinian sandhi to finite state calculus. In Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Sanskrit Computational Linguistics, Gérard Huet & Amba Kulkarni (eds), 13–21.Google Scholar
Itkonen, Esa. 1974. Linguistics and Metascience [Studia Philosophica Turkuensia 2]. Turku: Societas Philosophica et Phaenomenologica Finlandiae.Google Scholar
. 1976. Linguistics and Empiricalness. Answers to Criticism. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Itkonen. 1981a. Rationality as an explanatory principle in linguistics. In Logos Semantikos. Studia Linguistica in Honorem Eugenio Coseriu 1921–1981, Vol. II, Horst Geckeler, Brigitte Schlieben-Lange, Jürgen Trabant & Harald Weydt (eds), 77–87. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Itkonen, Esa. 1981b. The concept of linguistic intuition. In A Festschrift for Native Speaker, Florian Coulmas (ed.), 127–140. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1982. Short-term and long-term teleology in linguistic change. In Papers from the Third International Conference on Historical Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 13], J. Peter Maher, Allan R. Bomhard & E. F. Konrad Koerner (eds), 85–118. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
. 1983. Causality in Linguistic Theory. A Critical Investigation into the Philosophical and Methodological Foundations of ‘Non-autonomous’ Linguistics. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
. 1984. On the ‘rationalist’ conception of linguistic change. Diachronica 1(2): 203–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1991. Universal History of Linguistics. India, China, Arabia, Europe [Studies in the History of the Language Sciences 65]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. What is Language? A Study in the Philosophy of Linguistics. Turku: University of Turku.Google Scholar
. 2008. The central role of normativity in language and linguistics. In The Shared Mind. Perspectives on Intersubjectivity [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 12], Jordan Zlatev, Timothy P. Racine, Chris Sinha & Esa Itkonen (eds), 279–305. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. On Coseriu’s legacy. Energeia 3: 1–29.Google Scholar
. 2013a. Functional explanation and its uses. In Functional Approaches to Language, Shannon Bischoff & Carmen Jany (eds), 31–69. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013b. Philosophy of linguistics. In The Oxford Handbook of the History of Linguistics, Keith Allan (ed.), 747–774. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2013/2014. On explanation in linguistics. Energeia 5: 10–40.Google Scholar
. 2019. Hermeneutics and generative linguistics. In Current Approaches to Syntax. A Comparative Handbook, András Kertész, Edith Moravcsik & Csilla Rákosi (eds), 441–467. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kac, Michael B. 1974. Autonomous linguistics and psycholinguistics. Minnesota Working Papers in Linguistics and Philosophy of Language 2: 42–48. (Reprinted in Papers on Language Theory, Timo Haukioja (ed.), 127–133. Turku: University of Turku.)Google Scholar
1987. The notion ‘rule of grammar’ reconsidered. In Mathematics of Language. Proceedings of a Conference Held at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Alexis Manaster-Ramer (ed.), 115–142. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
1992. Grammars and Grammaticality [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 78]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1993. Pāṇinian linguistics. In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Ronald E. Asher & James M. Y. Simpson (eds), 2918–2923. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
. 2012. Pāṇini, variation, and orthoepic diaskeuasis. AS/EA 66: 327–335.Google Scholar
Kusch, Martin. 1999. Psychological Knowledge. A Social History and Philosophy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2006. A Sceptical Guide to Meaning and Rules. Defending Kripke’s Wittgenstein. Chesham: Acumen.Google Scholar
Lagerspetz, Eerik. 1995. The Opposite Mirrors. An Essay on the Conventionalist Theory of Institutions. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1991. Concept, Image, and Symbol. The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lass, Roger. 1997. Historical Linguistics and Language Change. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 1974. Semantics. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Lewis, David. 1969. Convention. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia. 2010. Causes of language change. In Bloomsbury Companion to Historical Linguistics, Silvia Luraghi & Vit Bubenik (eds), 358–370. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
MacCormick, Neil. 1998. Norms, institutions, and institutional facts. Law and Philosophy 17: 301–345.Google Scholar
Noy, Avigail S. 2012. Don’t be absurd: The term muḥāl in Sībawayhi’s Kitāb . In The Foundations of Arabic Linguistics. Sībawayhi and Early Arabic Grammatical Theory, Amal Elesha Marogy (ed.), 27–58. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Owens, David. 2012. Shaping the Normative Landscape. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paul, Hermann. 1920. Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte, 5th edn. Halle: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Pullum, Geoffrey K. 2009. Formalism, grammatical rules, and normativity. In Form and Formalism in Linguistics, James McElvenny (ed.), 197–223. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Ringen, Jon D. 1975. Linguistic facts: A study of the empirical scientific status of transformational generative grammars. In Testing Linguistic Hypotheses. Papers from the 3rd UWM Linguistics Group Annual Symposium, May 10–11, 1974, David Cohen and Jessica R. Wirth (eds), 1–41. Washington DC: Hemisphere.Google Scholar
Rutten, Gijsbert, Vosters, Rik & Vandenbussche, Wim (eds). 2014. Norms and Usage in Language History, 1600–1900. A Sociolinguistic and Comparative Perspective [Advances in Sociolinguistics 3]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Sag, Ivan A., Wasow, Thomas & Bender, Emily M. 2003. Syntactic Theory. A Formal Introduction, 2nd edn. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward. 1921. Language. An Introduction to the Study of Speech. New York NY: Harcourt, Brace & Co.Google Scholar
de Saussure, Ferdinand. 1916. Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Searle, John. 1969. Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stainton, Robert J. 2014. Philosophy of linguistics. In Oxford Handbooks Online. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trubetzkoy, N. S. 1958. Grundzüge der Phonologie, 2nd edn. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Tuomela, Raimo. 1995. The Importance of Us. A Philosophical Study of Basic Social Notions. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
von Wright, Georg Henrik. 1963. Norm and Action. A Logical Enquiry. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
. 1971. Explanation and Understanding. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wedgwood, Ralph. 2007. The Nature of Normativity. Oxford: Clarendon Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whiting, Daniel. 2016. What is the normativity of meaning? Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 59(3): 219–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whitney, William Dwight. 1875. The Life and Growth of Language. An Outline of Linguistic Science. New York NY: D. Appleton & Co.Google Scholar
Winch, Peter. 1958. The Idea of a Social Science. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1958. Philosophical Investigations, 2nd edn., translated by Gertrude Elizabeth Margaret Anscombe. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Zlatev, Jordan. 2008. The dependence of language on consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies 15(6): 34–62.Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Beekman, Wim & Henk Jochemsen
2023. The Biosynthesis of Proteins for Nano Engines as a Normative Process. Biosemiotics 16:3  pp. 441 ff. DOI logo
Foolen, Ad
2023. Linguistic Feeling in Real Life and in Linguistics. In Emotions, Metacognition, and the Intuition of Language Normativity,  pp. 267 ff. DOI logo
Kunch, Zoriana, Oksana Mykytyuk, Liliia Kharchuk & Myroslava Hnatyuk
2023. Lexical Norms in Business, Informal and Internet Communication. In Developments in Information and Knowledge Management Systems for Business Applications [Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, 466],  pp. 99 ff. DOI logo
Karczewski, Daniel & Marcin Trojszczak
2020. Normative Generics and Norm Breaching – A Questionnaire-Based Study of Parent-Child Interactions in English. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 61:1  pp. 49 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.