Chapter 14
Genitive (smixut) constructions in Modern Hebrew
The chapter concerns the morpho-syntactic structure and usage-based properties
of MH constructions involving two nominal constituents, an initial head and following
modifier. Focus is on the three smixut ‘adjacency’ or ‘dependency’
constructions: (i) “construct-state” compounds in the form N^ N(P), where a caret indicates
the relation between an initial bound head N and its free-form modifier; (ii) free, analytic
N(P) šel (N)P constructions with the genitive marker šel
‘of’; and (iii) doubly marked N1pro2
šel N2 genitives. Usage-based analyses of alternations between
these three options for expressing possession and other genitive relations reveal
conflicting results, leading to the conclusion that text-type (genre, medium of expression,
level of usage, and communicative setting) plays a major role in choice of construction.
The chapter also considers two other binominal constructions – construct-state Adj^ Noun and
Noun + Denominal Adjective phrases – and concludes by noting more general properties of
Modern Hebrew reflected in current use of these constructions.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1Constructions analyzed
- 1.2Sources of data
- 2.Binominal N^ N(P) smixut genitive constructions
- 2.1Bound N^ N(P) constructions
- 2.1.1Morphological marking of head noun
- 2.1.2Syntactic constraints on N^ N constructions
- 2.1.2.1Constituents of N^ N construct state: Head nominal and modifying constructions
- 2.1.2.2Word-order constraints
- 2.1.3Stylistic and processing constraints
- 2.1.4Degree of lexicalization
- 2.1.5Semantics of head nouns in bound N^ N constructions
- 2.2Free analytical genitives
- 2.3Double-marked complex genitives
- 2.4Alternation between genitive constructions
- 3.Other binominal constructions
- 3.1Construct-state adjective + noun [ac]
- 3.2Head noun + denominal adjective (daj)
- 4.Concluding discussion
-
Notes
-
References
References (86)
References
Atlas, Yehuda. 1981. wraq ani loʔ (And Only Me Not). Tel Aviv: Sheba.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Azar, Moshe. 1976. hasmixut haprudah whasmixut hakfulah baʕitonut hayomit (Analytic and double
compounds in daily newspapers). In Readings in Judaic Studies: Literature, Bible, and Linguistics, Efrat Carmon (ed.), 9–26. Haifa: Haifa University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Beard, Robert. 1976. Once more on the analysis of the ed-adjectives. Journal of Linguistics 12(1): 155–157. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Beard, Robert. 1993. Simultaneous dual derivational origin. Language 69(4): 716–741. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ben-Yehuda, Netiva. 1981. 1948 – beyn hasfirot: roman al hatħalat hamilħamah (1948 – Between the Calendars: A Novel on the Beginning of
War). Jerusalem: Keter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berman, Ruth A. 1978. Modern Hebrew Structure. Tel Aviv: University Publishing Projects.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berman, Ruth A. 1985. The acquisition of Hebrew. In The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, Vol. I, Dan Isaac Slobin (ed.), 255–371. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berman, Ruth A. 1987a. A developmental route: Learning about the form and use of complex
nominals. Linguistics 25(6): 1057–1086. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berman, Ruth A. 1987b. ʕal habaʕayatiyut bħeqer haʕivrit haħadašah
uvhoraʔatah (Issues and problems in Modern Hebrew research). Praqim 7: 84–96.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berman, Ruth A. 1988a. Language knowledge and language use: Binominal constructions in Modern
Hebrew. General Linguistics 28(4): 261–285.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berman, Ruth A. 1988b. On the ability to relate events in narratives. Discourse Processes 11(4): 469–497. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berman, Ruth A. 1988c. Productivity in the lexicon: New-word formation in Modern
Hebrew. Folia Linguistica 21(2–4): 425–461.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berman, Ruth A. 1994a. Formal, lexical, and semantic factors in acquisition of Hebrew resultative
participles. In Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics
Society, Vol. I, Susan Gahl, Andy Dolbey & Chris Johnson (eds), 82–92. Berkeley CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berman, Ruth A. 1999. Children’s innovative verbs vs. nouns: Structured elicitations and
spontaneous coinages. In Methods for Studying Language Production, Lise Menn & Nan Bernstein Ratner (eds), 69–92. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berman, Ruth A. 2008. The psycholinguistics of developing text construction. Journal of Child Language 35(4): 735–771. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berman, Ruth A. 2009. Children’s acquisition of compound constructions. In The Oxford Handbook of Compounding, Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds), 298–322. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berman, Ruth A. 2016a. Linguistic literacy and later language development. In Written and Spoken Language Development across the Lifespan: Essays in Honor of
Liliana, Tolchinsky, Joan Perera, Melina Aparici & Elisa Rosado & Naymé Salas (eds), 181–200. New York NY: Springer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berman, Ruth A. & Neeman, Yonni. 1994. Development of linguistic forms: Hebrew. In Relating Events in Narrative: A Crosslinguistic Developmental Study, Ruth A. Berman & Dan Isaac Slobin (eds), 285–328. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berman, Ruth A. & Nir, Bracha. 2011. safah dvurah wsafah ktuvah lʔorex hahtibagrut (Spoken and written language across the school
years)]. In Literacy and Language: Interactions, Bilingualism and Difficulties. Festschrift in
Honor of Iris Levin, Vol. I, Dorit Aram & Ofra Korat (eds), 211–229. Jerusalem: Magnes.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berman, Ruth A. & Ravid, Dorit. 1986. ʕal dargat hamilun šel cerufey smixut (Lexicalization of noun compounds). Hebrew Linguistics 24: 5–22.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berman, Ruth A. & Sagi, Yisrael. 1981. ʕal darxey tcurat-hamilim wħidušan bagil
hacaʕir (Children’s word-formation and lexical innovations). Hebrew Computational Linguistics Bulletin 18: 31–62.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berman, Ruth A. & Slobin, Dan Isaac. 1994. Relating Events in Narrative: A Crosslinguistic Developmental Study. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bi-Lev, Roni. 1985. hitpatxut hašimuš bmicmadim šemaniyim bqerev yladim dovrey
ʕivrit (Development and Use of Noun Compounds in Hebrew). MA thesis, Tel Aviv University.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Blau, Joshua. 2010. torat hahegeh whacurot šel lšon hamiqraʔ (The Phonology and Morphology of Biblical Hebrew). Jerusalem: Academy of the Hebrew Language.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bliboim, Rivka & Shatil, Nimrod. 2014. beyn cmidut lsmixut bilšon yameynu (Juxtaposition and construct states in contemporary
Hebrew). Lešonenu 76(3): 345–370.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bolozky, Shmuel. 2016. ʔefšaruyot šel zihuy ʕemdot ʕicuriyot šeʔeynan mmumašot ʕal
pney hašetaħ baʕivrit hadvurah (The quest for gutturals in colloquial Hebrew: Strategies for
identifying missing slots). In Studies in Spoken Hebrew [Te’uda 27], Einat Gonen (ed.), 183–198. Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Borer, Hagit. 1988. On the morphological parallelism between compounds and
constructs. In Yearbook of Morphology, Vol. I, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 45–65. Dordrecht: Foris.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Borer, Hagit. 2009. Compounds: Afro-Asiatic, Semitic: Hebrew. In The Oxford Handbook of Compounding, Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds), 491–511. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cahana-Amitay, Dalia & Ravid, Dorit. 2000. Optional bound morphology in the development of text
production. In BUCLD 24: Proceedings of the 24th Annual Boston University Conference on Language
Development, Vol. I, Catherine S. Howell, Sarah A. Fish & Thea Keith-Lucas (eds), 176–184. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clark, Eve V. & Berman, Ruth A. 1984. Structure and use in acquisition of word-formation. Language 60(3): 542–590. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clark, Eve V. & Berman, Ruth A. 1987. Types of linguistic knowledge: Interpreting and producing compound
nouns. Journal of Child Language 14(3): 547–567. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Creissels, Denis. 2009. Construct forms of nouns in African languages. In Proceedings of Conference on Language Documentation and Linguistic Theory, Vol. 2, Peter K. Austin, Oliver Bond, Monik Charette, David Nathan & Peter Sells (eds), 73–82. London: School of Oriental & Africa Studies.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Danon, Gabi. 2008. Definiteness spreading in the Hebrew construct state. Lingua 118(7): 872–906. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Danon, Gabi. 2017. The Hebrew genitive alternation: Empirical data and theoretical
questions. Paper presented at the Tel Aviv University Linguistics Colloquium, 23
November.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
de Jong, Nivja H., Feldman, Laurie B., Schreuder, Robert, Pastizzo, Matthew & Baayen, R. Harald. 2002. The processing and representation of Dutch and English compounds: Peripheral
morphological and central orthographic effects. Brain and Language 81(1–3): 555–567. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
de Jong, Nivja H., Schreuder, Robert & Baayen, R. Harald. 2000. The morphological family size effect and morphology. Language and Cognitive Processes 15(4–5): 329–365. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
del Prado Martín, Fermín M., Deutsch, Avital, Frost, Ram, Schreuder, Robert, de Jong, Nivja H. & Baayen, R. Harald. 2005. Changing places: A cross-language perspective on frequency and family size
in Dutch and Hebrew. Journal of Memory and Language 53(4): 496–512. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Doron, Edit. 2016. Language Contact and the Development of Modern Hebrew. Leiden: Brill.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Doron, Edit & Meir, Irit. 2013. Construct state: Modern Hebrew. In The Encyclopedia of Hebrew Language and Linguistics, Vol. I, Geoffrey Khan (ed.), 581–589. Leiden: Brill.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Downing, Pamela. 1977. On the creation and use of English compound nouns. Language 53(4): 810–842. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Glinert, Lewis. 1989. The Grammar of Modern Hebrew. Cambridge: CUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldenberg, Gideon. 1998. Studies in Semitic Linguistics: Selected Writings. Jerusalem: Magnes Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halevy, Rivka 1992. tʔarim ħofšiyim utʔarim bilti ħofšiyim baʕivrit
haħadašah (Free and restricted adjectives in Contemporary
Hebrew). In Language Studies, Vol. 5–6, Moshe Bar-Asher (ed.), 521–536. Jerusalem: Magnes.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halevy, Rivka. 2000a. tmurot bmaʕamadah uvtifqudah šel hasmixut haprudah bʕivrit šel
yameynu (Functional changes of šel phrases in Contemporary
Hebrew). Lešonenu 63(1–2): 61–80.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halevy, Rivka. 2000b. tifqudan šel yħidot miloniyot murkavot lcad maqbiloteyhen
hapšutot: hirhurim ʕal dmutah šel haʕivrit bat yameynu (Complementary distribution of single vs. expanded lexical units
in Modern Israeli Hebrew: Contemplations on the character of Modern Hebrew). Lešonenu 63(3–4): 293–309.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halevy, Rivka. 2013. Syntax of Modern Hebrew. In Encyclopedia of Hebrew Language and Linguistics, Vol. III, Geoffrey Khan (ed.), 707–722. Leiden: Brill.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hazout, Ilan. 2000. Adjectival genitive constructions in Modern Hebrew: A case study in
coanalyses. Linguistic Review 17(1): 29–52. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hillel, Ayin. 1976. mah qarah laqroqodil (What happened to the crocodile?). Tel Aviv: Am Oved.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hinrichs, Lars & Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. 2007. Recent changes in the function and frequency of Standard English genitive
constructions: A multivariate analysis of tagged corpora. English Language & Linguistics 11(3): 437–474. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lander, Yury. 2008. Varieties of genitive. In The Oxford Handbook of Case, Andrej L. Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds), 581–592. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langacker, Ronald W. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. II: Descriptive
Application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lees, Robert B. 1960. The Grammar of English Nominalizations. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Research Center of Anthropology, Folklore, and Linguistics.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lieber, Rochelle. 2009. A lexical semantic approach to compounding. In The Oxford Handbook of Compounding, Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds), 78–104. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lieber, Rochelle & Štekauer, Pavol. 2009. Introduction: Status and definition of compounding. In The Oxford Handbook of Compounding, Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds), 3–18. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lyons, Christopher. 1986. The syntax of English genitive constructions. Journal of Linguistics 22(1): 122–143. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nichols, Johanna. 1986. Head-marking and dependent-marking grammar. Language 62(1): 56–119. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nir, Bracha. 2015. Frames for clause combining: Schematicity and formulaicity in discourse
patterns. Constructions and Frames 7(2): 348–379.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ornan, Uzzi. 1965. šimušam šel kinuyey qinyan ħavurim ufrudim bilšon
yameynu (Bound and free possessive pronouns in Contemporary
Hebrew). In Proceedings of the Fourth World Congress of Jewish Studies, Vol. 2, 117–122. Jerusalem: World Union of Jewish Studies.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ravid, Dorit. 1990. Internal structure constraints on new-word formation devices in Modern
Hebrew. Folia Linguistica 24(3–4): 289–348.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ravid, Dorit. 1995. Language Change in Child and Adult Hebrew: Psycholinguistic Perspectives. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ravid, Dorit. 2006. Word-level morphology: A psycholinguistic perspective on linear formation in
Hebrew nominals. Morphology 16(1): 127–148. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ravid, Dorit & Assulin Tzabar, Noa. 2017. Compounding in early child speech: Hebrew peer talk 2–8. In Nominal Compound Acquisition [Language Acquisition & Language Disorders 61], Wolfgang U. Dressler, F. Nihan Ketrez, & Marianne Kilani-Schoch (eds), 251–274. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ravid, Dorit & Shlesinger, Yitzhak. 1987. ʕal miyunam wʕal darxey gziratam šel šmot hatoʔar baʕaley
sofit -y baʕivrit haħadašah (On the classification and structure of -i suffixed
adjectives). Hebrew Linguistics 25: 59–70.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ravid, Dorit & Shlesinger, Yitzhak. 1995. Factors in the selection of compound-type in spoken and written
Hebrew. Language Sciences 17(2): 147–179. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ravid, Dorit & Zilberbuch, Shoshana. 2003a. Morphosyntactic constructs in the development of spoken and written Hebrew
text production. Journal of Child Language 30(2): 395–418.
. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ritter, Elizabeth. 1991. Two functional categories in noun phrases. Syntax and Semantics 25: 37–62.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rosén, Haiim B. 1956. haʕivrit šelanu: dmutah lʔor šitot habalšanut (Our Hebrew: Viewed in the Light of Linguistic
Methodology). Tel Aviv: Am Oved.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rothstein, Susan. 2014. Adjectivally headed construct states and the semantics of metonymic
predication. Lingua 138: 23–54. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schiff, Rachel., Ravid, Dorit & Levy-Shimon, Shany. 2011. Children’s command of plural and possessive marking on Hebrew nouns: A
comparison of obligatory vs. optional inflections. Journal of Child Language 38(2): 433–454. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schwarzwald, Ora Rodrigue. 2003. Transition in Modern Hebrew word formation: From discontinuous to linear
formation. SKASE – Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 3(3): 1–11.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schwarzwald, Ora Rodrigue. 2016. mivħan tofaʕot morfologiyot bqorpus haʕivrit
hamduberet (Selected morphological phenomena in the corpus of spoken
Hebrew). In Studies in Spoken Hebrew [Te’uda 27], Einat Gonen (ed.), 251–274. Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shlesinger, Yitzhak & Ravid, Dorit. 1998. hasmixut hakfulah baʕivrit haħadašah: ʕodfut ʔo qiyum
ʕacmaʔi? (The double compound in Modern Hebrew: Redundancy or an
independent existence?). Hebrew Linguistics 43: 85–97.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Siloni, Tali. 2001. Construct states at the PF interface. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 1(1): 229–266.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Silverman, David. 2006. Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analyzing Talk, Text and Interaction (3rd ed.). London: Sage.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Speer, Susan. 2002. ‘Natural’ and ‘contrived’ data: A sustainable distinction? Discourse Studies 4(4): 511–526.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Taube, Dana. 1990. ʕal cerufey šem ʕecem + šem toʔar gzur-šem baʕal sofit -y
bʕivrit bat yameynu (The Noun Phrase construction Noun + denominal -iy suffixed
adjective in Contemporary Hebrew). In Homage to Chaim Rabin: Anthology of Linguistic Research on his Attaining the Age of
75, Moshe Goshen-Gottstein, Shlomo Morag & Simcha Kogut (eds), 117–132. Jerusalem: Akademon.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wulff, Stefanie. 2008. Rethinking Idiomaticity: A Usage-Based Approach. London: Continuum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zur, Batia. 1983. rxišat hayiduaʕ bqerev yladim dovrey-ʕivrit (Acquisition of Definiteness by Hebrew-Speaking
Children). MA thesis, Tel Aviv University.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Berman, Ruth A.
2022.
The view from Hebrew: A commentary on Kidd and Garcia (2022).
First Language 42:6
► pp. 740 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.