Chapter published in:
Usage-Based Studies in Modern Hebrew: Background, Morpho-lexicon, and SyntaxEdited by Ruth A. Berman
[Studies in Language Companion Series 210] 2020
► pp. 539–582
Impersonal and pseudo-impersonal constructions
Rivka Halevy | The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
The domain of impersonal constructions is highly complex and heterogeneous in
Hebrew as in other languages. It includes sentences that lack an overt constituent bearing
the properties of a referential and identifiable subject or that are altogether lacking in
canonical subject properties. The aim of the present chapter is to present an up-to-date
classification of the major impersonal and generalized or impersonalized constructions in
Modern, primarily spoken, Hebrew. To this end, the coding properties of such constructions
are analyzed, based on the typological characterization of Modern Hebrew (MH) as a non-subject-oriented and
non-configurational language characterized by synthetic inflectional morphology with marking
of person in finite verbs, so not requiring an expletive or ‘dummy’ subject. Functional
properties of impersonal and generalized constructions in MH are noted in relation to
pragmatic underpinnings of their patterning and use.
Published online: 18 March 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.210.16hal
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.210.16hal
References
References
Benveniste, Émile
Berman, Ruth A.
Berman, Ruth A. & Neeman, Yonni
Blau, Joshua
Borer, Hagit
Borschev, Vladimir & Partee, Barbara H.
Bossong, Georg
Bybee Joan L. & Hopper, Paul
Cabredo Hofherr, Patricia
2003 Arbitrary readings of 3pl pronominal. In Proceedings of the Conference ‘sub7 – Sinn und Bedeutung’ [Arbeitspapier 114], Matthias Weisgerber (ed.), 81–94. Konstanz: FB Sprachwissenshaft, Universität Konstanz. < http://ling.uni-konstanz.de/pages/conferences/sub7/>
Cinque, Gugliemo
Creissels, Denis
2008 Impersonal and related constructions: A typological approach. Lectures
presented at the University of Tartu, 2–3 June.
Croft, William A.
Doron, Edit
2003 Bare singular reference to kinds. In Proceedings of Israel Association for Theoretical Linguistics 19, Yehuda F. Falk (ed.). Jerusalem: Hebrew University. <
http://linguistics.huji.ac.il/IATL/19/
>


Dubnov, Keren
Gast, Volker & Florian Haas
2011 On the distribution of subject properties in formulaic presentationals of
Germanic and Romance: A diachronic-typological approach. In Impersonal Constructions: A Cross-linguistic Perspective [Studies in Language Companion Series 124], Andrej Malchukov & Anna Siewierska (eds), 127–166. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 

Gast, Volker & van der Auwera, Johan
Givón, Talmy
Goldberg, Adele E.
Goldenberg, Gideon
Grossman, Eitan
Hale, Ken
Halevy, Rivka
Izre’el, Shlomo
Jespersen, Otto & Haislund, Niels
Keenan, Edward L.
Kitagawa, Chisato & Lehrer, Adrienne
Kuzar, Ron
2002 tavnit ha‘ħagam’ hapšutah balašon hamyuceget
kimduberet([The simple impersonal construction in texts represented as
colloquial Hebrew). In Speaking Hebrew: Studies in the Spoken Language and in Linguistic Variation in
Israel [Te’uda 18], Shlomo Izre’el (ed.), 329–352. Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv University.
Lambert, Pierre-Yves
Lambrecht, Knud
Langacker, Robert W.
Lauwers, Peter & Willems, Dominique
Leonetti, Manuel
Malchukov, Andrej & Siewierska, Anna
Malchukov, Andrej & Ogawa, Akio
McNally, Louise
Muchnik, Malka
Perlmutter, David M.
Rabin, Haiim B.
1998 givun signoni baguf hastami bamikraʔ (Stylistic variation in use of impersonals in Biblical
Hebrew). In Linguistic Studies: Collected Papers in Hebrew and Semitic Languages, Moshe Bar-Asher & Baraq Dan (eds), 244–253. Jerusalem: The Academy of Hebrew Language & The Bialik Institute. (Original work published 1979)
Sa’ar, Amalia
Siewierska, Anna & Papastathi, Maria
Taube, Dana