Cover not available
Part of
Information-Structural Perspectives on Discourse Particles
Edited by Pierre-Yves Modicom and Olivier Duplâtre
[Studies in Language Companion Series 213] 2020
► pp. 111–132

Chapter 4
From focus marking to illocutionary modification

Functional developments of Italian solo ‘only’

| University of Turin | Humboldt University of Berlin

This paper investigates the polyfunctionality of the Italian adverb solo ‘only’. Beside its prototypical use as an exclusive focus particle, the adverb solo has developed some secondary uses which have not yet been investigated: connective uses (uses as a conjunctional adverb and as a discourse marker) and illocutive uses (use as an illocutionary operator tied to specific speech-act types). By analyzing the different contexts of occurrence and possible paths of semantic change, the meaning variation of solo is described and a synchronic categorization is laid out. Particular attention has been devoted to its illocutive uses, the meaning of which displays a complex interrelationship between features pertaining to the information structure level (focus marking, common ground management) and features connected to the speech-act domain (marking of the illocutionary force and speech-act specification in an interpersonal perspective).

Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Basic notions of information structure
  • 3.Solo as a focus particle
    • 3.1Focus particles and information structure
    • 3.2The meaning of solo
  • 4.Functional developments of solo: Connective uses
  • 5.Functional developments of solo: Illocutive uses
    • 5.1Directive speech acts
    • 5.2Assertive speech acts
    • 5.3A possible bridging context for solo in assertive speech acts
    • 5.4Illocutive uses of solo: Summary
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
  • Corpora
Published online: 4 March 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.213.04fav
References
Andorno, Cecilia
1999 Avverbi focalizzanti in italiano. Parametri per un’analisi. Studi Italiani di Linguistica Teorica e Applicata 28(1): 43–83.Google Scholar
2000 Focalizzatori fra connessione e messa a fuoco. Il punto di vista delle varietà di apprendimento. Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Andorno, Cecilia & De Cesare Greenwald, Anna-Maria
2017 Mapping additivity through translation. From French aussi to Italian anche and back in the Europarl-direct corpus. In De Cesare Greenwald & Cecilia Andorno (eds), 157–200.Google Scholar
Auer, Peter & Günthner, Susanne
2005 Die Entstehung von Diskursmarkern im Deutschen – ein Fall von Grammatikalisierung? In Grammatikalisierung im Deutschen, Torsten Leuschner & Tanja Mortelmans (eds), 335–362. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beeching, Kate
2017 Just a suggestion. just/e in French and English. In Fedriani & Sansò (eds), 459–480.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J.
1998 The flowers are lovely; only, they have no scent: The evolution of a pragmatic marker. In Anglistentag 1997 Giessen. Proceedings, Raimund Borgmeier, Herbert Grabes & Andreas H. Jucker (eds), 9–33. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.Google Scholar
Cerruti, Massimo
2009 Strutture dell’italiano regionale. Morfosintassi di una varietà diatopica in prospettiva sociolinguistica. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L.
1976 Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and point of view. In Subject and Topic, Charles N. Li (ed.), 27–55. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace
1987 Cognitive constraints on information flow. In Coherence and Grounding in Discourse [Typological Studies in Language 11], Russell S. Tomlin (ed.), 21–51. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Cesare, Anna-Maria
2010 On the focusing function of focusing adverbs. A discussion based on Italian data. Linguistik Online 44(4): 99–116.Google Scholar
De Cesare Greenwald, Anna-Maria
2015 Defining Focusing Modifiers in a cross-linguistic perspective. A discussion based on English, German, French and Italian. In Adverbs. Functional and Diachronic Aspects [Studies in Language Companion Series 170], Karin Pittner, Daniela Elsner & Fabien Barteld (eds), 47–81. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Cesare Greenwald, Anna-Maria & Andorno, Cecilia
(eds) 2017 Focus on Additivity. Adverbial Modifiers in Romance, Germanic and Slavic Languages [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 278]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth, Cornillie, Bert & Pietrandrea, Paola
(eds) 2013 Discourse Markers and Modal Particles. Categorization and Description [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 234]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Detges, Ulrich & Gévaudan, Paul
2017 Insubordination, Abtönung, and the next move in interaction. Main-clause-initial puisque in French. In Beyond Grammaticalization and Discourse Markers. New Issues in the Study of Language Change, Salvador Pons Bordería & Óscar Loureda Lamas (eds), 304–333. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Detges, Ulrich & Waltereit, Richard
2009 Diachronic pathways and pragmatic strategies: Different types of pragmatic particles from a diachronic point of view. In Current Trends in Diachronic Semantics and Pragmatics, Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen & Jacqueline Visconti (eds), 43–61. Bingley: Emerald. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 Grammaticalization and pragmaticalization. In Manual of Grammatical Interfaces in Romance, Susann Fischer & Christoph Gabriel (eds), 635–657. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele
2013 Same same but different – Modal particles, discourse markers and the art (and purpose) of categorization. In Degand, Cornillie & Pietrandrea (eds), 19–46.Google Scholar
Ducrot, Oswald
1984 Le dire et le dit. Paris: Editions de Minuit.Google Scholar
Favaro, Marco
2017 Usi non focalizzanti di solo. Evoluzione semantica e pragmatica. MA thesis, Università degli Studi di Torino.Google Scholar
Fedriani, Chiara & Sansò, Andrea
(eds) 2017 Pragmatic markers, Discourse Markers and Modal Particles. New Perspectives [Studies in Language Companion Series 186]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard
1998 The Function of Discourse Particles. A Study with Special Reference to Spoken Standard French [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 53]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 Particles at the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface: Synchronic and Diachronic Issues. A Study with Special Reference to the French Phasal Adverbs. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees & Mackenzie, Lachlan J.
2008 Functional Discourse Grammar. A Typologically-Based Theory of Language Structure. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
König, Ekkehard
1991 The Meaning of Focus Particles. A Comparative Perspective. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1993 Focus particles. In Syntax. Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung/An international Handbook of Contemporary Research, Vol. 1, Joachim Jacobs, Arnim von Stechow, Wolfgang Sternefeld & Theo Vennemann (eds), 978–987. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
2017 Syntax and semantics of additive focus markers from a crosslinguistic perspective: A tentative assessment of the state of the art. In De Cesare Greenwald & Andorno (eds), 23–43.Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred
2008 Basic notions of information structure. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 55(3): 243–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kroon, Caroline
1995 Discourse Particles in Latin: A Study of nam, enim, autem, vero and at. Amsterdam: Gieben. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud
1994 Information Structure and Sentence Form. Topic, Focus and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maiden, Martin & Parry, Mair
1997 The Dialects of Italy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Modicom, Pierre-Yves & Duplâtre, Olivier
2018 Nicht nur Fokuspartikel: Geschichte und Varianz von nur im Deutschen. In Diskursive Verfestigungen. Schnittstellen zwischen Morphosyntax, Phraseologie und Pragmatik im Deutschen und im Sprachvergleich, Laurent Gautier, Pierre-Yves Modicom & Hélène Vinckel-Roisin (eds), 73–92. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramat, Paolo & Ricca, Davide
1994 Prototypical adverbs: On the scalarity/radiality of the notion ADVERB. Rivista di Linguistica 6(2): 289–326.Google Scholar
1998 Sentence adverbs in the languages of Europe. In Adverbial Constructions in the Languages of Europe, Johan van der Auwera (ed.), 187–275. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reich, Uli
2018 Presupposed modality. In Focus Realization in Romance and Beyond [Studies in Language Companion Series 201], Marco García García & Melanie Uth (eds), 203–228. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ricca, Davide
1999 Osservazioni preliminari sui focalizzatori in italiano. In Grammatik und Diskurs/Grammatica e discorso. Studien zum Erwerb des Deutschen und des Italienischen/Studi sull’acquisizione dell’italiano e del tedesco, Norbert Dittmar & Anna Giacalone Ramat (eds), 145–163. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
2017 Meaning both ‘also’ and ‘only’? The intriguing polysemy of Old Italian pure. In De Cesare Greenwald & Cecilia Andorno (eds), 45–76.Google Scholar
Schwenter, Scott A. & Waltereit, Richard
2010 Presupposition accommodation and language change. In Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds), 75–102. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle
1969 Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Squartini, Mario
2013 From TAM to discourse via information structure: North-Western Italian già ‘already’ and its Fench Cognate déjà. In Degand, Pietrandrea & Cornillie (eds), 163–190.Google Scholar
2017 Italian non-canonical negations as modal particles. Information state, polarity and mirativity. In Fedriani & Sansò (eds), 203–228.Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve E.
1988 Grammaticalization and semantic bleaching. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Shelley Axmaker, Annie Jaisser & Helen Singmaster (eds), 389–405. Berkeley CA: BLS.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2010 (Inter)subjectivity and (Inter)subjectification: A Reassessment. In Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds), 29–71. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Dasher, Richard B.
2002 Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Waltereit, Richard
2001 Modal particles and their functional equivalents: A speech-act theoretic approach. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 1391–1417. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 Abtönung. Zur Pragmatik und historischen Semantik von Modalpartikeln und ihren funktionalen Äquivalenten in romanischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 On the origins of grammaticalization and other types of language change in discourse strategies. In Grammaticalization and Language Change: New Reflections [Studies in Language Companion Series, 130], Kristin Davidse, Tine Breban, Lieselotte Brems, & Tanja Mortelmans (eds), 51–72. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar

Corpora

LIP = De Mauro, Tullio, Mancini, Federico, Vedovelli, Massimo & Voghera, Miriam
1993 Lessico di frequenza dell’italiano parlato. Milano: ETAS Libri. [URL]
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Jasionytė-Mikučionienė, Erika
2021. Chapter 7. The Lithuanian focus particles net ‘even’ and tik ‘only’ and clause peripheries. In Pragmatic Markers and Peripheries [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 325], ► pp. 199 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.