Chapter published in:
Information-Structural Perspectives on Discourse Particles
Edited by Pierre-Yves Modicom and Olivier Duplâtre
[Studies in Language Companion Series 213] 2020
► pp. 124
Abraham, Werner
1991The grammaticization of the German modal particles. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. II: Types of Grammatical Markers [Typological Studies in Language 19], Elisabeth C. Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 331–380. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Illocutive force is speaker and information source concern. What type of syntax does the representation of speaker deixis require? In Abraham & Leiss (eds), 109–146.Google Scholar
2017Modal particles and Verum focus: New corollaries. In Fedriani & Sansó (eds), 171–202.Google Scholar
Abraham, Werner & Leiss, Elisabeth
2012Introduction: Theory of Mind elements across languages. In Abraham & Leiss (eds), 1–36.Google Scholar
(eds) 2012Modality and Theory of Mind Elements across Languages. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Adams, James Noel
1994Wackernagel’s law and the position of unstressed personal pronouns in classical Latin. Transactions of the Philological Society 92(2): 103–178. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R.
1993Wackernagel’s revenge: Clitics, morphology, and the syntax of second position. Language 69(1): 68–98. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bayer, Josef & Obenauer, Hans-Georg
2011Discourse particles, clause structure, and question types. The Linguistic Review 28: 449–491. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beeching, Kate & Detges, Ulrich
(eds) 2014Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bergqvist, Henrik
2019The frequency and distribution of modal particles in spoken Swedish. Talk at the 52nd meeting of Societas Linguistica Europaea, Leipzig.
Blakemore, Diane
1987Semantic Constraints on Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bonnot, Christine
1986La particule že marqueur de thème. In Les particules énonciatives en russe contemporain 1, 125–151. Paris: Université Paris VII.Google Scholar
1990La particule to et la polémique cachée en russe moderne: À propos du statut énonciatif du thème. Revue des Études Slaves 62(1): 67–75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015Deixis, intersubjectivité et thématisation. La particule énonciative –to en russe contemporain. Faits de Langues 45: 11–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bonnot, Christine & Bottineau, Tatiana
2012Lorsque la marque du conditionnel est une particule mobile: Le cas du russe. Faits de Langue 40: 189–196. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Büring, Daniel
2003On D-trees, beans, and B-accent. Linguistics and Philosophy 26: 511–545. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace
1976Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. In Subject and Topic, Charles N. Li (ed.), 25–55. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Coniglio, Marco
2008Modal particles in Italian. University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics 18: 91–129.Google Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth, Cornillie, Bert & Pietrandrea, Paola
(eds) 2013Discourse Markers and Modal Particles: Categorization and Description [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 234]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele
2013Same same but different: Modal particles, discourse markers and the art (and purpose) of categorization. In Degand, Cornillie & Pietrandrea (eds), 19–45.Google Scholar
Egg, Markus & Mursell, Johannes
2016The syntax and semantics of discourse particles. In Discourse particles: Formal Approaches to Their Syntax and Semantics, Josef Bayer & Volker Struckmeier (eds), 15–48. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Endo, Yoshio
2007Locality and Information Structure. A Cartographic Approach to Japanese [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 116]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Illocutionary force and modal particles in the syntax of Japanese. In Abraham & Leiss (eds), 405–424.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas, Bergqvist, Henrik & San Roque, Lila
2018The grammar of engagement. Language and Cognition 10: 110–170. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fedriani, Chiara & Sansò
(eds) 2017Pragmatic Markers, Discourse Markers and Modal Particles: New Perspectives [Studies in Language Companion Series 186]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fernandez-Vest, Marie-Madeleine Jocelyne
1994Les particules énonciatives dans la construction du discours. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Fischer, Kerstin
2007Grounding and common ground: Modal particles and their translation equivalents. In Lexical Markers of Common Grounds, Anita Fetzer & Kerstin Fischer (eds), 47–66. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Floyd, Simeon, Norcliffe, Elisabeth & San Roque, Lila
(eds) 2018Egophoricity [Typological Studies in Language 118]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Bruce
2001The clause start in Ancient Greek: Focus and the second position. Glotta 77: 138–177.Google Scholar
Gast, Volker
2006Modal particles and context updating: The functions of German ‘ja’, ‘doch’, ‘wohl’ and ‘etwa’. In Modalverben und Grammatikalisierung, Heinz Vater & Ole Letnes (eds), 153–177. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.Google Scholar
Grosz, Patrick
2016Information structure and discourse particles. In The Oxford Handbook of Information Structure, Caroline Féry & Shinichiro Ishihara (eds), 336–358. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Grzech, Karolina
2016aDiscourse Enclitics in Tena Kichwa: A Corpus-based Account of Information Structure and Epistemic Meaning. PhD dissertation, SOAS, University of London.Google Scholar
2016bThe non-evidential meaning of the Tena Kichwa ‘direct evidential’. Special issue of York Papers in Linguistics 3: 73–94.Google Scholar
Gutzmann, Daniel
2015Use-conditional Meaning. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood
1967Notes in transitivity and theme in English, 2. Journal of Linguistics 3(2): 199–244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hancil, Sylvie, Haselow, Alexander & Post, Margje
(eds) 2015Final Particles. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hargreaves, David
2018Am I blue? Privileged access constraints in Kathmandu Newar. In Floyd, Norcliffe & San Roque (eds), 79–107.Google Scholar
Haselow, Alexander
2015Left vs. right periphery in grammaticalization: The case of anyway . In New Directions in Grammaticalization Research [Studies in Language Companion Series 166], Andrew D. M. Smith, Graeme Trousdale & Richard Waltereit (eds), 157–186. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hentschel, Elke
1986Funktion und Geschichte deutscher Partikeln. Ja, doch, halt und eben. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Izutsu, Katsunobu & Izutsu, Mitsuko Narita
2013From discourse markers to modal/final particles: What the position reveals about the continuum. In Degand, Cornillie & Pietrandrea (eds), 217–235.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Joachim
1991On the semantics of modal particles. In Discourse Particles. Descriptive and Theoretical Investigations on the Logical, Syntactic and Pragmatic Properties of Discourse Particles in German [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 12], Werner Abraham (ed.), 141–162. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
König, Ekkehard
1991The Meaning of Focus Particles: A Comparative Perspective. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997Zur Bedeutung von Modalpartikeln im Deutschen: Ein Neuansatz im Rahmen der Relevanztheorie. In special issue Studien zu Deutsch als Fremdsprache III. Aspekte der Modalität im Deutschen – auch in kontrastiver Sicht, Friedhelm Debus & Oddleif Leirbukt (eds). Germanistische Linguistik 136: 67–75.Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred
2008Basic notions of information structure. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 55: 243–276. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krivonossov, Alexey
1977Die modalen Partikeln in der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Göppingen: Kümmerle.Google Scholar
Kuroda, Sige-Yuki
2005Focusing on the matter of topic: A study of wa and ga in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 14: 1–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kwon, Min-Jae
2005Modalpartikeln und Satzmodus: Untersuchungen zur Syntax, Semantik und Pragmatik der deutschen Modalpartikeln. PhD dissertation, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München.Google Scholar
Leiss, Elisabeth
2012Epistemicity, evidentiality and Theory of Mind. In Abraham & Leiss (eds), 109–146.Google Scholar
Métrich, René, Faucher, Eugène & Courdier, Gilbert
(eds) 1999Les invariables difficiles: Dictionnaire allemand-français des particules, connecteurs, interjections et autres mots de la communication, Vol. 2: bald-geradezu. Nancy: Nouveaux Cahiers d’Allemand.Google Scholar
(eds) 2002Les invariables difficiles: Dictionnaire allemand-français des particules, connecteurs, interjections et autres mots de la communication, Vol. 3: gern-nur so. Nancy: Nouveaux Cahiers d’Allemand.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne
2018Factors behind variation in marking information structure: Contributions from Central Pomo. In Information Structure in Lesser-described Languages: Studies in Prosody and Syntax [Studies in Language Companion Series 199], Evangelia Adamou, Katharina Haude & Martine Vanhove (eds), 119–156. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Modicom, Pierre-Yves
2012The epistemological treatment of information and the interpersonal distribution of belief in language: German modal particles and the typological challenge. In Abraham & Leiss (eds), 361–382. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Molnár, Valéria
1998On the syntax, phonology, semantics and pragmatics of the so-called “contrastive topic” in Hungarian and German. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 45: 89–166. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002Contrast – From a contrastive perspective. In Information Structure in a Cross-Linguistic Perspective, Hilde Hasselgård, Stig Johansson, Bergljot Behrens & Cathrine Fabricius-Hansen (eds), 147–161. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Onodera, Yoriko
2004Japanese Discourse Markers: Synchronic and diachronic discourse analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ozerov, Pavel
2015Information structure without topic and focus: Differential Object Marking in Burmese. Studies in Language 39(2): 386–423. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paillard, Denis
2017Scène énonciative et types de marqueurs discursifs. Langages 207: 17–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Padučeva, Edita
1987La particule že: Sémantique, syntaxe et prosodie. In Les particules énonciatives en russe contemporain 3, 1–44. Paris: Université Paris VII.Google Scholar
Panov, Vladimir
2018Defining the area of (sentence-)final particles in Asia. Talk at the 51st meeting of Societas Linguistica Europaea in Tallinn.
2019The markers of uncontroversial information in Europe. Talk at the 52nd meeting of Societas Linguistica Europaea in Leipzig.
Prince, Ellen
2002The ZPG letter: Subjects, definiteness and information-status. In Discourse Description: Diverse Linguistic Analyses of a Fund-raising Text [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 16], William S. Mann & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 293–325. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Repp, Sophie
2013Common ground management: Modal particles, illocutionary negation and verum. In Beyond Expressives: Explorations in Use-Conditional Meaning, Daniel Gutzmann & Hansmartin Gärtner (eds), 231–274. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schoonjans, Steven
2013Modal particles: Problems in defining a category. In Degand, Bert & Pietrandrea (eds), 133–161.Google Scholar
2014Oui, il y a des particules de démodulation en français. Cognitextes 11. http://​journals​.openedition​.org​/cognitextes​/712 Crossref
Schultze-Berndt, Eva
2017Shared vs. primary epistemic authority in Jaminjung/Ngaliwurru. Open Linguistics 3: 178–218. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shinzato, Rumiko
2017Grammaticalization of pragmatic markers, discourse markers and modal markers in Japanese. In Fedriani & Sansò (eds), 305–333.Google Scholar
Spevak, Olga
2010Constituent Order in Classical Latin Prose [Studies in Language Companion Series 117]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Squartini, Mario
2017Italian non-canonical negations as modal particles: Information state, polarity and mirativity. In Fedriani & Sansò (eds), 203–228.Google Scholar
Thijs, Kees
2017The Attic particle μήν: Intersubjectivity, contrast and polysemy. Journal of Greek Linguistics 17: 73–112. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2010Revisiting subjectification and intersubjectification. In Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds), 29–70. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Trotzke, Andreas & Turco, Giuseppina
2015The grammatical reflexes of emphasis: Evidence from German wh-questions. Lingua 168: 37–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Waltereit, Richard
2006Abtönung: Zur Pragmatik und historischen Semantik von Modalpartikeln und ihren funktionalen Äquivalenten in romanischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Waltereit, Richard & Detges, Ulrich
2007Different functions, different histories. Modal particles and discourse markers from a diachronic point of view. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 6: 61–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weydt, Harald
1969Abtönungspartikel: Die deutschen Modalwörter und ihre französischen Entsprechungen. Bad Homburg: Gehlen.Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre & Sperber, Dan
(eds) 2013Meaning and Relevance. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Malte
2008Discourse particles in the left periphery. In Dislocated Elements in Discourse. Syntactic, Semantic, and Pragmatic Perspectives, Benjamin Shaer, Philippa Cook, Werner Frey & Claudia Maienborn (eds), 200–231. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Lewis, Diana M.
2021.  In Pragmatic Markers and Peripheries [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 325],  pp. 351 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.