Cover not available
Part of
Information-Structural Perspectives on Discourse Particles
Edited by Pierre-Yves Modicom and Olivier Duplâtre
[Studies in Language Companion Series 213] 2020
► pp. 1–24

Introduction

What can information-structural categories tell us about discourse particles?

| University of Bordeaux Montaigne
| Sorbonne University
Article outline
  • 1.Discourse particles and information structure: Preliminary definitions
  • 2.Information-structural aspects of the syntax, semantics and pragmatics of discourse particles
    • 2.1Givenness and newness in the syntax and semantics of German discourse particles
    • 2.2Common Ground Management and speech act specification as loci for information-structural strategies
    • 2.3A cross-linguistic view: Equivalence and interactions between particles and information-structural strategies
    • 2.4Particle placement, polyfunctionality and the role of information structure in the emergence and specialization of discourse particles
  • 3.“Epistemic authority”, “engagement” and “enimitives”: Information-structural approaches in the face of the newest typological research on particle semantics
    • 3.1Engagement, epistemic authority, egophoricity
    • 3.2“Enimitives”
  • 4.The contributions in this volume
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 4 March 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.213.int
References
Abraham, Werner
1991 The grammaticization of the German modal particles. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. II: Types of Grammatical Markers [Typological Studies in Language 19], Elisabeth C. Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 331–380. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 Illocutive force is speaker and information source concern. What type of syntax does the representation of speaker deixis require? In Abraham & Leiss (eds), 109–146.Google Scholar
2017 Modal particles and Verum focus: New corollaries. In Fedriani & Sansó (eds), 171–202.Google Scholar
Abraham, Werner & Leiss, Elisabeth
2012 Introduction: Theory of Mind elements across languages. In Abraham & Leiss (eds), 1–36.Google Scholar
(eds) 2012 Modality and Theory of Mind Elements across Languages. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Adams, James Noel
1994 Wackernagel’s law and the position of unstressed personal pronouns in classical Latin. Transactions of the Philological Society 92(2): 103–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R.
1993 Wackernagel’s revenge: Clitics, morphology, and the syntax of second position. Language 69(1): 68–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bayer, Josef & Obenauer, Hans-Georg
2011 Discourse particles, clause structure, and question types. The Linguistic Review 28: 449–491. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beeching, Kate & Detges, Ulrich
(eds) 2014 Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bergqvist, Henrik
2019 The frequency and distribution of modal particles in spoken Swedish. Talk at the 52nd meeting of Societas Linguistica Europaea, Leipzig.
Blakemore, Diane
1987 Semantic Constraints on Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bonnot, Christine
1986 La particule že marqueur de thème. In Les particules énonciatives en russe contemporain 1, 125–151. Paris: Université Paris VII.Google Scholar
1990 La particule to et la polémique cachée en russe moderne: À propos du statut énonciatif du thème. Revue des Études Slaves 62(1): 67–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 Deixis, intersubjectivité et thématisation. La particule énonciative –to en russe contemporain. Faits de Langues 45: 11–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bonnot, Christine & Bottineau, Tatiana
2012 Lorsque la marque du conditionnel est une particule mobile: Le cas du russe. Faits de Langue 40: 189–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Büring, Daniel
2003 On D-trees, beans, and B-accent. Linguistics and Philosophy 26: 511–545. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace
1976 Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. In Subject and Topic, Charles N. Li (ed.), 25–55. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Coniglio, Marco
2008 Modal particles in Italian. University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics 18: 91–129.Google Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth, Cornillie, Bert & Pietrandrea, Paola
(eds) 2013 Discourse Markers and Modal Particles: Categorization and Description [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 234]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele
2013 Same same but different: Modal particles, discourse markers and the art (and purpose) of categorization. In Degand, Cornillie & Pietrandrea (eds), 19–45.Google Scholar
Egg, Markus & Mursell, Johannes
2016 The syntax and semantics of discourse particles. In Discourse particles: Formal Approaches to Their Syntax and Semantics, Josef Bayer & Volker Struckmeier (eds), 15–48. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Endo, Yoshio
2007 Locality and Information Structure. A Cartographic Approach to Japanese [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 116]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 Illocutionary force and modal particles in the syntax of Japanese. In Abraham & Leiss (eds), 405–424.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas, Bergqvist, Henrik & San Roque, Lila
2018 The grammar of engagement. Language and Cognition 10: 110–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fedriani, Chiara & Sansò
(eds) 2017 Pragmatic Markers, Discourse Markers and Modal Particles: New Perspectives [Studies in Language Companion Series 186]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fernandez-Vest, Marie-Madeleine Jocelyne
1994 Les particules énonciatives dans la construction du discours. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Fischer, Kerstin
2007 Grounding and common ground: Modal particles and their translation equivalents. In Lexical Markers of Common Grounds, Anita Fetzer & Kerstin Fischer (eds), 47–66. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Floyd, Simeon, Norcliffe, Elisabeth & San Roque, Lila
(eds) 2018 Egophoricity [Typological Studies in Language 118]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Bruce
2001 The clause start in Ancient Greek: Focus and the second position. Glotta 77: 138–177.Google Scholar
Gast, Volker
2006 Modal particles and context updating: The functions of German ‘ja’, ‘doch’, ‘wohl’ and ‘etwa’. In Modalverben und Grammatikalisierung, Heinz Vater & Ole Letnes (eds), 153–177. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.Google Scholar
Grosz, Patrick
2016 Information structure and discourse particles. In The Oxford Handbook of Information Structure, Caroline Féry & Shinichiro Ishihara (eds), 336–358. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Grzech, Karolina
2016a Discourse Enclitics in Tena Kichwa: A Corpus-based Account of Information Structure and Epistemic Meaning. PhD dissertation, SOAS, University of London.Google Scholar
2016b The non-evidential meaning of the Tena Kichwa ‘direct evidential’. Special issue of York Papers in Linguistics 3: 73–94.Google Scholar
Gutzmann, Daniel
2015 Use-conditional Meaning. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood
1967 Notes in transitivity and theme in English, 2. Journal of Linguistics 3(2): 199–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hancil, Sylvie, Haselow, Alexander & Post, Margje
(eds) 2015 Final Particles. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hargreaves, David
2018 Am I blue? Privileged access constraints in Kathmandu Newar. In Floyd, Norcliffe & San Roque (eds), 79–107.Google Scholar
Haselow, Alexander
2015 Left vs. right periphery in grammaticalization: The case of anyway. In New Directions in Grammaticalization Research [Studies in Language Companion Series 166], Andrew D. M. Smith, Graeme Trousdale & Richard Waltereit (eds), 157–186. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hentschel, Elke
1986 Funktion und Geschichte deutscher Partikeln. Ja, doch, halt und eben. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Izutsu, Katsunobu & Izutsu, Mitsuko Narita
2013 From discourse markers to modal/final particles: What the position reveals about the continuum. In Degand, Cornillie & Pietrandrea (eds), 217–235.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Joachim
1991 On the semantics of modal particles. In Discourse Particles. Descriptive and Theoretical Investigations on the Logical, Syntactic and Pragmatic Properties of Discourse Particles in German [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 12], Werner Abraham (ed.), 141–162. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
König, Ekkehard
1991 The Meaning of Focus Particles: A Comparative Perspective. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997 Zur Bedeutung von Modalpartikeln im Deutschen: Ein Neuansatz im Rahmen der Relevanztheorie. In special issue Studien zu Deutsch als Fremdsprache III. Aspekte der Modalität im Deutschen – auch in kontrastiver Sicht, Friedhelm Debus & Oddleif Leirbukt (eds). Germanistische Linguistik 136: 67–75.Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred
2008 Basic notions of information structure. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 55: 243–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krivonossov, Alexey
1977 Die modalen Partikeln in der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Göppingen: Kümmerle.Google Scholar
Kuroda, Sige-Yuki
2005 Focusing on the matter of topic: A study of wa and ga in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 14: 1–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kwon, Min-Jae
2005 Modalpartikeln und Satzmodus: Untersuchungen zur Syntax, Semantik und Pragmatik der deutschen Modalpartikeln. PhD dissertation, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München.Google Scholar
Leiss, Elisabeth
2012 Epistemicity, evidentiality and Theory of Mind. In Abraham & Leiss (eds), 109–146.Google Scholar
Métrich, René, Faucher, Eugène & Courdier, Gilbert
(eds) 1999 Les invariables difficiles: Dictionnaire allemand-français des particules, connecteurs, interjections et autres mots de la communication, Vol. 2: bald-geradezu. Nancy: Nouveaux Cahiers d’Allemand.Google Scholar
(eds) 2002 Les invariables difficiles: Dictionnaire allemand-français des particules, connecteurs, interjections et autres mots de la communication, Vol. 3: gern-nur so. Nancy: Nouveaux Cahiers d’Allemand.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne
2018 Factors behind variation in marking information structure: Contributions from Central Pomo. In Information Structure in Lesser-described Languages: Studies in Prosody and Syntax [Studies in Language Companion Series 199], Evangelia Adamou, Katharina Haude & Martine Vanhove (eds), 119–156. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Modicom, Pierre-Yves
2012 The epistemological treatment of information and the interpersonal distribution of belief in language: German modal particles and the typological challenge. In Abraham & Leiss (eds), 361–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Molnár, Valéria
1998 On the syntax, phonology, semantics and pragmatics of the so-called “contrastive topic” in Hungarian and German. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 45: 89–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002 Contrast – From a contrastive perspective. In Information Structure in a Cross-Linguistic Perspective, Hilde Hasselgård, Stig Johansson, Bergljot Behrens & Cathrine Fabricius-Hansen (eds), 147–161. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Onodera, Yoriko
2004 Japanese Discourse Markers: Synchronic and diachronic discourse analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ozerov, Pavel
2015 Information structure without topic and focus: Differential Object Marking in Burmese. Studies in Language 39(2): 386–423. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paillard, Denis
2017 Scène énonciative et types de marqueurs discursifs. Langages 207: 17–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Padučeva, Edita
1987 La particule že: Sémantique, syntaxe et prosodie. In Les particules énonciatives en russe contemporain 3, 1–44. Paris: Université Paris VII.Google Scholar
Panov, Vladimir
2018 Defining the area of (sentence-)final particles in Asia. Talk at the 51st meeting of Societas Linguistica Europaea in Tallinn.
2019 The markers of uncontroversial information in Europe. Talk at the 52nd meeting of Societas Linguistica Europaea in Leipzig.
Prince, Ellen
2002 The ZPG letter: Subjects, definiteness and information-status. In Discourse Description: Diverse Linguistic Analyses of a Fund-raising Text [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 16], William S. Mann & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 293–325. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Repp, Sophie
2013 Common ground management: Modal particles, illocutionary negation and verum. In Beyond Expressives: Explorations in Use-Conditional Meaning, Daniel Gutzmann & Hansmartin Gärtner (eds), 231–274. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schoonjans, Steven
2013 Modal particles: Problems in defining a category. In Degand, Bert & Pietrandrea (eds), 133–161.Google Scholar
2014 Oui, il y a des particules de démodulation en français. Cognitextes 11. [URL] DOI logo
Schultze-Berndt, Eva
2017 Shared vs. primary epistemic authority in Jaminjung/Ngaliwurru. Open Linguistics 3: 178–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shinzato, Rumiko
2017 Grammaticalization of pragmatic markers, discourse markers and modal markers in Japanese. In Fedriani & Sansò (eds), 305–333.Google Scholar
Spevak, Olga
2010 Constituent Order in Classical Latin Prose [Studies in Language Companion Series 117]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Squartini, Mario
2017 Italian non-canonical negations as modal particles: Information state, polarity and mirativity. In Fedriani & Sansò (eds), 203–228.Google Scholar
Thijs, Kees
2017 The Attic particle μήν: Intersubjectivity, contrast and polysemy. Journal of Greek Linguistics 17: 73–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2010 Revisiting subjectification and intersubjectification. In Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds), 29–70. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Trotzke, Andreas & Turco, Giuseppina
2015 The grammatical reflexes of emphasis: Evidence from German wh-questions. Lingua 168: 37–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waltereit, Richard
2006 Abtönung: Zur Pragmatik und historischen Semantik von Modalpartikeln und ihren funktionalen Äquivalenten in romanischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waltereit, Richard & Detges, Ulrich
2007 Different functions, different histories. Modal particles and discourse markers from a diachronic point of view. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 6: 61–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weydt, Harald
1969 Abtönungspartikel: Die deutschen Modalwörter und ihre französischen Entsprechungen. Bad Homburg: Gehlen.Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre & Sperber, Dan
(eds) 2013 Meaning and Relevance. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Malte
2008 Discourse particles in the left periphery. In Dislocated Elements in Discourse. Syntactic, Semantic, and Pragmatic Perspectives, Benjamin Shaer, Philippa Cook, Werner Frey & Claudia Maienborn (eds), 200–231. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Lewis, Diana M.
2021. Chapter 13. Pragmatic markers at the periphery and discourse prominence. In Pragmatic Markers and Peripheries [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 325], ► pp. 351 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.