Cover not available
Part of
Late Modern English: Novel encounters
Edited by Merja Kytö and Erik Smitterberg
[Studies in Language Companion Series 214] 2020
► pp. 67–90

The myth of American English gotten as a historical retention

 | University of Kiel
In this article, I investigate where and when the myth of American English as a conservative variety originates, and how it has become linked to the verb form gotten in particular. Drawing on corpus materials, prescriptive grammar writers of the time, publications on Americanisms, and nineteenth-century newspaper articles, this article shows that gotten is not a historical retention, but was revived in the nineteenth century in American English. However, this revival was not linked (yet) to the idea of it being a specific American form. Once this indexical link was established, however, it seems to have fuelled the rise of gotten further. The concept of gotten as indexing AmE linguistic conservativism is thus indeed a myth (if a powerful one).
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction: The myth
  • 2.Unmasking the myth: The corpus evidence
  • 3.Investigating the source of the myth
    • 3.1The collection of nineteenth-century grammars (CNG)
    • 3.2Dictionaries and glossaries of Americanisms
    • 3.3American newspapers
  • 4.Twentieth-century publications
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • Newspaper databases
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 18 March 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.214.03and
References (67)
Newspaper databases
AHN America’s Historical Newspapers, contains over 1,000 newspapers published between 1690 and 1922, available at <[URL]>.
NCNP Nineteenth Century U.S. Newspapers, contains ca. 1.7 million articles from 1800–1900, available at <[URL]>.
References
Algeo, John (ed.). 2001. The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. VI: English in North America. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderwald, Lieselotte. 2013. Natural language change or prescriptive influence? Throve, dove, pled, drug and snuck in 19th-century American English. English World-Wide 34(2): 146–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. Language between Description and Prescription: Verb Categories in Nineteenth-Century Grammars of English. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. Get, get-constructions and the get-passive in 19th-century English: Corpus analysis and prescriptive comments. In Exploring Recent Diachrony: Corpus Studies of Lexicogrammar and Language Practices in Late Modern English [Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English 18], Sebastian Hoffmann, Andrea Sand & Sabine Arndt-Lappe (eds). Helsinki: Varieng, Department of Modern Languages, University of Helsinki. <[URL]>
. Forthcoming. Historical retention, progressive nation or the eye of the beholder? The evolution of morphological Americanisms. In Earlier North-American Englishes, Merja Kytö & Lucia Siebers (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bartlett, John Russell. 1848. Dictionary of Americanisms: A Glossary of Words and Phrases, Usually Regarded as Peculiar to the United States. New York NY: Bartlett and Welford.Google Scholar
. 1859 [1848]. Dictionary of Americanisms. A Glossary of Words and Phrases Usually Regarded as Peculiar to the United States. Second edition, greatly improved and enlarged. Boston MA: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Baskervill, William M. & Sewell, J. W. 1895. An English Grammar for the Use of High School, Academy, and College Classes. New York NY: American Book Company.Google Scholar
Bentley, Rensselaer. 1825. The American Instructer; Calculated to Succeed the English, and other Spelling-Books; Containing a Selection of the Principal Part of the Words in Common Use, Divided, Accented, Defined, and their Pronunciation Accurately Pointed out. Adapted to the Orthography and Pronunciation of Walker Interspersed with Instructive and Entertaining Reading Lessons; to which is Added a Comprehensive Abridgment of English Grammar. Troy: E. Platt & Co.Google Scholar
Bingham, William. 1867. A Grammar of the English Language: For the Use of Schools and Academies. With Copious Parsing Exercises. Philadelphia PA: E.H. Butler & Co.Google Scholar
Brown, Goold. 1851. The Grammar of English Grammars, with an Introduction Historical and Critical; the Whole Methodically Arranged and Amply Illustrated; with Forms of Correcting and of Parsing, Improprieties for Correction, Examples for Parsing, Questions for Examination, Exercises for Writing, Observations for the Advanced Student, Decisions and Proofs for the Settlement of Disputed Points, Occasional Strictures and Defences, an Exhibition of the Several Methods of Analysis, and a Key to the Oral Exercises: to which are Added Four Appendixes, Pertaining Separately to the Four Parts of Grammar. New York NY: Samuel S. & William Wood.Google Scholar
Brown, James. 1820. An American Grammar, Developing the Principles of our Language and Impressing them upon the Memory by Exercising the Judgment of the Learner. Designed for the Use of Schools in the United States. Troy: Francis Adancourt.Google Scholar
Clapin, Sylva. 1902. A New Dictionary of Americanisms: Being a Glossary of Words Supposed to be Peculiar to the United States and the Dominion of Canada. New York NY: Louis Weiss & Co.Google Scholar
Crowell, Michael G. 1967. Richard Grant White and Americanisms. American Speech 42: 122–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Curme, George O. 1927. Gotten. American Speech 2(12): 495–496. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, Mark. 2010–. The Corpus of Historical American English: 400 million words, 1810–2009. <[URL]>
Ellis, Alexander J. 1869. On Early English Pronunciation, with Especial Reference to Shakspere and Chaucer, Containing an Investigation of the Correspondence of Writing with Speech in England, from the Anglosaxon Period to the Existing Received and Dialectal Forms, with a Systematic Notation of Spoken Sounds by Means of the Ordinary Printing Types. Vol. I: On the Pronunciation of the XIVth, XVIth, XVIIth, and XVIIIth Centuries. London: Published for the Philological Society by Asher & Co.; and for the Early English Text Society, and the Chaucer Society, by Trübner & Co.Google Scholar
Elwyn, Alfred L. 1859. Glossary of Supposed Americanisms. Philadelphia PA: J.B. Lippincott & Co.Google Scholar
Farmer, John S. 1889. Americanisms – Old & New: A Dictionary of Words, Phrases and Colloquialisms Peculiar to the United States, British America, the West Indies, &c. &c, Their Derivation, Meaning and Application, Together with Numerous Anecdotal, Historical, Explanatory, and Folk-Lore Notes. E.C.: Privately printed by Thomas Poulter.Google Scholar
Finegan, Edward. 1980. Attitudes towards English Usage: The History of a War of Words. New York NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
. 2001. Usage. In The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. VI: English in North America, John Algeo (ed.), 358–421. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Görlach, Manfred. 1998. An Annotated Bibliography of 19th-Century Grammars of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1999. English in Nineteenth-Century England: An Introduction. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gowers, Rebecca. 2016. Horrible Words: A Guide to the Misuse of English. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Hallock, Edward J. 1849. A Grammar of the English Language; for the Use of Common Schools, Academies and Seminaries. New York NY: Mark H. Newman & Co.Google Scholar
Hundt, Marianne. 2001. What corpora can tell us about the grammaticalisation of voice in get-constructions. Studies in Language 25: 49–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. Colonial lag, colonial innovation or simply language change? In One Language – Two Grammars? Differences between British and American English, Günter Rohdenburg & Julia Schlüter (eds), 13–37. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1931. A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles, Vol. IV: Syntax. Third Volume. Time and Tense. London & Copenhagen: Allan & Unwin & Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Kenyon, William Colgrove. 1849. Elements of English Grammar, Analytical and Synthetical; Arranged in Progressive Exercises, 2nd edn. Rochester: Erastus Darrow; New York NY: Baker & Scribner; Philadelphia PA: Hogan & Thompson; and Boston: Perkins & Co.Google Scholar
Marckwardt, Albert H. 1958. American English. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Mencken, Henry L. 1919. The American Language: A Preliminary Inquiry into the Development of English in the United States. New York NY: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
1936 [1919]. The American Language, 4th corrected, enlarged, and rewritten edn. New York NY: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
1948. The American Language: An Inquiry Into the Development of English in the United States, Supplement II. [Supplement to the 4th edn, 1936]. New York NY: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Michael, Ian. 1991. More than enough English grammars. In English Traditional Grammars: An International Perspective [Studies in the History of the Language Sciences 62], Gerhard Leitner (ed.), 11–26. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1997. The hyperactive production of English grammars in the nineteenth century: A speculative bibliography. Publishing History 41: 23–61.Google Scholar
Milroy, James & Milroy, Lesley. 1999 [1985]. Authority in Language: Investigating Standard English, 3rd edn. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Michael. 2001. British and Irish antecedents. In The Cambridge History of the English Language, Volume VI: English in North America, John Algeo (ed.), 86–153. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu & Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid. 2006. Standardisation. In A History of the English Language, Richard M. Hogg & David Denison (eds), 271–311. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
OED. 2011–. Oxford English Dictionary Online. Oxford: OUP. <[URL]>
Pickering, John. 1816. A Vocabulary, or Collection of Words and Phrases which have been Supposed to be Peculiar to the United States of America. To which is Prefixed an Essay on the Present State of the English Language in the United States. Originally Published in the Memoirs of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences; and now Republished with Corrections and Additions. Boston MA: Cummings & Hilliard.Google Scholar
Pue, Hugh A. 1841. A Grammar of the English Language, in a Series of Letters, Addressed to Every American Youth. Philadelphia PA: Published by the Author.Google Scholar
Putnam, John M. 1828 [1825]. English Grammar, with an Improved Syntax, Part I: Comprehending at one View what is Necessary to be Committed to Memory, Part II: Containing a Recapitulation, with Various Illustrations and Critical Remarks. Designed for the Use of Schools, 2nd edn. Concord: Jacob B. Moore.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Schele de Vere, Maximilian. 1872. Americanisms; The English of the New World. London: Trubner & Co.; and New York: Charles Scribner.Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 2007. Postcolonial English: Varieties around the World. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strunk, William & White, E. B. 1959. Elements of Style. New York NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Thornton, Richard H. 1912. An American Glossary: Being an Attempt to Illustrate Certain Americanisms upon Historical Principles. London: Francis & Co.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter & Hannah, Jean. 2002 [1982]. International English: A Guide to Varieties of Standard English. 4th edition. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Webster, Noah. 1789. Dissertations on the English Language: With Notes, Historical and Critical. To Which is Added, by Way of Appendix, an Essay on a Reformed Mode of Spelling, with Dr. Franklin’s Arguments on that Subject. Boston MA: For the author.Google Scholar
Wells, William H. 1847 [1846]. A Grammar of the English Language; For the Use of Schools. Andover: Allen, Morrill, and Wardwell; and Boston MA: John P. Jewett & Co.Google Scholar
White, Richard G. 1870. Words and their Uses, Past and Present: A Study of the English Language. New York NY: Sheldon and Company.Google Scholar
1877a. Americanisms. The Galaxy 24(3): 376–383.Google Scholar
1877b. The federal language. The Galaxy 24(5): 681–688.Google Scholar
1878a. Americanisms. The Galaxy 25(1): 94–101.Google Scholar
1878b. Americanisms I. Atlantic Monthly 41(246): 495–503.Google Scholar
1878c. Americanisms II. Atlantic Monthly 41(247): 656–664.Google Scholar
1878d. Americanisms III. Atlantic Monthly 42(249): 97–106.Google Scholar
1878e. Americanisms IV. Atlantic Monthly 42(251): 342–348.Google Scholar
1878f. Americanisms V. Atlantic Monthly 42(253): 619–631.Google Scholar
1879a. Americanisms VI. Atlantic Monthly 43(255): 88–98.Google Scholar
1879b. Americanisms VII. Atlantic Monthly 43(257): 379–392.Google Scholar
1879c. Americanisms VIII. Atlantic Monthly 43(259): 656–666.Google Scholar
1879d. English Skies. Atlantic Monthly 44(261): 107–116.Google Scholar
1882. Every-Day English: A Sequel to “Words and Their Uses”. Boston MA: Houghton, Mifflin and Co.Google Scholar
Witherspoon, John. 1802. The Works of the Rev. John Witherspoon, Vol. IV, 2nd edn. Philadelphia PA: William W. Woodward.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Anderwald, Lieselotte
2020. American English gotten . In Voices Past and Present - Studies of Involved, Speech-related and Spoken Texts [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 97], ► pp. 187 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.