Chapter published in:Late Modern English: Novel encounters
Edited by Merja Kytö and Erik Smitterberg
[Studies in Language Companion Series 214] 2020
► pp. 91–116
Changes affecting relative clauses in Late Modern English
This paper presents the results of a corpus study comparing relative markers (relative complementisers and relative pronouns) in the King James Bible and its modernised version, focusing on subject and object relative clauses involving a human referent. The attested differences indicate changes affecting Standard (British) English during Late Modern English. The paper discusses three important aspects: in Early Modern English, (i) which was available for human subjects, (ii) that-relatives had a higher proportion, and (iii) the equative element as could introduce relative clauses as a complementiser. The paper argues that the disappearance or reduction of alternative forms to who/whom was driven both by internal and by external factors, and that significant differences can be observed between the standard variety and regional dialects.
- 2.Changes in Modern English
- 2.2The results of the corpus study
- 3.Equative relative clauses
Published online: 18 March 2020
Austin, Frances O.
1985 Relative which in late 18th-century usage: The Clift family correspondence. In Papers from the 4th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics: Amsterdam, 10–13 April 1985 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 41], Roger Eaton, Olga Fischer, Willem F. Koopman & Frederike van der Leek (eds), 15–29. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ball, Catherine N.
Brandner, Ellen & Bräuning, Iris
Corver, Norbert Ferdinand Marie
van Gelderen, Elly
Keenan, Edward L. & Comrie, Bernard
Kortmann, Bernd & Wagner, Susanne
López-Couso, María José & Méndez-Naya, Belén
Montgomery, Michael & Bailey, Guy
Nevalainen, Terttu & Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
Tagliamonte, Sali, Smith, Jennifer & Lawrence, Helen