Cover not available
Part of
Late Modern English: Novel encounters
Edited by Merja Kytö and Erik Smitterberg
[Studies in Language Companion Series 214] 2020
► pp. 185–202

“Divided by a common language”?

The treatment of Americanism(s) in Late Modern English dictionaries and usage guides on both sides of the Atlantic

 | Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg
The present study investigates the treatment of the term Americanism and its plural form in their generic sense in selected British and American reference works of the 19th and early 20th centuries. It concentrates on two special types of reference books, namely dictionaries of Americanisms and usage guides from both sides of the Atlantic. By analyzing whether the paraphrase or the labelling conveys a positive, a neutral, or a negative stance, the terms Americanism(s) serve as keywords for Anglo-American linguistic attitudes towards the “other” variety. Methodologically, the study combines socio-lexicography and meta-pragmatics; the results show a change in the relationship of the two varieties and also substantive differences in how the two types of reference book deal with the topic.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background and method
    • 2.1The Scottish connection: Americanism coined on Scotticism
  • 3.Dictionaries of Americanisms
    • 3.1Pickering (1816)
    • 3.2Bartlett (1848)
    • 3.3Farmer (1889)
    • 3.4Thornton (1912)
    • 3.5Summary
  • 4.British and American usage guides
    • 4.1Alford (1864)
    • 4.2Moon (1865)
    • 4.3White (1870)
    • 4.4Fowler & Fowler (1906)
    • 4.5Partridge (1942)
    • 4.6Gowers (1948)
    • 4.7Summary
  • 5.Summary and conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 18 March 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.214.08bus
References (42)
References
1. Primary sources
1.1 Dictionaries
Bartlett, John Russell. 41896 [1848]. Dictionary of Americanisms. A Glossary of Words and Phrases Usually Regarded as Peculiar to the United States. Boston MA: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Beattie, James. 1787. Scoticisms arranged in Alphabetical Order, designed to correct Improprieties of Speech and Writing. Edinburgh: Creech.Google Scholar
DA = Matthews, Mitford M. 1951. Dictionary of Americanisms on Historical Principles. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
DAE = Craigie, W. A. & Hulbert, James Root. 1938. A Dictionary of American English on Historical Principles, 4 Vols. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
DOST = Craigie, William A., Aitken, Adam J. & Stevenson, James A. C. 1931–1986. A Dictionary of the Older Scottish Tongue from the twelfth Century to the end of the Seventeenth, 6 Vols. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press.Google Scholar
EDD = Wright, Joseph. 1898–1905. The English Dialect Dictionary, 6 Vols. Oxford: Henry Frowde.Google Scholar
Farmer, John S. 1889. Americanisms – Old & New. A Dictionary of Words, Phrases and Colloquialisms Peculiar to the United States, British America, The West Indies, & c., & c. London: Thomas Poulter & Sons.Google Scholar
Jamieson, John. 1808. An Etymological Dictionary of the Scottish Language, illustrating the words in their different significations, by examples from ancient and modern writers, 2 Vols. Edinburgh: University Press.Google Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary. Third edn. online <[URL]>
Mackie, Alexander. 1881. Scotticisms arranged and corrected. London: Hamilton Adams & Co.Google Scholar
Pickering, John. 1816. A Vocabulary or Collection of Words and Phrases Which Have Been Supposed to Be Peculiar to the United States of America. Boston MA [repr. together with Noah Webster: A Letter to the Honorable John Pickering. 1817. New York NY, 1974].Google Scholar
SND = Grant, William & Murison, David D. 1931–1976. The Scottish National Dictionary, designed partly on regional lines and partly on historical principles, and containing all the Scottish words known to be in use or to have been in use c. 1700, 10 Vols. Edinburgh: The Scottish National Dictionary Association.Google Scholar
Thornton, Richard H. 1912. An American Glossary. Being an attempt to illustrate certain Americanisms upon historical principles. Philadelphia PA: J. B. Lippincott and London: Francis & Co.Google Scholar
1.2 Usage guides
Alford, Henry. [1864] 51880. The Queen’s English. A Manual of Idiom and Usage. London: George Bell and Sons.Google Scholar
Fowler, H. W. 1926 and [1965] 21968. Modern English Usage. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Fowler, H. W. & Fowler, F. G. [1906] 31931. The King’s English. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Gowers, Sir Ernest. 1948. Plain Words. A Guide to the Use of English. London: His Majesty’s Stationary Office.Google Scholar
Moon, George Washington. [1865] 101876. The Dean’s English. A Criticism on the Dean of Canterbury’s Essays on the Queen’s English. London: Hatchards.Google Scholar
Partridge, Eric. [1942] 51957. Usage and Abusage. A Guide to Good English. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
White, Richard Grant. [1870] 91886. Words and their Uses, Past and Present. A Study of the English Language. London: Sampson Low, Marston, Searle & Rivington.Google Scholar
2. Secondary sources
Aitken, Adam Jack. 1990. The lexicography of Scots. In Wörterbücher, Dictionaries, Dictionnaires. An International Encyclopedia of Lexicography, Vol. 2 [Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft 5.2], Franz Josef Hausmann, Oskar Reichmann, Herbert Ernst Wiegand & Ladislav Zgusta (eds), 1983–1987. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Algeo, John. 1990. American lexicography. In Wörterbücher, Dictionaries, Dictionnaires. An International Encyclopedia of Lexicography, Vol. 2 [Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft 5.2], Franz Josef Hausmann, Oskar Reichmann, Herbert Ernst Wiegand & Ladislav Zgusta (eds), 1987–2009. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Baron, Dennis E. 1982. Grammar and Good Taste. Reforming the American Language. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Baugh, Albert C. & Cable, Thomas. 2002. A History of the English Language, 5th edn. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Beal, Joan C. 2004. English in Modern Times 1700–1945. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Busse, Ulrich & Schröder, Anne. 2010. How Fowler became ‘The Fowler’: An anatomy of a success story. English Today. The International Review of the English Language 26(2): 45–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Busse, Ulrich. 2015. Transatlantic perspectives on late nineteenth-century English usage: Alford (1864) compared to White (1871). In Transatlantic Perspectives on Late Modern English [Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics 4], Marina Dossena (ed.), 73–93. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Crystal, David. 2018. Punch as a satirical usage guide. In English Usage Guides. History, Advice, Attitudes, Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade (ed.), 83–106. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Finegan, Edward. 1998. English grammar and usage. In The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. IV: 1776–1997, Suzanne Romaine (ed.), 536–588. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
. 2001. Usage. In The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. VI: English in North America, John Algeo (ed.), 358–421. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gilman, E. Ward. 1989. A brief history of English usage. In Webster’s Dictionary of English Usage, E. Ward Gilman (ed.), 7a–11a. Springfield IL: Merriam Webster.Google Scholar
Görlach, Manfred. 1990. The dictionary of transplanted varieties of language: English. In Wörterbücher, Dictionaries, Dictionnaires. An International Encyclopedia of Lexicography, Vol. 2 [Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft 5.2], Franz Josef Hausmann, Oskar Reichmann, Herbert Ernst Wiegand & Ladislav Zgusta (eds), 1475–1499. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Gowers, Rebecca. 2018. Even more complete words. In English Usage Guides. History, Advice, Attitudes, Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade (ed.), 69–81. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Graddol, David. 1996. English manuscripts: The emergence of a visual identity. In English. History, Diversity and Change, David Graddol, Dick Leith & Joan Swann (eds), 41–94. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hübler, Axel & Busse, Ulrich. 2012. Introduction. In Investigations into the Meta-Communicative Lexicon of English [Pragmatics & Beyond. New Series 220], Ulrich Busse & Axel Hübler (eds), 1–16. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kretzschmar Jr., William A. & Meyer, Charles F. 2012. The idea of Standard American English. In Standards of English. Codified Varieties around the World, Raymond Hickey (ed.), 139–158. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Milroy, Lesley. 2001. Britain and the United States: Two nations divided by the same language (and different language ideologies). Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 10(1): 56–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruano-García, Javier, García-Bermejo Giner, María F. & Sánchez-García, Pilar. 2015. ‘Provincial in England, but in common with us’: John R. Bartlett’s Dictionary of Americanisms and the English Dialect Dictionary. In Transatlantic Perspectives on Late Modern English [Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics 4], Marina Dossena (ed.), 99–116. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Straaijer, Robin. 2018. The usage guide: Evolution of a genre. In English Usage Guides. History, Advice, Attitudes, Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade (ed.), 11–29. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Strang, Barbara M. H. 1970. A History of English. London: Methuen & Co.Google Scholar
Sundby, Bertil, Bjørge, Anne Kari & Haugland, Kari E. 1991. A Dictionary of English Normative Grammar 1700–1800 [Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science 63]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watts, Richard J. 2008. Grammar writers in eighteenth-century Britain: A community of practice or a discourse community? In Grammars, Grammarians and Grammar-Writing in Eighteenth-Century England, Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade (ed.), 37–56. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Yáñez-Bouza, Nuria
2022. Methodological approaches to the study of codification, prescription, and prescriptivism. Studia Neophilologica 94:3 ► pp. 334 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.