Cover not available
Part of
Morphological Complexity within and across Boundaries: In honour of Aslı Göksel
Edited by Aslı Gürer, Dilek Uygun-Gökmen and Balkız Öztürk
[Studies in Language Companion Series 215] 2020
► pp. 63–92

Restrictive relative clauses in the Greek dialects of Pharasa and Cappadocia

 | Ghent University
Relative clauses in Cappadocian (Greek) are introduced by two morphemes that agree with the Head in number. In Pharasiot (Greek), on the other hand, there is one morpheme marking RCs. I argue that the morphemes in Cappadocian are not relativizers but are agreement markers appearing not only on relatives but also on numerals/adjectives in a definite DP. In Pharasiot, the invariant morpheme is a complementizer emerged by the fusion of the external determiner and a complementizer in a D-CP structure. I further show that pre-nominal relatives in Pharasiot display characteristics of matching relatives whereas post-nominal ones should be analyzed as raising structures. Preliminary evidence suggests that in Cappadocian both pre- and post-nominal relatives involve a matching derivation.
Keywords: relative clauses, pre-nominal, post-nominal, Cappadocian Greek, Pharasiot Greek
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The Greek dialects of Cappadocia and Pharasa, and their speakers
  • 3.Data
  • 4.Extended Projection of NPs in CG and PhG
  • 5.The position of (pre-nominal) RCs in the extended projection of NP
  • 6.On the so-called relativizers and the structure of RCs
    • 6.1CG: No relativizers
    • 6.2PhG: The origin of the relativizer and the structure of RCs
    • 6.3CG again: The structure of RCs
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgment
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 15 July 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.215.03bag
References (55)
References
Alexiadou, Artemis. 1998. On the structure of Greek relative clauses. Studies in Greek Linguistics 18: 15–29.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis & Varlakosta, Spyridoula. 1996. The syntactic and semantic properties of relative clauses in Modern Greek. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 5: 1–32.Google Scholar
Anastasiadis, Vasilios. 1976. I sintaksi sto farasiotiko idioma tis Kappadokias (The Syntax of the Dialect of Pharasa in Cappadocia). PhD dissertation, University of Ioannina.
. 2015. To neoeliniko glosiko idioma ton Farason tis Kapadokias (The Modern Greek dialect of Pharasa in Cappadocia). Grevena.Google Scholar
Andriotis, Nikolaos. 1948. To glossiko idioma ton Farason (The dialect of Pharasa). Athens: Ikaros.Google Scholar
Bağrıaçık, Metin. 2018. Pharasiot Greek: Word Order and Clause Structure. PhD dissertation, Ghent University.
Bağrıaçık, Metin & Danckaert, Lieven. 2019. Raising and matching in Pharasiot Greek relative clauses: A diachronic reconstruction. Ms, Ghent University & Université de Lille.Google Scholar
Bakker, Willem. 1974. Pronomen abundans and pronomen coniunctum: Α Contribution to the History of the Resumptive Pronoun within the Relative Clause in Greek. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Barri, Nimrod. 1971. Essai de syntaxe structural du dialécte Neo-Grec de Cappadoce. PhD dissertation, University of Paris (Sorbonne).
Bentein, Klaas & Bağrıaçık, Metin. 2018. On the third type of headed relative clause in Post-classical and Early Byzantine Greek (I–VIII AD). Transactions of the Philological Society 116(3): 529–554. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Browning, Robert. 1983. Medieval and Modern Greek. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Browning, Marguerite. 1987. Null Operator Constructions. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Campos, Hector & Stavrou, Melita. 2004. Polydefinites in Greek and Aromanian. In Balkan Syntax and Semantics [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 67], Olga M. Tomic (ed.), 137–173. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chila-Markopoulou, Despina. 1990/1991. Provlimata diachronikis sintaksis. I anaforikes protasis sti Meseoniki ke Nea Eliniki (Problems of diachronic syntax. Relative clauses in Medieval and Modern Greek). Glossologia 9–10: 13–42.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 2003. The pre-nominal origin of relative clauses. Paper presented at the ‘Workshop on Antisymmetry and Remnant Movement’, New York University, October 31–November 1.
. 2005. Deriving Greenberg’s universal 20 and its exceptions. Linguistic Inquiry 36: 315–332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. More on the indefinite character of the head of restrictive relatives. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 33: 3–24.Google Scholar
. 2015. Three phenomena discriminating between “raising” and “matching” relative clauses. Semantics-Syntax Interface 2: 1–27.Google Scholar
. To appear. The Syntax of Relative Clauses. A Unified Double-head Analysis. Cambridge: CUP.
Dawkins, Richard. 1916. Modern Greek in Asia Minor: A Study of the Dialects of Sillí, Cappadocia and Phárasa, with Grammar, Texts, Translation and Glossary. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Drettas, Georges. 1997. Aspects Pontiques. Paris: Association de recherches pluridisciplinaires.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Stefanie. 2014. Internal and external relative clauses in Ancient Greek. Journal of Greek Linguistics 14: 141–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Favis, Vasilis. 1948. Sintaktike paratirisis is to idioma ton Farason (Syntactic observations on the dialect of Pharasa). Epetiris Vizantinon Spoudon 18: 173–191.Google Scholar
Guardino, Cristina & Michelioudakis, Dimitris. 2019. Syntactic variation across Greek dialects: The case of demonstratives. In Italian Dialectology at the Interfaces [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 251], Silvio Cruschina & Adam Ledgeway, Eva-Maria Remberger (eds), 319–355. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holton, David, Horrocks, Geoffrey, Janssen, Marjolijne, Lentari, Stamatina, Manolessou, Io & Toufexis, Panagiotis (eds). 2019. The Cambridge Grammar of Medieval and Early Modern Greek, Vol. 4. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Horrocks, Geoffrey. 2010[1997]. Greek: A History of the Language and its Speakers. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jannaris, Antonius. 1987[1897]. An Historical Greek Grammar. London: Macmillan & Co.Google Scholar
Janse, Mark. 1998. Grammaticalization and typological change: The clitic cline in Asia Minor Greek. In Productivity and Creativity: Studies in General and Descriptive Linguistics in Honor of E. M. Uhlenbeck, Mark Janse (ed.), 521–547. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1999. Greek, Turkish, and Cappadocian relatives revis(it)ed. In Greek Linguistics 97: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Greek Linguistics, Georgios Babiniotis (ed.), 453–462. Athens: Elinika Gramata.Google Scholar
. 2002. Aspects of bilingualism in the history of the Greek language. In Bilingualism in Ancient Society: Language Contact and the Written Word, James Noel Adams, Mark Janse & Simon Swain (eds), 332–390. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. Animacy, definiteness, and case in Cappadocian and other Asia Minor Greek dialects. Journal of Greek Linguistics 5: 3–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. To appear. I Kapadokiki dialektos (The Cappadocian dialect). In Neoelinikes dialekti (Modern Greek dialects), Christos Tzitzilis (ed.). Thessaloniki: INES.
Karatsareas, Petros. 2011. A Study of Cappadocian Greek Nominal Morphology from a Diachronic and Dialectological Perspective. PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge.
. 2013. Understanding diachronic change in Cappadocian Greek: The dialectological perspective. Journal of Historical Linguistics 3: 192–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kesisoglou, Ioannis I. 1951. To glosiko idioma tu Ulaghats (The Dialect of Ulaghats). Athens: Institut Français d’Athènes.Google Scholar
Kolliakou, Dimitra. 2004. Monadic definites and polydefinites: Their form, meaning and use. Journal of Linguistics 40: 263–333. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kriki, Eirini. 2013. Morfosintaktiki neoterismi sti glossa ton mi filologikon Papiron: I anaforikes protasis (Morphosyntactic Innovations in the Language of the non-philological Papyri: Relative Clauses). PhD dissertation, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.
Lekakou, Marika & Szendrői, Kriszta. 2012. Polydefinites in Greek: Εllipsis, close apposition and expletive determiners. Journal of Linguistics 48: 107–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lekakou, Marika & Karatsareas, Petros. 2016. Marking definiteness multiply: Evidence from two varieties of Greek. Studies in Greek Linguistics 36: 189–203.Google Scholar
Levidis, Anastasios. 1892. Pragmatia peri tis en Kapadokia lalumenis glossis [A treatise on the language spoken in Cappadocia]. Ms, Center of Asia Minor Greek Studies.Google Scholar
Liosis, Nikos & Kriki, Eirini. 2013. Towards a typology of relative clauses in Modern Greek dialects. In Online Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Modern Greek Dialects and Linguistic Theory, Mark Janse, Brian Joseph, Angela Ralli & Metin Bağrıaçık (eds), 245–271. <[URL]> (13 June 2019).
Loukopoulos, Dimitris & Loukatos, Dimitris. 1951. Parimies ton Farason (Idioms of Pharasa). Athens: Center of Asia Minor Studies.Google Scholar
Manolessou, Io. 2000. Greek Noun Phrase Structure: A Study in Syntactic Evolution. PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge.
. 2004. I anaforikes protasis tis Elinikis: Diahroniki prosengisi (Relative clauses in Greek: A diachronic approach). In Online Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Greek Linguistics, September 18–21, 2003, Georgis Catsimali, Alexis Kalokairinos, Elena Anagnostopoulou & Ionna Kappa (eds). Rethymno: University of Crete. <[URL]> (1 July 2019).
. 2019. The historical background of the Asia Minor Greek dialects. In The Morphology of Asia Minor Greek, Angela Ralli (ed.), 20–65. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nicholas, Nick. 1998. The Story of pu: The Grammaticalisation in Space and Time of a Modern Greek Complementizer. PhD dissertation, University of Melbourne.
Partee, Barbara. 1975. Montague grammar and transformational grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 6: 203–300.Google Scholar
Perna, Elena. 2013a. La frase relativa in Greco Antico: Analisi sintattica basata sul dialetto attico di platone. PhD dissertation, University of Padua.
Polinsky, Maria. 2018. Heritage Languages and Their Speakers. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Probert, Philomen. 2015. Early Greek Relative Clauses. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rijksbaron, Albert. 1981. Relative clause formation in Ancient Greek. In Predication and Expression in Functional Grammar, Machtelt Bolkestein, Henk Combé, Simon Dik, Casper de Groot, Jadranka Gvozdanović, Albert Rijksbaron & Co Vet (eds), 236–259. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar: Handbook in Generative Syntax, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roussou, Anna. 2000. On the left periphery: Modal particles and complementisers. Journal of Greek Linguistics 1: 65–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tompaidis, Dimitris. 1992. I tihi ton mikrasiatikon idiomaton ston eliniko horo (The future of Asia Minor dialects in Greece). Deltio Kentru Mikrasiatikon Spudon 9: 241–250.Google Scholar
Triandaphyllidis, Periklis. 1993[1938]. Neoeliniki grammatiki, Tom. A: Istoriki isagogi (Modern Greek grammar, Vol. I: A historical introduction). Thessaloniki: INES.Google Scholar