Chapter published in:
Re-Assessing Modalising Expressions: Categories, co-text, and context
Edited by Pascal Hohaus and Rainer Schulze
[Studies in Language Companion Series 216] 2020
► pp. 4778
References

References

Alfonso, Anthony
1980Japanese Language Patterns, Vol. 2. Tokyo: Sophia University.Google Scholar
Beukema, Frits & van der Wurff, Wim
2002Modals, objects and negation in late Middle English. In Modality and its Interaction With the Verbal System [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 47], Sjef Barbiers, Frits Beukema & Wim van der Wurff (eds), 75–102. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Byloo, Pieter
2009Modality and Negation. A Corpus-Based Study. PhD dissertation, Universiteit Antwerpen.
Cinque, Guglielmo
1999Adverbs and Functional Heads. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2001A note on mood, modality, tense and aspect affixes in Turkish. In The Verb in Turkish [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 44], Eser Erguvanli Taylan (ed.), 47–59. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Declerck, Renaat
1991A Comprehensive Descriptive Grammar of English. Tōkyō: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
De Haan, Ferdinand
1997The Interaction of Modality and Negation. A Typological Study. New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar
Dik, Simon
1997The Theory of Functional Grammar, Part 1: The Structure of the Clause, 2nd rev. edn, ed. by Kees Hengeveld. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Givón, T.
1985Iconicity, isomorphism and non-arbitrary coding in syntax. In Iconicity in Syntax. Proceedings of a Symposium on Iconicity in Syntax, Stanford, June 24–6, 1983 [Typological Studies in Language 6], John Haiman (ed.),187–219. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001aSyntax. An Introduction, Vol. I, 2nd edn. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
2001bSyntax. An Introduction, Vol. II. 2nd edn. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd
1995Agent-oriented vs. epistemic modality: Some observations on German modals. In Modality in Grammar and Discourse [Typological Studies in Language 32], Joan L. Bybee & Suzanne Fleischman (eds), 17–53. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees & Mackenzie, J. Lachlan
2008 Functional Discourse Grammar. A Typologically-based Theory of Language Structure. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hinds, John
1986Japanese. London: Croom Helms.Google Scholar
Horn, L.R.
1978Some aspects of negation. In Universals of Human Language, Vol. 4, Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), pp. 127–170. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Iwasaki, Shoichi
2013Japanese [London Oriental and African Language Library 17], rev. edn. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kawashima, Nobue
2004Hiteikei o motsu modariti keishiki to meidai no hyōkasei. Kibō hyōgen no hitei taku nai o rei ni (Negated modal forms and the evaluation of the proposition – Taking negated wish taku nai as an example). Nihongo Kyōiku 118, 57–66.Google Scholar
McCready, Eric & Ogata, Norry
2006Evidentiality, modality and probability. Linguistics and Philosophy 30(2), 147–206. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Narrog, Heiko
2009Modality in Japanese – The Layered Structure of the Clause and Hierarchies of Functional Categories [Studies in Language Companion Series 109]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010The order of meaningful elements in the Japanese verbal complex. Morphology 20: 205–237. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Modality, Subjectivity, and Semantic Change. A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nitta, Yoshio
1984Kakarimusubi ni tsuite (On kakarimusubi agreement). In Kenkyū Shiryō Nihon Bunpō 5. Joji-hen (1) Joshi, Kazuhiko Suzuki & Ōki Hayashi (eds), 102–135. Tōkyō: Meiji Shoin.Google Scholar
1997Nihongo Bunpō Kenkyū Josetsu (Preliminaries to the Study of Japanese Grammar). Tōkyō: Kuroshio.Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank Robert
1995Negation and the modals of possibility and necessity. In Modality in Grammar and Discourse [Typological Studies in Language 32], Joan L. Bybee & Suzanne Fleischman (eds), 453–471. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rickmeyer, Jens
1994Ein taxonomisch-dependentielles Modell für eine deskriptive Grammatik der japanischen Sprache. Bochumer Jahrbuch zur Ostasienforschung 18: 249–258.Google Scholar
1995Japanische Morphosyntax. Heidelberg: Julius Groos.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masatoshi
2006On the conceptual framework for voice phenomena. Linguistics 44(2): 217–269. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shirakawa, Hiroyuki, et al.
2001Chūjōkyū o oshieru hito no tame no nihongo bunpō handobukku (Handbook for Teachers of Intermediate and Advanced Japanese). Tōkyō: Surii Ee Nettowaaku.Google Scholar
Takanashi, Shino
2004Hyōka no modariti keishiki no Ta-kei ni tsuite – beki-datta, nakute-wa ikenakatta, zaru-o enakatta (The Ta-form of valuative modality - beki-datta, nakute-wa ikenakatta, zaru-o enakatta ). Nihongo Bunpō 4(1): 38–54.Google Scholar
2006Hyōka no modariti to kibō hyōgen – Ta-kei no seishitsu o chūshin ni (Valuative modality and expression of desires – the Ta-form in focus). In Nihongo Bunpō no Shinchihei, Takashi Masuoka, Hisashi Noda & Takurō Moriyama (eds), 77–97. Tōkyō: Kuroshio Shuppan.Google Scholar
Teramura, Hideo
1979Muudo no keishiki to hitei (Mood forms and negation). In Eigo to Nihongo to. Hayashi Eiichi kyōju kanreki kinen ronbunshū, Hayashi Eiichi Kyōju Kanreki Kinen Ronbunshū Kankō Iinkai (eds), 191–222. Tōkyō: Kuroshio.Google Scholar
Van Valin Jr., Robert D. & LaPolla, Randy J.
1997Syntax: Structure, Meaning, and Function. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Narrog, Heiko
2020.  In Re-Assessing Modalising Expressions [Studies in Language Companion Series, 216],  pp. 173 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.