Chapter published in:
The Perfect Volume: Papers on the perfect
Edited by Kristin Melum Eide and Marc Fryd
[Studies in Language Companion Series 217] 2021
► pp. 291318
References
Arkiv for Dansk Litteratur
. Det Danske Sprog- og Litteraturselskab og Det Kongelige Bibliotek. www​.adl​.dk> (2 November 2020).
Alexiadou, Artemis & Anagnostopoulou, Elena
2008Structuring participles. In Proceedings of the 26th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Charles B. Chang & Hannah J. Haynie (eds), 33–41. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Barbiers Sjef, Brandner, Ellen, Koeneman, Olaf, Lekakou, Marika, Poletto, Cecilia, Salzmann, Martin & Schaden, Gerhard
2010Mesocomparative syntax of perfect doubling. Presented at 4th European Dialect Syntax Meeting Donostia, 21–23 June.
Bentley, Delia & Eythórsson, Thórhallur
2003Auxiliary selection and the semantics of unaccusativity. Lingua 114: 447–471. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bjerrum, Anders
1931–1932Nogle Sprogprøver fra Fjolde. Danske Folkemaal V: 113–127.Google Scholar
Bowers, John
1993The syntax of predication. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 591–656.Google Scholar
Broekhuis, Hans
2021The rise of the periphrastic perfect tense in the continental West Germanic languages. In The Perfect Volume: Papers on the Perfect [Studies in Language Companion Series 217], Kristin Melum Eide & Marc Fryd (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (This volume) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Buchwald-Wargenau, Isabel
2012Die doppelten Perfektbildungen im Deutschen: Eine diachrone Untersuchung. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coussé, Evie
2014Lexical expansion in the have and be perfect in Dutch. A constructional prototype account. Diachronica 31(2): 159–191. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Den Danske Ordbog
. http://​ordnet​.dk​/ddo> (2 November 2020).
Dentler, Sigrid
1997Zur Perfekterneuerung im Mittelhochdeutschen. Die Erweiterung des Zeitreferentiellen Funktionsbereichs von Perfektfügungen. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Google Scholar
Diderichsen, Paul
1944Perfektparticipium – Supinum – Verbaladjektiv i Dansk og Svensk. In Festskrift till Jöran Sahlgren, K. G. Ljunggren (ed.), 263–283. Lund: University of Lund.Google Scholar
Dieninghoff, Joseph
1904Die Umschreibungen aktiver Vergangenheit mit dem Participium Praeteriti im Althochdeutschen. PhD dissertation, University of Bonn.
Eide, Kristin Melum & Åfarli, Tor Anders
1999The syntactic disguises of the predication operator. Studia Linguistica 53:155–181. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Elsness, Johan
1997The Perfect and the Preterite in Contemporary and Earlier English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Faarlund, Jan Terje, Lie, Svein & Vannebo, Kjell Ivar
1997Norsk referansegrammatikk. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Falk, Cecilia
2002Modalt perfekt i Olaus Petris. En Swensk Cröneka. In Svenska språkets historia i Östersjöområdet, Svante Lagman, Stig Örjan Ohlsson & Viivika Voodla (eds), 167–178 Tartu: University of Tartu.Google Scholar
Gillmann, Melitta
2015Auxiliary selection in closely related languages: The case of German and Dutch. In Auxiliary Selection: Gradience and Gradualness, Rolf Kailuweit & Malte Rosemeyer (eds), 333–358. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016 Perfektkonstruktionen mit Haben und Sein. Eine Korpusuntersuchung im Althochdeutchen, Altsächsischen und Neuhochdeutchen. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grønvik, Ottar
1986Über den Ursprung und die Entwicklung der aktiven Perfekt- und Plusquamperfektkonstruktionen des Hochdeutschen und ihre Eigenart innerhalb des germanischen Sprachraumes. Oslo: Solum Forlag.Google Scholar
Hansen, Erik & Heltoft, Lars
2011Grammatik over det Danske Sprog. København: Dansk Sprog- og Litteraturselskab.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi
2002Possession and the double object construction. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 2: 29–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heinat, Fredrik
2021The Swedish perfect and periphrasis. In The Perfect Volume: Papers on the Perfect [Studies in Language Companion Series 217], Kristin Melum Eide & Marc Fryd (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (This volume) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Iatridou, Sabine, Anagnostopoulou, Elena & Izvorski, Roumyana
2001Observations about the form and meaning of the perfect. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, Michael J. Kenstowicz (ed.), 189–238. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Izvorski, Roumyana
1997The present perfect as an epistemic modal. In Proceedings of SALT VII, Aaron Lawson (ed.), 222–239. Ithaca NY: CLC Publications. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johannessen, Janne Bondi, Priestley, Joel, Hagen, Kristin, Åfarli, Tor A. & Vangsnes, Øystein A.
2009The Nordic Dialect Corpus – An Advanced Research Tool. NEALT Proceedings Series 4: 73–80.Google Scholar
Johannisson, Ture
1945Hava och vara som tempusbildande hjälpverb i de nordiska språken. Lund: Gleerups.Google Scholar
Julien, Marit
2001The syntax of complex tenses. The Linguistic Review 18:125–167. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard
1989Facets of Romance past participle agreement. In Dialect Variation on the Theory of Grammar, Paola Benincà (ed.), 85–104. Dordrecht: Foris. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard S.
1993Toward a modular theory of auxiliary selection. Studia Linguistica 47: 3–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kern, Johan H.
1912De met het participium praeteriti omschcreven werkwoordsvormen in ’t Nederlands. Amsterdam: Johannes Müller.Google Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang
1992The present perfect puzzle. Lanugage 68: 525–552. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koeneman, Olaf, Lekakou, Marika & Barbiers, Sjef
2011Perfect doubling. Linguistic Variation 11: 35–75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika
2000Building statives. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Lisa J. Conathan, Jeff Good, Darya Karitskaya, Alyssa B. Wulf & Alan C. L. Yu (eds), 385–399. Berkeley CA: BLS. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuroda, Susumu
1999Die historische Entwicklung der Perfektkonstruktionen im Deutschen. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Laanemets, Anu
2017The choice of perfect auxiliary in contemporary Danish. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia. 49(2): 232–254. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Larsson, Ida
2009Participles in Time. The Development of the Perfect Tense in Swedish. Gothenburg: Gothenburg University.Google Scholar
2012On the development of the perfect (participle). In Historical Linguistics 2009: Selected papers from the 19th International Conference of Historical Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 320], Ans M. C. van Kemenade & Nynke de Haas (eds), 191–290. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015The have/be alternation in Scandinavian. Perfects, resultatives and unaccusative structure. In Auxiliary Selection: Gradience and Gradualness, Rolf Kailuweit & Malte Rosemeyer (eds). Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Larsson, Ida & Brandner, Ellen
To appear. Tense recursion, perfect doubling and the grammaticalization of auxiliaries. In Functional Heads across Time: Syntactic Reanalysis and Change, Barbara Egedi & Veronika Hegedűs eds Oxford OUP
Litvino, Litvino P. & Radcenko, Vladimir
1998Doppelte Perfektbildungen in der deutschen Literatursprache. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P.
(ed.) 1988Typology of Resultative Constructions [Typological Studies in Language 12]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McCoard, Robert W.
1978The English Perfect: Tense-Choice and Pragmatic Inferences. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
McFadden, Thomas
2007Auxiliary selection. Language and Linguistics Compass 1: 674–708. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McFadden, Thomas & Alexiadou, Artemis
2006Pieces of the be perfect in German and Older English. In Proceedings of the 25th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Donald Baumer, David Montero, & Michael Scanlon (eds), 270–278. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
2010Perfects, resultatives, and auxiliaries in earlier English. Linguistic Inquiry 41(3): 389–425. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
The Nordic Dialect Corpus
Oubouzar, Erika
1974Über die Ausbildung der zusammengesetzten Verbformen im deutschen Verbalsystem. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 95: 5–96.Google Scholar
Pancheva, Roumyana
2003The aspectual makeup of Perfect participles and the interpretations of the Perfect. In Perfect Explorations, Artemis Alexiadou, Monika Rathert & Arnim von Stechow (eds), 277–308. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pancheva, Roumyana & von Stechow, Arnim
2004On the present perfect puzzle. In Proceedings of NELS 34, Keir Moulton & Matthew Wolf (eds), Charleston NC: BookSurge Publishing.Google Scholar
Paul, Hermann
1902Die Umschreibung des Perfektums im Deutschen mit haben und sein. München: Verlag der k. Akademie.Google Scholar
Ritz, Marie-Eve
2010The perfect crime: A study of illicit adverbial combinations with the present perfect in Australian police media releases. Journal of Pragmatics 42(12): 3400–3417. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rosemeyer, Malte
2014Auxiliary Selection in Spanish: Gradience, Gradualness, and Conservation [Studies in Language Companion Series 155]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, Björn
2008The Perfect Time Span. On the Present Perfect in German, Swedish and English [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 125]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sapp, Christopher D.
2009Syncope as the cause of Präteritumschwund: New data from an early new High German corpus. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 21: 419–450. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shannon, Thomas F.
1995Toward a cognitive explanation of perfect auxiliary variation: some modal and aspectual effects in the history of Germanic. American Journal of Germanic Linguistics & Literatures 7(2): 129–163. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sorace, Antonella
2000Gradients in auxiliary selection with intransitive verbs. Language 76: 859–890. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali
2012Variationist Sociolinguistics: Change, Observation, Interpretation. Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Thestrup, Merle
2000Min kusine har haft hest – hun har også kommet af med den igen! – Om hjælpeverbet ‘at have’ som aspektuel mulighed i mundtlig diskurs. Nydanske Sprogstudier 26–27: 101–129. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weijnen, Anthonius A.
1971Schets van de geschiedenis van de Nederlandse syntaxis. Assen: Van Gorcum & Comp.Google Scholar