Part of
The Perfect Volume: Papers on the perfect
Edited by Kristin Melum Eide and Marc Fryd
[Studies in Language Companion Series 217] 2021
► pp. 343364
Ackerman, Farrell, & Webelhuth, Gert
1998A theory of predicates. Stanford, CA.: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Andersson, Anders-Börje, & Dahl, Östen
1974Against the penthouse principle. Linguistic Inquiry 5:451–453.Google Scholar
Andréasson, Maia, Karlsson, Susanna, Magnusson, Erik, & Tingsell, Sofia
2004 Har/hade- bortfall. Hur finit är ett naket supinum? In Svenskans beskrivning 26, ed. Björn Melander. Hallgren & Fallgren.Google Scholar
Binnick, Robert I.
1991Time and the verb: A guide to tense and aspect. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bonami, Olivier, & Samvelian, Pollet
2015The diversity of inflectional periphrasis in Persian. Journal of Linguistics 51:327–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Börjars, Kersti, Engdahl, Elisabet, & Andréasson, Maia
2003Subject and object positions in Swedish. In Proceedings of the LFG03, ed. Miriam Butt and Tracy Holloway King, 43–58. Stanford, Ca: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan
1982The passive in lexical theory. In The mental representation of grammatical relations, ed. Joan Bresnan, 3–86. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2001Lexical-functional syntax. Blackwell Textbooks in Linguistics 16. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan, Asudeh, Ash, Toivonen, Ida, & Wechsler, Stephen
2015Lexical-functional syntax, 2nd edition. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chumakina, Marina, & Corbett, Greville G.
2013Periphrasis: the role of syntax and morphology in paradigms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1976Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen
1985Tense and aspect systems. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dalrymple, Mary
2001Lexical Functional Grammar. San Diego, CA.: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015aMorphology in the LFG architecture. In Proceedings of lfg15, ed. Miriam Butt and Tracy Holloway King, 64–83. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
2015bPeriphrasis and morphology in LFG. Handout, Workshop on Morphology, Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar
Falk, Yehuda
2003The English auxiliary system revisited. In Proceedings of LFG03, ed. Miriam Butt and Tracy Holloway King, 184–204. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Falk, Yehuda N.
2001Lexical-functional grammar: An introduction to parallel constraint-based syntax. Stanford, CA.: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Gibson, Edward, & Fedorenko, Evelina
2013The need for quantitative methods in syntax and semantics research. Language and Cognitive Processes 28:88–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Häussler, Jana, & Juzek, Tom
2017Hot topics surrounding acceptability judgement tasks. In Proceedings of linguistic evidence 2016 – empirical, theoretical, and computational perspectives, ed. Sam Featherston, Robin Hörnig, Reinhild Steinberg, Birgit Umbreit, and Jennifer Wallis, 1–21. [URL].: University of Tübingen, online publication system.
Hedlund, Cecilia
1992On Participles. Doctoral Dissertation, Stockholm University, Stockholm.
Heinat, Fredrik
2017The syntax and morphology of the periphrastic perfect in Swedish. ms.Google Scholar
Holm, Gösta
1951Om utelämnandet av hjälpverbet hava i bisats [on the omission of the auxiliary verb hava in subordinate clauses]. Nysvenska studier 30:87–93.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders
1986Word order and syntactic features in the Scandinavian languages and English. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Stockholm.
Holmberg, Anders, & Platzack, Christer
1995The role of inflection in Scandinavian syntax. Oxford studies in comparative syntax. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Iatridou, Sabine, Anagnostopoulou, Elena, & Izvorski, Roumyana
2001Observations about the form and meaning of the perfect. In Ken Hale: A life in language, ed. Michael Kenstowicz and Ken Hale, 189–238. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Julien, Marit
2002Optional ha in Swedish and Norwegian. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 5:67–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klingvall, Eva
2013 and its passive complement. In Non-canonical passives, 297–314. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larsson, Ida
2009Participles in time. The development of the perfect tense in Swedish. Doctoral dissertation, Göteborgs Universitet, Göteborg.
McCawley, James D.
1971Tense and time reference in English. In Studies in linguistic semantics, ed. Charles Fillmore and D. T. Langendoen, 96–113. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Nikolaeva, Irina
2013Unpacking finiteness. In Canonical morphology and syntax, ed. Dunstan Brown, Marina Chumakina, and Greville G. Corbett, 99–122. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Platzack, Christer
1986COMP, INFL and Germanic word order. In Topics in Scandinavian syntax, ed. L. Hellan and K. K. Christensen, 185–234. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sadler, Louisa, & Spencer, Andrew
2001Syntax as an exponent of morphological features. In Yearbook of morphology 2000, ed. Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle, 71–96. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sells, Peter
2005Morphological and constructional expression and recoverability of verbal features. In Morphology and the web of grammar, ed. C. Orhan Orgun and Peter Sells, 197–224. Stanford, CA.: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
2007Finiteness in non-transformational syntactic frameworks. In Finiteness: Theoretical and empirical foundations, ed. Irina Nikolaeva, 59–88. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Spencer, Andrew
2001The paradigm-based model of morphosyntax. Transactions of the Philological Society 99:279–313. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013Lexical relatedness. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stump, Gregory
2001Inflectional morphology: A theory of paradigm structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taraldsen, Knut Tarald
1984Some phrase strucure dependent differences between Swedish and Norwegian. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 9.Google Scholar
Teleman, Ulf, Hellberg, Staffan, & Andersson, Erik
1999Svenska akademiens grammatik. Stockholm: Norstedts Ordbok.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Larsson, Ida

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.