Chapter 14
The Swedish perfect and periphrasis
This paper investigates the apparent
near-optionality of the perfect auxiliary ha
(‘have’) in Swedish. Restrictions on the near-optionality of
ha-omission are typically recognized in the
previous literature as lexical or structural. The paper scrutinizes
the viability of these restrictions by means of corpus data. Most of
these restrictions are shown not to hold. Instead, the paper defends
the view that the optionality of the perfect auxiliary
ha in Swedish is linked to whether the clause
it occurs in requires a finite feature or not, and whether
ha is the only element that can supply a value
for this feature. The phenomenon of ha-omission is
accounted for in the syntactic frame work LFG. It is shown that
ha can only be omitted if another element in
the clause can provide a value for the finite feature.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Lexical restrictions
- 3.Structural restrictions
- 3.1Raising constructions
- 3.2ECM
- 4.The corpus study
- 4.1Material
- 4.2Method
- 4.3Results and discussion
- 4.3.1Lexical restrictions
- 4.3.2Structural restrictions
- 5.A lexical approach to ha-omission
- 6.Conclusion
-
Abbreviations
-
Acknowledgements
-
Notes
-
References
References
Ackerman, Farrell, & Webelhuth, Gert
1998 A theory of predicates. Stanford, CA.: CSLI Publications.
Andersson, Anders-Börje, & Dahl, Östen
1974 Against the penthouse principle.
Linguistic Inquiry 5:451–453.
Andréasson, Maia, Karlsson, Susanna, Magnusson, Erik, & Tingsell, Sofia
2004
Har/hade- bortfall. Hur finit är ett naket
supinum? In
Svenskans beskrivning 26, ed.
Björn Melander. Hallgren & Fallgren.
Binnick, Robert I.
1991 Time and the verb: A guide to tense and aspect. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bonami, Olivier, & Samvelian, Pollet
2015 The diversity of inflectional periphrasis in
Persian.
Journal of Linguistics 51:327–382.
Börjars, Kersti, Engdahl, Elisabet, & Andréasson, Maia
2003 Subject and object positions in
Swedish. In
Proceedings of the LFG03, ed.
Miriam Butt and
Tracy Holloway King, 43–58. Stanford, Ca: CSLI Publications.
Bresnan, Joan
1982 The passive in lexical theory. In
The mental representation of grammatical
relations, ed.
Joan Bresnan, 3–86. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.
Bresnan, Joan
2001 Lexical-functional syntax.
Blackwell Textbooks in Linguistics 16. Oxford: Blackwell.
Bresnan, Joan, Asudeh, Ash, Toivonen, Ida, & Wechsler, Stephen
2015 Lexical-functional syntax, 2nd edition. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
Chumakina, Marina, & Corbett, Greville G.
2013 Periphrasis: the role of syntax and morphology in
paradigms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Comrie, Bernard
1976 Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect
and related problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dahl, Östen
1985 Tense and aspect systems. Oxford: Blackwell.
Dalrymple, Mary
2001 Lexical Functional Grammar. San Diego, CA.: Academic Press.
Dalrymple, Mary
2015a Morphology in the LFG
architecture. In
Proceedings of lfg15, ed.
Miriam Butt and
Tracy Holloway King, 64–83. Stanford: CSLI.
Dalrymple, Mary
2015b Periphrasis and morphology in LFG. Handout, Workshop on Morphology, Tokyo, Japan.
Falk, Yehuda
2003 The English auxiliary system
revisited. In
Proceedings of LFG03, ed.
Miriam Butt and
Tracy Holloway King, 184–204. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Falk, Yehuda N.
2001 Lexical-functional grammar: An introduction to parallel
constraint-based syntax. Stanford, CA.: CSLI Publications.
Gibson, Edward, & Fedorenko, Evelina
2013 The need for quantitative methods in syntax and
semantics research.
Language and Cognitive Processes 28:88–124.
Häussler, Jana, & Juzek, Tom
2017 Hot topics surrounding acceptability judgement
tasks. In
Proceedings of linguistic evidence 2016 – empirical,
theoretical, and computational perspectives, ed.
Sam Featherston,
Robin Hörnig,
Reinhild Steinberg,
Birgit Umbreit, and
Jennifer Wallis, 1–21.
[URL].: University of Tübingen, online publication system.
Hedlund, Cecilia
1992 On Participles. Doctoral Dissertation, Stockholm University, Stockholm.
Heinat, Fredrik
2017 The syntax and morphology of the periphrastic
perfect in Swedish.
ms.
Holm, Gösta
1951 Om utelämnandet av hjälpverbet
hava i bisats [on the omission of the auxiliary verb
hava in subordinate clauses].
Nysvenska studier 30:87–93.
Holmberg, Anders
1986 Word order and syntactic features in the
Scandinavian languages and English. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Stockholm.
Holmberg, Anders, & Platzack, Christer
1995 The role of inflection in Scandinavian syntax. Oxford studies in comparative syntax. New York: Oxford University Press.
Iatridou, Sabine, Anagnostopoulou, Elena, & Izvorski, Roumyana
2001 Observations about the form and meaning of the
perfect. In
Ken Hale: A life in language, ed.
Michael Kenstowicz and
Ken Hale, 189–238. MIT Press.
Julien, Marit
2002 Optional ha in Swedish and
Norwegian.
The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 5:67–95.
Larsson, Ida
2009 Participles in time. The development of the
perfect tense in Swedish. Doctoral dissertation, Göteborgs Universitet, Göteborg.
McCawley, James D.
1971 Tense and time reference in
English. In
Studies in linguistic semantics, ed.
Charles Fillmore and
D. T. Langendoen, 96–113. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Nikolaeva, Irina
2013 Unpacking finiteness. In
Canonical morphology and syntax, ed.
Dunstan Brown,
Marina Chumakina, and
Greville G. Corbett, 99–122. Oxford University Press.
Platzack, Christer
1986 COMP, INFL and Germanic word
order. In
Topics in Scandinavian syntax, ed.
L. Hellan and
K. K. Christensen, 185–234. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Sadler, Louisa, & Spencer, Andrew
2001 Syntax as an exponent of morphological
features. In
Yearbook of morphology 2000, ed.
Geert Booij and
Jaap van Marle, 71–96. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Sells, Peter
2005 Morphological and constructional expression and
recoverability of verbal features. In
Morphology and the web of grammar, ed.
C. Orhan Orgun and
Peter Sells, 197–224. Stanford, CA.: CSLI Publications.
Sells, Peter
2007 Finiteness in non-transformational syntactic
frameworks. In
Finiteness: Theoretical and empirical
foundations, ed.
Irina Nikolaeva, 59–88. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Spencer, Andrew
2001 The paradigm-based model of
morphosyntax.
Transactions of the Philological Society 99:279–313.
Spencer, Andrew
2013 Lexical relatedness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stump, Gregory
2001 Inflectional morphology: A theory of paradigm
structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Taraldsen, Knut Tarald
1984 Some phrase strucure dependent differences
between Swedish and Norwegian.
Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 9.
Teleman, Ulf, Hellberg, Staffan, & Andersson, Erik
1999 Svenska akademiens grammatik. Stockholm: Norstedts Ordbok.
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.