Cover not available
Part of
The Perfect Volume: Papers on the perfect
Edited by Kristin Melum Eide and Marc Fryd
[Studies in Language Companion Series 217] 2021
► pp. 439–460

Chapter 17
Auxiliary reduction in secondary grammaticalization

Evidence from the Spanish periphrastic past

| University of Georgia

At the center of grammaticalization studies has been an effort to understand the interplay between form and function throughout the development of a construction. A recent analysis by Dehé & Stathi (2016) has made the case that desemanticization (semantic reduction) and erosion (phonetic reduction) occur in parallel and that different phonetic patterns can be associated with different degrees of grammaticalization. This paper approaches Dehé and Stathi’s proposal by means of the periphrastic past (PP) in Spanish, a form that shows considerable variation across dialects and has been shown to display various degrees of grammaticalization (Howe 2013). Focusing specifically on the PP’s use in sequenced past narratives in Peninsular Spanish, this analysis observes the behavior of the haber auxiliary and finds evidence for increased reduction/omission in these innovative narrative contexts. The patterns of reduction shown in this analysis are consistent with the claim made by Dehé and Stathi regarding the association of specific reductive processes with more advanced stages of grammaticalization. These data reveal a coevolution of form and meaning with the PP not yet discussed in the literature, one that has broader implications for the study of periphrastic past forms in Romance.

Keywords: Spanish, grammaticalization, present perfect, auxiliary reduction
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The development of the Spanish PP
    • 2.1Dialectal development in Spanish
    • 2.2The Spanish PP in secondary grammaticalization
  • 3.Morpho-phonological changes in the PP
  • 4.Auxiliary reduction in the Spanish PP
    • 4.1Neutralizing contexts for auxiliary reduction
    • 4.2Beyond phonetic contexts of reduction
  • 5.Auxiliary reduction in Spanish narratives
    • 5.1Evidence for auxiliary reduction
    • 5.2A preliminary proposal for form/function development
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Abbreviations
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 9 July 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.217.17how
References
Alonso, Amado & Henríquez Ureña, Pedro
1951 Gramática castellana. Segundo curso. Buenos Aires: Losada.Google Scholar
Amaral, Patrícia & Howe, Chad
2010 Detours along the perfect path. In Romance Linguistics 2009 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 315], Sonia Colina, Antxon Olarrea & Ana Maria Carvalho (eds), 387–404. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ansaldo, Umberto & Lim, Lisa
2002 Phonetic absence as syntactic prominence: Grammaticalization in isolating total languages. In Up and Down the Cline. The Nature of Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 59], Olga Fischer, Muriel Norde & Harry Perridon (eds), 345–362. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blas Arroyo, José Luís
2006 Hasta aquí hemos llega(d)o: ¿un caso de variación morfológica? factores estructurales y estilísticos en el español de una comunidad bilingüe. Southwest Journal of Linguistics 25: 39–73.Google Scholar
Butt, John & Benjamin, Carmen
2013 A New Reference Grammar of Modern Spanish, 5th edn. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L.
2002 Word frequency and context of use in the lexical diffusion of phonetically conditioned sound change. Language Variation and Change 14: 23–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 Usage-based theory and grammaticalization. In The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds), 69–78. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L., Perkins, Revere & Pagliuca, William
1991 Back to the future. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol.2 [Typological Studies in Language 19], Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 17–58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994 The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Camus Bergareche, Bruno
2008 El perfecto compuesto (y otros tiempos compuestos) en las lenguas románicas: formas y valores. In Tiempos compuestos y formas verbales complejas, Ángeles Carrasco Gutiérrez (ed), 54–86. Madrid/Frankfurt: Iberoamericana/Vervuert. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chamorro, Maria del Pilar
2012 Pluractionality and Aspectual Structure in the Galician Spanish Tener-Perfect. PhD dissertation, The Ohio State University.
Comrie, Bernard
1976 Aspect. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Copple, Mary T.
2011 Tracking the constraints on a grammaticalizing perfect(ive). Language Variation and Change 23(2): 163–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, Mark
2002 Corpus del Español: 100 million words, 1200s–1900s. [URL]> (3 November 2020).
Dehé, Nicole & Stathi, Katerina
2016 Grammaticalization and prosody: The case of English sort/kind/type of constructions. Language 92(4): 911–947. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drinka, Bridget
2017 Romance perfects, aorists, and the role of ‘aoristic drift’. In Aorists and Perfects: Synchronic and Diachronic Perspectives, Marc Fryd & Pierre-Don Giancarli (eds), 5–24. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fløgstad, Guro N.
2016 Preterit Expansion and Perfect Demise in Porteño Spanish and Beyond. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1991 The evolution of dependent clause morpho-syntax in Biblical Hebrew. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. 1 [Typological Studies in Language 19], Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 257–310. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gómez Molina, José Ramón & Gómez Devís, María Begoña
2008 Estudio sociolingüístico de la /d/ intervocálica en el español hablado de Valencia. In Actas del XV Congreso Internacional de la ALFAL. ALFAL, Montevideo, Uruguay.Google Scholar
Harre, Catherine
1991 Tener + Past Participle: A Case Study in Linguistic Description. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Harris, Martin
1982 The “past simple” and “present perfect” in Romance. In Studies in the Romance verb, Martin Harris & Nigel Vincent (eds), 42–70. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania
2002 World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Narrog, Heiko
2010 Grammaticalization in linguistic analysis. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds), 401–424. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Howe, Chad
2013 The Spanish Perfects: Pathways of Emergent Meaning. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 Reduction in secondary grammaticalization: Evidence from the Spanish periphrastic past. Paper presented at the Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages. Western University, London, Ontario.
2018 El pasado compuesto en el español peruano. Hacia una explicación unificada de su significado. In Roxana Risco (ed.), Estudios de variación y contacto lingüístico en el español peruano, 169–197. La Plata, Argentina: Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación.Google Scholar
Howe, Chad & Schwenter, Scott A.
2008 Variable constraints on past reference in dialects of Spanish. In Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Spanish Sociolinguistics, Maurice Westmoreland & Juan A. Thomas (eds), 100–108. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Hualde, José Ignacio, Nadeu, Marianna & Simonet, Miquel
2010 Lenition and phonemic constrast in Majorcan Catalan. In Romance Linguistics 2009 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 315], Sonia Colina, Antxon Olarrea & Ana Maria Carvalho (eds), 63–80. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
1995 Thoughts on Grammaticalization. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
López Morales, Huberto
1996 Rasgos generales. In Manual de dialectología hispánica. El español de América. Manuel Alvar (ed.), 19–27. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
Marcos Marín, Francisco
(ed.) 1992 COREC: Corpus de Referencia de la Lengua Española Contemporánea: Corpus Oral Peninsular. [URL]> (3 November 2020).
Ortega Llebaria, Marta
2004 Interplay between phonetic and inventory constraints in the degree of spirantization of voiced stops: Comparing intervocalic /b/ and intervocalic /g/ in Spanish and English. In Laboratory Approaches to Spanish Phonology, Timothy L. Face (ed.), 237–253. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ritz, Marie-Eve & Engel, Dulcie
2008 Vivid narrative use and the present perfect in spoken Australian English. Linguistics 46(1): 131–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ritz, Marie-Eve & Richard, Sophie
2021 The functions of the auxiliary ‘have’ in Australian English vivid narratives. In The Perfect Volume: Papers on the Perfect. [Studies in Language Companion Series 217], Kristin Melum Eide & Marc Fryd (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (This volume) DOIGoogle Scholar
Roca Pons, José
1958 Estudios sobre perífrasis verbales del español. Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas.Google Scholar
Rodríguez Louro, Celeste
2013 La referencia indefinida y la expresión de pasado en el español rioplatense argentino. En Perspectivas teóricas y experimentales sobre el español de la Argentina, Laura Colantoni & Celeste Rodríguez Louro (eds), 283–297. Madrid/Frankfurt: Iberoamericana/Vervuert. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwenter, Scott A.
1994 The grammaticalization of an anterior in progress: Evidence from a Peninsular dialect. Studies in Language 18(1): 71–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwenter, Schwenter A. & Torres Cacoullos, Rena
2008 Defaults and indeterminacy in temporal grammaticalization: The ‘perfect’ road to perfective. Language Variation and Change 20(1): 1–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Serrano, María José
1995 Sobre el uso del pretérito perfecto y pretérito indefinido en el español de Canarias: Pragmática y variación. Boletín de Filología 35: 533–566.Google Scholar
Squartini, Mario & Bertinetto, Pier Marco
2000 The simple and compound past in Romance languages. In Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe, Östen Dahl (ed.), 403–439. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar