Chapter published in:
Lost in Change: Causes and processes in the loss of grammatical elements and constructions
Edited by Svenja Kranich and Tine Breban
[Studies in Language Companion Series 218] 2021
► pp. 261290
Aarts, Bas, Wallis, Sean & Bowie, Jill
2015Profiling the English verb phrase over time: Modal patterns. In Developments in English. Expanding Electronic Evidence, Irma Taavitsainen, Merja Kytö, Claudia Claridge & Jeremy Smith (eds), 48–76. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas
2004Modal use across register and time. In Studies in the History of the English Language II, Anne Curzan & Kimberly Emmons (eds), 189–216. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bowie, Jill, Wallis, Sean & Aarts, Bas
2013Contemporary change in modal usage in spoken British English: Mapping the impact of ‘genre’. In English Modality. Core, Periphery and Evidentiality, Juana I. Marín-Arrese, Marta Carretero, Jorge Arús Hita & Johan van der Auwera (eds), 57–94. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Caliendo, Giuditta
2004Modality and communicative interaction in EU law. In Intercultural Discourse in Domain-specific English, Christopher Candlin & Maurizio Gotti (eds), 241–259. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Cappelle, Bert & Depraetere, Ilse
2016Short-circuited interpretations of modal verb constructions: Some evidence from The Simpsons. In Modal Meaning in Construction Grammar, Bert Cappelle & Ilse Depraetere (eds). Special issue of Constructions and Frames 8 (1): 7–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coates, Jennifer
1983The Semantics of the Modal Auxiliaries. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Collins, Peter
2009aModals and Quasi-modals in English. Amsterdam: Rodopi. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009bModals and quasi-modals in world Englishes. World Englishes 28 (3): 281–292. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Daugs, Robert
2017On the development of modals and semi-modals in American English in the 19th and 20th centuries. In Big and Rich Data in English Corpus Linguistics. Methods and Explorations [Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English 19], Turo Hiltunen, Joe McVeigh & Tanja Säily (eds). Helsinki: VARIENG. <http://​www​.helsinki​.fi​/varieng​/series​/volumes​/19​/daugs/> (19 February 2020).Google Scholar
Davies, Mark
2007TIME Magazine Corpus (100 million words, 1920s-2000s). <http://​corpus​.byu​.edu​/time> (10 November 2015).
2010The Corpus of Historical American English (400 million words,1810–2009). <http://​corpus​.byu​.edu​/coha/> (10 November 2019).
2012Expanding horizons in historical linguistics with the 400-million word Corpus of Historical American English. Corpora 7 (2): 121–157. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Declerck, Renaat
2009‘Not-yet-factual at time t’: A neglected modal concept. In Modality in English. Theory and Description, Raphael Salkie, Pierre Busuttil & Johan van der Auwera (eds), 31–54. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Depraetere, Ilse & Verhulst, An
2008Source of modality: A reassessment. English Language and Linguistics 12 (1): 1–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Döhler, Per N.
1984Semantik und Pragmatik der Modalität im Englischen. MA thesis, <http://​www​.triacom​.com​/archive​/semprag​.de​.html> (10 November 2019).
Fairclough, Norman
1992Introduction. In Critical Language Awareness, Norman Fairclough (ed.), 1–29. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Farrelly, Michael & Seoane, Elena
2012Democratization. In The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth Closs Traugott (eds), 392–401. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E
1995Constructions. A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2006Constructions at Work. The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Hilpert, Martin
2013Constructional Change in English. Developments in Allomorphy, Word Formation, and Syntax. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016Change in modal meanings: Another look at the shifting collocates of may. In Modal Meaning in Construction Grammar, Bert Cappelle & Ilse Depraetere (eds), Special issue of Constructions and Frames 8 (1): 66–85. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken
1998Boosting, hedging, and the negotiation of academic knowledge. Text 18 (3): 349–382. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johansson, Stig
2013Modals and semi-modals of obligation in American English: Some aspects of developments from 1990 until the present day. In The Verb Phrase in English. Investigating Recent Language Change with Recent Corpora, Bas Aarts, Joanna Close, Geoffrey Leech & Sean Wallis (eds), 372–380. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kranich, Svenja
2010Evidentielle Ausdrücke als Übersetzungen epistemischer Ausdrücke: Eine Korpusanalyse populärwissenschaftlicher Übersetzungen aus dem Englischen. Talk presented at the workshop Modalität und Evidentialität, University of Hannover, Germany, 31 May-2 June.Google Scholar
2016Contrastive Pragmatics and Translation. Evaluation, Epistemic Modality and Communicative Styles in English and German [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 261]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref
Kranich, Svenja & Gast, Volker
2015Explicitness of epistemic modal marking: Recent changes in British and American English. In Thinking Modally. English and Contrastive Studies on Modality, Juan Rafael Zamorano-Mansilla, Carmen Maíz, Elena Domínguez & M. Victoria Martín de la Rosa (eds), 3–22. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Kranich, Svenja & Neuhäuser, Wera
2017Some effects of democraticization on the performance of face-threatening acts in expert-layman communication. Talk presented at the 15th International Pragmatics Conference (IPrA), Ulster University, Belfast, Northern Ireland, 16–21July. <https://​www​.lets​.uni​-bonn​.de​/uploads​/research​/presentations​/kranich​-neuhaeuser​-2017> (19 February 2020).Google Scholar
Kranich, Svenja & Scholz, Anna-Katharina
2020‘What we may conclude without fear of contradiction’ - The demise of a hedging construction in 20th century English. Unpublished working paper, LETS, University of Bonn.Google Scholar
Kranich, Svenja, Bruns, Hanna & Hampel, Elisabeth
2021Requests across varieties and cultures: Norms are changing (but not everywhere in the same way). Anglistik, 32(1 Special Issue Focus on English Linguistics: Varieties Meet Histories (Daniela Kolbe-Hannah & Ilse Wischer, eds): 91–114.Google Scholar
Kranich, Svenja, Hampel, Elisabeth & Bruns, Hanna
2020Changes in the modal domain in different varieties of English as potential effects of democratization. Language Sciences 79: 1–15. Crossref
Krug, Manfred G
2000Emerging Modals. A Corpus-based Study of Grammaticalization. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Larreya, Paul & Rivière, Claude
2014Grammaire Expliciative de l’Anglais, 4th edn. London: Pearson.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey
2003Modality on the move: The English modal auxiliaries 1961–1992. In Modality in Contemporary English, Roberta Facchinetti, Manfred Krug & Frank Palmer (eds), 223–240. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011The modals ARE declining: Reply to Neil Millar's “Modal verbs in TIME: Frequency changes 1923–2006”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14:2 (2009), 191–220. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 16 (4): 547–564.Google Scholar
2013Where have all the modals gone? An essay on the declining frequency of core modal auxiliaries in recent standard English. In English Modality. Core, Periphery and Evidentiality, Juana I. Marín-Arrese, Marta Carretero, Jorge Arús Hita & Johan van der Auwera (eds), 95–115. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. Crossref
Leech, Geoffrey & Smith, Nicholas
2006Recent grammatical change in written English 1961–1992: Some preliminary findings of a comparison of American with British English. In The Changing Face of Corpus Linguistics, Antoinette Renouf & Andrew Kehoe (eds), 186–204. Amsterdam: Rodopi. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, Hundt, Marianne, Mair, Christian & Smith, Nicholas
2009Change in Contemporary English. A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mair, Christian
2006Twentieth Century English. History, Variation and Standardization. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015Cross-variety diachronic drifts and ephemeral regional contrasts: An analysis of modality in the extended Brown family of corpora and what it can tell us about the New Englishes. In Grammatical Change in English World-Wide [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 67], Peter Collins (ed.), 119–146. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mair, Christian & Leech, Geoffrey
2006Current change in English syntax. In The Handbook of English Linguistics, Bas Aarts & April McMahon (eds), 318–342. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Markkanen, Raija & Schröder, Hartmut
1997Hedging: A challenge for pragmatics and discourse analysis. In Hedging and Discourse. Approaches to the Analysis of a Pragmatic Phenomenon in Academic Texts, Raija Markkanen & Hartmut Schröder (eds), 3–18. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martin, James R
1997Analysing genre: Functional parameters. In Genre and Institutions. Social Processes in the Workplace and School, Frances Christie & James R. Martin (eds), 3–39. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Millar, Neil
2009Modal verbs in TIME: Frequency changes 1923–2006. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14 (2): 191–220. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mortelmans, Tanja
2010Falsche Freunde: Warum sich die Modalverben must, müssen und moeten nicht entsprechen. In Modalität / Temporalität in kontrastiver und typologischer Sicht, Andrzej Kątny & Anna Socka (eds), 133–148. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Myhill, John
1995Change and continuity in the functions of the American English modals. Linguistics 33 (2): 157–211. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nuyts, Jan
2005The modal confusion: On terminology and the concepts behind it. In Modality. Studies in Form and Function, Alex Klinger & Henrik Høeg Müller (eds), 5–38. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank R
2001Mood and Modality, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Nicholas
2003Changes in the modals and semi-modals of strong obligation and epistemic necessity in recent British English. In Modality in Contemporary English, Roberta Facchinetti, Manfred Krug & Frank Palmer (eds), 241–266. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Geoff & Thetela, Puleng
1995The sound of one hand clapping: The management of interaction in written discourse. Text 15: 103–127. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trousdale, Graeme
2008Constructions in grammaticalization and lexicalization: Evidence from the history of a composite predicate construction in English. In Constructional Approaches to English Grammar, Graeme Trousdale & Nikolas Gisborne (eds), 33–67. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan, Schalley, Ewa & Nuyts, Jan
2005Epistemic possibility in a Slavonic parallel corpus: A pilot study. In Modality in Slavonic Languages. New perspectives, Petr Karlík & Björn Hansen (eds), 201–217. München: Sagner.Google Scholar
Wärnsby, Anna
2009On controllability as a contextual variable. In Studies on English Modality. In Honour of Frank Palmer, Anastasios Tsangalidis & Roberta Facchinetti (eds), 69–97. Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2016On the adequacy of constructionist approach to modality. In Modal Meaning in Construction Grammar, Bert Cappelle & Ilse Depraetere (eds), Special issue of Constructions and Frames 8 (1): 40–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Westney, Paul
1995Modals and Periphrastics in English. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar