Chapter 3
On divergent paths and functions of ‘background’-based discourse
markers in Korean
This paper analyzes two polyfunctional discourse
markers (DMs) in Korean, kulssey and
kuntey, which share lexical and grammatical
sources, with the meaning of ‘at the time’ for
kulssey and ‘at the place’ for
kuntey. They denote the background of an
action/event (‘in such circumstances’), which is their primary
meaning when used as connective adverbs. Despite these source
commonalities, when they developed into DMs, their functional
differences are pronounced, only with a few shared functions. They
show a certain degree of positional preferences by function, but at
a more comprehensive level, left- and right-periphery do not show
rigid functional dichotomy with respect to subjectification and
intersubjectification, often hypothesized in the literature.
Instead, the role of prosody is more crucial.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The development of kulssey and
kuntey
- 3.Multiple DM functions of kulssey and
kuntey
- 3.1Kulssey
- 3.1.1Uncertainty (“Well, I’m not sure”)
- 3.1.2Pause-filling (“Well, let’s see”)
- 3.1.3Reluctance/Hesitance (“Well, I need time to reveal my
stance”)
- 3.1.4(Feigned) surprise (“Guess what happened!; Why on
earth”)
- 3.1.5Discontent (“I cannot understand; I’m not happy”)
- 3.1.6Protest (“What are you doing?”)
- 3.1.7Emphatic reassertion (“I’m telling you!; For
sure!”)
- 3.1.8Disregard for Emphasis (“No matter what!;
Whatever!”)
- 3.1.9Agreement (“You’re right!”)
- 3.2Kuntey
- 3.2.1Topic presentation (“So”)
- 3.2.2Topic shift (“By the way”)
- 3.2.3Elaboration request (“So?; Then what?”)
- 3.2.4Preface to dispreferred information (“Well..
but”)
- 3.2.5(Feigned) Surprise (“Guess what happened!; Why on
earth”)
- 3.2.6Discontent (“I don’t understand!”)
- 3.2.7Protest (“What are you doing?”)
- 4.Functional determinants
- 4.1Functions compared
- 4.2Syntagmatic independence
- 4.3Semantic persistence and periphery
- 4.4Prosody
- 4.5Pragmatic inference and functional network
- 5.Summary and conclusion
-
Acknowledgements
-
Notes
-
Abbreviations
-
References
References
Beeching, Kate & Detges, Ulrich
(eds) 2014 Functions at the Left and Right Periphery:
Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language
Change. Leiden: Brill.
Brinton, Laurel J.
1996 Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and
Discourse Functions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Bybee, Joan L., Perkins, Revere D. & Pagliuca, William
1994 The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in
the Languages of the World. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
Choi, Boyun Jane
2007 A Corpus-based Discourse Analysis of Korean
Discourse Markers: An Analysis of Spoken and Written
Use. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
Chung, Jaeyoung
1996 A Study on the Grammaticalization of dA Syntagma in
Middle Korean. Seoul: Kwukehakhoy.
Fischer, Kerstin
2006 Toward an understanding of the spectrum of
approaches to discourse particles: Introduction to the
volume. In
Approaches to Discourse Particles,
Kerstin Fischer (ed.), 1–20. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Hancil, Sylvie & Hirst, Daniel
Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard
1997
Alors and donc in spoken
French: A reanalysis.
Journal of Pragmatics 28(2): 153–187.
Haspelmath, Martin
2011 The gradual coalescence into ‘words’ in
grammaticalization. In
The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization,
Heiko Narrog &
Bernd Heine (eds), 342–355. Oxford: OUP.
Heine, Bernd
2013 On discourse markers: Grammaticalization,
pragmaticalization, or something else? Linguistics 51(6): 1205–1247.
Heine, Bernd, Claudi, Ulrike & Hünnemeyer, Friederike
1991 Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Heine, Bernd, Kaltenböck, Gunther, Kuteva, Tania & Long, Haiping
Forthcoming. On the rise of discourse markers.
Hopper, Paul J.
1991 On some principles of
grammaticalization. In
Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. 1 [
Typological Studies in Language 19],
Elizabeth Closs Traugott &
Bernd Heine (eds), 17–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hopper, Paul J. & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2003 [1993] Grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP.
Jeon, Young-ok & Nam, Killim
2005 Kwuewa mwuneuy cepsok phyohyen
pikyo yenkwu: “kulentey, -nuntey”-lul
cwungsimulo (A comparative study of conjunctions
in spoken and written Korean: Focusing on
kulentey,
-nuntey
).
Korean Language Research 17: 169–194.
Jeong, Howan
2003 Hankwukeuy
Paltalkwa Uyconmyengsa (
The development of Korean and
dependent nouns). Seoul: Ihoymwunhawa.
Jucker, Andreas H.
1993 The discourse marker well: A
relevance-theoretical account.
Journal of Pragmatics 19(5): 435–452.
Koo, Hyun Jung
2008 Grammaticalization of negation markers in
Korean.
Discourse and Cognition 15(3): 1–27.
Koo, Hyun Jung
2018 Hankwuke tamhwaphyoci yenkwuuy
tonghyangkwa cenmang (Research tends and prospect of Korean
discourse markers). In
Hankwuke Yenkwuuy Saylowun Hulum (
New Research Trends of
Korean),
Yong-Kwon Shin (ed.), 221–255. Seoul: Pakijong Publishing.
Koo, Hyun Jung & Rhee, Seongha
2013 “I will do it… but I’m asking you to do it”: On
the emergence of polite imperative from
promissive.
Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 97: 487–494.
Koo, Hyun Jung & Rhee, Seongha
2018 On the emergence of polyfunctionality of
discourse markers: The case of kulay ‘it is
so’ in Korean. Paper presented at the 36th AESLA Conference, University of
Cádiz, Spain, 19–21 April.
Koo, Hyun Jung & Rhee, Seongha
2019 From self-talk to grammar: The emergence of
multiple paradigms from self-quoted questions in
Korean.
Lingue e Linguaggi 31: 255–278.
Lee, Won-pyo
1993 Discourse analysis of three ‘volitional
interjections,’ ‘yey,’ ‘kulssey,’ and ‘ani’ in
Korean.
Inmwunkwahak (Yonsei University) 69–70: 139–185.
Lehmann, Christian
2015 [1982] Thoughts on Grammaticalization. Berlin: Language Science Press.
Nam, Ki-Shim & Ko, Yong-Kun
1985 Phyocwun Kwukemwunpeplon [
Standard Korean
Grammar]. Seoul: Tower Press.
Rhee, Seongha
2015 On the emergence of Korean markers of
agreement.
Journal of Pragmatics 83: 10–26.
Rhee, Seongha
2017 Periphery and prosody as determinants of
discourse marker functions: A case in Korean. Invited lecture at the Meiji International Symposium 2017: New Directions in
Pragmatic Research: Synchronic and Diachronic Perspectives,
Meiji University, Nakano, Japan, 20 March.
Rhee, Seongha
2018 On multiple determinants of discourse marker
functions: Peripheral asymmetry revisited. Paper presented at the 20th International Congress of Linguists, Cape Town, South Africa, 2–6 July.
Rhee, Seongha & Koo, Hyun Jung
2020 From quotation to surprise: The case in
Korean.
Journal of Pragmatics 155: 83–100.
Ryu, Chang-Don
1962 Hesahwa kokwu [From content word to function
word].
Inmwunkwahak (
Yonsei University) 7: 1–25.
Song, Inseong & Rhee, Seongha
2017 On the role of prosody in the development of
discourse markers: The case of kulssey
. Paper presented at the 2017 Winter Conference of Korean Association of
Linguistic Science, Pusan National University, Busan, 14 February.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2014 On the function of the epistemic adverbs surely
and no doubt at the left and right peripheries of the
Clause. In
Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery:
Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language
Change,
Kate Beeching &
Ulrich Detges (eds), 72–91. Leiden: Brill.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & König, Ekkehard
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Dasher, Richard B.
2002 Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: CUP.
Wierzbicka, Anna
1976 Particles and linguistic
relativity.
International Review of Slavic Linguistics 1(2–3): 327–367.
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Rhee, Seongha
2023.
Intertwined grammaticalization, degrammaticalization, and pragmaticalization: The case of ppwun ‘share’ in Korean.
Lingua 291
► pp. 103559 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.