Cover not available
Part of
Studies at the Grammar-Discourse Interface: Discourse markers and discourse-related grammatical phenomena
Edited by Alexander Haselow and Sylvie Hancil
[Studies in Language Companion Series 219] 2021
► pp. 1–20

Grammar, discourse, and the grammar-discourse interface

| University of Münster
| University of Rouen
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Current issues in research on the grammar-discourse interface
    • 2.1Part I – Discourse markers: The interaction of grammar and discourse from a historical-developmental perspective
    • 2.2Part II – Discourse markers: The grammar-discourse interaction from a synchronic, usage-based perspective
    • 2.3Part III – Discourse-related grammatical phenomena
  • 3.Overview of the papers in this volume
  • 4.Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 3 June 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.219.int
References (73)
References
Aijmer, Karin. 2002. English Discourse Particles. Evidence from a Corpus [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 10]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alcázar, Asler. 2017. A syntactic analysis of rhetorical questions. In Proceedings of the 34th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Aaron Kaplan, Abby Kaplan, Miranda K. McCarvel & Edward J. Rubin (eds), 32–41. Somerville MA: Cascadilla.Google Scholar
Álvarez González, Albert. 2019. From discourse to syntax: The use of the discourse marker bwe in the creation of interclausal connectives in Yaqui. In Diverse Scenarios of Syntactic Complexity [Typological Studies in Language 126], Albert Álvarez González, Zarina Estrada-Fernández & Claudine Chamoreau (eds), 217–247. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ariel, Mira. 2008. Pragmatics and Grammar. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. Discourse, grammar, discourse. Discourse Studies 1(1):5–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beal, Joan, Burbano Elizondo, Lourdes & Llamas, Carmen. 2012. Urban North-Eastern English: Tyneside to Teeside. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
Beeching, Kate & Detges, Ulrich (eds). 2014. Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blakemore, Diane. 2002. Relevance and Linguistic Meaning: The Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boeckx, Cedric, Hornstein, Norbert & Nunes, Jairo. 2010. Control as Movement. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brandt, Patrick, Trawiński, Beata & Wollstein, Angelika. 2016. (Anti-)Control in German: Evidence from comparative, corpus- and psycholinguistic studies. In Co- and Subordination in German and other Languages, Ingo Reich & Augustin Speyer (eds), 77–98. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel. 2017. The Development of Pragmatic Markers in English: Pathways of Change. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Levinson, Stephen C. 1987. Politeness. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. 2006. From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language 82: 711–733. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth, Cornillie, Bert & Pietrandrea, Paola (eds). 2013. Discourse Markers and Modal Particles. Categorization and Description [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 234] Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth & Evers-Vermeul, Jacqueline. 2015. Grammaticalization or pragmaticalization of discourse markers? More than a terminological issue. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 16(1): 59–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dik, Simon C. 1997. The Theory of Functional Grammar, Part 2. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W. 1987. The discourse basis of ergativity. Language 63: 805–855. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003. Discourse and grammar. In The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure, Vol. 2, Michael Tomasello (ed.), 47–87. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Etxepare, Ricardo. 2010. Omen bariazioan. In Euskara eta euskarak: Aldakortasun sintaktikoa aztergai, Beatriz Fernández, Pablo Albizu & Ricardo Etxepare (eds). Vitoria-Gasteiz: University of the Basque Country.Google Scholar
Etxepare, Ricardo & Uria, Larraitz. 2016. Microsyntactic variation in the Basque hearsay evidential. In Microparameters in the Grammar of Basque [Language Faculty and Beyond 13], Beatriz Fernández & Jon Ortiz de Urbina (eds), 265–288. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Farkas, Donka F. 2017. Going beyond the prototypical: Special interrogatives and special declaratives. Paper presented at the Stanford Colloquium, 8 December 2017.
Fischer, Kerstin (ed.). 2006. Approaches to Discourse Particles. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Foolen, Ad. 2015. Expressives. In The Routledge Handbook of Semantics, Nick Riemer (ed.), 473–490. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce. 1999. What are discourse markers? Journal of Pragmatics 3(7): 931–952. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. The combining of discourse markers – A beginning. Journal of Pragmatics 86: 48–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garmendia, Joana. 2014. A pragmatic analysis of the Basque particle ote . In Cognitive and Pragmatic Aspects of Speech Actions, Iwona Witczak Plisiecka (ed.), 97–166. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Grodzinsky, Yosef. 2000. The neurology of syntax: Language use without Broca’s area. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23: 1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hancil, Sylvie, Haselow, Alexander & Post, Margje (eds). 2015. Final Particles. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haselow, Alexander. 2013. Arguing for a wide conception of grammar: The case of final particles in spoken discourse. Folia Linguistica 47(2): 375–424. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. A processual view on grammar: Macrogrammar and the final field in spoken syntax. Language Sciences 54: 77–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. Spontaneous Spoken English. An Integrated Approach to the Emergent Grammar of Speech. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. Discourse marker sequences: Insights into the serial order of communicative tasks in real-time turn production. Journal of Pragmatics 146: 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haselow, Alexander & Kaltenböck, Gunther (eds). 2020. Grammar and Cognition: Dualistic Models of Language Structure and Language Processing [Human Cognitive Processing 70]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 2013. On discourse markers: Grammaticalization, pragmaticalization, or something else? Linguistics 51(6): 1205–1247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania. 2007. The Genesis of Grammar. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Heine, B. 2019. Some observations on the dualistic nature of discourse processing. Folia Linguistica 53(2): 411–442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Kuteva, Tania, Kaltenböck, Gunther & Long, Haiping. 2017. Cooptation as a discourse strategy. Linguistics 55(4): 813–855. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Kuteva, Tania, & Long, Haiping. 2020. Dual process frameworks on reasoning and linguistic discourse. A comparison. In Haselow & Kaltenböck (eds), 59–89.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey. 2002. Language Description: The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. & Smith, Sara W. 1998. And people just you know like ‘wow’ – Discourse markers as negotiating strategies. In Discourse Markers. Theory and Descriptions [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 57], Andreas Jucker & Yael Ziv (eds), 171–201. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania. 2011. On thetical grammar. Studies in Language 35(4): 848–893. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Korta Carrión, Kepa & Zubeldia Arruabarrena, Larraiz. 2016. Bide partikula: Eduki doxastikoa eta ebidentziala. Gogoa 15: 11–29.Google Scholar
Koyanagi, Tomokazu. 2018. Research on Grammatical Change Tokyo: Kuroshio. (In Japanese).Google Scholar
Landau, Idan. 2000. Elements of Control. Structure and Meaning in Infinitival Constructions. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
. 2003. Movement out of control. Linguistic Inquiry 34: 471–498. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. The scale of finiteness and the calculus of control. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22: 811–877. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 2015. Thoughts on Grammaticalization, 3rd edn [Classics in Linguistics 1]. Berlin: Language Science Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehman Blake, Margaret. 2006. Clinical relevance of discourse characteristics after right hemisphere brain damage. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 15(3): 255–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lenk, Uta. 1998. Marking Discourse Coherence: Functions of Discourse Markers in Spoken English. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Mann, William C. & Thompson, Sandra A. 1988. Rhetorical structure theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization. Text 8(3): 243–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marini, Andrea. 2012. Characteristics of narrative discourse processing after damage to the right hemisphere. Seminars in Speech and Language 33(1): 68–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marini, Andrea, Carlomagno, Sergio, Caltagirone, Carlo & Nocentini, Ugo. 2005. The role played by the right hemisphere in the organization of complex textual structures. Brain and Language 93: 46–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Monforte, Sergio. 2018a. About the particle al in basque. In Novas Perspectivas na Lingüística Aplicada, Marta Díaz Ferro, Jorge Diz Ferreira, Ania Pérez Pérez & Ana Varela Suárez (eds), 19–31. Lugo: Editorial Axac.Google Scholar
. 2018b. Question particles in basque. Isogloss. A Journal on Variation of Romance and Iberian Languages 4(1): 29–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Myers, Penelope S. 1999. Right Hemisphere Damage: Disorders of Communication and Cognition. San Diego CA: Singular.Google Scholar
Prat, Chantel S., Long, Debra L. & Baynes, Kathleen. 2007. The representation of discourse in the two hemispheres: An individual differences investigation. Brain and Language 100(3): 283–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rhee, Seongha. 2012. Context-induced reinterpretation and (inter)subjectification: The case of grammaticalization of sentence-final particles. Language Sciences 34(3): 284–300. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. From quoting to reporting to stance-marking: Rhetorical strategies and intersubjectification of reportative. Language Sciences 55: 36–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schourup, Lawrence. 1985. Common Discourse Particles in English Conversation. New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sherratt, Sue & Bryan, Karen. 2012. Discourse production after right brain damage: Gaining a comprehensive picture using a multi-level processing model. Journal of Neurolinguistics 25(4): 213–239. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shibasaki, Reijirou. 2018. From the inside to the outside of the sentence: Forming a larger discourse unit with jijitsu ‘fact’ in Japanese. In New Trends in Grammaticalization and Language Change [Studies in Language Companion Series 202], Sylvie Hancil, Tine Breban & José V. Lozano (eds), 333–360. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strauss, Susan. 2005. Cognitive realization markers in Korean: A discourse-pragmatic study of the sentence-ending particles -kwun, -ney and -tela . Language Sciences 27(4): 437–480. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. & Suzuki, Ryoko. 2011. The grammaticalization of final particles. In The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds), Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1997. The role of the development of discourse markers in a theory of grammaticalization. Paper presented at the ICHL XII, Manchester, UK.
. 2015. Investigating “periphery” from a functionalist perspective. Linguistics Vanguard 1. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. On the rise of types of clause-final pragmatic markers in English. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 17(1): 26–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trotzke, Andreas & Monforte, Sergio. 2019. Basque question particles: Implications for a syntax of discourse particles. Linguistic Variation 19(2): 352–385. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A. 1972. Some Aspects of Text Grammars. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1977. Text and Context: Explorations in the Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Wales, Katie. 2006. Northern English. A Social and Cultural History. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watanabe, Fumio, Muraishi, Shōzō & Kabe, Sasuke. 1993. Nihongo kaishaku katuyo jiten (A dictionary of reading and application of Japanese). Tokyo: Gyosei.Google Scholar